Tomsk Cancer Research Institute

In this paper, we propose to use quasi-monochromatic Cherenkov spectral lines for ion beam diagnostics. As representatives of light and heavy ions, we use C12 and Au197 ions, respectively. First, using the Geant4 toolkit, we determine the ionization lost energy as a function of the radiator penetration depth. After that, we use those data in the polarization currents method to compare the theoretical spectral lines with and without ionization losses. We also use the real-beam polarization currents method to analyze real-beam and setup parameters affecting the accuracy of the beam diagnostics. We emphasize that the precision of refractive index measurement might be a source of inaccuracy in ion beam diagnostics. Nevertheless, according to the provided data, we can expect that the method for measuring Cherenkov quasi-monochromatic spectral lines should be applicable for beam-diagnostics purposes, especially for lighter ions.

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies in women worldwide. Numerous studies in immuno-oncology and successful trials of immunotherapy have demonstrated the causal role of the immune system in cancer pathogenesis. The interaction between the tumor and the immune system is known to have a dual nature. Despite cytotoxic lymphocyte activity against transformed cells, a tumor can escape immune surveillance and leverage chronic inflammation to maintain its own development. Research on antitumor immunity primarily focuses on the role of the tumor microenvironment, whereas the systemic immune response beyond the tumor site is described less thoroughly. Here, a comprehensive review of the formation of the immune profile in breast cancer patients is offered. The interplay between systemic and local immune reactions as self-sustaining mechanism of tumor progression is described and the functional activity of the main cell populations related to innate and adaptive immunity is discussed. Additionally, the interaction between different functional levels of the immune system and their contribution to the development of the pro- or anti-tumor immune response in BC is highlighted. The presented data can potentially inform the development of new immunotherapy strategies in the treatment of patients with BC.

LBA440 Background: The IMvigor130 primary analysis demonstrated statistically significant PFS benefit with 1L atezo + plt/gem (Arm A) vs placebo + plt/gem (Arm C) in pts with mUC (Galsky Lancet 2020). Interim data showed improved OS with Arm A vs C but did not cross the pre-specified threshold for significance (Galsky Lancet 2020; Galsky AACR 2021). In exploratory analyses, OS improved when atezo was combined with cisplatin (cis) vs carboplatin (carbo) regardless of PD-L1 status. Here, we report final OS data from Arms A and C. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to Arm A, B (atezo alone) or C. Arm A and C pts received cis or carbo per investigator (INV) choice. Co-primary endpoints were PFS per INV RECIST 1.1 and OS (Arm A vs C), and OS (Arm B vs C), tested hierarchically. Safety, ORR and DOR, disease control rate (DCR; confirmed CR, PR or [SD ≥ 6 mo]) and pre-specified exploratory OS data are also reported. Results: As of data cutoff Aug 31, 2022 (49 mo since last pt randomly assigned), in ITT pts, OS benefit was not statistically significant; in the cis subgroup, HR was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57, 1.01; Table). In ITT pts, DCR was 65% (290/447) in Arm A and 60% (239/397) in Arm C. 81% of safety-evaluable pts (370/454) in Arm A and 80% (312/389) in Arm C had a Gr 3/4 tx-related AE (TRAE). Gr 5 TRAEs occurred in 9 pts (2%) in Arm A and 4 (1%) in Arm C; Gr 3/4 AEs of special interest were seen in 41 pts (9%) in Arm A and 17 (4%) in Arm C. Conclusions: In this final analysis, improved OS with atezo + plt/gem vs placebo + plt/gem did not reach statistical significance in ITT pts with mUC. As seen with prior exploratory data, improved OS with atezo + plt/gem was greater when pts received cis vs carbo. No new safety signals were seen. Clinical trial information: NCT02807636 . [Table: see text]

Radionuclide molecular imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression may enable a noninvasive discrimination between HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers for stratification of patients for HER2-targeted treatments. DARPin (designed ankyrin repeat proteins) G3 is a small (molecular weight, 14 kDa) scaffold protein with picomolar affinity to HER2. The aim of this first-in-humans study was to evaluate the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3. Methods: Three cohorts of patients with primary breast cancer (each including at least 4 patients with HER2-negative and 5 patients with HER2-positive tumors) were injected with 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 (287 ± 170 MBq). Whole-body planar imaging followed by SPECT was performed at 2, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection. Vital signs and possible side effects were monitored during imaging and up to 7 d after injection. Results: All injections were well tolerated. No side effects were observed. The results of blood and urine analyses did not differ before and after studies. 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 cleared rapidly from the blood. The highest uptake was detected in the kidneys and liver followed by the lungs, breasts, and small intestinal content. The hepatic uptake after injection of 2,000 or 3,000 μg was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the uptake after injection of 1,000 μg. Effective doses did not differ significantly between cohorts (average, 0.011 ± 0.004 mSv/MBq). Tumor-to-contralateral site ratios for HER-positive tumors were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than for HER2-negative at 2 and 4 h after injection. Conclusion: Imaging of HER2 expression using 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 is safe and well tolerated and provides a low absorbed dose burden on patients. This imaging enables discernment of HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Phase I study data justify further clinical development of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3.

Abstract Background: IMvigor130 evaluated atezo + plt/gem (Arm A) vs placebo + plt/gem (Arm C) as 1L mUC treatment, allowing pts with at least SD to continue atezo or placebo “maintenance” after 4-6 cycles of plt/gem. The primary analysis showed statistically significant PFS benefit for Arm A vs C (Galsky Lancet 2020). The 1st interim OS data for Arm A vs C were encouraging but immature. This exploratory analysis used 2nd interim OS data (ITT median follow-up, 13.3 mo) to examine OS outcomes by response during atezo or placebo + chemo “induction” in Arm A vs C. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to Arm A, B (atezo monotherapy) or C. In Arms A and C, chemo was gem + investigator's choice of cis or carbo. Co-primary EPs of PFS and OS in Arm A vs C (ITT) and OS in Arm B vs C (ITT and IC2/3) were tested hierarchically. This post hoc analysis evaluated post-induction (post-wk 18) OS in pts who completed 4-6 (but not &amp;gt;6) cycles of chemo without PD during induction (through wk 18), followed by ≥1 dose of atezo or placebo maintenance. Post-PD OS was evaluated in pts with PD during induction. HRs were adjusted to account for potential imbalances in known prognostic factors between arms. Results: Efficacy data are in the Table. Post-induction OS HR (95% CI) for pts with no PD was 0.86 (0.64, 1.16) (cis: 0.60 [0.35, 1.03], carbo: 0.97 [0.67, 1.41]). Post-progression OS HR for pts with PD was 0.74 (0.53, 1.03) (cis: 0.52 [0.28, 0.96], carbo: 0.78 [0.51, 1.18]). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis from IMvigor130, OS benefit with atezo + plt/gem vs placebo + plt/gem in both pts with and without PD during induction was consistent with ITT results from the 1st interim analysis. Preliminary data suggest that cis-treated pts may derive greater OS benefit from adding atezo to chemo than carbo-treated pts, which warrants further investigation. OS follow-up is ongoing. IMvigor130 efficacy (second interim OS analysis)No PD during inductiona (post-induction OS)bPD during induction (post-progression OS)Arm A (n=166)Arm C (n=152)Arm A (n=91)Arm C (n=93)OS events, n (%)ITT97 (58.4)92 (60.5)82 (90.1)84 (90.3)Cisplatinc27/57 (47.4)35/59 (59.3)24/29 (82.8)30/33 (90.9)Carboplatinc70/109 (64.2)57/93 (61.3)58/62 (93.5)54/60 (90.0)Median OS (95% CI), moITT20.5 (17.6, 25.9)18.8 (14.4, 21.9)4.3 (3.5, 5.8)3.3 (2.5, 4.4)Cisplatin28.2 (19.8, NE)19.9 (11.0, 26.5)6.6 (4.8, 10.1)2.5 (1.6, 5.2)Carboplatin18.5 (12.9, 21.6)18.8 (12.9, 22.8)3.8 (3.2, 5.6)3.4 (2.6, 4.5)OS HR (95% CI)dITT0.86 (0.64, 1.16)0.74 (0.53, 1.03)Cisplatin0.60 (0.35, 1.03)0.52 (0.28, 0.96)Carboplatin0.97 (0.67, 1.41)0.78 (0.51, 1.18)Data cutoff: June 14, 2020. 1L, first-line; carbo, carboplatin; chemo, chemotherapy; cis, cisplatin; CR, complete response; EP, endpoint; HR; hazard ratio; ITT, intention to treat; mets, metastases; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. a Pts who achieved at least SD (CR, PR, or SD without PD) during induction. b Post-week 18 OS. c Denominators refer to the number of pts in each chemotherapy subgroup/treatment arm. d Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model stratified by enrollment stage (1/2); adjusted for age, ECOG PS (0, 1, 2), cisplatin ineligibility (Y/N), liver mets (Y/N), lymph node mets only (Y/N), ≥3 metastatic sites (Y/N), renal impairment (Y/N), alkaline phosphatase ≥upper limit of normal (Y/N), glomerular filtration rate (&amp;lt;60 vs ≥60 mL/min), PD-L1 status (IC0/1, IC2/3), Bajorin risk score (0, 1, 2 and/or liver mets). For pts without PD, model was additionally adjusted for best response (CR, PR, SD) during induction. Citation Format: Enrique Grande, Aristotelis Bamias, Matthew D. Galsky, Eiji Kikuchi, Ian D. Davis, José Ángel Arranz, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty, Xavier Garcia del Muro, Se Hoon Park, Ugo De Giorgi, Boris Alekseev, Marina Mencinger, Kouji Izumi, Javier Puente, Jian-Ri Li, Xiaodong Shen, Beiying Ding, Qian Zhu, Jeremy Linsenmeier, Maria De Santis. Overall survival (OS) by response during “induction” from the global, randomized Phase III IMvigor130 study of atezolizumab (atezo) + platinum/gemcitabine (plt/gem) vs placebo + plt/gem in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT187.

We studied the rate of oxygen consumption by mitochondria isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes of patients with acute myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers. It was found that leukocyte mitochondria in patients with acute myocardial infarction were characterized by significantly lower rate of oxygen consumption and lower level of coupling of oxidation and phosphorylation processes in comparison with mitochondria from healthy volunteers.