Editorial: Getting to the Heart of the Matter in IBD-Authors' Reply.
We commend Dr Ananthakrishnan [1] for highlighting the clinical implications of our findings of an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after coronary intervention in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [2]. In patients with IBD, chronic inflammation is widely recognised as the key driver in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and recurrent cardiovascular events. Therefore, effective management of inflammation would be the optimal therapeutic approach to reduce the risk. To complicate matters, some novel targeted therapies have shown adverse cardiovascular side effects, and it is currently unknown whether the side effects of modern IBD therapies might even outweigh their anti-inflammatory benefits. In addition, these observations were made in the context of IBD-ologists already recommending lifestyle changes, including smoking cessation, a healthy diet and physical activity, as a means of reducing disease activity in IBD. But do we really spend enough time counselling patients about relevant CVD risk factors, or do we focus primarily on IBD-related symptoms? While there is no urgent need for IBD-ologists to attain a second specialty in cardiology, it is essential to apply a systematic CVD risk assessment in clinical practice and refer high-risk patients to cardiologists at an early stage. We need to raise awareness among both patients and healthcare professionals that patients are much more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than from IBD itself. It is time to incorporate a systematic approach to CVD risk assessment and management into daily clinical care. Optimal treatment goals should include not only achieving clinical remission, but also reducing CVD risk through effective primary prevention measures. CVD-preventive therapies could even serve as adjunctive treatments in IBD. Statins may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer [3] and improve disease outcomes in patients with IBD [4]. In addition, European guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes advocate the use of anti-inflammatory treatments, such as colchicine, and individualisation of the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention [5]. Despite the robust evidence of increased CVD risk in IBD, further mechanistic studies are needed to disentangle the risk attributed to inflammation and IBD therapies. In addition, studies are needed to estimate the individual contributions of smoking, BMI, lipid profiles, diet, physical activity and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary interventions to the elevated risk of CVD events in IBD. While there are specific guidelines [6] on how to manage CVD risk in other chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, there is a lack of guidance on CVD risk management in IBD. The evidence base is now sufficient to support updating guidelines with recommendations on how to assess and manage CVD risk in patients with IBD. We urge a concerted effort to increase awareness of the CVD risk among IBD-ologists, primary care physicians and cardiologists not only to achieve disease remission in the gut but also to maintain a healthy heart. F.E., R.E. and A.F. jointly drafted and edited this editorial. F.E. has served as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim. A.F. has served as a speaker and advisory board member for Janssen Cilag Ab and Tillotts Pharma. This article is linked to Ebrahimi et al. papers. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70162 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70177. No new data was generated in this article.
Read more