Re-envisioning farmsteads as commons through design: the case of olive tree intercropping in Laconia, Greece
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how landscape infrastructures and architectural tools can serve as intermediaries in reimagining olive grove farmsteads in the face of climate change. It examines how diversification through intercropping with Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (MAPs) facilitates new kinds of collaboration between smallholders, large landowners and agri-business stakeholders, with a focus on two estates in Laconia, Greece. Design is positioned as a catalyst for socio-ecological regeneration and adaptive transformation in Mediterranean rural landscapes by illustrating how “common enabling infrastructures” promote collective resourcefulness, ecological resilience and more-than-human relations through a research through design (RtD) methodology. Design/methodology/approach In order to investigate the spatial, ecological and social interdependencies within the diversification of olive groves in Laconia, Greece, the study employs a RtD methodology. Participatory mapping, diagrammatic representation and unstructured interviews with farmers, agribusiness stakeholders and local communities were all incorporated into the fieldwork. The study visualized intercropping and shared infrastructure scenarios through iterative “by-design” processes, which allowed actors to negotiate and revealed latent ecological and spatial potentials. The design tools – prototypes, maps and composite diagrams – acted as intermediaries, converting ecological, social and technical knowledge into workable frameworks for collaborative, climate-adaptive infrastructures in rural areas. Findings By visualizing shared infrastructures and more-than-human relations in olive grove diversification, the study shows how design can mediate local–global interdependencies within the framework of planetary ruralities. Intercropping with MAPs promotes ecological regeneration and allows for new partnerships between smallholders, large estates and agribusiness actors, according to field-based “by-design” procedures. The suggested common enabling infrastructures, like hybrid solar drying sheds, represent low-impact, collaborative ways to connect community agency and climate adaptation. These results demonstrate how architectural representation functions as a global instrument for navigating rural change and promoting robust, interdependent bioregional economies. Research limitations/implications The study captures context-specific socio-ecological dynamics that may vary among Mediterranean regions. Although transferable spatial principles were identified by the RtD approach, longer-term studies and comparative applications in various rural settings are necessary for wider validation. However, the results have important ramifications for reconsidering rural infrastructures as dynamic, community-focused systems. Within the larger context of planetary ruralities, they propose that design methodologies can help close the gaps between ecology, policy and practice, facilitating the shift to community-led, regenerative and climate-adaptive rural economies. Practical implications The study provides practical methods for incorporating design thinking into agribusiness innovation and rural revitalization. It offers a transferable model for encouraging collaboration between farmers, landowners and industry stakeholders by presenting infrastructures as shared, adaptable systems. The proposed common enabling infrastructures – such as hybrid solar drying sheds and intercropping layouts – demonstrate how low-cost, participatory design can enhance biodiversity, circularity and social equity. In the context of Mediterranean and global rural transitions, these strategies can help shape bioregional planning frameworks, European Union (EU) agri-environmental programs and rural development policies. They can also help create multipurpose landscapes that combine community empowerment and ecological resilience. Social implications The study emphasizes how, in rural communities dealing with economic and climate change, design can foster new kinds of social cooperation and collective agency. It encourages communication and mutual reliance between smallholders, migrant laborers and large landowners by illustrating shared infrastructures and intercropping systems. By encouraging fair access to resources and the sharing of knowledge, these cooperative frameworks upend established land ownership hierarchies. In the larger framework of planetary ruralities, the method helps to rethink rurality as a networked, relational field where human and non-human actors jointly generate resilience, solidarity and socio-ecological regeneration. Originality/value This study presents a new point of convergence between the developing concept of planetary ruralities, common enabling infrastructures and RtD. It illustrates how architectural representation can function as a negotiating tool, converting rural infrastructures from immobile structures into dynamic, collaborative and environmentally conscious systems. The study provides fresh perspectives on how design mediates interactions between people, non-humans and territorial processes by concentrating on the diversification of olive groves in Laconia, Greece. Redefining farmstead infrastructures as drivers of commoning, regeneration and multi-scalar connectivity across social, ecological and spatial domains is what makes it original within contemporary discourse.
Read more