Comparative Analysis of Information Management Practices by WHO EMTCC During Major Disasters: Cyclone Idai (2019), Moldova Refugee Crisis (2022), Türkiye Earthquake (2023), and Palestine Humanitarian Crisis (2024)
Background/Introduction:The WHO EMTCC coordinated responses to Cyclone Idai in Mozambique (2019), the refugee crisis in Moldova (2022), the earthquake in Türkiye (2023), and the humanitarian crisis in Cairo (2024). Each event presented unique Information Management (IM) challenges.Objectives:Analyze and compare WHO EMTCC Information Management practices across these crises, identifying specific challenges and implemented solutions.Method/Description: 2019 MozambiqueDisaster: Cyclone IdaiImpact: Infrastructure destruction, numerous casualtiesInformation Management: Diverse data collection, weak real-time updates, lack of unified management, poor communication infrastructure2022 MoldovaDisaster: Refugee crisis from Ukraine invasionImpact: Overburdened medical systemInformation Management: Fragmented EMT management, information overlaps, language barriers, stable communication infrastructure2023 TürkiyeDisaster: Major earthquakeImpact: Building collapses, numerous injuriesInformation Management: Improved use of tools like MDS, rapid data collection, multi-national team coordination challenges, real-time sharing needs, lack of domestic EMT data2024 CairoDisaster: Palestine Humanitarian CrisisImpact: Numerous casualties, infrastructure damageInformation Management: Secretive management, high-security needs, limited internal sharing, independent coordinator decisionsResults/Outcomes:Mozambique highlighted the need for digitalization and unified data systems. Moldova emphasized unified platforms and pre-registration processes. Türkiye showed progress in data tools but needed better real-time systems and domestic coordination. Cairo underlined secure and efficient information sharing in high-security contexts.Conclusion:WHO EMTCC’s IM practices varied across disasters. Common challenges included unified data management, real-time sharing, and multi-national team coordination. Future efforts should standardize protocols, improve communication infrastructure, and enhance WHO EMT Initiative training. The Japan Disaster Relief team’s contributions provided valuable insights for future improvements.
Read more