• Home
  • Search
  • Комментарий Александра к «Метафизике» и некоторые схоластические представления об автоматах
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2020-14-1-7-25Copy DOI Icon

Комментарий Александра к «Метафизике» и некоторые схоластические представления об автоматах

  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In this article, I argue that Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas read a certain passage of Aristotle's Metaphysics on the nature of metaphysical curiosity in a way that is inconsistent with the earlier reading of the same passage by Alexander of Aphrodisias. The passage has to do with Aristotle's use of mechanical automata as a metaphor for kinetic mimesis in his metaphysics. The result of the variant reading of the passage in question is that these Scholastic readings emphasize universal causality as a vehicle of “wonder banishment” in metaphysics at the expense of recognizing the key metaphysical principle that Aristotle is suggesting. Such readings actually turn out to be difficult to maintain with the example of mechanical automata that Aristotle employs. I argue that the absence of the availability of Alexander's commentary to Albert and Aquinas contributes to their variant and inconsistent reading. There are three main parts and a conclusion. Part I discusses the passage from Aristotle's Metaphysics in question, which I call the thaumata passage, as well as Alexander's commentary on it. Part II discusses the unavailability of Alexander's commentary to Albert, Aquinas and their predecessors. Part III discusses the variant scholastic readings of the thaumata passage and how these readings, which take Aristotle's mechanical automata as chance occurrences result in an emphasis on wonder banishment through universal causal reasoning that is inconsistent with the example Aristotle uses in the thaumata passage. By way of conclusion I suggest that even had Alexander's commentary been available to Aquinas, he would have understood the passage as more akin to remarks on magic than to metaphysics.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

ARISTOTLE, METAPHYSICS A 10, 993A13–15: A NEW READING AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE UNITY OF BOOK ALPHA

  • Apr 16, 2021
  • The Classical Quarterly
  • Mirjam E Kotwick
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Descartes's mathematical thought

  • Sep 01, 2004
  • Choice Reviews Online
  • 力 佐々木
  • Book Chapter

INDEX DES TEXTES CITÉS

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Concetta Luna
  • Book Chapter

APPENDICE V: A propos de la locution Πληρώσας τòν περί τινoς λóγoν...

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Concetta Luna
  • Research Article

Nabokovs Version von Puškins "Evgenij Onegin." Zwischen Version und Fiktion: Eine übersetzungs- und fiktionstheoretische Untersuchung (review)

  • Jan 01, 1996
  • Nabokov Studies
  • Sven Spieker
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Designing and Evaluating Selection and Recruitment in Healthcare

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Fiona Patterson
  • Research Article

PRINCIPLES OF METAPHYSICS IN THE THEORY OF PHYSICAL STRUCTURES AND IN THE META-RELATIONAL PARADIGM

  • Dec 15, 2023
  • Metaphysics
  • Yu S Vladimirov
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The Person as the Key Metaphysical Principle

  • Dec 01, 1956
  • Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
  • Peter A Bertocci
  • Research Article

Spinoza on Melancholy and Cheerfulness

  • Jun 04, 2021
  • Dialogue
  • Christopher Thomas
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Coping with Coastal Change

  • Mar 09, 2015
  • Robert J Nicholls +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.