• Home
  • Search
  • A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for tracking copper using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge
  • https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/addfb9Copy DOI Icon

A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for tracking copper using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract This paper compares the performance of five different supervised machine learning (SL) algorithms to identify the practical model for tracking copper using solution cathode glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (SCGD-OES). A total of 4500 SCGD-OES spectra were collected, corresponding to 15 different copper concentrations ranging from 10.3 mg l−1 to 59.6 mg l−1, for training and validating five models: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), and recurrent neural network (RNN). Then, performance of these models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision of predictions and training time. In terms of accuracy, the relative error (RE) was 3% for the CNN model and 4% for the ANN model. Conversely, the RE increased from 21% and 43% for the RF and RNN models to 103% for the KNN model due to the unpredictability of Cu concentration outside the training range. Regarding precision, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values were similar across all models, with the lowest RSD being 3% for the CNN model and the highest being 5% for the RF model. The training time indicated that the KNN and RF models provided the best learning speed, while the CNN model had the slowest learning speed, taking 5 times longer than the ANN model. The accuracy of the ANN and CNN models is in agreement with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), with a average difference not exceeding 6% when tracking six different Cu concentrations, both inside and outside the training range. Additionally, this research investigated the weight distribution in the hidden layers of the ANN, CNN, and RNN models and feature importances in the RF model to enhance understanding of the internal structure of models and assist analysts in selecting the practical model for tracking heavy metals based on SCGD-OES.

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Rapid extraction of skin physiological parameters from hyperspectral images using machine learning

  • Dec 10, 2022
  • Applied Intelligence
  • Teo Manojlović +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Prediction of Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Jun 28, 2022
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Peng Wang +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Inversion of winter wheat leaf area index from UAV multispectral images: classical vs. deep learning approaches.

  • Mar 14, 2024
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Jiaxing Zu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Phishing Detection Using Machine Learning: A Model Development and Integration

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • International Journal of Scientific and Management Research
  • Valentine Adeyemi Onih
  • Research Article

Smart Drop: A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting College Dropouts

  • Mar 03, 2025
  • International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM)
  • Deepa Priya V +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer

  • Mar 18, 2021
  • The British Journal of Radiology
  • Laia Humbert-Vidan +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Estimation and uncertainty analysis of groundwater quality parameters in a coastal aquifer under seawater intrusion: a comparative study of deep learning and classic machine learning methods.

  • Aug 08, 2022
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Mehmet Taşan +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Enhancing pepper growth and yield through disease identification in plants using leaf-based deep learning techniques

  • Jan 29, 2025
  • S Pradeep +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Short-Term Travel Speed Prediction for Urban Expressways: Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network Models

  • Nov 03, 2020
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Keshuang Tang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Advanced tumor progression detection by leveraging EHR based convolutional neural network boosting approaches.

  • May 20, 2021
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Guanhao Wei +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Artificial Intelligence–Based Multimodal Risk Assessment Model for Surgical Site Infection (AMRAMS): Development and Validation Study

  • Jun 15, 2020
  • JMIR Medical Informatics
  • Weijia Chen +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Distinguishing lymphoma from benign lymph node diseases in fever of unknown origin using PET/CT radiomics

  • Nov 13, 2024
  • EJNMMI Research
  • Xinchao Zhang +11
  • Research Article
  • Citations140

Understanding the learning mechanism of convolutional neural networks in spectral analysis

  • Apr 08, 2020
  • Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Xiaolei Zhang +8
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Reply on RC1

  • Dec 19, 2022
  • Omar Seleem
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Reply on AC2

  • Dec 19, 2022
  • Omar Seleem
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.