A Survey on Process Modelling, Innovation, Design, and Material Characterisation in Additive Manufacturing

Design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) seeks to develop designs that take advantage of the unique capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) processes to maximize benefits. In this paper, several issues at the frontier of DFAM research are highlighted. First, the need is described to include as-manufactured mechanical and other physical properties, such as topology and shape optimization and generative design, during computational design. AM processes rarely produce parts with homogeneous composition and isotropic properties, so design methods and tools should not assume them. Second, the topic of designing for the AM process chain is important since AM-fabricated parts typically need postprocessing operations, such as support removal, finish machining, heat treatments, etc. DFAM methods need to incorporate the entire process chain, not just the AM process, which is explored with an example from metal powder bed fusion. Third, potentially, the largest benefit of AM can be realized by radically rethinking product architectures. Examples of an electric motorcycle and an assistive exosuit illustrate the ideas and potential benefits. Finally, some thoughts on design for 4D printing are offered, specifically for 3D printed morphing and deployable systems that utilize the shape memory effect.

The unique tool-less and layer-upon-layer capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) have largely lessened manufacturing constraints and significantly broadened design freedom. AM offers new opportunities for developing customized products by achieving significant improvements in product performances and lower overall costs. The AM-enabled customization opportunities inevitably challenge traditionally design theories and methodologies (DTMs) that lack design knowledge for AM products. Here, to counteract this limitation, this study presents a novel methodology for constructing knowledge supporting DTMs for AM-enabled customization: customized design for AM (CDfAM). The CDfAM supports two main phases of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM): (1) opportunistic DfAM in a conceptual design phase and (2) restrictive DfAM in an embodiment design phase. In terms of the knowledge construction for the opportunistic DfAM, it is essential to construct knowledge that supports to explore a customized design space enabled by AM’s design freedom from the conceptual design phase. To address the challenge, this study provides a novel method for capturing knowledge of customized AM product behaviors. First, this study proposes an affordance-based DfAM framework by integrating the concept of affordance into three link chain models. Second, an affordance structure is proposed to develop a formal method for representing the knowledge of the customized AM product behaviors utilizing finite state automata. In terms of the knowledge construction for the restrictive DfAM, this study presents a formal method for representing and reasoning customizable modular knowledge of design rules for AM. First, a novel structured modular hierarchy and associated formalisms of AM design rule elements are presented. Second, machine learning is employed to automatically learn design rules from AM data, which leverages the proposed design rule formalisms. A knowledge graph is designed and built to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Case studies with AM products such as a transtibial prosthesis leg and AM data such as ex-situ AM measurement data provide illustrations in this study. The case studies show that the proposed methodology explicitly constructs structured and correlated AM design knowledge of customized AM product behaviors, product geometries, and additive manufacturability constraints. It is also shown that qualified design knowledge in the knowledge graph enhances automation of DfAM decision-making and data-driven knowledge constructions. The proposed CDfAM methodology enables incorporating both customized AM product functionalities and additive manufacturability constraints into product designs. This study provides a foundation for AM knowledge construction and data- and knowledge-driven automation of DfAM decision-making. Validated design rules and representations are expected to contribute to developing international standards on AM design rules.

In recent years, there has been widespread adoption of machine learning (ML) technologies to unravel intricate relationships among diverse parameters in various additive manufacturing (AM) techniques. These ML models excel at recognizing complex patterns from extensive, well-curated datasets, thereby unveiling latent knowledge crucial for informed decision-making during the AM process. The collaborative synergy between ML and AM holds the potential to revolutionize the design and production of AM-printed parts. This review delves into the challenges and opportunities emerging at the intersection of these two dynamic fields. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the publication landscape for ML-related research in the field of AM, explores common ML applications in AM research (such as quality control, process optimization, design optimization, microstructure analysis, and material formulation), and concludes by presenting an outlook that underscores the utilization of advanced ML models, the development of emerging sensors, and ML applications in emerging AM-related fields. Notably, ML has garnered increased attention in AM due to its superior performance across various AM-related applications. It is envisioned that the integration of ML into AM processes will significantly enhance 3D printing capabilities across diverse AM-related research areas.

The cyclic manufacturing processes of Additive Manufacturing (AM) create three-dimensional objects layer by layer, offer a large freedom in design, and suffer from very different restrictions compared to conventional manufacturing processes. Nowadays, AM is a mature manufacturing technology capable of being applied in industrial series production. However, the AM technology enters the industrial series production only slowly. A main reason is the fact that engineers in industry have little to no experience in Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) and an integrated experience transfer in engineering education is not yet widespread. To implement the AM technology, a course for graduate students was developed and established, mainly in the master studies and in the field of mechanical engineering. The goal of the course is that the students gain experience in the possibilities and the restrictions of DfAM. The course is based on the Experience Transfer Model (ETM) and is divided in two parts, a lecture and a team project. In the lecture, the students gain explicit knowledge for DfAM. In the practical team project, the students develop and produce AM prototypes based on a variety of AM processes and gain implicit knowledge. The concept of the team project is based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The whole team project follows a product development process, including presentations of milestone. The physical outcomes showed that the students are able to design AM optimized parts without falling back into old design patterns. In a survey at the end of the lecture series, the students gave the authors feedback. The large majority of the feedback was positive.

Of Narrow Windows and Acrobats: COVID-Responsiveness and Knock-Ons via Additive Manufacturing Capabilities

Comparative study on life cycle assessment of components produced by additive and conventional manufacturing process

The ability of additive manufacturing (AM) processes to produce components with virtually any geometry presents a unique challenge in terms of quantifying the dimensional quality of the part. In this paper, a novel spectral graph theory (SGT) approach is proposed for resolving the following critical quality assurance concern in AM: how to quantify the relative deviation in dimensional integrity of complex AM components. Here, the SGT approach is demonstrated for classifying the dimensional integrity of standardized test components. The SGT-based topological invariant Fiedler number (λ2) was calculated from 3D point cloud coordinate measurements and used to quantify the dimensional integrity of test components. The Fiedler number was found to differ significantly for parts originating from different AM processes (statistical significance p-val. < 1%). By comparison, prevalent dimensional integrity assessment techniques, such as traditional statistical quantifiers (such as mean and standard deviation) and examination of specific facets/landmarks failed to capture part-to-part variations, and thus proved incapable of ranking the quality of test AM components in a consistent manner. In contrast, the SGT approach was able to consistently rank the quality of the AM components with a high degree of statistical confidence independent of sampling technique used. Consequently, from a practical standpoint, the SGT approach can be a powerful tool for assessing the dimensional integrity of AM components, and thus encourage wider adoption of AM capabilities.

Additive manufacturing (AM) has recently been accorded considerable interest by manufacturers. Many manufacturing industries, amongst others in the aerospace sector, are already using AM parts or are investing in such manufacturing methods. Important material properties, such as microstructures, residual stress, and surface topography, can be affected by AM processes. In addition, a subtractive manufacturing (SM) process, such as machining, is required for finishing certain parts when accurate tolerances are required. This finish machining will subsequently affect the surface integrity and topography of the material. In this research work, we focused on the surface integrity of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured using three different types of AM and finished using an SM step. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding on how each process affects the resulting surface integrity of the material. It was found that each AM process affects the materials’ properties differently and that clear differences exist compared to a reference material manufactured using conventional methods. The newly generated surface was investigated after the SM step and each combination of AM/SM resulted in differences in surface integrity. It was found that different AM processes result in different microstructures which in turn affect surface integrity after the SM process.

Additive manufacturing (AM) has impacted the manufacturing of complex three-dimensional objects in multiple materials for a wide array of applications. However, additive manufacturing, as an upcoming field, lacks automated and specific design rules for different AM processes. Moreover, the selection of specific AM processes for different geometries requires expert knowledge, which is difficult to replicate. An automated and data-driven system is needed that can capture the AM expert knowledge base and apply it to 3D-printed parts to avoid manufacturability issues. This research aims to develop a data-driven system for AM process selection within the design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) framework for Industry 4.0. A Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Weighting technique was optimized using 3D CAD data as an input to identify the optimal AM technique based on several requirements and constraints. A two-stage model was developed wherein the stage 1 model displayed average accuracies of 70% and the stage 2 model showed higher average accuracies of up to 97.33% based on quantitative feature labeling and augmentation of the datasets. The steady-state genetic algorithm (SSGA) was determined to be the most effective algorithm after benchmarking against estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms, respectively. The output of this system leads to the identification of optimal AM processes for manufacturing 3D objects. This paper presents an automated design for an additive manufacturing system that is accurate and can be extended to other 3D-printing processes.

The design methodologies and part shape algorithms for additive manufacturing (AM) are rapidly growing fields, proven to be of critical importance for the uptake of additive manufacturing of parts with enhanced performance in all major industrial sectors. The current trend for part design is a computationally driven approach where the parts are algorithmically morphed to meet the functional requirements with optimized performance in terms of material distribution. However, the manufacturability restrictions of AM processes are not considered at the primary design phases but at a later post-morphed stage of the part’s design. This paper proposes an AM design method to ensure: (1) optimized material distribution based on the load case and (2) the part’s manufacturability. The buildability restrictions from the direct energy deposition (DED) AM technology were used as input to the AM shaping algorithm to grant high AM manufacturability. The first step of this work was to define the term of AM manufacturability, its effect on AM production, and to propose a framework to estimate the quantified value of AM manufacturability for the given part design. Moreover, an AM design method is proposed, based on the developed internal stresses of the build volume for the load case. Stress tensors are used for the determination of the build orientation and as input for the part morphing. A top-down mesoscale geometric optimization is used to realize the AM part design. The DED Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) rules are used to delimitate the morphing of the part, representing at the same time the freeform mindset of the AM technology. The morphed shape of the part is optimized in terms of topology and AM manufacturability. The topology optimization and AM manufacturability indicator (TMI) is introduced to screen the percentage of design elements that serve topology optimization and the ones that serve AM manufacturability. In the end, a case study for proof of concept is realized.

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a “game-changing” digital fabrication technology that can fundamentally alter the way products are designed and manufactured. In nuclear engineering, the application of additive manufacturing can enable advanced reactor designs with better performance, lower cost, and quicker deployment. To exploit the maximum potential of additive manufacturing, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) is needed, DfAM can leverage the complexity freedom offered by additive manufacturing technology to break traditional design constraints and achieve enhanced performance. Generative design, one of the key technologies in DfAM, is an iterative exploration method using AI-driven algorithms to generate a series of design solutions that meet specified constraints. In this work, a generative design platform for micro-reactors is developed based on DASSULT SIMULIA Isight. To simulate and analyze the multi-physics performance of the reactor design, various multi-physics simulation codes are integrated on this generative design platform, including RMC for neutron physics analysis, ANSYS Fluent for computational fluid dynamics analysis, and ANSYS Mechanical for structural mechanics analysis. A multi-objective optimization method is used to explore geometric parameters and fuel configurations to achieve better neutronics, thermal-fluidics, and structural mechanics performance. The generative design solution is a 4 MW helium-cooled nuclear reactor which includes 3D-printed silicon carbide (SiC) matrix embedded with tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel. Helium at 3 MPa is chosen as the coolant, and the cross-shaped coolant channels are distributed within the matrix to remove the heat generated by fission. According to the multiphysics analysis, the reactor has a initial keff of 1.0571, power peaking factor FQ of 1.50, and operating lifetime of 1200 EFPD (Effective Full Power Days), with a maximum temperature of 1331 K and a peak thermal stress of 141.3 MPa. The generative design method and platform provide a systematic and efficient approach for the design of additively manufactured micro-reactors, and the generative design solution demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Activity Modeling of Preliminary Additive Manufacturing Process Planning

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to review the current status of additive manufacturing (AM) used for tissue engineering (TE) scaffold. AM processes are identified as an effective method for fabricating geometrically complex objects directly from computer models or three-dimensional digital representations. The use of AM technologies in the field of TE has grown rapidly in the past 10 years.Design/methodology/approach– The processes, materials, precision, applications of different AM technologies and their modified versions used for TE scaffold are presented. Additionally, future directions of AM used for TE scaffold are also discussed.Findings– There are two principal routes for the fabrication of scaffolds by AM: direct and indirect routes. According to the working principle, the AM technologies used for TE scaffold can be generally classified into: laser-based; nozzle-based; and hybrid. Although a number of materials and fabrication techniques have been developed, each AM technique is a process based on the unique property of the raw materials applied. The fabrication of TE scaffolds faces a variety of challenges, such as expanding the range of materials, improving precision and adapting to complex scaffold structures.Originality/value– This review presents the latest research regarding AM used for TE scaffold. The information available in this paper helps researchers, scholars and graduate students to get a quick overview on the recent research of AM used for TE scaffold and identify new research directions for AM in TE.

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have revolutionized manufacturing industries by enabling the production of complex geometries with reduced material waste and lead times. However, ensuring the quality of AM parts remains a significant challenge due to the complexity of the process and inherent variability in material properties. This review investigates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance quality assurance in AM processes, focusing on specific machine learning techniques such as convolutional neural networks for defect detection, support vector machines for classification of material properties, and reinforcement learning for real-time process optimization. The AI-driven methodologies are applied to predict defects, optimize process parameters, and monitor real-time production quality, utilizing large datasets generated from sensors and in-situ monitoring systems. The study demonstrates significant improvements in the accuracy of defect detection, the reliability of material property classification, and the efficiency of process optimization. In addition, it addresses challenges such as data pre-processing, model interpretability, and integration with existing AM systems. The findings highlight the potential of AI to transform quality assurance in AM and outline future research directions for further integration and enhancement of AI techniques in AM.

PurposeThis paper aims to present a systematic approach in the literature survey related to metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes and its multi-physics continuum modelling approach for its better understanding.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review of the literature available in the area of continuum modelling practices adopted for the powder bed fusion (PBF) AM processes for the deposition of powder layer over the substrate along with quantification of residual stress and distortion. Discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) approaches have been reviewed for the deposition of powder layer and thermo-mechanical modelling, respectively. Further, thermo-mechanical modelling adopted for the PBF AM process have been discussed in detail with its constituents. Finally, on the basis of prediction through thermo-mechanical models and experimental validation, distortion mitigation/minimisation techniques applied in PBF AM processes have been reviewed to provide a future direction in the field.FindingsThe findings of this paper are the future directions for the implementation and modification of the continuum modelling approaches applied to PBF AM processes. On the basis of the extensive review in the domain, gaps are recommended for future work for the betterment of modelling approach.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper is limited to review only the modelling approach adopted by the PBF AM processes, i.e. modelling techniques (DEM approach) used for the deposition of powder layer and macro-models at process scale for the prediction of residual stress and distortion in the component. Modelling of microstructure and grain growth has not been included in this paper.Originality/valueThis paper presents an extensive review of the FEM approach adopted for the prediction of residual stress and distortion in the PBF AM processes which sets the platform for the development of distortion mitigation techniques. An extensive review of distortion mitigation techniques has been presented in the last section of the paper, which has not been reviewed yet.