A Task-dependent Investigation on Dose and Texture in CT Image Reconstruction.

Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: Comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection

Recent advances in computed tomography (CT) technology have considerably improved the quality of CT images and reduced radiation exposure in patients. At present, however, there is no generally accepted figure of merit (FOM) for comparing the dose efficiencies of CT systems. (i) To establish an FOM that characterizes the quality of CT images in relation to the radiation dose by means of a mathematical model observer and (ii) to evaluate the new FOM on different CT systems and image reconstruction algorithms. Images of a homogeneous phantom with four low-contrast inserts were acquired using three different CT systems at three dose levels and a representative protocol for CT imaging of low-contrast objects in the abdomen. The images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection and iterative algorithms. A channelized hotelling observer with difference-of-Gaussian channels was applied to compute the detectability ( ). This was done for each insert and each of the considered imaging conditions from square regions of interest (ROIs) that were (semi-)automatically centered on the inserts. The estimated detectabilities ( ) were averaged in the first step over the three dose levels ( ), and subsequently over the four contrast inserts ( ). All calculation steps included a dedicated assessment of the related uncertainties following accepted metrological guidelines. The determined detectabilities ( ) varied considerably with the contrast and diameter of the four inserts, as well as with the radiation doses and reconstruction algorithms used for image generation ( =1.3-5.5). Thus, the specification of a single detectability as an FOM is not well suited for comprehensively characterizing the dose efficiency of a CT system. A more comprehensive and robust characterization was provided by the averaged detectabilities and, in particular, . Our analysis reveals that the model observer analysis is very sensitive to the exact position of the ROIs. The presented automatable software approach yielded with the weighted detectability an objective FOM to benchmark different CT systems and reconstruction algorithms in a robust and reliable manner. An essential advantage of the proposed model-observer approach is that uncertainties in the FOM can be provided, which is an indispensable prerequisite for type testing.

BackgroundThe recently developed model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) enables significant reduction of image noise and artifacts, compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and filtered back projection (FBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) with MBIR in comparison with ASIR and FBP.MethodsChest CT was acquired with 64-slice CT (Discovery CT750HD) with standard-dose (5.7 ± 2.3 mSv) and low-dose (1.6 ± 0.8 mSv) conditions in 55 patients (aged 72 ± 7 years) who were suspected of lung disease on chest radiograms. Low-dose CT images were reconstructed with MBIR, ASIR 50% and FBP, and standard-dose CT images were reconstructed with FBP, using a reconstructed slice thickness of 0.625 mm. Two observers evaluated the image quality of abnormal lung and mediastinal structures on a 5-point scale (Score 5 = excellent and score 1 = non-diagnostic). The objective image noise was also measured as the standard deviation of CT intensity in the descending aorta.ResultsThe image quality score of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on low-dose MBIR CT (4.7 ± 0.5) was significantly improved in comparison with low-dose FBP and ASIR CT (3.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.004; 4.0 ± 0.5, p = 0.02, respectively), and was nearly identical to the score of standard-dose FBP image (4.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.66). Concerning decreased lung attenuation (bulla, emphysema, or cyst), the image quality score on low-dose MBIR CT (4.9 ± 0.2) was slightly better compared to low-dose FBP and ASIR CT (4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.01; 4.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences in image quality scores of visualization of consolidation or mass, ground-glass attenuation, or reticular opacity among low- and standard-dose CT series. Image noise with low-dose MBIR CT (11.6 ± 1.0 Hounsfield units (HU)) were significantly lower than with low-dose ASIR (21.1 ± 2.6 HU, p < 0.0005), low-dose FBP CT (30.9 ± 3.9 HU, p < 0.0005), and standard-dose FBP CT (16.6 ± 2.3 HU, p < 0.0005).ConclusionMBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for providing diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT without compromising image quality. With radiation dose reduction of >70%, MBIR can provide equivalent lesion detectability of standard-dose FBP CT.

This paper presents an improved CT (Computed Tomography) image reconstruction algorithm, called PB-BPF (Parallel-Beam Back projection Filtration). It mains that the image is reconstructed under the parallel beam scanning mode. It doesn't need to resample to get the image, and it simplifies the usual BPF (Back projection Filtration) in helical cone-beam CT. At First, The projection data is differentiated by using the Shepp-Logan model. Then, the image is reconstructed by choosing parallel PI beams to back-projection, Hilbert transform and constant compensation. At last, the image quality is assessed by using peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity. Being compared with FBP(Filtered Back Projection), the results indicate that the improved algorithm can reconstruct the image accurately, at the same time, it is more close to human visual system.

BackgroundIterative computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction shows high potential for the preservation of image quality in diagnostic CT while reducing patients’ exposure; it has become available for low-dose CT (LD-CT) in high-end hybrid imaging systems (e.g. single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]-CT).PurposeTo examine the effect of an iterative CT reconstruction algorithm on image quality, image noise, detectability, and the reader’s confidence for LD-CT data by a subjective assessment.Material and MethodsThe LD-CT data were validated for 40 patients examined by an abdominal hybrid SPECT-CT (U = 120 kV, I = 40 mA, pitch = 1.375). LD-CT was reconstructed using either filtered back projection (FBP) or an iterative image reconstruction algorithm (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction [ASIR]®) with different parameters (ASIR levels 50% and 100%). The data were validated by two independent blinded readers using a scoring system for image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader confidence, for a predefined set of 16 anatomic substructures.ResultsThe image quality was significantly improved by iterative reconstruction of the LD-CT data compared with FBP (P ≤ 0.0001). While detectability increased in only 2/16 structures (P ≤ 0.03), the reader’s confidence increased significantly due to iterative reconstruction (P ≤ 0.002). Meanwhile, at the ASIR level of 100%, the detectability in bone structure was highly reduced (P = 0.003).ConclusionAn ASIR level of 50% represents a good compromise in abdominal LD-CT image reconstruction. The specific ASIR level improved image quality (reduced image noise) and reader confidence, while preserving detectability of bone structure.

Volume quantifications of lung nodules with multidetector computed tomography (CT) images provide useful information for monitoring nodule developments. The accuracy and precision of the volume quantification, however, can be impacted by imaging and reconstruction parameters. This study aimed to investigate the impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on the accuracy and precision of volume quantification with dose and slice thickness as additional variables. Repeated CT images were acquired from an anthropomorphic chest phantom with synthetic nodules (9.5 and 4.8 mm) at six dose levels, and reconstructed with three reconstruction algorithms [filtered backprojection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR), and model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR)] into three slice thicknesses. The nodule volumes were measured with two clinical software (A: Lung VCAR, B: iNtuition), and analyzed for accuracy and precision. Precision was found to be generally comparable between FBP and iterative reconstruction with no statistically significant difference noted for different dose levels, slice thickness, and segmentation software. Accuracy was found to be more variable. For large nodules, the accuracy was significantly different between ASiR and FBP for all slice thicknesses with both software, and significantly different between MBIR and FBP for 0.625 mm slice thickness with Software A and for all slice thicknesses with Software B. For small nodules, the accuracy was more similar between FBP and iterative reconstruction, with the exception of ASIR vs FBP at 1.25 mm with Software A and MBIR vs FBP at 0.625 mm with Software A. The systematic difference between the accuracy of FBP and iterative reconstructions highlights the importance of extending current segmentation software to accommodate the image characteristics of iterative reconstructions. In addition, a calibration process may help reduce the dependency of accuracy on reconstruction algorithms, such that volumes quantified from scans of different reconstruction algorithms can be compared. The little difference found between the precision of FBP and iterative reconstructions could be a result of both iterative reconstruction's diminished noise reduction at the edge of the nodules as well as the loss of resolution at high noise levels with iterative reconstruction. The findings do not rule out potential advantage of IR that might be evident in a study that uses a larger number of nodules or repeated scans.

To investigate feasibility of applying deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in a low-kilovolt enhanced scan of the upper abdomen. A total of 64 patients (BMI<28) are selected for the enhanced upper abdomen scan and divided evenly into two groups. The tube voltages in Group A are 100kV in arterial phase and 80kV in venous phase, while tube voltages are 120kV during two phases in Group B. Image reconstruction algorithms used in Group A include the filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm, the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V 40% and 80%) algorithm, and the DLIR algorithm (DL-L, DL-M, DL-H). Image reconstruction algorithm used in Group B is ASIR-V40%. The different reconstruction algorithm images are used to measure the common hepatic artery, liver, renal cortex, erector spinae, and subcutaneous adipose in the arterial phase and the average CT value and standard deviation of the portal vein, liver, spleen, erector spinae, and subcutaneous adipose in the portal phase. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is calculated, and the images are also scored subjectively. In Group A, noise in the aorta, liver, portal vein (the portal phase), spleen (the portal phase), renal cortex, retroperitoneal adipose, and muscle is significantly lower in both the DL-H and ASIR-V80% images, and the SNR is significantly higher than those in the remaining groups (P<0.05). The SNR of each tissue and organ in Group B is not significantly different from that in DL-M, DL-L, and ASIR-V40% in Group A (P>0.05). The subjective image quality scores in the DL-H and B groups are higher than those in the other groups, and the FBP group has significantly lower image quality than the remaining groups (P<0.05). For upper abdominal low-kilovolt enhanced scan data, the DLIR-H gear yields a more satisfactory image quality than the FBP and ASIR-V.

This study aimed to compare the image quality of filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) and the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms in low-dose head CT angiography (CTA). This prospective study was conducted on 25 patients undergoing head CTA using a 256-slice CT scanner. Patients received 25 mL of iodine contrast (Iopromide, 370 mg I/mL, 3.0 mL/s). Images were reconstructed using DLIR with high settings (DLIR-H) and medium settings (DLIR-M), FBP, and ASIR-V with a blending factor of 50% (ASIR-V 50%). CT values, standard deviations, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured at the basal ganglia, posterior cranial fossa, center of semiovale, and middle cerebral artery. The edge rise slope (ERS) of the middle cerebral artery rim was measured to assess vessel clarity. Image noise, vessel edge definition, and overall quality were scored on a 5-point scale, while sharpness and clarity were rated on a 4-point scale. FBP images exhibited the highest image noise, as reflected by SD values. DLIR, especially DLIR-H, showed superior noise reduction compared to ASIR-V 50%. SNR followed this trend: FBP < ASIR-V 50% < DLIR-M < DLIR-H. Spatial resolution, measured by ERS for vessel wall clarity, was higher in DLIR images compared to in ASIR-V 50%. DLIR outperformed conventional iterative algorithms in balancing noise reduction and edge clarity, with both DLIR-M and DLIR-H achieving better subjective scores for noise, edge definition, and sharpness than ASIR-V 50% and FBP. DLIR in low-dose head CTA could reduces image noise, preserve natural texture, and enhance image clarity compared with ASIR-V and FBP methods.

This study aimed to evaluate image quality, the detection rate of enlarged lymph nodes, and radiation dose exposure of ultralow-dose and low-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) in patients with lymphoma. Patients with lymphoma who underwent abdominopelvic CT using dual-source scanner were retrospectively recruited from a single center. CT images were obtained at 90 kVp dual-source mode reformatted in three data sets using the advanced modelled iterative reconstruction algorithm: 100% (standard-dose CT), 66.7% (low-dose CT), and 33.3% (ultralow-dose CT). Two radiologists analyzed subjective image quality and detection of abdominal enlarged lymph nodes on ultralow-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT blindly and independently. The results were compared with reference standards. Three readers (two radiologists and one hematologist) reviewed overall image quality and spleen size. In total, 128 consecutive CT scans (77 complete response, 44 partial response, 6 progressive disease, and 1 initial evaluation) from 86 patients (64 B-cell lymphoma, 14 T/NK-cell lymphoma, and 8 Hodgkin’s lymphoma cases) were assessed. The enlarged lymph node-based detection rates for two readers were 97.0% (96/99) and 94.0% (93/99) on standard-dose CT, 97.0% (96/99) and 94.0% (93/99) on low-dose CT, and 94.0% (93/99) and 89.9% (89/99) on ultralow-dose CT. Overall image quality was 3.8 ± 0.5, 3.9 ± 0.5, and 4.1 ± 0.5 on ultralow-dose CT; 4.7 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.5, and 4.8 ± 0.3 on low-dose CT; and 4.8 ± 0.4, 4.7 ± 0.4, and 4.9 ± 0.2 on standard-dose CT, according to two radiologists and one hematologist, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients of spleen size were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–0.93), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93) on ultralow-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT, respectively. Mean effective radiation doses of standard-dose, low-dose, and ultralow-dose CT were 5.7 ±1.8 mSv, 3.8 ± 1.2 mSv, and 1.9 ± 0.6 mSv, respectively. Our findings suggest that ultralow-dose and low-dose CT, even with radiation doses reduced by 66.7% and 33.3%, respectively, maintained adequate image quality. These imaging modalities may be employed for follow-up lymphoma evaluation in consideration of the long surveillance periods.

Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study.

In X-ray computed tomography (CT) reconstruction, accurate statistical modeling of the measurement after linearity/nonlinearity calibration is essential to yield high quality diagnostic images, especially for low-dose CT. Due to the complicate noise distribution of after-log projection data or sinogram data, direct image reconstruction by filtered backprojection (FBP) approach is a very challenging task for noise reduction. As studied in our previous work, a (alpha) divergence as an important information metric has shown its advantages in describing the statistical distribution of sinogram data. In practice, the estimation of sinogram data is relevant to each detector bin, and the mismatched measure between the estimated and measured sinogram data should be balanced by using data-dependent weight factor at different detector bins, such as weighted least-square approach. With above observations, based on our previous work, in this paper, we propose a penalized weighted alpha-divergence (PWAD) approach for low-dose (i.e., low-mAs) CT sinogram iterative restoration. To test the performance of the present PWAD approach, a modified digital Shepp-Logan phantom and a physical phantom were used in our study. The results show that the present PWAD approach could significantly reduce the noise with less sacrificing image resolution. As a conclusion, the weighted alpha-divergence metric may be an interesting choice for building more reasonable cost-function in low-dose CT image reconstruction.

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has attracted much attention in clinical applications since X-ray radiations can cause serious health risks to patients. Sparse-view CT imaging is one of the major ways to reduce radiation dose. However, if reconstructing the sparse-view CT images with conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm, image quality may be significantly degraded due to the severe streaking artifacts. Therefore, iterative sparse-view CT image reconstruction (IR) algorithms have been developed and utilized to improve image quality. One drawback of using the IR algorithms is they usually spend long computation time. Additionally, adjusting and optimizing the hyper-parameters that are needed during iteration procedures is also time-consuming, some- times may even depend on individual experience. These potential drawbacks strongly limit the wide applications of IR algorithms. Aiming at partially overcome such difficulties, in the present work, we propose a deep iterative reconstruction (DIR) framework to generalize the conventional IR algorithms by mapping them into the deep neural network (DNN) technique. With this proposed DIR algorithms, the prior term, the data fidelity term, and the hyper-parameters can all be represented and learned by network. By doing so, some generalized iterative models can be used to perform high quality sparse-view CT image reconstructions. Numerical experiments based on clinical patient data demonstrated that the proposed DIR algorithms can mitigate the streaking artifacts more effectively while well preserving the subtle structures.

Deep-learning-based image reconstruction and noise reduction methods (DLIR) have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate image quality assessment of these methods is challenging as the performance measured using physical phantoms may not represent the true performance of DLIR in patients since DLIR is trained mostly on patient images. In this work, we aim to develop a patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework and, as a first application, use it to measure the spatial resolution properties of a DLIR method. The patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework consists of five steps: (1) insertion of lesions into projection domain data using the acquisition geometry of the patient exam to simulate different lesion characteristics; (2) insertion of noise into projection domain data using a realistic photon statistical model of the CT system to simulate different dose levels; (3) creation of DLIR-processed images from projection or image data; (4) creation of ensembles of DLIR-processed patient images from a large number of noise and lesion realizations; and (5) evaluation of image quality using ensemble DLIR images. This framework was applied to measure the spatial resolution of a ResNet based deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) trained on patient images. Lesions in a cylindrical shape and different contrast levels (-500, -100, -50, -20, -10 HU) were inserted to the lower right lobe of the liver in a patient case. Multiple dose levels were simulated (50%, 25%, 12.5%). Each lesion and dose condition had 600 noise realizations. Multiple reconstruction and denoising methods were used on all the noise realizations, including the original filtered-backprojection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and the DCNN method with three different strength setting (DCNN-weak, DCNN-medium, and DCNN-strong). Mean lesion signal was calculated by performing ensemble averaging of all the noise realizations for each lesion and dose condition and then subtracting the lesion-present images from the lesion absent images. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) both in-plane and along the z-axis were calculated based on the mean lesion signals. The standard deviations of MTFs at each condition were estimated with bootstrapping: randomly sampling (with replacement) all the DLIR/FBP/IR images from the ensemble data (600 samples) at each condition. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and denoising strengths were evaluated. Statistical analysis with paired t-test was used to compare the z-axis and in-plane spatial resolution of five algorithms for five different contrasts and three dose levels. The in-plane and z-axis spatial resolution degradation of DCNN becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. In comparison with FBP, a 59.5% and 4.1% reduction of in-plane and z-axis MTF (in terms of spatial frequencies at 50% MTF), respectively, was observed at low contrast (-10 HU) for DCNN with the highest denoising strength at 25% routine dose level. When the dose level reduces from 50% to 12.5% of routine dose, the in-plane and z-axis MTFs reduces from 92.1% to 76.3%, and from 98.9% to 95.5%, respectively, at contrast of -100 HU, using FBP as the reference. For most conditions of contrasts and dose levels, significant differences were found among the five algorithms, with the following relationship in both in-plane and cross-plane spatial resolution: FBP>DCNN-Weak>IR>DCNN-Medium>DCNN-Strong. The spatial resolution difference among algorithms decreases at higher contrast or dose levels. A patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework was developed and applied to measuring the spatial resolution properties of a DCNN noise reduction method at different contrast and dose levels using real patient data. As with other non-linear image reconstruction and post-processing techniques, the evaluated DCNN method degraded the in-plane and z-axis spatial resolution at lower contrast levels, lower radiation dose, and higher denoising strength.

In recent years, health risks concerning high-dose x-ray radiation have become a major concern in dental computed tomography (CT) examinations. Therefore, adopting low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) technology has become a major focus in the CT imaging field. One of these LDCT technologies is downsampling data acquisition during low-dose x-ray imaging processes. However, reducing the radiation dose can adversely affect CT image quality by introducing noise and artifacts in the resultant image that can compromise diagnostic information. In this paper, we propose an artifact correction method for downsampling CT reconstruction based on deep learning. We used clinical dental CT data with low-dose artifacts reconstructed by conventional filtered back projection (FBP) as inputs to a deep neural network and corresponding high-quality labeled normal-dose CT data during training. We trained a generative adversarial network (GAN) with Wasserstein distance (WGAN) and mean squared error (MSE) loss, called m-WGAN, to remove artifacts and obtain high-quality CT dental images in a clinical dental CT examination environment. The experimental results confirmed that the proposed algorithm effectively removes low-dose artifacts from dental CT scans. In addition, we showed that the proposed method is efficient for removing noise from low-dose CT scan images compared to existing approaches. We compared the performances of the general GAN, convolutional neural networks, and m-WGAN. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results, we concluded that the proposed m-WGAN method resulted in better artifact correction performance preserving the texture in dental CT scanning. The image quality evaluation metrics indicated that the proposed method effectively improves image quality when used as a postprocessing technique for dental CT images. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first deep learning architecture used with a commercial cone-beam dental CT scanner. The artifact correction performance was rigorously evaluated and demonstrated to be effective. Therefore, we believe that the proposed algorithm represents a new direction in the research area of low-dose dental CT artifact correction.

To evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of low-dose (LD) computed tomography (LD-CT) combining with iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm for response assessment in patients after treatment of malignant tumor compared with routine-dose CT (RD-CT). Forty-seven patients [mean age 57.8±10.9 years, 30 males, body mass index (BMI) 22.09±2.35 kg/m2] after treatment of malignant tumor underwent contrast-enhanced chest and abdomen CT twice for response assessment with an interval of 6 months according to clinical routine. The first CT scans were performed with RD protocol at 120 kVp and images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm; while the second scans were performed with LD protocol at 100 kVp and images were reconstructed with FBP and IMR algorithm respectively. All scans were performed using an automatic tube current modulation technique with 150 mAs as reference. Objective image quality including CT attenuation, image noise, and contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality including artifacts, noise, visualization of small structures and confidence of targeted lesions, as well as lesion detection were assessed and compared. Effective radiation dose of LD-CT scans was reduced 54.8% compared to RD-CT scans (26.89±3.35 vs. 12.14±2.09 mSv). Higher CT attenuation was found in both LD-IMR and LD-FBP images compared to RD-FBP images. Better subjective image quality and CNR as well as lower objective noise were found in LD-IMR images (all, P<0.05). Two small lesions with the diameter less than 1 cm were missed in LD-FBP images, which were able to be observed in LD-IMR images. IMR is able to help more than half of reduction of radiation dose without compromising the quality of diagnostic information in patients after treatment of malignant tumors to chest and abdomen CT for response assessment.