Advanced inference techniques for two-parameter Topp-Leone models under unified progressively hybrid censoring

In this paper, we consider estimation of parameters for a two-parameter Kumaraswamy-exponential distribution based on adaptive type-II progressive censoring schemes which is a mixture of type-I and progressive type-II censoring schemes. The maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters are obtained. Bayes estimators are also obtained using different loss functions such as squared error loss function, LINEX loss function, and entropy loss function. For Bayes estimation, we use the importance sampling method. A simulation study is then performed for comparing various estimators developed in this paper. All Bayesian estimates are compared with the corresponding maximum likelihood estimates numerically in terms of their bias and mean square error values and found that Bayes estimators perform better than MLEs for α and β. A real data set is also used for illustration.

To analyze the performance of various estimators, this paper compares Bayesian and classical estimate approaches across a variety of loss functions. The work focuses on informative versus non-informative priors in Bayesian estimation. The calculations are based on a number of loss functions, including the Square Error Loss Function (SELF), Quadratic Loss Function (QLF), Precautionary Loss Function (PLF), and Entropy Loss Function (ELF). The methodology uses simulation techniques as well as real-world datasets to test the performance and robustness of the proposed estimators. The Bayesian estimators, classical estimators, and related Bayes hazards using empirical analysis and extensive simulations to computed. The findings show that the Minimum Mean Square Error estimator (MiniMSE) is more accurate and reliable than other estimators in a variety of settings. Furthermore, for both types of priors, it is demonstrated that the Bayes risk under the Quadratic Loss Function (QLF) is the lowest among all loss functions considered, including SELF, PLF, and ELF. This suggests that, when compared to other loss functions, QLF is a more effective and balanced criterion for making estimation decisions. The study’s findings provide vital new insights into how to choose the optimum estimate techniques and loss functions for statistical decision theory and practical data processing.

We consider here the generalization of the Bilal distribution proposed by Abd-Elrahman (2017) by zeroing in on two measures of reliability, R(t) and P, based on type II censoring. We obtain point estimators namely, λ and θ, of the above said distribution, when both parameters of the distribution are unknown. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), Bayes estimators (BEs) and Lindley’s approximation for the Bayes estimators are proposed. By using independent noninformative type of priors for the unknown parameters Bayes estimators are derived. Although the proposed estimators cannot be expressed in closed forms, these can be easily obtained through the use of numerical procedures. The performance of these estimators is studied on the basis of their mean squared error (MSE), computed separately under LINEX loss function (LLF) and squared error loss function (SELF) through Monte-Carlo simulation technique.

This article studies the E-Bayesian estimation of the unknown parameter of Lomax distribution based on generalized Type-I hybrid censoring. Under square error loss and LINEX loss functions, we get the E-Bayesian estimation and compare its effectiveness with Bayesian estimation. To measure the error of E-Bayesian estimation, the expectation of mean square error (E-MSE) is introduced. With Markov chain Monte Carlo technology, E-Bayesian estimations are computed. Metropolis–Hastings algorithm is applied within the process. Similarly, the credible interval for the parameter is calculated. Then, we can compare the MSE and E-MSE to evaluate whose result is more effective. For the purpose of illustration in real datasets, cases of generalized Type-I hybrid censored samples are presented. In order to judge whether the sample data can be directly fitted by the Lomax distribution, we adopt the Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests for evaluation. Finally, we can get the conclusion after comparing the results of E-Bayesian and Bayesian estimation.

Estimation using hybrid censored data from a two-parameter distribution with bathtub shape

The present paper is concerned with the estimation of stress strength reliability R=P[X>Y] when X and Y are the random variables following Lomax and Exponential Distribution based on right censored sample. The main aim of this article is to estimate the Maximum Likelihood estimates of R and Bayesian Estimates of R under Squared Error Loss function, Linex Loss function and Entropy Loss function. Finally the performance of the estimators are evaluated by simulation study.

This study uses the adaptive Type-II progressively censored competing risks model to estimate the unknown parameters and the survival function of the Gompertz distribution. Where the lifetime for each failure is considered independent, and each follows a unique Gompertz distribution with different shape parameters. First, the Newton-Raphson method is used to derive the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), and the existence and uniqueness of the estimators are also demonstrated. We used the stochastic expectation maximization (SEM) method to construct MLEs for unknown parameters, which simplified and facilitated computation. Based on the asymptotic normality of the MLEs and SEM methods, we create the corresponding confidence intervals for unknown parameters, and the delta approach is utilized to obtain the interval estimation of the reliability function. Additionally, using two bootstrap techniques, the approximative interval estimators for all unknowns are created. Furthermore, we computed the Bayes estimates of unknown parameters as well as the survival function using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method in the presence of square error and LINEX loss functions. Finally, we look into two real data sets and create a simulation study to evaluate the efficacy of the established approaches.

In this article we consider statistical inferences about the unknown parameters of the inverse Weibull distribution based on progressively first-failure censoring using Bayesian procedures. The Bayes estimators are obtained based on both the symmetric and asymmetric (Linex, General Entropy and Precautionary) loss functions. There are no explicit forms for the Bayes estimators; therefore, we propose the Lindley’s approximation method to compute the Bayes estimators. A comparison between these estimators and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) is provided by using extensive simulation and two criteria, namely, the bias and the mean squared error. It is concluded that the approximate Bayes estimators outperform the MLEs most of the time. Real life data example is provided to illustrate our proposed estimators.

In this work the analysis of interval-censored data, with Weibull distribution as the underlying lifetime distribution has been considered. It is assumed that censoring mechanism is independent and non-informative. As expected, the maximum likelihood estimators cannot be obtained in closed form. In our simulation experiments it is observed that the Newton-Raphson method may not converge many times. An expectation maximization algorithm has been suggested to compute the maximum likelihood estimators, and it converges almost all the times. The Bayes estimates of the unknown parameters under gamma priors are considered. If the shape parameter is known, the Bayes estimate of the scale parameter can be obtained in explicit form. When both the parameters are unknown, the Bayes estimators cannot be obtained in explicit form. Lindley’s approximation, importance sampling procedures and Metropolis Hastings algorithm are used to compute the Bayes estimates. Highest posterior density credible intervals of the unknown parameter are obtained using importance sampling technique. Small simulation experiments are conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators, and the analysis of two data sets; one simulated and one real life, have been provided for illustrative purposes.

In this paper, we offer generalized exponentiated gamma distribution. We consider the maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimators of unknown parameters and propose Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to generate samples from the posterior distribution. The mean square error of estimations is computed and comparisons are made using Monte Carlo simulation. Key words: Maximum likelihood estimator, Bayesian estimator, squared error loss function, generalized exponentiated gamma distribution.

Maximum likelihood and Bayes estimators of the parameters, survival function (SF) and hazard rate function (HRF) are obtained for the three-parameter exponentiated Burr type XII distribution when sample is available from type II censored scheme. Bayes estimators have been developed using the standard Bayes and MCMC methods under square error and LINEX loss functions, using informative type of priors for the parameters. Simulation comparison of various estimation methods is made when n = 20, 40, 60 and censored data. The Bayes estimates are found to be, generally, better than the maximum likelihood estimates against the proposed prior, in the sense of having smaller mean square errors. This is found to be true whether the data are complete or censored. Estimates improve by increasing sample size. Analysis is also carried out for real life data.

In this paper, Bayes estimators of the unknown shape and scale parameters of the Exponentiated Inverse Rayleigh Distribution (EIRD) have been derived using both the frequentist and bayesian methods. The Bayes theorem was adopted to obtain the posterior distribution of the shape and scale parameters of an Exponentiated Inverse Rayleigh Distribution (EIRD) using both conjugate and non-conjugate prior distribution under different loss functions (such as Entropy Loss Function, Linex Loss Function and Scale Invariant Squared Error Loss Function). The posterior distribution derived for both shape and scale parameters are intractable and a Lindley approximation was adopted to obtain the parameters of interest. The loss function were employed to obtain the estimates for both scale and shape parameters with an assumption that the both scale and shape parameters are unknown and independent. Also the Bayes estimate for the simulated datasets and real life datasets were obtained. The Bayes estimates obtained under dierent loss functions are close to the true parameter value of the shape and scale parameters. The estimators are then compared in terms of their Mean Square Error (MSE) using R programming language. We deduce that the MSE reduces as the sample size (n) increases.

In this research, the statistical inference of unknown lifetime parameters is proposed in the presence of independent competing risks using a progressive Type-II censored dataset. The lifetime distribution associated with a failure mode is assumed to follow the new Pareto distribution, with consideration given to two distinct competing failure reasons. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for the unknown model parameters, as well as reliability and hazard functions, are derived, noting that they are not expressible in closed form. The Newton–Raphson, expectation maximization (EM), and stochastic expectation maximization (SEM) methods are employed to generate maximum likelihood (ML) estimations. Approximate confidence intervals for the unknown parameters, reliability, and hazard rate functions are constructed using the normal approximation of the MLEs and the normal approximation of the log-transformed MLEs. Additionally, the missing information principle is utilized to derive the closed form of the Fisher information matrix, which, in turn, is used with the delta approach to calculate confidence intervals for reliability and hazards. Bayes estimators are derived under both symmetric and asymmetric loss functions, with informative and non-informative priors considered, including independent gamma distributions for informative priors. The Monte Carlo Markov Chain sampling approach is employed to obtain the highest posterior density credible intervals and Bayesian point estimates for unknown parameters and reliability characteristics. A Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to assess the effectiveness of the proposed techniques, with the performances of the Bayes and maximum likelihood estimations examined using average values and mean squared errors as benchmarks. Interval estimations are compared in terms of average lengths and coverage probabilities. Real datasets are considered and examined for each topic to provide illustrative examples.

The progressively first failure censored (PFFC) data have become very popular in the past decade due to its usefulness in life testing experiments and in reliability theory. The PFFC data record the number of failures and increase the efficiency of the estimators. The inverse Pareto distribution (IPD) is useful when empirical data suggest a decreasing or upside-down bathtub-shaped failure rate functions. In this article, we consider the classical and Bayesian estimation of the model parameter and the reliability characteristics of the IPD using the PFFC data. The maximum likelihood estimators, asymptotic confidence, and bootstrap confidence intervals are considered in the classical estimation. Under the Bayesian paradigm, Bayes estimators based on non-informative and the gamma informative priors under the squared error loss function using Tierney-Kadane approximation, importance sampling, and Metropolis-Hasting (M-H) algorithm are assessed. In addition, the highest probability density (HPD) intervals based on the M-H algorithm are also constructed. To investigate the efficacy of each of the estimation procedures, numerical computations are performed based on a simulation study. Finally, a real data set is re-analyzed to show the applicability of the IPD model under a censoring scheme.

Bayesian and frequentist estimation and prediction for exponential distributions