• Home
  • Search
  • Alternative Methodologies for the Internal Quality Control of Parallel LiDAR Strips
  • Cite Icon69
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2009.2026424Copy DOI Icon

Alternative Methodologies for the Internal Quality Control of Parallel LiDAR Strips

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) systems have been widely adopted for the acquisition of dense and accurate topographic data over extended areas. Although the utilization of this technology has increased in different applications, the development of standard methodologies for the quality control (QC) of LiDAR data has not followed the same trend. In other words, a lack in reliable, practical, cost-effective, and commonly acceptable QC procedures is evident. A frequently adopted procedure for QC is comparing the LiDAR data to ground control points. Aside from being expensive, this approach is not accurate enough for the verification of horizontal accuracy, unless specifically designed LiDAR targets are used. This paper is dedicated to providing accurate, economical, and convenient internal QC procedures for the evaluation of LiDAR data, which is captured from parallel flight lines. The underlying concept of the proposed methodologies is that, in the absence of systematic and random errors in system parameters and measurements, conjugate surface elements in overlapping strips should perfectly match each other. Consistent incompatibilities and the quality of fit between conjugate surface elements in overlapping strips can be used to detect systematic errors in the system parameters/measurements and to evaluate the noise level in the LiDAR point cloud, respectively. Experimental results from real data demonstrate that all the proposed methods, with one exception, produce compatible estimates of systematic discrepancies between the involved data sets, as well as good quantification of inherent noise.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations108

Above ground biomass estimation across forest types at different degradation levels in Central Kalimantan using LiDAR data

  • Feb 28, 2012
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Karin Kronseder +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Remote Sensing Methods for Monitoring Ground Surface Deformation of Compacted Clay Test Sections

  • Feb 24, 2014
  • Cyrus D Garner +1
  • Dissertation
  • Citations7

Evaluation of surface defect detection in reinforced concrete bridge decks using terrestrial LiDAR

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Ryan C Hoensheid
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Accessible light detection and ranging: estimating large tree density for habitat identification

  • Dec 01, 2016
  • Ecosphere
  • Heather A Kramer +5
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

The Role of Airborne LiDAR Survey Technology in Digital Transformation

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • MATEC Web of Conferences
  • Trudy R Ganendra +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations191

Designing and Testing a UAV Mapping System for Agricultural Field Surveying

  • Nov 23, 2017
  • Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Martin Peter Christiansen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Automatic Building Extraction from Image and LiDAR Data with Active Contour Segmentation

  • Oct 26, 2018
  • Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
  • Zeynep Akbulut +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations133

A Comparison of Accuracy and Cost of LiDAR versus Stand Exam Data for Landscape Management on the Malheur National Forest

  • Jul 01, 2011
  • Journal of Forestry
  • Susan Hummel +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Quantitative Comparison of LiDAR Point Cloud Segmentation for Autonomous Vehicles

  • Sep 01, 2021
  • Bhaskar Anand +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Individual Tree Delineation in Deciduous Forest Areas with LiDAR Point Clouds

  • Mar 04, 2014
  • Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Yanshan Bian +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Modeling Urban Flooding by Filtering LiDAR Data

  • Oct 01, 2011
  • Journal of Urban Technology
  • Md Aktaruzzaman +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

LIDAR Data Compression Challenges and Difficulties

  • Sep 01, 2019
  • Mohamed M Abdelwahab +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations53

Joint Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Based on Mamba

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Diling Liao +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations39

Landslide manual and automated inventories, and susceptibility mapping using LIDAR in the forested mountains of Guerrero, Mexico

  • Mar 03, 2017
  • Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
  • Krzysztof Gaidzik +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Analysis of Factors Affecting Random Measurement Error in LiDAR Point Cloud Feature Matching Positioning

  • Apr 18, 2025
  • Remote Sensing
  • Guoliang Liu +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.