Annotations for Alloy: Automated Incremental Analysis Using Domain Specific Solvers

We perform a comprehensive study of mappings between constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and propositional satisfiability (SAT). We analyse four different mappings of SAT problems into CSPs, and two of CSPs into SAT problems. For each mapping, we compare the impact of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP with unit propagation on the SAT problem. We then extend these results to CSP algorithms that maintain (some level of) arc-consistency during search like FC and MAC, and to the Davis-Putnam procedure (which performs unit propagation at each search node). Because of differences in the branching structure of their search, a result showing the dominance of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP over unit propagation on the SAT problem does not necessarily translate to the dominance of MAC over the Davis-Putnam procedure. These results provide insight into the relationship between propositional satisfiability and constraint satisfaction.

Optimized solvers for the Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem have many applications in areas such as hardware and software verification, FPGA routing, planning, and so forth. Further uses are complicated by the need to express "counting constraints" in conjunctive normal form (CNF). Expressing such constraints by pure CNF leads to more complex SAT instances. Alternatively, those constraints can be handled by integer linear programming (ILP), but generic ILP solvers may ignore the Boolean nature of 0-1 variables. Therefore, specialized 0-1 ILP solvers extend SAT solvers to handle these so-called "pseudo-Boolean" (PB) constraints. This work provides an update on the on-going competition between generic ILP techniques and specialized 0-1 ILP techniques. To make a fair comparison, we generalize recent ideas for fast SAT-solving to more general 0-1 ILP problems that may include counting constraints and optimization. This generalization is embodied in our PB constraint solver and optimizer PBS, which is compared with state-of-the-art CNF and generic ILP solvers. Another aspect of our comparison is the evaluation on 0-1 ILP benchmarks that originate in electronic design automation (EDA) but that cannot be directly solved by an SAT solver. Specifically, we solve instances of the max-SAT and max-ONEs optimization problems, which seek to maximize the number of satisfied clauses and the "true" values over all satisfying assignments, respectively. Those problems have straightforward applications to SAT-based routing and are additionally important due to reductions from max-cut, max-clique, and min vertex cover. Our experimental results show that specialized 0-1 techniques implemented in PBS tend to outperform generic ILP techniques on Boolean optimization problems, as well as on general EDA SAT problems.

Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers are at the core of efficient approaches for solving a vast multitude of practical problems. Moreover, albeit targeting an NP-complete problem, SAT solvers are increasingly used for tackling problems beyond NP. Despite the success of SAT in practice, modeling with SAT and more importantly implementing SAT-based problem solving solutions is often a difficult and error-prone task. This paper proposes the PySAT toolkit, which enables fast Python-based prototyping using SAT oracles and SAT-related technology. PySAT provides a simple API for working with a few state-of-the-art SAT oracles and also integrates a number of cardinality constraint encodings, all aiming at simplifying the prototyping process. Experimental results presented in the paper show that PySAT-based implementations can be as efficient as those written in a low-level language.

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is a fundamental problem of immense practical importance. While SAT is NP-complete when clauses can contain 3 literals or more, the problem can be solved in linear time when the given formula contains only binary clauses (2SAT). Many complete search algorithms for SAT solving have taken advantage of 2SAT information that occurs in the statement of the problem in order to simplify the solving process, only one that we are aware of uses 2SAT information that arises in the process of the search, as clauses are simplified. There are a number of possibilities for making use of 2SAT information to improve the SAT solving process: maintaining 2SAT satisfiability during search, detecting unit consequences of the 2SAT clauses, and Krom subsumption using 2SAT clauses. In this paper we investigate the tradeoffs of increasing complex 2SAT handling versus the search space reduction and execution time. We give experimental results illustrating that the SAT solver resulting from the best tradeoff is competitive with state of the art Davis-Putnam methods, on hard problems involving a substantial 2SAT component.

Many formal verification tools today are based on Boolean proof techniques. The two most powerful approaches in this context are binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and methods based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT). Recent studies have shown that BDDs and SAT are orthogonal, i.e. there exist problems where BDDs work well, while SAT solvers fail and vice versa. Beside this, the techniques are very different in general. E.g. SAT solvers try to find a single solution and BDDs represent all solutions in parallel. In this paper the first integrated approach is presented that combines BDDs and SAT within a single data structure. This hybrid approach combines the advantages of the two techniques, i.e. multiple solutions can be computed while the memory requirement remains small. First experimental results demonstrate the quality of the approach in comparison to BDDs and SAT solvers.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers are popular engines used throughout the verification world. Bounded sequential problems such as bounded model checking and bounded sequential equivalence checking rely on fast and robust SAT solvers. In this work, we introduce a technique that improves the performance of the underlying SAT solver for bounded sequential problems by taking advantage of a design's don't care states. We develop cost effective methods of filtering, replicating and applying the don't care states to the original problem thus reducing the search space. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on ISCAS'89 benchmarks.

The Aperiodic Tiling Complements Problem (ATCP) involves finding the full set of (normalized) aperiodic complements of a given pattern. This has become a classic problem in music theory, with some recent attempts to model it using Integer Linear Programming (ILP) and Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) frameworks. In this paper, we develop and compare different models of ATCP encoded with Constraint Programming (CP). The most effective approach admits two phases: a first one that allows us to merge (join) several subsets of linear constraints under the form of tables with large arity, and a second one that advantageously exploits the generated tables to discard periodic tiling complements. Our experimental results show that our approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art, solving every instance of a classical benchmark (standard Vuza rhythms for canons with periods set up to 900) in a time between 5 seconds and 2 minutes (except the largest instance being solved in 18 minutes).

Chapter 2 Satisfiability Solvers

The exponential-time hypothesis (ETH) states that 3-SAT is not solvable in subexponential time, i.e. not solvable in O(c^n) time for arbitrary c > 1, where n denotes the number of variables. Problems like k-SAT can be viewed as special cases of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), which is the problem of determining whether a set of constraints is satisfiable. In this paper we study the worst-case time complexity of NP-complete CSPs. Our main interest is in the CSP problem parameterized by a constraint language Gamma (CSP(Gamma)), and how the choice of Gamma affects the time complexity. It is believed that CSP(Gamma) is either tractable or NP-complete, and the algebraic CSP dichotomy conjecture gives a sharp delineation of these two classes based on algebraic properties of constraint languages. Under this conjecture and the ETH, we first rule out the existence of subexponential algorithms for finite domain NP-complete CSP(Gamma) problems. This result also extends to certain infinite-domain CSPs and structurally restricted CSP(Gamma) problems. We then begin a study of the complexity of NP-complete CSPs where one is allowed to arbitrarily restrict the values of individual variables, which is a very well-studied subclass of CSPs. For such CSPs with finite domain D, we identify a relation SD such that (1) CSP({SD}) is NP-complete and (2) if CSP(Gamma) over D is NP-complete and solvable in O(c^n) time, then CSP({SD}) is solvable in O(c^n) time, too. Hence, the time complexity of CSP({SD}) is a lower bound for all CSPs of this particular kind. We also prove that the complexity of CSP({SD}) is decreasing when |D| increases, unless the ETH is false. This implies, for instance, that for every c>1 there exists a finite-domain Gamma such that CSP(Gamma) is NP complete and solvable in O(c^n) time.

Different search strategies, like Boolean satisfiability (SAT), constraint programming (CP), and integer programming (IP) have been developed to solve classes of combinatorial search problems like the quasi-group completion problem (QCP). This paper proposes a new effective algorithm developed for solving the classic QCP — the Latin-square completion problem. The method is demonstrated by solving some typical Latin-square completion problems and ways to improve upon the algorithm are discussed.

Efficient solutions to nonpolynomial (NP)-complete problems would significantly benefit both science and industry. However, such problems are intractable on digital computers based on the von Neumann architecture, thus creating the need for alternative solutions to tackle such problems. Recently, a deterministic, continuous-time dynamical system (CTDS) was proposed [1] to solve a representative NP-complete problem, Boolean Satisfiability (SAT). This solver shows polynomial analog time-complexity on even the hardest benchmark $k$ -SAT ( $k \geq 3$ ) formulas, but at an energy cost through exponentially driven auxiliary variables. This paper presents a novel analog hardware SAT solver, AC-SAT , implementing the CTDS via incorporating novel, analog circuit design ideas. AC-SAT is intended to be used as a coprocessor and is programmable for handling different problem specifications. It is especially effective for solving hard $k$ -SAT problem instances that are challenging for algorithms running on digital machines. Furthermore, with its modular design, AC-SAT can readily be extended to solve larger size problems, while the size of the circuit grows linearly with the product of the number of variables and the number of clauses. The circuit is designed and simulated based on a 32-nm CMOS technology. Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) simulation results show speedup factors of ~104 on even the hardest 3-SAT problems, when compared with a state-of-the-art SAT solver on digital computers. As an example, for hard problems with $N=50$ variables and $M=212$ clauses, solutions are found within from a few nanoseconds to a few hundred nanoseconds.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT), the first problem proven to be NP-complete, is intractable on digital computers based on the von Neumann architecture. An efficient SAT solver can benefit many applications such as artificial intelligence, circuit design, and functional verification. Recently, a SAT solver approach based on a deterministic, continuous-time dynamical system (CTDS) was introduced [1]. This approach shows polynomial analog time-complexity on even the hardest k-SAT (k ≥ 3) problem instances, but at an energy cost dependent on exponentially growing auxiliary variables. This paper reports a novel analog hardware SAT solver, AC-SAT, implementing the CTDS via incorporating novel, analog circuit design ideas. AC-SAT is intended to be used as a co-processor and is programmable for handling different problem specifications. Furthermore, with its modular design, AC-SAT can be readily extended to solve larger size problems. SPICE simulation results show that AC-SAT can indeed solve the SAT problems, and it has speedup factors of ~10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sup> on even the hardest 3-SAT problems, when compared with a state-of-the-art SAT solver on digital computers.

This paper addresses the problem of counting models in integer linear programming (ILP) using Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) techniques, and proposes two approaches to solve this problem. The first approach consists of encoding ILP instances into pseudo-Boolean (PB) instances. Moreover, the paper introduces a model counter for PB constraints, which can be used for counting models in PB as well as in ILP. A second alternative approach consists of encoding instances of ILP into instances of SAT. A two-step procedure is proposed, consisting of first mapping the ILP instance into PB constraints and then encoding the PB constraints into SAT. One key observation is that not all existing PB to SAT encodings can be used for counting models. The paper provides conditions for PB to SAT encodings that can be safely used for model counting, and proves that some of the existing encodings are safe for model counting while others are not. Finally, the paper provides experimental results, comparing the PB and SAT approaches, as well as existing alternative solutions.

Learning is a general concept, playing an important role in many Artificial intelligence domains. In this paper, we address the learning paradigm used to explain failures or conflicts encountered during search. This explanation, derived by conflict analysis, and generally expressed as a new constraint, is usually used to dynamically avoid future occurrences of similar situations. Before focusing on clause learning in Boolean satisfiability (SAT), we first overview some important works on this powerful reasoning tool in other domains such as constraint satisfaction and truth maintenance systems. Then, we present a comprehensive survey of the most important works having led to what is called today—conflict driven clause learning—which is one of the key components of modern SAT solvers. We also overview some of the original extensions or variants of clauses learning. In theory, current SAT solvers with clause learning are as powerful as general resolution proof systems. In practice, real-world SAT instances with millions of variables and clauses are now in the scope of this solving paradigm.

The periodic event scheduling problem (PESP) is a well studied problem known as intrinsically hard. Its main application is for designing periodic timetables in public transportation. To this end, the passengers' paths are required as input data. This is a drawback since the final paths which are used by the passengers depend on the timetable to be designed. Including the passengers' routing in the PESP hence improves the quality of the resulting timetables. However, this makes PESP even harder. Formulating the PESP as satisfiability problem and using SAT solvers for its solution has been shown to be a highly promising approach. The goal of this paper is to exploit if SAT solvers can also be used for the problem of integrated timetabling and passenger routing. In our model of the integrated problem we distribute origin-destination (OD) pairs temporally through the network by using time-slices in order to make the resulting model more realistic. We present a formulation of this integrated problem as integer program which we are able to transform to a satisfiability problem. We tested the latter formulation within numerical experiments, which are performed on Germany's long-distance passenger railway network. The computation's analysis in which we compare the integrated approach with the traditional one with fixed passengers' weights, show promising results for future scientific investigations.