Approximate Solutions for a Class of Multiobjective Interval-Valued Optimization Problems with Applications

Multi-objective optimization problems (MOP) are frequently encountered in practice. In some cases, different computationally expensive analyses may be independently used for computing different objectives of the MOP. Additionally, the analyses may be executed to obtain estimates with different fidelity, typically higher fidelity requiring a longer run-time. For instance, in automotive design, the aerodynamic drag is computed using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis and its crashworthiness/strength is assessed using finite element analysis (FEA). Both the objectives can be independently computed and the underlying fidelity of each analysis can also be controlled using different mesh sizes/thresholds on the residual errors. While there exist a number of generic MOP benchmark problems in the literature, there is scarce work on constructing MOPs with multi-fidelity (MF) analyses to support the development of multi-fidelity, multi-objective optimization algorithms. The existing MF benchmarks are limited to unconstrained, single-objective optimization problems only. Towards addressing this gap, in this paper, we introduce a test suite for multi-objective, multi-fidelity optimization (MOMF). The problems are derived by combining existing unconstrained, multi-objective design optimization problems with resolution/stochastic/instability errors that are common manifestations of MF simulations. The method allows for the construction of any number of low-fidelity functions with desired level of correlations for a given high-fidelity objective function. We hope that the test suite would motivate novel algorithmic developments to support optimization involving computationally expensive and independently evaluable objectives.

Although various optimization methods for solving single-objective problems have been developed in the last few decades, these methods have lost their eligibility due to the fact that today’s engineering problems are toward multiple objective optimization problems, in real applications. For single-objective optimization problems, for example, in case of a minimization problem, this value is the decision vector giving the smallest objective that can be achieved within the specified constraints. Hence the minimum decision vector within all possible (feasible) solution vectors is the so-called optimal solution and/or optimal design. However, in multi-objective optimization problems, since a different objective value is generated against each decision vector, the superiority of the solutions over each other is determined by considering the trade-off among the objective values. Therefore, the solution of multi-objective optimization problems, unlike single-objective problems, is a set of vectors rather than a single decision vector. In multi-objective optimization problems, especially if there are intricate objectives, the computational cost of the problem increases. In other words, while synchronously trying to maximize one of the objectives and to minimize another one makes it difficult to find the global optimum design. One of the important techniques used in multi-objective optimization problems is Pareto optimality which enables to select the global optimum solution taking into account the trade-off among all objectives. In this context, using of derivative-based methods has decreased, but the use of metaheuristic methods has increased due to the rapid availability of global optimum solution. This is because the improvements in the field of optimization are progressing in proportion to technology and varying according to the needs. In this chapter, one of the recent metaheuristic optimization methods based on swarm intelligence that is so-called a Pareto-based bat algorithm inspired by the behavior of determining the direction and distance of an object using the echo of the sound called the echolocation of bats is used in order to obtain optimum solutions for multi-objective engineering design problems. In this regard, a four-bar planar truss, a real-sized welded steel beam as well as a multi-layer radar absorber are selected as multi-objective engineering design optimization problems. In case the obtained results (optimal designs) are examined, the potency and the reliability of the proposed multi-objective Pareto-based bat algorithm are demonstrated.

This paper provides a novel framework for solving multiobjective discrete optimization problems with an arbitrary number of objectives. Our framework represents these problems as network models, in that enumerating the Pareto frontier amounts to solving a multicriteria shortest-path problem in an auxiliary network. We design techniques for exploiting network models in order to accelerate the identification of the Pareto frontier, most notably a number of operations to simplify the network by removing nodes and arcs while preserving the set of nondominated solutions. We show that the proposed framework yields orders-of-magnitude performance improvements over existing state-of-the-art algorithms on five problem classes containing both linear and nonlinear objective functions. Summary of Contribution: Multiobjective optimization has a long history of research with applications in several domains. Our paper provides an alternative modeling and solution approach for multiobjective discrete optimization problems by leveraging graphical structures. Specifically, we encode the decision space of a problem as a layered network and propose graph reduction operators to preserve only solutions whose image are part of the Pareto frontier. The nondominated solutions can then be extracted through shortest-path algorithms on such a network. Numerical results comparing our method with state-of-the-art approaches on several problem classes, including the knapsack, set covering, and the traveling salesperson problem (TSP), suggest orders-of-magnitude runtime speed-ups for exactly enumerating the Pareto frontier, especially when the number of objective functions grows.

This paper deals with the multi-objective optimization of tire reinforcement structures such as the tread belt and the carcass path. The multi-objective functions are defined in terms of the discrete-type design variables and approximated by artificial neutral network, and the sensitivity analyses of these functions are replaced with the iterative genetic evolution. The multi-objective optimization algorithm introduced in this paper is not only highly CPU-time-efficient but it can also be applicable to other multi-objective optimization problems in which the objective function, the design variables and the constraints are not continuous but discrete. Through the illustrative numerical experiments, the fiber-reinforced tire belt structure is optimally tailored. The proposed multi-objective optimization algorithm is not limited to the tire reinforcement structure, but it can be applicable to the generalized multi-objective structural optimization problems in various engineering applications.

The present work focuses on obtaining optimal operational policies of an industrial scale penicillin fed-batch fermentation process using dynamic optimization (DO). The three process objectives considered in this work include, maximization of total penicillin formed (J 1), minimization of total biomass formed (J 2), and minimization of fed-batch operation time (J 3). The control variables for the optimization study include, the feed flowrates of sugar, soyabean oil, and phenylacetic. We perform a single-objective optimization study with J 1 as the objective function and showcased the importance of DO. Consequently, we solve three multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems corresponding to all the pairwise combinations of the aforementioned three objectives. Outcomes of MOO problems are presented in terms of several non-dominated Pareto-optimal solutions. Furthermore, descriptive analysis of three representative Pareto points for all the MOO problems is presented, which highlights the importance of MOO study of the penicillin bio-reactor.

In many recent works, the potential of Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) features to numerically characterize single-objective continuous optimization problems has been demonstrated. These numerical features provide the input for all kinds of machine learning tasks in the domain of continuous optimization problems, ranging, for example, from High-level Property Prediction to Automated Algorithm Selection and Automated Algorithm Configuration. Without ELA features, analyzing and understanding the characteristics of single-objective continuous optimization problems is-to the best of our knowledge-very limited. Yet, despite their usefulness, as demonstrated in several past works, ELA features suffer from several drawbacks. These include, in particular, (1) a strong correlation between multiple features, as well as (2) its very limited applicability to multiobjective continuous optimization problems. As a remedy, recent works proposed deep learning-based approaches as alternatives to ELA. In these works, among others, point-cloud transformers were used to characterize an optimization problem's fitness landscape. However, these approaches require a large amount of labeled training data. Within this work, we propose a hybrid approach, Deep-ELA, which combines (the benefits of) deep learning and ELA features. We pre-trained four transformers on millions of randomly generated optimization problems to learn deep representations of the landscapes of continuous single- and multiobjective optimization problems. Our proposed framework can either be used out of the box for analyzing single- and multiobjective continuous optimization problems, or subsequently fine-tuned to various tasks focusing on algorithm behavior and problem understanding.

Decision makers tend to define their optimization problems as multi-objective optimization problems. Generating the whole nondominated set is often unrealistic due to its size but also because most of these points are irrelevant to the decision maker. Another approach consists in obtaining preference information and integrating it a priori, in order to reduce the size of the nondominated set and have a gain in computation time. In this work we focus on a partial preference relation based on requirement and tolerance thresholds that translate the Pareto dominance cone. After introducing this preference relation, we present adaptations to use it in existing discrete multi-objective optimization algorithms. Numerical experiments on multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems show the applicabiliy of our approach.

In a real life situation, due to the complexity of the industrial systems and non-linearity of their behavior, it is very difficult to achieve optimum performance of system for desired industrial goals using uncertain, vague and imprecise data. Herein, an approach has been proposed through which the behavior of the system is analyzed in the form of well- known six reliability indices by using triangular fuzzy numbers which allow the consideration of expert opinions, linguistic variables, operating conditions in reliability information. Using their behavior analysis a fuzzy multi-objective optimization problem (FMOOP) has been formulated. Due to the conflicting nature of the multiple objectives, the decision making is difficult and it leads to the Pareto optimal solutions instead of single optimal solutions. Many evolutionary algorithms (EAs) already exist in the literature for solving a multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP), and are termed as multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is one of such MOEA which demonstrates the ability to identity a Pareto-optimal front efficiently. Here, a crisp optimization problem is reformulated from FMOOP by taking into account the preference of decision maker (DM) and then PSO is applied to solve the resulting fuzzified MOOP. The presented approach is applied in order to solve the multi-objective series-parallel system reliability optimization problem for a crystallization unit of a urea plant.

It is shown that finding the equivalence set for solving multiobjective discrete optimization problems is advantageous over finding the set of Pareto optimal decisions. An example of a set of key parameters characterizing the economic efficiency of a commercial firm is proposed, and a mathematical model of its activities is constructed. In contrast to the classical problem of finding the maximum profit for any business, this study deals with a multiobjective optimization problem. A method for solving inverse multiobjective problems in a multidimensional pseudometric space is proposed for finding the best project of firm’s activities. The solution of a particular problem of this type is presented.

Construction site layout is multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem. However, the previous researchers treated site layout as a single objective optimization problem, which is far away from the reality. In this study, site layout was treated as MOO problem. The two objective functions are minimizing the likelihood of accidents happened and total handling cost of interaction flows between the facilities. The modified Pareto-based ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm was proposed to solve site layout problem. Moreover, fuzzy rule-based system was used to quantify the interaction flows. Finally, a case of office building was used to evaluate the modified Pareto-based ACO algorithm for solving MOO site layout problem. The results showed the feasibility and effectiveness of the modified Pareto-based ACO algorithm to solve MOO site layout problem.

Optimization problems in many industrial applications are very hard to solve. Many examples of them can be found in the design of aeronautical systems. In this field, the designer is frequently faced with the problem of considering not only a single design objective, but several of them, i.e., the designer needs to solve a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOP). In aeronautical systems design, aerodynamics plays a key role in aircraft design, as well as in the design of propulsion system components, such as turbine engines. Thus, aerodynamic shape optimization is a crucial task, and has been extensively studied and developed. Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) have gained popularity in recent years as optimization methods in this area, mainly because of their simplicity, their ease of use and their suitability to be coupled to specialized numerical simulation tools. In this chapter, we will review some of the most relevant research on the use of MOEAs to solve multi-objective and/or multi-disciplinary aerodynamic shape optimization problems. In this review, we will highlight some of the benefits and drawbacks of the use of MOEAs, as compared to traditional design optimization methods. In the second part of the chapter, we will present a case study on the application of MOEAs for the solution of a multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization problem.

The search region in multiobjective optimization problems is a part of the objective space where nondominated points could lie. It plays an important role in the generation of the nondominated set of multiobjective combinatorial optimization (MOCO) problems. In this paper, we establish the representation of the search region by half-open polyblocks (a variant concept of “polyblock” in monotonic optimization) and propose a new procedure for updating the search region. We also study the impact of stack policies to the new procedure and the existing methods that update the search region. Stack policies are then analyzed, pointing out their performance effectiveness by means of the results of rich computational experiments on finding the whole set of nondominated points of MOCO problems.

Genetic algorithm based multi-objective reliability optimization in interval environment

Editorial

The routing of multi-branch cable harness in aircraft relies heavily on manual work and experience, which is highly time-consuming. In order to realize the automatic 3D layout of multi-branch cable harness, this paper presents a novel approach by solving the layout as a multi-objective optimization problem that is NP-hard. The optimization objectives are to minimize the weight of multi-branch cables, to maximize the proportion of main roads, and to maximize the openness of the wiring path. Various regulatory and functional design rules are considered to be constraints. And the number and spatial position of branch points are taken as decision variables. As a result, a multi-objective layout optimization problem model of multi-branch cable based on Steiner tree is established. Then an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization based on decomposition (MOPSO/D) is proposed to obtain the Pareto solution set of multi-branch cable layout. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method is verified by the cable layout of the aircraft cabin.