Automatic dose reduction should not mask needs for individual dose reduction.

This study is to investigate the computed tomography (CT) image quality of the low- tube-voltage protocol with low contrast agent dose.CT portography was performed in 118 cirrhosis patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m2 under 2 protocols: Protocol A, tube voltage of 90 kVp/395 mAs and contrast agent dosage of 1.2 mL/kg, and, Protocol B, tube voltage of 120 kVp/200 mAs and contrast agent dosage of 1.5 mL/kg.The number of patients in each protocol was 59. The CT value noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in portal veins was comparatively analyzed between the 2 protocols. The subjective image quality was further assessed on 5-point scales. Radiation dose was also recorded and statistical analysis was performed.The CT value, CNR, and SNR of the images were higher at 90 kVp than those at 120 kVp (P < .05). There was no significant difference in image noise between the 2 protocols (P > .05). The CT dose index volume, dose-length product, and effective dose at 90 kVp were 18.2%, 16.0%, and 16.0% less than that at 120 kVp, respectively. There was no difference in image quality score between the 2 protocols (P > .05). The average amount of contrast agent was decreased by 17.8% when the 90 kVp protocol was used.CT portography at 90 kVp combined with low-dosage contrast agent leads to a significant reduction in radiation dose and improved SNR and CNR, without deterioration of image quality.

Estimates of individual patient risk, and epidemiologic studies assessing potential late effects, must use patient size–specific dose estimates—they cannot use only scanner output (volume CT dose index or dose-length product).

For the past several years, increased levels of imaging radiation and cumulative radiation to children has been a significant concern. Although several measures have been taken to reduce radiation dose during computed tomography (CT) scan, the newer dose reduction software adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) has been an effective technique in reducing radiation dose. To our knowledge, no studies are published that assess the effect of ASIR on extremity CT scans in children. To compare radiation dose, image noise, and subjective image quality in pediatric lower extremity CT scans acquired with and without ASIR. The study group consisted of 53 patients imaged on a CT scanner equipped with ASIR software. The control group consisted of 37 patients whose CT images were acquired without ASIR. Image noise, Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) were measured. Two pediatric radiologists rated the studies in subjective categories: image sharpness, noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts. The CTDI (p value = 0.0184) and DLP (p value <0.0002) were significantly decreased with the use of ASIR compared with non-ASIR studies. However, the subjective ratings for sharpness (p < 0.0001) and diagnostic acceptability of the ASIR images (p < 0.0128) were decreased compared with standard, non-ASIR CT studies. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces radiation dose for lower extremity CTs in children, but at the expense of diagnostic imaging quality. Further studies are warranted to determine the specific utility of ASIR for pediatric musculoskeletal CT imaging.

Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study

To evaluate if real-time dose visualisation during computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions leads to a reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists. The individual radiation dose radiologists are exposed to during CT interventions was measured using dedicated dosimeters (RaySafe i2-system, Unfors RaySafe GmbH, Billdal, Sweden) worn over the usual radiation protective apron. Initially, only the total radiation dose was measured, without visualisation (control group). In the following study period, the radiation dose was shown to participants on a live screen in real-time (experimental group). In both groups, the dose was recorded in 1-second intervals. The results collected were evaluated by comparison using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. In particular, the variables experience, gender, role, and position during the intervention were analysed. In total, 517 measurements of 304 interventions (n=249 with and n=268 without live screen) performed by 29 radiologists acting as interventionalists or assistants were analysed. All CT-guided interventions were performed percutaneously, the majority of which (n=280) were microwave ablations (MWA). Radiation doses in the group without visualisation were comparable with usual dose rates for the corresponding intervention type. The mean total radiation dose was reduced by 58.1% (11.6 versus 4.86 μSv) in the experimental group (p=0.034). The highest reduction of 78.5% (15.55 versus 3.35 μSv) was observed in radiologists with the role of assistant (p=0.002). Sub-analysis showed significant dose reduction (p<0.0001) for the use of live screen in general; considering all variables, the role "assistant" alone had a statistically significant influence (p=0.002). The real-time visualisation of active radiation dose during CT interventions leads to a relevant reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists.

Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT), is an X-ray procedure that generates high quality cross-sectional images of the body, and by comparison to other radiological diagnosis, is responsible for higher doses to patients. This work studies the doses and image qualities produced from the default primary scanning factors of a Siemens CT machine and afterwards came up with scanning protocols that allow radiologists to obtain the necessary diagnostic information while reducing radiation doses to as low as reasonably achievable. Methods : Approximately 1000 CT scans from mostly common examinations; head, thorax, abdomen and pelvis routines were selected and analyzed for their image quality and radiation doses over a two year interval. Dose measurements were performed for the same routines using Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) phantoms, RTI barracuda system with electrometer, and CT dose Profiler detector to evaluate the doses delivered during these CT procedures. Subsequently, image quality checks were performed using the CT Catphan 600 and anthropomorphic phantoms. CTDI and Dose Length Product (DLP) values were calculated for each scan. From analyzing these measurements, the appropriate machine scanning parameters were adjusted to reduce radiation does while at the same time providing good image quality. Results: Doses to patients using the default head sequence protocol had an average CTDI vol value of 65.45 mGy and a range of 7.10-16.80 mGy for thorax, abdomen and pelvis examinations whiles the new protocol had an average CTDI vol of 58.32 mGy for the head and a range of 3.83-15.24 mGy for the truck region. The DLP value for default head scans decreased from an average of 2279.85 mGy.cm to 874.53 mGy.cm with the new protocol. Tube potentials (KV) and tube current-time (mAs) had an effect on spatial resolution and low contrast detectability as well as doses. Conclusion : From the new protocols, lower values of KV and mAs together with other factors were enough to produce acceptable level of image quality which leads to adequate diagnosis without unnecessary doses to patients. ...................................................... Cite this article as: Acquah GF, Schiestl B,Cofie AY, Nkansah JO. Radiation dose reduction without degrading image quality during computed tomography examinations: Dosimetry and quality control study. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2 (3):02039. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0203.9

The number of CT (computed tomography) examinations in the diagnosis field has increased, and X-ray exposure to patients has also continued to increase. As the number of CT examinations is increasing in the general population, the number of pediatric CT examinations is rapidly increasing as well. The radiation dose from CT for pediatric patients remains a major concern because the risk related to ionizing radiations is higher in children than in adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast as a function of tube voltage (kVp) and tube current (mAs) in dierent phantoms, which were intended to simulate abdominal size, and to provide guidance on dose reduction on the basis of patient dimensions, as well as technical parameters. In this study, MDCT (multi-detector computed tomography) was used as an X-ray generator, and PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) phantoms were used in all experiments. PMMA phantom diameters were 10 cm, 16 cm, and 32 cm corresponding to newborn, age 5, and adult abdominal sizes, respectively. To evaluate radiation dose, the CTDIw (weighted CT dose index) was calculated from the CTDI measured using ion chamber, and to evaluate image quality, image noise and image contrast were measured from a scanned image. Finally, the CNRD (dose-weighted contrast-to-noise ratio) was calculated from the radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast to optimize the technical factors. The radiation dose increased as a function of kVp and mAs and decreased as a function of the phantom diameter. Especially, for increasing tube voltage from 80 to 140 kVp, there were 395.08% and 448.27% increases in radiation dose for 10 cm and 32 cm PMMA phantoms, respectively. The image noise decreased as a function of kVp and mAs and increased as a function of the phantom diameter. And, the image contrast decreased as a function of kVp and phantom diameter and remained fixed as a function of mAs. The values of the CNRD were maximum at 80 kVp for all three phantoms. The results of this study show that it is possible to reduce radiation dose and maintain image quality through the use of lower technical factors (kVp and mAs) for small-sized phantom corresponding to pediatric patients and to provide guidance on radiation dose reduction on the basis of the patient’s dimensions.

To evaluate effects of varying tube current and voltage on radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast with different phantom sizes and shapes. Four round lucite phantoms with 8-32-cm diameters were scanned with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and 80-120 kVp. Radiation dose was based on CT dose index, image noise, and iodine contrast and measured with constant and variable tube currents that were age appropriate for each tube voltage. Radiation dose and image noise and contrast were compared in round and oval 24-cm phantoms. For various combinations of technical factors and phantom sizes and shapes, percentage differences were calculated for radiation dose and image noise and contrast. Associations between tube voltage and radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast in round and oval phantoms were determined by fitting second-degree polynomials to data. Differences in radiation dose and image noise and contrast, which were attributable to differences in tube voltage, were tested with paired t tests. With 165-mAs tube current, radiation doses with 140- and 80-kVp tube voltages were 103% ([41.9 mGy - 20.6 mGy]/20.6 mGy) and 58% ([10.2 mGy - 4.2 mGy]/10.1 mGy) higher in the 8-cm phantom than in the 32-cm phantom. When tube current was adapted for phantom size, radiation dose at 80 kVp in the 8-cm phantom was reduced by 82% ([10.1 mGy - 1.8 mGy]/10.1 mGy). In the 8-cm phantom, tube voltage was decreased from 120 to 80 kVp and tube current remained at 165 mAs, resulting in a 68% noise increase ([3.1 HU - 1.8 HU]/1.8 HU). With variable tube current, 80-kVp tube voltage in the 8-cm phantom led to a 138% noise increase ([7.3 HU - 3.1 HU]/3.1 HU). With reduced tube voltage, image contrast increased. In the 8-cm phantom, with a constant 165-mAs tube current and a decrease in tube voltage from 120 to 80 kVp, there was a 35% ([333 HU - 217 HU]/333 HU) increase in contrast. No difference was noted in radiation dose or noise between round and oval phantoms (P = .604 and P = .06, respectively), but a small statistically significant difference (1%) in contrast attenuation was demonstrated (P = .025). Reduced tube voltage for pediatric contrast material-enhanced CT reduces radiation dose and maintains image contrast. Image noise increases, but the effect is minimal in smaller phantoms. An additional reduction in tube current further reduces radiation dose.

BackgroundCatheter laboratories are high-radiation exposure environments, especially during X-ray procedures like percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and electrophysiological studies. Radiation exposure poses risks of stochastic (e.g., cancer) and deterministic (e.g., skin changes) effects. This study assessed radiation safety and health practices in a cardiac catheterization unit to optimize radiation safety. A cross-sectional study in Cairo University Hospital (March–September 2019) evaluated 700 patients and healthcare workers. Real-time radiation measurements, educational lectures, and radiation protection measures were implemented in three phases. Data on radiation exposure, procedures, and compliance were collected and analyzed.ResultsThe total procedure time and fluoroscopy time per cardiologist did not significantly differ between phases, but there was a statistically significant reduction in the mean total cumulative radiation doses between Phase I and Phase III for cardiologists (P = 0.013). Among nurses and technicians, there was no significant difference in radiation doses between the two phases. Significant correlations were found between operators' radiation doses, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. Patients' radiation doses decreased significantly from Phase I to Phase III, with correlations between dose, procedure time, and gender. Compliance with radiation protection measures was suboptimal.ConclusionsCompliance with radiation safety standards in the cardiac catheterization unit at the Cairo University Hospital needs improvement. The study highlights the importance of adhering to radiation safety principles and optimizing protective measures to reduce radiation exposure for both patients and healthcare personnel. Despite low compliance, significant reductions in radiation doses were achieved with increased awareness and adherence to specific protection measures. Future efforts should focus on enhancing radiation safety protocols and organ-specific radiation impact assessments.

BackgroundReducing radiation and contrast media (CM) doses in computed tomography angiography (CTA) is especially relevant for potentially vulnerable populations. Low tube voltage photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) offers an improved iodine contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as compared to conventional CT scanners. We investigated optimized radiation and CM doses of PCD-CT angiography at low tube voltage in an animal model.MethodsSix minipigs (median weight: 32.5 kg; IQR: 29.8–34.6 kg) underwent thoracoabdominal CTA using a clinical dual-source PCD-CT at 70 kVp with three scan protocols: (A) reference (100% CM and radiation dose), (B) increased radiation (233%) and reduced CM (56%) dose, and (C) reduced radiation (50%) and increased CM (141%) dose. CNR, subjective image quality, and radiation doses were assessed, with statistical analysis including Mann–Whitney U-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests.ResultsCTDIvol was 1.7 mGy (IQR: 1.5–1.8) for scan A, 4.3 mGy (IQR: 3.8–4.7) for scan B, and 0.9 mGy (IQR: 0.8–1.0) for scan C (p < 0.001). CM volumes were 16 mL (IQR: 15–17) for scan A, 10 mL (IQR: 8–10) for scan B, and 23 mL (IQR: 21–24) for scan C. No significant differences in CNR were found between scans, with medians of 26 (IQR: 24–28) for scan A, 23 (IQR: 22–26) for scan B, and 26 (IQR: 24–30) for scan C (p = 0.276). Subjective image quality was similar across scans (p = 0.342).ConclusionLow tube voltage PCD-CT angiography allows substantial reductions in radiation and CM dose while maintaining stable and improved CNR, which allows further dose flexibility for individualized CTA protocols.Relevance statementPCD-CT at low tube voltage provides a high CNR and great flexibility in dose optimization, making it particularly effective for applications where minimizing radiation and CM exposure is a priority.Key PointsLow tube voltage imaging with photon counting detector (PCD)-CT enables flexible contrast and radiation dose optimization strategies in thoracoabdominal CT angiography (CTA).The CNR for thoracoabdominal CTA remains stable with appropriate contrast and radiation dose adjustments at low tube voltage PCD-CT.Low tube voltage PCD-CT consistently yields diagnostic image quality in thoracoabdominal angiography even at reduced contrast or radiation doses.Graphical

Effect of a Standardized Quality-Improvement Protocol on Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Introduction: Due to use of ionization radiation in the computed tomography (CT), optimal parameters should be used to reduce the risk of incidence of secondary cancers in patients who are constantly exposed to x-rays. To reduce the dose delivered to patients in each scan, CT technologists can change the image acquisition parameters. However, this reduces image quality. The present study aimed to optimize and reduce radiation dose in a CT of the paranasal sinuses while minimizing deterioration of image quality. Methods: In this study patients were divided in two groups: Group A was scanned axially and coronally using default parameters, while Group B was scanned axially and coronally using new parameters. Common CT dose descriptors including weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw), volumetric CTDI (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), effective dose (ED) and image noise were measured for each group. The patients’ organ doses were estimated using the ImPACT CT patient Dosimetry Calculator. The tube voltage, tube current, pitch, rotation time, and other parameters were then reduced and optimized. After reconstruction and analysis, all of the images were of good diagnostic quality in both groups Results: Using the new parameters, good agreement was found between the direct and reconstructed images. The CT parameters were reduced by the following proportions: kVp—16.6%, mA—75%, rotation time—20%, and mAs—80%. However, these reductions did not obscure any anatomical landmarks. These parameters reduced the CTDIw, CTDIvol and DLP by 88.2%, 91.3%, and 91.3% respectively. Conclusion: The results suggest that the use of a Bone algorithm reduces the total amount of radiation used during CT of the sinuses. We recommend using these parameters in children, in the evaluation of facial trauma, and in emergency CT of the paranasal sinuses.

Background Currently there is a trend towards reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality during computer tomography (CT) examination. This results from the concerns about radiation exposure from CT and the potential increase in the incidence of radiation induced carcinogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the lowest radiation dose for maintaining good image quality in adult chest scanning using GE CT equipment. Methods Seventy-two adult patients were examined by Gemstone Spectral CT. They were randomly divided into six groups. We set up a different value of noise index (NI) when evaluating each group every other number from 13.0 to 23.0. The original images were acquired with a slice of 5 mm thickness. For each group, several image series were reconstructed using different levels of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) (30%, 50%, and 70%). We got a total of 18 image sequences of different combinations of NI and ASIR percentage. On one hand, quantitative indicators, such as CT value and standard deviation (SD), were assessed at the region of interest. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The volume CT dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded. On the other hand, two radiologists with ≥5 years of experience blindly reviewed the subjective image quality using the standards we had previously set. Results The different combinations of noise index and ASIR were assessed. There was no significant difference in CT values among the 18 image sequences. The SD value was reduced with the noise index's reduction or ASIR's increase. There was a trend towards gradually lower SNR and CNR with an NI increase. The CTDI and DLP were diminishing as the NI increased. The scores from subjective image quality evaluation were reduced in all groups as the ASIR increased. Conclusions Increasing NI can reduce radiation dose. With the premise of maintaining the same image quality, using a suitable percentage of ASIR can increase the value of NI. To assure image quality, we concluded that when the NI was set at 17.0 and ASIR was 50%, the image quality could be optimal for not only satisfying the requirements of clinical diagnosis, but also achieving the purpose of low-dose scanning.

In CT scanning, image quality has many components and is influenced by many technical parameters. While image quality has always been a concern for the physics community, clinically acceptable image quality has become even more of an issue as strategies to reduce radiation dose — to all patients, but especially to pediatric patients— has become a focus in many radiology practices.The purpose of this presentation will be to first describe several of the components of CT image quality — noise, slice thickness (Z‐axis resolution), low contrast resolution and high contrast resolution— as well as radiation dose and to describe how each of these may be affected by technical parameter selection. This presentation will pay particular attention to the tradeoffs that exist between different aspects of image quality, especially when the reduction of radiation dose is one of the objectives.The presentation will then explore several mechanisms that can be used to reduce radiation dose in CT exams and the implications for the diagnostic image quality of the exam. Specifically, the implications of varying the tube current*time product (mAs), pitch or tablespeed (or for axial imaging, the table increment), slice thickness, beam energy (kVp), patient (or phantom) size and dose reduction options (such as tube current modulation) will be described for both radiation dose and diagnostic image quality. Finally, this presentation will emphasize that the tradeoffs between radiation dose and image quality are clinical‐task dependent; that is, the goals of the clinically indicated exam dictate what aspect of image quality may be emphasized for that exam (low contrast resolution or high contrast spatial resolution, etc.) and this will have implications for the amount of radiation dose reduction that is acceptable. This will be illustrated with examples from selected diagnostic imaging exams.Educational Objectives:1. Understand key components of image quality in CT scanning as well as reinforce CT radiation dose concepts.2. Understand the impact that technical parameter selection has on the various aspects of image quality and radiation dose.3. Examine the tradeoffs between various aspects of image quality and radiation dose.4. Examine the impact of these tradeoffs on a few clinical imaging protocols and illustrate the task‐dependence of image quality requirements.