• https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198515760.003.0006Copy DOI Icon

Basic Issues

  • Jan 8, 2004
  • Wesley Petersen +1 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Since first proposed by Gordon Moore (an Intel founder) in 1965, his law [107] that the number of transistors on microprocessors doubles roughly every one to two years has proven remarkably astute. Its corollary, that central processing unit (CPU) performance would also double every two years or so has also remained prescient. Figure 1.1 shows Intel microprocessor data on the number of transistors beginning with the 4004 in 1972. Figure 1.2 indicates that when one includes multi-processor machines and algorithmic development, computer performance is actually better than Moore’s 2-year performance doubling time estimate. Alas, however, in recent years there has developed a disagreeable mismatch between CPU and memory performance: CPUs now outperform memory systems by orders of magnitude according to some reckoning [71]. This is not completely accurate, of course: it is mostly a matter of cost. In the 1980s and 1990s, Cray Research Y-MP series machines had well balanced CPU to memory performance. Likewise, NEC (Nippon Electric Corp.), using CMOS (see glossary, Appendix F) and direct memory access, has well balanced CPU/Memory performance. ECL (see glossary, Appendix F) and CMOS static random access memory (SRAM) systems were and remain expensive and like their CPU counterparts have to be carefully kept cool. Worse, because they have to be cooled, close packing is difficult and such systems tend to have small storage per volume. Almost any personal computer (PC) these days has a much larger memory than supercomputer memory systems of the 1980s or early 1990s. In consequence, nearly all memory systems these days are hierarchical, frequently with multiple levels of cache. Figure 1.3 shows the diverging trends between CPUs and memory performance. Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) in some variety has become standard for bulk memory. There are many projects and ideas about how to close this performance gap, for example, the IRAM [78] and RDRAM projects [85]. We are confident that this disparity between CPU and memory access performance will eventually be tightened, but in the meantime, we must deal with the world as it is.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Low power reconfigurable FPGA based on SRAM

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • A Priadarshini +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

A Comparative Analysis of 65nm CMOS SRAM and Commercial SRAMs in Security Vulnerability Evaluation

  • Nov 01, 2018
  • Weng-Geng Ho +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

HSCS: a hybrid shared cache scheduling scheme for multiprogrammed workloads

  • Jun 04, 2018
  • Frontiers of Computer Science
  • Jingyu Zhang +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Performance evaluation of SRAM design using different field effect transistors

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • E3S Web of Conferences
  • Venkataiah C +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

A Study of Single Event Upsets in Static RAMS's

  • Jan 01, 1980
  • IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
  • W E Price +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations84

Nanoelectromechanical (NEM) relays integrated with CMOS SRAM for improved stability and low leakage

  • Nov 02, 2009
  • Soogine Chong +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations13

A Low Power and High Performance SOI SRAM Circuit Design with Improved Cell Stability

  • Oct 01, 2006
  • Proceedings - IEEE International SOI Conference/Proceedings
  • R Joshi +11
  • Research Article

Systematic Analysis on Memory Technology of It Applications and Optimization

  • Dec 31, 2024
  • Science and Technology of Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Protection
  • Dylan Quanhan Chen
  • Research Article

Systematic Analysis on Memory Technology of It Applications and Optimization.

  • Nov 12, 2024
  • Science and Technology of Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Protection
  • Dylan Quanhan Chen
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

THE SEARCH FOR A NEW MACHINE.

  • Apr 14, 2015
  • Scientific American
  • John Pavlus
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Monocrystalline Half-Metallic NiMnSb Thin Films: Preparation and Characterization

  • Jan 01, 2006
  • Delia Ristoiu +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Two-Port PCM Architecture for Network Processing

  • Oct 01, 2015
  • IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
  • Jiayin Li +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

A Universal Performance Chart for CPU Cooling Devices

  • Jul 01, 2008
  • Heat Transfer Engineering
  • Kim Choon Ng +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

A 14-ns 1-Mbit CMOS SRAM with variable bit organization

  • Jan 01, 1988
  • IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
  • Y Kohno +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Bit line sensing strategy for testing for dataretention faults in CMOS SRAMs

  • Jul 06, 2000
  • Electronics Letters
  • V.H Champac +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.