Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Medial Funnel Technique

The medial cortical pedicle screw—a new technique for cervical pedicle screw placement with partial drilling of medial cortex

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated in posterior scoliosis surgeries with or without the use of computer-assisted surgical techniques. In this retrospective cohort study, the pedicle screw placement accuracy in posterior scoliosis surgery was compared between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted surgical techniques. There has been no study systemically analyzing the perforation pattern and comparative accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery. The 45 patients who received posterior correction surgeries were divided into 2 groups: Group C, manual control (25 patients); and Group N, navigation surgery (20 patients). The average Cobb angles were 73.7 degrees and 73.1 degrees before surgery in Group C and Group N, respectively. Using CT images, vertebral rotation, pedicle axes as measured to anteroposterior sacral axis and vertebral axis, and insertion angle error were measured. In perforation cases, the angular tendency, insertion point, and length abnormality were evaluated. The perforation was observed in 11% of Group C and 1.8% in Group N. In Group C, medial perforations of left screws were demonstrated in 8 of 9 perforated screws and 55% were distributed either in L1 or T12. The perforation consistently occurred in pedicles in which those axes approached anteroposterior sacral axis within 5 degrees . The average insertion errors were 8.4 degrees and 5.0 degrees in Group C and Group N, respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.02). The medial perforation in Group C occurred around L1, especially when pedicle axis approached anteroposterior sacral axis. This consistent tendency was considered as the limitation of fluoroscopic screw insertion in which horizontal vertebral image was not visible. The use of surgical navigation system successfully reduced the perforation rate and insertion angle errors, demonstrating the clear advantage in safe and accurate pedicle screw placement of scoliosis surgery.

This was a prospective, nonrandomized study. To assess the accuracy of O-arm navigation-based pedicle screw insertion in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and to compare it with free-hand pedicle screw insertion technique in matched population. O-arm navigation is latest in navigation technology that can provide real-time intraoperative images in 3 dimensions while placing the pedicle screws to improve intraoperative pedicle screw accuracy. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a locally unstable pathology and placement of pedicle screws can cause increased rotation and translation of the vertebral body. However, is this motion detected by the tracker placed across the unstable segment, is a matter of debate. Inability to detect these positional changes can lead to pedicle perforation while inserting screws using navigation. No study has evaluated the role of O-arm navigation in this patient population. The study population was divided into 2 groups with 19 patients each, one comprising patients who underwent O-arm navigation-based pedicle screw insertion (group 1) and the other comprising patients who underwent free-hand pedicle screw insertion technique (group 2). A total of 152 pedicle screws were implanted in 38 patients for 1-level instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Intraoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography scans using the O-arm were obtained for all patients after insertion of pedicle screws. The images were reviewed intraoperatively and postoperatively for the analysis of pedicle breaches. Assessments in either of the group included (i) accuracy of placement of screws; (ii) the rate and direction of perforation; and (iii) the number of segments the perforated screw was away from the navigation tracker. Mean age of patients in group 1 (O-arm navigation-assisted) was 60 years (SD 11.25; range, 37-73 y), whereas in group 2 (free-hand pedicle screw) was 62 years (SD 18.07; range, 36-90 y). Overall anatomic perforation rate was 12.5% (19/152). Individually, group 1 had 14.47% (11/76) of perforations in comparison with 10.53% (8/76) observed in group 2. The difference was not statistically significant. The lateral margin was the most common site of perforation in both group 1 (64%, 7/11) and group 2 (62.5%, 5/8). Functional perforation rate for the series was 3.3% (5/152), with group 1 having 2.63% (2/76) and group 2 having 3.95% (3/76). The rate of perforation (PR) was significantly higher statistically when the tracker was placed 3 or more [PR 37.5% (6/16)] spinal segments away from instrumented segment compared with when it was placed 1 (0%) or 2 [PR 13.89% (5/36)] spinal segments away. Overall, 11 screws (11/152, 7.24%) had grade 2 perforations and had to be revised. No neurological complications were observed in the series. O-arm navigation does not provide any significant advantage over conventional free-hand pedicle screw insertion technique in patients with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis. The accuracy is dependent on the distance of the tracker from the level of instrumentation. Lateral perforations are more common because of instability at the instrumented level leading to translation and rotation of the vertebral body while placing pedicle screws leading to preferential lateral trajectory. These lateral perforations could not be prevented by using navigation. However, no significant complications were noted in either technique.

The use of thoracic pedicle screws for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has gained widespread popularity. However, the placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine poses unique challenges, and surgeons experience a learning curve. The in vivo accuracy as determined by computed tomography (CT) of placement of thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine as a function of surgeon experience is unknown. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the effect of surgeon experience on the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in AIS. In 2005, we started to obtain routine postoperative CT scans on patients undergoing a spinal fusion. From a database of these patients, we selected AIS patients, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion. Fifteen consecutive patients for each of the following three groups stratified by attending surgeon experience were selected (N = 45): A) less than 20 cases of all pedicle screw constructs for AIS (surgeons <2 years of practice), B) 20-50 cases (surgeons 2-5 years of practice), and C) greater than 50 cases (surgeons greater than 5 years of practice). Intraoperative evaluation of all screws included probing of the pedicle screw tract, neurophysiologic monitoring, and fluoroscopic confirmation. A total of 856 thoracic pedicle screws were studied. Postoperative CT scans were evaluated by two spine surgeons and a consensus read established as follows: (1) In: intraosseous placement or <or=2-mm breach, (2) Out: >2-mm breach, either medial or lateral. Of the 856 screws, 104 demonstrated a >2-mm breach, for an overall rate of 12.1% (medial = 55, lateral = 49, P = 0.67). When the breach rates were stratified by surgeon experience, there was a trend toward decreased rate of breach for the most experienced surgeons, although this did not attain statistical significance (Group A: 12.7%, Group B: 12.9%, Group C: 10.8%, P = 0.58). However, the most experienced group (C) had a markedly decreased rate of medial breaches (3.5 vs. 7.4% and 8.4% for groups A and B, respectively, P < 0.01). The breach rate for the concave periapical screws was not statistically different from the overall breach rate (13.0% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.93). In conclusion, the overall accuracy of placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine was 87.9%, with no neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications. Meticulous technique allows spine surgeons with a range of surgical experience to accurately and safely place thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine. The most experienced surgeons demonstrated the lowest rate of medial breaches.

In the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, posterior correction and fusion in freehand technique is a proven procedure and is frequently performed. Malpositioned pedicle screws can result in serious neurovascular complications. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and neurophysiological measurements are performed to ensure the correct position of pedicle screws. Newer procedures with fluoroscopic- and computertomographic-assisted navigation are advertised as less dangerous and with a more accurate screw position. Is the freehand technique used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis safer than other methods with regard to complications caused by screw malposition and intraoperative radiation exposure? Register data of 34 consecutive idiopathic scoliosis patients with two structural curves (Lenke 3 and 6) were collected prospectively in our scoliosis center and were retrospectively analyzed. The following parameters were evaluated: total radiation product, time of fluoroscopy, number of fused segments, time of operation, blood loss, screw-related complications and number of instrumented pedicle screws. All values were given as mean ± standard deviation and statistically analyzed. Finally, our data were compared on accuracy of screw placement and radiation exposure to data from literature with screw placement under navigation. Average age at the time of surgery was 23.6 ± 12 years. The average thoracic curve was 69.2 ± 14.2° preoperatively and 21.7 ± 12.8° postoperatively (correction 69.9%), the average lumbar curve was 64.3° ± 10.8° preoperatively and corrected to 15.6 ± 10.4° postoperatively (correction 76.2%). The total radiation product per patient was 145.7 ± 86.1 cGy*cm², the time of fluoroscopy 31.7 ± 23.5 s (11.5 segments), the time of operation 267.2 ± 64.1 min and the blood loss 700.4 ± 522.3 ml. A total of 803 pedicle screws were placed. No screw-associated complications were detected in the entire collective. The comparison of our data with freehand placement of pedicle screws to literature data showed a noticeable higher radiation exposure for the patient during fluoroscopic- and computertomographic-assisted navigation. The results showed that positioning of pedicle screws with freehand technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is accompanied with considerably lower intraoperative radiation exposure compared to fluoroscopic- or computertomographic-assisted navigation. An increased radiation exposure of these typically young patients is associated with an increased long-term risk for the occurrence of radiation-induced malignant diseases. With appropriate surgical experience, placement of pedicle screws in freehand technique is safe and effective and with similar accuracy than screws placed under navigation, but produces significantly less radiation exposure to the patients.

A retrospective study. To evaluate the reliability of computed tomography (CT) with low radiation dose in the assessment of implant status in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The use of all-pedicle screw construct in scoliosis corrective surgery continues to gain increasing popularity since their introduction 1994 although their use in the thoracic spine carries a potential risk for neurovascular complications. CT is the method widely used to evaluate screw placement. Retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive low-dose spine CT in patients with AIS after posterior corrective surgery. Status of 809 titanium screws (642 thoracic) was evaluated. The degree of interobserver and intraobserver agreements about implant status was used as an indicator of the reliability of the low-dose spine CT in the assessment of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion. A new grading system has been developed for this purpose. Five types of misplacement have been evaluated: lateral, medial, and anterior cortical perforations; endplate perforation; and foraminal perforation. The analysis has shown a substantial interobserver and intraobserver agreements (kappa: 0.69 and 0.76, respectively) in differentiating pedicle screws with acceptable placement from screws with partial or total cortical perforation. None of the examinations was subjectively classified as unreliable. The study has shown that low-dose spine CT is a reliable method in evaluating screw placement in patients with AIS after posterior scoliosis surgery with titanium implants, using the here proposed grading system. The new grading system of screw misplacement was feasible and in line with the general agreement about the harmlessness of misplacement with minor pedicle breach. The reliability of low-dose spine CT in evaluation of lateral and medial cortical perforations was substantial. To reduce the radiation load, the postoperative assessment of titanium implants should be performed with low-dose CT.

Posterior corrective surgery using "all pedicle screw construct" carries risk of neurovascular complications. The study aims were to assess the screw placement in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using CT with low-radiation dose, and to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients with misplaced pedicle screws. CTs of 49 consecutive patients (873 screws, 79% thoracic) were retrospectively evaluated by two independent radiologists. A new grading system was developed to distinguish between lateral, medial and anterior cortical perforations, endplate perforation and foraminal perforation. The grading system is based on whether the cortical violation is partial or total rather than on mm-basis. The overall rate of screw misplacement was 17% (n = 149): 8% were laterally placed and 6.1% were medially placed. The rates of anterior cortical, endplate and foraminal perforation were 1.5, 0.9, and 0.5%, respectively. Lateral cortical perforation was more frequent in the thoracic spine (P = 0.005), whereas other types of misplacement including medial cortical perforation were more frequent on the left and the concave side of scoliotic curves (P = 0.002 and 0.003). No neurovascular complications were reported. The association between the occurrence of screw misplacement and the Cobb angle was statistically significant (P = 0.037). Misplacements exceeding half screw diameter should be classified as unacceptable. Low-dose CT implies exposing these young individuals to a significantly lower radiation dose than do other protocols used in daily clinical practice. We recommend using low-dose CT and the grading system proposed here in the postoperative assessment of screw placement.

BackgroundPercutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a key step in several minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) procedures. Traditional technique for PPS makes use of C-arm fluoroscopy assistance (FA). More recently, newer intraoperative imaging techniques have been developed for PPS, including CT-guided navigation (CTNav). The aim of this study was to compare FA and CTNav techniques for PPS with regard to accuracy, complications, and radiation dosage.Materials and methodsA total of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and canal stenosis who underwent MISS posterior fusion ± interbody fusion through transforaminal approach (TLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Pedicle screws were placed percutaneously using either standard C-arm fluoroscopy guidance (FA group) or CT navigation (CTNav group). Intraoperative effective dose (ED, mSv) was measured. Screw placement accuracy was assessed postoperatively on a CT scan using Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grades A–E). Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared in both groups before and after surgery.ResultsA total of 101 and 91 procedures were performed with FA (FA group) and CTNav approach (CTNav group), respectively. Median age was 61 years in both groups, and the most commonly treated level was L4–L5. Median ED received from patients was 1.504 mSv (0.494–4.406) in FA technique and 21.130 mSv (10.840–30.390) in CTNav approach (p < 0.001). Percentage of grade A and B screws was significantly higher for the CTNav group (96.4% versus 92%, p < 0.001), whereas there were 16 grade E screws in the FA group and 0 grade E screws in the CTNav group (p < 0.001). A total of seven and five complications were reported in the FA and CTNav group, respectively (p = 0.771).ConclusionsCTNav technique increases accuracy of pedicle screw placement compared with FA technique without affecting operative time. Nevertheless, no significant difference was noted in terms of reoperation rate due to screw malpositioning between CTNav and FA techniques. Radiation exposure of patients was significantly higher with CTNav technique.Level of Evidence: Level 3.

A prospective clinical study of thoracic pedicle screws monitored with triggered electromyographic testing. To evaluate the sensitivity of recording rectus abdominis triggered electromyographs to assess thoracic screw placement. Triggered electromyographic testing from lower extremity myotomes has identified medially placed lumbar pedicle screws. Higher thresholds indicate intraosseous placement because of increased resistance to current flow. Lower thresholds correspond to compromised pedicles with potential for nerve impingement. No clinical study has correlated an identical technique with rectus muscle recordings, which are innervated from T6 to T12. A total of 677 thoracic screws were placed in 92 consecutive patients. Screws placed from T6 and T12 were evaluated using an ascending method of stimulation until a compound muscle action potential was obtained from the rectus abdominis. Threshold values were compared both in absolute terms and also in relation to other intrapatient values. Screws were separated into three groups: Group A (n = 650 screws) had thresholds >6.0 mA and intraosseus placement. Group B (n = 21) had thresholds <6.0 mA but an intact medial pedicle border on reexamination and radiographic confirmation. Group C (n = 6) had thresholds <6.0 mA and medial wall perforations confirmed by tactile and/or visual inspection. Thus, 3.9% (27 of 677) of all screws had thresholds <6.0 mA. Only 22% (6 of 27) had medial perforation. Group B screws averaged a 54% decrease from the mean as compared with a 69% decrease for Group C screws (P = 0.0160). There were no postoperative neurologic deficits or radicular chest wall complaints. To assess thoracic pedicle screw placement, triggered electromyographic thresholds <6.0 mA, coupled with values 60-65% decreased from the mean of all other thresholds in a given patient, should alert the surgeon to suspect a medial pedicle wall breach.

O-Arm Assisted Cervicothoracic Spine Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy Is Higher Than C-Arm Fluoroscopy

The risks of pedicle wall breech with larger screws after undertapping

To evaluate the accuracy of a novel guidance method of pedicle screw implantation determined by spinal stress. We retrospectively analyzed patients underwent pedicle screw internal fixation between January 2015 and August 2018 in our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to the methods of pedicle screw implantation namely, the conventional nail placement and novel guidance method of pedicle screw implantation determined by spinal stress. Accuracy of spinal pedicle screw placements was evaluated using intraoperative and postoperative X-ray computed tomography (CT) examination and intraoperative touch of nerve root dissection pedicle bone. The success rate of intraoperative one-time screw placement was calculated according to Heary classification I. A total of 785 patients underwent pedicle screw internal fixation were retrospectively analyzed. Among them 384 patients were treated using conventional nail placement (Group A) and 401 patients were treated using the technique according to analysis of spinal stress (Group B). There was no significant difference in terms of the characteristics between two groups. There were significant differences in terms of the success rate of total of screw placement (88.7% vs. 96.2%, P < 0.001) including thoracic screw placement (87.8% vs. 94.5%, P = 0.003) and lumbar screw placement (88.8% vs. 96.5%, P = 0.001) for Group A and Group B, respectively. Using the novel guidance method of pedicle screw implantation determined by spinal stress might improve the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation.

Obliterating atherosclerosis ranks third in the system of cardiovascular disease. With age the incidence of peripheral artery disease increases and makes 3-5% in general population. The most difficult group of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) or obliterating atherosclerosis is elderly patients. Currently there is a tendency to increase the life expectancy and aging of the Belarusian population. Elderly and senile patients with obliterating atherosclerosis (PAD) are characterized by a multi-level lesion and damage to the distal parts of the arterial bed, an increase in the number of comorbidities, a high risk of cardiovascular death, and seeking medical help often at the stage of critical lower limb ischemia. Patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications with intermittent lameness are subject to conservative treatment. When developing a clinic for critical lower limb ischemia, due to the low effectiveness of conservative methods of treatment, it is worth considering revascularization of the lower limb arteries. Open surgical methods of treatment are associated with a high risk of complications and mortality. X-ray endovascular methods of treatment of patients of the older age group are characterized by a lower risk of complications, lower injury rate. The use of low-injury x-ray endovascular and hybrid methods of treatment in elderly and senile patients can improve the results of treatment (reduce the frequency of amputations, reduce the risk of complications, improve the quality of life).

Objective: To comparing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) between robotic-assisted and traditional freehand techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included 92 patients with ADS who underwent posterior spinal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital) between March 2019 and December 2023. There were 19 males and 73 females with a mean age of (63.6±9.8) years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the technique used for pedicle screw placement: robot-assisted group (34 cases) and manual group (58 cases). Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, facet joint violation, postoperative complications, magnitude of curve correction, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 1 month postoperatively were compared and analyzed between the two groups. The Gertzbein-Robbins classification criteria was used to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Results: Differences in baseline data, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, magnitude of curve correction, and VAS and ODI scores preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 1 month postoperatively between the two groups exhibited no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the robot-assisted group was significantly higher than that in the manual group [90.9% (416/458) vs 80.1% (697/870), P<0.001]. In terms of surgical segments, in T1-T12 and L1-S1 segments, the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the robot group were both significantly higher than those in the control group [91.5% (130/142) vs 77.8% (186/239), P=0.001; 90.3% (271/300) vs 80.8% (502/621), P<0.001]. However, no significant differences was observed in the accuracy of S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement between the two groups [90.0%(9/10) vs 93.8%(15/16), P=0.727]. Moreover, no significant differences was found in the deviation direction of the cortical screw penetration between both groups (P=0.133). Significant differences were observed in the accuracy of screw placement between the Nash Moe 2 and 3 vertebral bodies in the robot group compared with those in the control group [88.9% (88/99) vs 71.0% (115/162), P=0.001; 89.2% (83/93) vs 60.2% (68/113), P<0.001]. Additionally, the incidence and grade of facet joint violation in the manual group were both significantly higher than those in the robot-assisted group (both P<0.001). No statistically significant differences was identified in postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.841). Conclusion: It suggests that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in posterior surgery for patients with ADS can significantly improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce the incidence of facet joint violation.

The authors conducted a study to determine if the rigidity supplied to the spine by posterior placement of the Ray threaded fusion cage (TFC) is further enhanced by the placement of pedicle screws and, additionally, if bilateral anteriorly placed TFCs render the spine more rigid than a single anteriorly placed TFC. Ten human cadaveric spinal specimens (L2-S1) were affixed within a testing frame. Loads of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm were applied to the spine in six degrees of freedom: flexion-extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Motion in an x, y, and z cartesian axis system was tracked using dual video cameras following light-emitting diodes attached to the spine and base plate. Load testing of the spines was performed in the intact mode, following which the spinal segments were randomized to receive anterior or posterior instrumentation. In five spine specimens we performed posterior discectomy, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with placement of femoral rings and pedicle screws, PLIF with bilateral TFCs, and bilateral TFCs with pedicle screws. Five other spines underwent anterior-approach discectomy, followed by implantation of a unilateral cage and bilateral cages. Load testing was performed after each step. Spines in which PLIF with pedicle screws and TFCs with pedicle screws were placed were more rigid than after discectomy in all directions of motion except flexion. Anterior discectomy provided significantly (p < or = 0.05) less stability in left and right axial rotation than the intact spines and following posterior discectomy. Following anterior implantation of bilateral TFCs, spines were significantly more rigid than after discectomy in all directions except extension.