Electrophoresis on Enantioseparations 2024.
As one can see from just a few papers dealing with the topic of Enantioseparation in this volume of Electrophoresis, this field appears to have maturated, and the number of research groups still performing innovative research on this topic decreases. There are several objective and subjective reasons for this. One of the reasons is that the separation of enantiomers of chiral compounds, which was a huge challenge 40–50 years ago, is a routine laboratory task currently. The other reason is that research and publications in some trendy areas, such as omics, get better funded, more easily published, and well cited compared with research and publications related to enantioseparations and fundamental aspects of enantioselective molecular recognition. When preparing the previous issue of Electrophoresis on Enantioseparations 2021, we sent about 200 invitations and received numerous submissions, but unfortunately, many of them were rejected due to their low quality. When preparing this special issue, we invited fewer but only high-quality groups, and the rejection rate was lower. However, unfortunately this time, we had fewer manuscripts accepted for publication, even compared with the last issue. Even more troubling is the fact that, of these accepted high-quality manuscripts, only very few deal with capillary electrophoresis (CE), none of them with capillary electrochromatography (CEC), and most of them deal with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). It is absolutely normal that challenging problems drive the research activity of scientists. Such challenges appear, get addressed, disappear, and new challenges arise in time. Thus, one cannot promote any kind of research if there is no real driving reason for that, and, of course, this is also not my task in this short Editorial. Because I have performed research in capillary electromigration techniques over the last 30 years, I just want to share, in a few sentences, my personal opinion about these techniques, their potential, their present, and their future. I remember well the fascination of scientists with both CE and CEC in the 1990s. Both techniques offer something special that is still not offered by any other separative and/or non-separative technique(s), and this makes it very hard for me to accept observing these techniques losing popularity. On a technical note, both techniques are environmentally friendly miniaturized techniques, and with the current fashion about green, sustainable, and circular chemistry, it is just not logical to take CE and CEC out of the repertoire of chemistry. On a fundamental note, both of these techniques offer extremely high separation efficiency with certain positive consequences, which are unmet by other techniques. In addition, electrokinetically driven flow is easier to generate without using mechanics (pumps), to direct, measure, and control. For those who are interested in understanding recognition processes on a molecular level (among them also enantioselective recognition), it must be underlined that CE is the technique with highest sensitivity to detect (inter)molecular recognition. It is true that performing CE and CEC experiments is not as easy and comfortable as the standard HPLC experiment. However, based on my over 30 years of experience, this challenge is very rewarding and worth being taken up. Thus, I sincerely hope that for the next special issue of Electrophoresis on Enantioseparations, we will receive more high-quality submissions based on capillary electromigration techniques. I would like to express my thanks to the Editors-in-Chief of Electrophoresis, Dr. Blanca Lapizco-Encinas and Prof. Hermann Wätzig, as well as the journal publisher, for supporting this special issue and for pleasant and efficient cooperation. My special thanks go also to all authors for submitting their high-quality works for publication in this issue and to all reviewers for their time, efforts, and competent comments. April 29, 2024.
Read more