• https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-125-rc2Copy DOI Icon

Comment on hess-2022-125

  • Jun 17, 2022
  • Zhaofei Liu
Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

According to 230 flux site observations, intra-day and diurnal ground heat flux (G) accounted for 19.2 % and 28.8 % of the corresponding net radiation, respectively. This indicates that G plays an important role in remote sensing (RS) evapotranspiration (ET) models. The accuracy of the five G simulation methods in the surface energy balance-based RS ET models was evaluated using half-hourly observations. The linear coefficient (LC) method and the methods embedded with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were able to accurately simulate a half-hourly G series at most sites. The mean and median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of all sites were generally higher than 0.50 in each half-hour period. However, the two methods embedded by fractional vegetation coverage showed poor performance in most half-hour periods, except the sunrise and sunset periods, with the mean and median NSE values of all sites below 0.20. The accuracy of each method varied significantly at different sites and at half-hour intervals. The highest accuracy was exhibited during sunrise periods (6:00–7:00), followed by sunset periods (17:00–18:00). There were 92 % (211/230) sites with an NSE of the LC method greater than 0.50 at 6:30. It showed a slightly higher accuracy during night periods than during daytime periods. The lowest accuracy was observed at noon periods (10:00–15:30). The sites with an NSE exceeding 0.50 only accounted for 51 % (118/230) and 43 % (100/230) at 10:30 and 13:30, respectively. The accuracy of Northern Hemisphere sites was generally higher than that of Southern Hemisphere sites. In general, the highest and lowest accuracies were observed at the high- and low-latitude sites, respectively. The performance of the LC method and the methods embedded with NDVI were generally satisfactory at the Eurasian and North American sites, with the NSE values of most sites exceeding 0.70. Conversely, it exhibited relatively poor performance at the African, South American, and Oceanian sites, especially the African sites. Both the temporal and spatial distributions of the accuracy of the G simulation were positively correlated with the correlation between G and the net radiation. Although the G simulation methods accurately simulated the G series at most sites and time periods, their performance was poor at some sites and time periods. The application of RS ET datasets covering these sites requires caution. The optimal parameter value for each method varied greatly at different sites. This indicates that the fixed parameter values in the G simulation methods are not appropriate. Further improvement of G simulations at these sites and time periods is recommended for the RS ET modelers.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Evapotranspiration in the Tono Reservoir Catchment in Upper East Region of Ghana Estimated by a Novel TSEB Approach from ASTER Imagery

  • Feb 08, 2020
  • Remote Sensing
  • Abdullah Alhassan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations79

Multi-scale evaluation of global evapotranspiration products derived from remote sensing images: Accuracy and uncertainty

  • Aug 01, 2022
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Wenbin Zhu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Remotely sensed ET for streamflow modelling in catchments with contrasting flow characteristics: an attempt to improve efficiency

  • Mar 14, 2018
  • Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
  • A Kunnath-Poovakka +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

SCHEDULING IRRIGATION IN HETEROGENEOUS CONTAINER NURSERY CROPS

  • May 01, 2014
  • Acta Horticulturae
  • L Incrocci +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

Identification and Quantification of Actual Evapotranspiration Using Integrated Satellite Data for Sustainable Water Management in Dry Areas

  • Sep 09, 2022
  • Agronomy
  • Rania Gamal +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Development of a Benchmark Eddy Flux Evapotranspiration Dataset for Evaluation of Satellite-Driven Evapotranspiration Models Over the CONUS

  • Jan 27, 2023
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • John M Volk +17
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Post-processed data and graphical tools for a CONUS-wide eddy flux evapotranspiration dataset

  • May 30, 2023
  • Data in Brief
  • J.M Volk +25
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Comment on hess-2020-669

  • Feb 07, 2021
  • Sangchul Lee +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Sensitivity for Correlated Input Variables and Propagated Errors in Evapotranspiration Estimates From a Humid Region

  • Aug 01, 1996
  • Water Resources Research
  • Hosung Ahn
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations67

Calibration and Validation of SWAT Model by Using Hydrological Remote Sensing Observables in the Lake Chad Basin

  • Mar 21, 2022
  • Remote Sensing
  • Ali Bennour +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Land-surface evapotranspiration derived from a first-principles primary production model

  • Oct 01, 2021
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Shen Tan +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Annual evapotranspiration retrieved from satellite vegetation indices for the eastern Mediterranean at 250 m spatial resolution

  • Nov 11, 2015
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • D Helman +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations130

Evapotranspiration modelling at large scale using near-real time MSG SEVIRI derived data

  • Mar 04, 2011
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • N Ghilain +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

SENSITIVITY OF FOUR CONTEXTUAL REMOTE SENSING BASED SURFACE ENERGY BALANCE MODELS TO SPATIAL DOMAIN

  • Jul 26, 2019
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • N Bhattarai +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Increased Bias in Evapotranspiration Modeling Due to Weather and Vegetation Indices Data Sources

  • Mar 01, 2019
  • Agronomy Journal
  • Ramesh Dhungel +8
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.