• Home
  • Search
  • Comparative Benchmarking of Multi-Objective Algorithms for Renewable Energy System Design Using Pareto Front Quality Metrics
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083775Copy DOI Icon

Comparative Benchmarking of Multi-Objective Algorithms for Renewable Energy System Design Using Pareto Front Quality Metrics

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Selecting the best multi-objective algorithms for photovoltaic energy storage system (PV-ESS) design remains challenging due to limited benchmarking across renewable energy studies. This study addresses this gap through a systematic evaluation of four widely used multi-objective optimization algorithms: NSGA-II, Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), weighted-sum scalarization, and ε-constraint methods. Performance assessment utilized three Pareto front quality metrics: Inverted Generational Distance (IGD) for convergence quality, hypervolume (HV) for objective-space coverage, and spacing for solution distribution uniformity. The algorithms were tested on PV-ESS design problems in three developing economies (Nigeria, South Africa, India) under identical problem formulations and computational resources. NSGA-II achieved superior performance across all metrics in all three case studies. For convergence quality, NSGA-II attained a mean IGD of 0.0083, outperforming MOPSO by 29%, ε-constraint by 64%, and weighted-sum by 131%. For objective-space coverage, NSGA-II achieved a mean HV of 0. 700, representing 10–16% better coverage than other methods. For solution distribution, NSGA-II showed a mean spacing of 0.076, indicating 30–117% more uniform Pareto fronts. Computational efficiency analysis revealed that NSGA-II’s runtime is between 5.5 and 7.8 h per case, providing better quality–time ratios compared to ε-constraint methods (which are 18 times slower), while avoiding MOPSO’s premature convergence. Statistical validation confirmed NSGA-II’s superiority, with p < 0.01 across all quality metrics. These results establish NSGA-II as the best algorithm for lifecycle-aware PV-ESS optimization, offering quantitative, evidence-based guidance for practitioners selecting optimization tools for renewable energy system design. The demonstrated performance leads to $ 45,000–$ 60,000 lifecycle cost savings per MW/MWh of system capacity through improved Pareto front identification.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

A Multi-Objective Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Improved Inertial Weights

  • Aug 31, 2018
  • DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering
  • Zhi-Yuan Pan +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

An enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm for economic environmental dispatch problem

  • Dec 01, 2015
  • Zineb Garroussi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Economic Expansion Planning of Sub-Transmission Grid and Regional Virtual Power Plant

  • Dec 01, 2019
  • Journal of Energy Management and Technology
  • Seyed Masoud Moghaddas-Tafreshi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

A novel multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for no-wait flow shop scheduling problems

  • Apr 01, 2008
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
  • Q-K Pan +2
  • Conference Article

Parameter Identification of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle Based on Distance-based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

  • Nov 25, 2022
  • Jinghui Yan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Multi-objective optimal approach for injection molding based on surrogate model and particle swarm optimization algorithm

  • Feb 01, 2010
  • Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science)
  • Wei Chen +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

An Exact Inverted Generational Distance for Continuous Pareto Front

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Zihan Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations53

A metaheuristic particle swarm optimization for enhancing energetic and exergetic performances of hydrogen energy production from plastic waste gasification

  • Apr 06, 2024
  • Energy Conversion and Management
  • Amirreza Gharibi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Multi-objective particle swarm optimization method with balanced diversity and convergence

  • Oct 30, 2013
  • Journal of Computer Applications
  • Huantong Geng +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Multi-Objective Optimization of Material Removal Characteristics for Robot Polishing of Ti-6Al-4V.

  • Jan 23, 2026
  • Micromachines
  • Fengjun Chen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations321

A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems

  • Mar 15, 2016
  • Energy and Buildings
  • Mohamed Hamdy +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Design of miniaturized FSS using equivalent circuit model and multi-objective particle swarm optimization

  • Jul 19, 2021
  • Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
  • Xianjun Sheng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Multi-objective discrete particle swarm optimisation algorithm for integrated assembly sequence planning and assembly line balancing

  • Oct 24, 2016
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
  • Mohd Fadzil Faisae Ab Rashid +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Multi-Objective based Generation Fuel Cost and Emission Reduction using Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm

  • Mar 23, 2023
  • R Lalhmachhuana +3
  • Research Article

A Multi-objective PSO Approach for Sustainable Production Routing: Balancing Cost, Emissions, and Social Impact

  • Aug 31, 2025
  • Jurnal Teknik Industri
  • Annisa Kesy Garside +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.