• Home
  • Search
  • Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Three Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Water Distribution System Design Optimization
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon13
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030695Copy DOI Icon

Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Three Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Water Distribution System Design Optimization

  • Mar 3, 2020
  • Water
  • Weiwei Bi +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Over the past few decades, various evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been applied to the optimization design of water distribution systems (WDSs). An important research area is to compare the performance of these EAs, thereby offering guidance for the selection of the appropriate EAs for practical implementations. Such comparisons are mainly based on the final solution statistics and, hence, are unable to provide knowledge on how different EAs reach the final optimal solutions and why different EAs performed differently in identifying optimal solutions. To this end, this paper aims to compare the real-time searching behaviour of three widely used EAs, which are genetic algorithms (GAs), the differential evolution (DE) algorithm and the ant colony optimization (ACO). These three EAs are applied to five WDS benchmarking case studies with different scales and complexities, and a set of five metrics are used to measure their run-time searching quality and convergence properties. Results show that the run-time metrics can effectively reveal the underlying searching mechanisms associated with each EA, which significantly goes beyond the knowledge from the traditional end-of-run solution statistics. It is observed that the DE is able to identify better solutions if moderate and large computational budgets are allowed due to its great ability in maintaining the balance between the exploration and exploitation. However, if the computational resources are rather limited or the decision has to be made in a very short time (e.g., real-time WDS operation), the GA can be a good choice as it can always identify better solutions than the DE and ACO at the early searching stages. Based on the results, the ACO performs the worst for the five case study considered. The outcome of this study is the offer of guidance for the algorithm selection based on the available computation resources, as well as knowledge into the EA’s underlying searching behaviours.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations73

Ant Colony Optimization for the Design of Water Distribution Systems

  • May 15, 2001
  • Holger R Maier +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations96

Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm Applied to Water Distribution System Optimization

  • Mar 17, 2012
  • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
  • Feifei Zheng +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

A Hybrid DE-ACO Algorithm for the Global Optimization

  • Dec 02, 2020
  • Soufiane Abi +2
  • Book Chapter

Evolutionary Computation for Single and Multiobjective Water Distribution Systems Optimal Design

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Avi Ostfeld
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Parameter Selection of Support Vector Regression Machine Based on Differential Evolution Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Qing Yu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations46

A novel optimization framework for efficiently identifying high-quality Pareto-optimal solutions: maximizing resilience of water distribution systems under cost constraints

  • Sep 01, 2025
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • Kun Du +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Application of non-animal-inspired evolutionary algorithms to reservoir operation: an overview.

  • Jun 15, 2019
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
  • Mahsa Jahandideh-Tehrani +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations14

A modified differential evolution algorithm with self-adaptive control parameters

  • Nov 01, 2008
  • Wu Zhi-Feng +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Performance Enhancement of Mutation and Crossover Components by using Differential Evolution Algorithm

  • Mar 01, 2020
  • M Aathira +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

A Cooperative Game Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Applied to UAV Inspection Path Planning in Urban Pipe Corridors

  • Aug 21, 2023
  • Mathematics
  • Chuanyue Wang +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations8

Efficient Design of Fixed Point Digital FIR Filters by Using Differential Evolution Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Nurhan Karaboğa +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Optimal design of controllers based on libraries and differential evolution

  • Jul 01, 2015
  • Sun Zhenlu +2
  • Conference Article

Performance Analysis of Parallel Differential Evolution Algorithm with Cooperative Emigrant Creation Strategy

  • Nov 01, 2019
  • Sercan Demirci +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

Hybrid metaheuristics for multi-objective design of water distribution systems

  • Jul 24, 2013
  • Journal of Hydroinformatics
  • Qi Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

A local search enhanced differential evolutionary algorithm for sparse recovery

  • Mar 31, 2017
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Qiuzhen Lin +6
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.