• Home
  • Search
  • Comparison of Three Algorithms to Estimate Tree Stem Diameter from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data
  • Cite Icon28
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070599Copy DOI Icon

Comparison of Three Algorithms to Estimate Tree Stem Diameter from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data

  • Jul 18, 2019
  • Forests
  • Joris Ravaglia +6 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners provide accurate and detailed point clouds of forest plots, which can be used as an alternative to destructive measurements during forest inventories. Various specialized algorithms have been developed to provide automatic and objective estimates of forest attributes from point clouds. The STEP (Snakes for Tuboid Extraction from Point cloud) algorithm was developed to estimate both stem diameter at breast height and stem diameters along the bole length. Here, we evaluate the accuracy of this algorithm and compare its performance with two other state-of-the-art algorithms that were designed for the same purpose (i.e., the CompuTree and SimpleTree algorithms). We tested each algorithm against point clouds that incorporated various degrees of noise and occlusion. We applied these algorithms to three contrasting test sites: (1) simulated scenes of coniferous stands in Newfoundland (Canada), (2) test sites of deciduous stands in Phalsbourg (France), and (3) coniferous plantations in Quebec, Canada. In most cases, the STEP algorithm predicted diameter at breast height with higher R2 and lower RMSE than the other two algorithms. The STEP algorithm also achieved greater accuracy when estimating stem diameter in occluded and noisy point clouds, with mean errors in the range of 1.1 cm to 2.28 cm. The CompuTree and SimpleTree algorithms respectively produced errors in the range of 2.62 cm to 6.1 cm and 1.03 cm to 3.34 cm, respectively. Unlike CompuTree or SimpleTree, the STEP algorithm was not able to estimate trunk diameter in the uppermost portions of the trees. Our results show that the STEP algorithm is more adapted to extract DBH and stem diameter automatically from occluded and noisy point clouds. Our study also highlights that SimpleTree and CompuTree require data filtering and results corrections. Conversely, none of these procedures were applied for the implementation of the STEP algorithm.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations119

Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • European Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Francesca Giannetti +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Integrating terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry to estimate individual tree attributes in managed coniferous forests in Japan

  • Dec 21, 2021
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Katsuto Shimizu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations215

Retrieving Forest Inventory Variables with Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in Urban Heterogeneous Forest

  • Dec 23, 2011
  • Remote Sensing
  • L Monika Moskal +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Using terrestrial laser scanning to evaluate non-destructive aboveground biomass allometries in diverse Northern California forests

  • May 10, 2023
  • Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • Paris Krause +6
  • Preprint Article

Influence of ULS data acquisition characteristics on the achievable stem reconstruction accuracies

  • Mar 23, 2020
  • Moritz Bruggisser +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Nondestructive Estimation of the Above-Ground Biomass of Multiple Tree Species in Boreal Forests of China Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning

  • Oct 23, 2019
  • Forests
  • Shilin Chen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Tree volume estimation with terrestrial laser scanning — Testing for bias in a 3D virtual environment

  • Jan 31, 2023
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Meinrad Abegg +3
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Reply on RC1

  • Jan 19, 2023
  • William Flynn
  • PDF
  • Peer Review Report

Comment on egusphere-2022-1055

  • Dec 05, 2022
  • Research Article

Utilizing Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Estimating Commercial Teak Volume: A Case Study of Mae Chang Forest Plantation, Mae Mo District, Lampang Province

  • Apr 23, 2025
  • Thai Forest Ecological Research Journal
  • Watcharin Sangsing +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Quantifying and mapping the ready-to-use veneer volume of European beech trees based on terrestrial laser scanning data

  • Jun 23, 2025
  • European Journal of Forest Research
  • Elena Larysch +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

3DFin: a software for automated 3D forest inventories from terrestrial point clouds

  • May 23, 2024
  • Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
  • Diego Laino +7
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations169

Estimating Individual Tree Height and Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) from Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) Data at Plot Level

  • Jul 04, 2018
  • Forests
  • Guangjie Liu +4
  • Research Article

Yersel lazer tarama ile tek ağaç özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

  • Feb 19, 2013
  • Turkish Journal of Forestry | Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi
  • İBrahim Özdemir
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Analysis of Taper Functions for Larix olgensis Using Mixed Models and TLS

  • Feb 08, 2021
  • Forests
  • Dandan Li +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.