• Home
  • Search
  • Cross-Subsidization in Higher Education: Does it Pervert Private Choice and Public Policy?
  • Cite Icon26
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195037104.003.0019Copy DOI Icon

Cross-Subsidization in Higher Education: Does it Pervert Private Choice and Public Policy?

  • May 22, 1986
  • Estelle James
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

During the 1950s and 1960s American higher education underwent a major change in size and structure, with a vast expansion in enrollments and increased emphasis on graduate training and research, relative to undergraduate teaching. This chapter explores the implications of this changing product mix for our understanding of costs, subsidies, financing methods, and decision-making structures in higher education. We ask the following questions: . . . 1. How did universities finance their production of graduate training and research (G and R), which usually do not bring in enough revenues to cover their costs? 2. What differences, if any, were there in the behavior of public and private universities regarding the shift toward G and R? 3. How did this change in product mix affect relative costs in universities versus two- and four-year colleges, which still specialize in undergraduate teaching? 4. What are the implications of this analysis for our understanding of the costs and benefits of education and for future public policy? For example, to what degree do state legislators and private donors control the product mix in higher education and who ultimately gains from the resources they provide?. . . Specifically, I characterize universities as multiproduct nonprofit organizations (NPOs) engaging in the teaching of undergraduates as a profitable activity, in order to subsidize graduate training and research, which are loss-making but yield direct utility to them. Cross-subsidization by NPOs, then, is an alternative to direct government funding of socially beneficial goods such as research, under certain circumstances. With certain differences that we shall note, this characterization applies to public and private institutions, and the term NPO is used for both in this chapter. At private universities, during the 1950s and 1960s, profits were generated mainly by huge tuition increases, made possible by rapidly rising demand, as we shall see below. State universities, too, engaged in cross-subsidization to finance G and R. However, since state universities often do not control or retain tuition revenue, their main device was a decrease in teaching cost per student.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of the Performance of Private Universities

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Aihua Zhang
  • Supplementary Content

Recently Published Dissertations on Community and Junior Colleges

  • Dec 08, 2016
  • Community College Journal of Research and Practice
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

A general equilibrium analysis of state and private colleges and access to higher education in the U.S.

  • Sep 09, 2016
  • Journal of Public Economics
  • Dennis Epple +3
  • Research Article

Comparison of State and Private Universities in Turkiye in terms of Instruction and R& D Regarding the Reports of the Turkish Council of Higher Education (YÖK)

  • Jul 05, 2023
  • PROFESSIONAL STUDIES: THEORY AND PRACTICE
  • Murat Gürbüz
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

University Social Responsibility Initiatives: An Empirical Study of Private and State Universities of Rajasthan

  • Jan 25, 2021
  • Psychology and Education Journal
  • Devika Sharma, Dr Rashmi Sharma
  • Research Article
  • Citations108

Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: On Integrating Pedagogical Training into the Graduate Experiences of Future Science Faculty

  • Mar 01, 2006
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education
  • Kimberly Tanner +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Women Presidents: Now 26.4% but Still Underrepresented

  • May 01, 2012
  • Women in Higher Education
  • Sarah Gibbard Cook
  • Supplementary Content
  • Citations3

Status of Higher Education, Science and Technology in Malawi: A focus on Agricultural Higher Education

  • Apr 11, 2016
  • Journal of Rural and Development
  • Joshua Valeta
  • Research Article

Evaluation of grading systems in Pharmacy education practiced by public and private universities in Bangladesh

  • Mar 25, 2024
  • Healthmed Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Md Moklesur Rahman Sarker +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations65

CO2 Emission Trends in the Cement Industry: An International Comparison

  • Jun 01, 2002
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
  • Yeonbae Kim +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations152

Hybrid ant systems for the dynamic facility layout problem

  • Sep 22, 2004
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • Alan R Mckendall +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Analysis of Quality in Public and Private Universities in Bangladesh and USA

  • Jun 01, 2014
  • International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
  • Quamrul H Mazumder
  • Research Article
  • Citations96

Cost Efficiency in Public Higher Education Institutions

  • Nov 01, 2001
  • The Journal of Higher Education
  • John Robst
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Comparison of Private Universities in India based on NIRF Ranking and Fee Charging Strategies

  • Dec 09, 2017
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • P S Aithal +2
  • Research Article

Research on the Factors Affecting the Staff Satisfaction in Private Higher Education in China

  • Dec 30, 2019
  • Asia Europe Perspective Association
  • Yanhua Yang +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.