• Home
  • Search
  • Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation
  • Cite Icon12
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21028Copy DOI Icon

Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract We report data fusion experiments carried out on the four best‐performing retrieval models from TREC 5. Three were conceptually/algorithmically very different from one another; one was algorithmically similar to one of the former. The objective of the test was to observe the performance of the 11 logical data fusion combinations compared to the performance of the four individual models and their intermediate fusions when following the principle of polyrepresentation. This principle is based on cognitive IR perspective (Ingwersen & Järvelin, 2005) and implies that each retrieval model is regarded as a representation of a unique interpretation of information retrieval (IR). It predicts that only fusions of very different, but equally good, IR models may outperform each constituent as well as their intermediate fusions. Two kinds of experiments were carried out. One tested restricted fusions, which entails that only the inner disjoint overlap documents between fused models are ranked. The second set of experiments was based on traditional data fusion methods. The experiments involved the 30 TREC 5 topics that contain more than 44 relevant documents. In all tests, the Borda and CombSUM scoring methods were used. Performance was measured by precision and recall, with document cutoff values (DCVs) at 100 and 15 documents, respectively. Results show that restricted fusions made of two, three, or four cognitively/algorithmically very different retrieval models perform significantly better than do the individual models at DCV100. At DCV15, however, the results of polyrepresentative fusion were less predictable. The traditional fusion method based on polyrepresentation principles demonstrates a clear picture of performance at both DCV levels and verifies the polyrepresentation predictions for data fusion in IR. Data fusion improves retrieval performance over their constituent IR models only if the models all are quite conceptually/algorithmically dissimilar and equally and well performing, in that order of importance.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

Applying statistical principles to data fusion in information retrieval

  • Feb 09, 2008
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Shengli Wu
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

Improving Arabic information retrieval using word embedding similarities

  • Jan 19, 2018
  • International Journal of Speech Technology
  • Abdelkader El Mahdaouy +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

The TIJAH XML information retrieval system

  • Aug 06, 2006
  • Henk Ernst Blok +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations70

Semantic Matching by Non-Linear Word Transportation for Information Retrieval

  • Oct 24, 2016
  • Jiafeng Guo +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations24

Preferential Models of Query by Navigation

  • Jan 01, 1998
  • Peter Bruza +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations71

A Neural Network-Based Joint Prognostic Model for Data Fusion and Remaining Useful Life Prediction.

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • Yuanyuan Gao +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

A novel fusion method for X-ray phase contrast imaging based on fast adaptive bidimensional empirical mode decomposition.

  • Oct 09, 2023
  • Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology
  • Zonghan Tian +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

A DT-CWT-based infrared-visible image fusion method for smart city

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling
  • Rongdi Yuan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations74

Cross-Scale Mixing Attention for Multisource Remote Sensing Data Fusion and Classification

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Yunhao Gao +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations16

Using gradient descent to optimize language modeling smoothing parameters

  • Jul 23, 2007
  • Donald Metzler
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations4

Collaborative Information Retrieval: Concepts, Models and Evaluation

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Lynda Tamine +1
  • Research Article

Report on the 1st International Workshop on Information Access in Smart Cities (i-ASC 2014)

  • Dec 23, 2014
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • M-Dyaa Albakour +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Retrieval, alignment, and clustering of computational models based on semantic annotations

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Molecular Systems Biology
  • Marvin Schulz +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

User-Oriented and Cognitive Models of Information Retrieval

  • Mar 15, 2017
  • Mette Skov +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Data reconciliation and fusion methods: A survey

  • Jul 06, 2019
  • Applied Computing and Informatics
  • Abdelghani Bakhtouchi
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.