User-Oriented and Cognitive Models of Information Retrieval

Humans have used electronic information retrieval (IR) systems for more than 50 years as they evolved from experimental systems to full-scale Web search engines and digital libraries. The fields of library and information science (LIS), cognitive science, human factors and computer science have historically been the leading disciplines in conducting research that seeks to model human interaction with IR systems for all kinds of information related behaviors. As technology problems have been mastered, the theoretical and applied framework for studying human interaction with IR systems has evolved from systems-centered to more user-centered, or cognitive-centered approaches. However, cognitive information retrieval (CIR) research that focuses on user interaction with IR systems is still largely under-funded and is often not included at computing and systems design oriented conferences. But CIR-focused research continues, and there are signs that some IR systems designers in academia and the Web search business are realizing that user behavior research can provide valuable insights into systems design and evaluation. The goal of our book is to provide an overview of new CIR research directions. This book does not provide a history of the research field of CIR. Instead, the book confronts new ways of looking at the human information condition with regard to our increasing need to interact with IR systems. The need has grown due to a number of factors, including the increased importance of information to more people in this information age. Also, IR was once considered document-oriented, but has now evolved to include multimedia, text, and other information objects. As a result, IR systems and their complexity have proliferated as users and user purposes for using them have also proliferated. Human interaction with IR systems can often be frustrating as people often lack an understanding of IR system functionality. New more holistic directions in CIR are emerging that conceptualize human-IR system interaction at the human-computer interaction level (taking into account interface issues), the information behavior level (taking into account the role of IR system interaction in the total range of people’s information behaviors), and the

Term mismatch is a common limitation of traditional information retrieval (IR) models where relevance scores are estimated based on exact matching of documents and queries. Typically, good IR model should consider distinct but semantically similar words in the matching process. In this paper, we propose a method to incorporate word embedding (WE) semantic similarities into existing probabilistic IR models for Arabic in order to deal with term mismatch. Experiments are performed on the standard Arabic TREC collection using three neural word embedding models. The results show that extending the existing IR models improves significantly baseline bag-of-words models. Although the proposed extensions significantly outperform their baseline bag-of-words, the difference between the evaluated neural word embedding models is not statistically significant. Moreover, the overall comparison results show that our extensions significantly improve the Arabic WordNet based semantic indexing approach and three recent WE-based IR language models.

Not many XML information retrieval (IR) systems exist that allow easy addition of and switching between different IR models. Especially for the scientific environment where building a system takes a lot of time and keeps researchers away from the real work, i.e., investigating what is the most effective IR model, a platform that would provide this functionality would be ideal. For this reason we developed such an XML IR system. It is centered around a logical algebra, named score region algebra (SRA), that enables transparent specification of IR models for XML databases (see [1] for more details). The transparency is achieved by a possibility to instantiate various retrieval models, using abstract score functions within algebra operators, while logical query plan and operator definitions remain unchanged. Our algebra operators model three important aspects of XML IR: element relevance score computation, element score propagation, and element score combination. To implement a new IR model, one only needs to provide definitions for these abstract function classes. To illustrate the usefulness of our algebra our demo system supports several, well known IR scoring models (e.g., Language Models, Okapi, and tf.idf), combined with different score propagation and combination functions. The user can select which model to use at run time. Following good practice in database systems design, our prototype system has a typical three-layered architecture. (1) The conceptual layer takes a NEXI [3] query expression as input, e.g.,

Research on information retrieval model under scarcity theory and user cognition

The Information Retrieval (IR) problem can be described as the quest to find the set of relevant information objects corresponding to a given information need, which is represented by a request. IR begins with a user who wishes to satisfy an information need. The information need is typically formulated in the form of a request, denoted by q. The intention is that the request q be as good as possible description of the information need N. The information being queried is modelled as a set of information carriers, or documents. An often used premise in IR is the following: if a given document d is about the request q, then there is a high likelihood that d is relevant with respect to the associated information need. Thus, the IR problem is reduced to deciding the aboutness relation between documents and requests. Many IR models have been developed, and there is a wide variation in how they determine aboutness. A common approach is to equate aboutness with overlap, meaning if there is sufficient overlap between the document and the query, the document is deemed to be about the query. The degree of overlap determined by the retrieval model is usually expressed as a real number between zero (no overlap) and unity (complete overlap). In most models, “sufficient” overlap is not prescribed by the model but by experimentation within a given IR setting. Such experimentation may lead to the conclusion, say, that sufficient overlap is apparent when the overlap measure is greater than α, 0 < α ≤ 1. The value α varies from setting to setting.

We report data fusion experiments carried out on the four best‐performing retrieval models from TREC 5. Three were conceptually/algorithmically very different from one another; one was algorithmically similar to one of the former. The objective of the test was to observe the performance of the 11 logical data fusion combinations compared to the performance of the four individual models and their intermediate fusions when following the principle of polyrepresentation. This principle is based on cognitive IR perspective (Ingwersen &amp; Järvelin, 2005) and implies that each retrieval model is regarded as a representation of a unique interpretation of information retrieval (IR). It predicts that only fusions of very different, but equally good, IR models may outperform each constituent as well as their intermediate fusions. Two kinds of experiments were carried out. One tested restricted fusions, which entails that only the inner disjoint overlap documents between fused models are ranked. The second set of experiments was based on traditional data fusion methods. The experiments involved the 30 TREC 5 topics that contain more than 44 relevant documents. In all tests, the Borda and CombSUM scoring methods were used. Performance was measured by precision and recall, with document cutoff values (DCVs) at 100 and 15 documents, respectively. Results show that restricted fusions made of two, three, or four cognitively/algorithmically very different retrieval models perform significantly better than do the individual models at DCV100. At DCV15, however, the results of polyrepresentative fusion were less predictable. The traditional fusion method based on polyrepresentation principles demonstrates a clear picture of performance at both DCV levels and verifies the polyrepresentation predictions for data fusion in IR. Data fusion improves retrieval performance over their constituent IR models only if the models all are quite conceptually/algorithmically dissimilar and equally and well performing, in that order of importance.

Recent work have shown the potential of collaboration for solving complex or exploratory search tasks allowing to achieve synergic effects with respect to individual search, which is the prevalent information retrieval (IR) setting this last decade. This interactive multiuser context gives rise to several challenges in IR. One main challenge relies on the adaptation of IR techniques or models [8] in order to build algo-rithmic supports of collaboration distributing documents among users. The second challenge is related to the design of Collaborative Information Retrieval (CIR) models and their effectiveness evaluation since individual IR frameworks and measures do not totally fit with the collaboration paradigms. In this tutorial, we address the second challenge and present first a general overview of collaborative search introducing the main underlying notions. Then, we focus on related work dealing with collaborative ranking models and their effectiveness evaluation. Our primary objective is to introduce these notions by highlighting how and why they should be different from individual IR in order to give participants the main clues for investigating new research directions in this domain with a deep understanding of current CIR work.

No abstract available.

Measuring the semantic similarity between phrases and sentences is an important task in natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR). We compare the quality of the distributional semantic NLP models against phrase-based semantic IR. The evaluation is based on the correlation between human judgements and model scores on a distributional phrase similarity task. We experiment with four NLP and two IR model variants. On the NLP side, models vary over normalization schemes and composition operators. On the IR side, models vary with respect to estimation of the probability of a term being in a document, namely P(t|d) where only term co-occurrence information is used and P(t|d, sim) which incorporates term distributional similarity. A mixture of the two methods is presented and evaluated. For both methods, word meanings are derived from large corpora of data: the BNC and ukWaC. One of the main findings is that grammatical distributional models give better scores than the IR models. This suggests that an IR model enriched with distributional linguistic information performs better in the long standing problem in IR of document retrieval where there is no direct symbolic relationship between query and document concepts.

Modern cities are increasingly becoming smart where a digital knowledge infrastructure is deployed by local authorities (e.g. City councils and municipalities) to better serve the information needs of their citizens, and to ensure the sustainability and efficient use of power and resources. This knowledge infrastructure consists of a wide range of systems from lowlevel physical sensors to advanced sensing devices through social sensors. The i-ASC 2014 workshop was the first international event, within the Information Retrieval (IR) community, that is dedicated to research on smart/future cities. In particular, the workshop was a venue for research on digesting the city's data streams and knowledge databases in order to serve the information needs of citizens and support decision making for local authorities. Possible use cases include helping tourists to find interesting places to go or activities to do while visiting a city, or assisting journalists in reporting local incidents. Indeed, the workshop was intended to foster the development of new information access and retrieval models that can harness effectively and efficiently the large number of heterogeneous big data streams in a city to provide a new generation of information services. The workshop was well attended, where more than 45 participants were officially registered. It featured two keynote talks from industry (IBM andWaag Society) and two invited talks from academia (Pisa and Edinburgh). In addition, seven refereed papers were presented before breakout groups considered questions and issues identified from a panel discussion.

A common limitation of many information retrieval (IR) models is that relevance scores are solely based on exact (i.e., syntactic) matching of words in queries and documents under the simple Bag-of-Words (BoW) representation. This not only leads to the well-known vocabulary mismatch problem, but also does not allow semantically related words to contribute to the relevance score. Recent advances in word embedding have shown that semantic representations for words can be efficiently learned by distributional models. A natural generalization is then to represent both queries and documents as Bag-of-Word-Embeddings (BoWE), which provides a better foundation for semantic matching than BoW. Based on this representation, we introduce a novel retrieval model by viewing the matching between queries and documents as a non-linear word transportation (NWT) problem. With this formulation, we define the capacity and profit of a transportation model designed for the IR task. We show that this transportation problem can be efficiently solved via pruning and indexing strategies. Experimental results on several representative benchmark datasets show that our model can outperform many state-of-the-art retrieval models as well as recently introduced word embedding-based models. We also conducted extensive experiments to analyze the effect of different settings on our semantic matching model.

Recently, pretrained models have achieved remarkable performance not only in natural language processing but also in information retrieval (IR). Previous studies show that IR-oriented pretraining tasks can achieve better performance than only finetuning pretrained language models in IR datasets. Besides, the massive search log data obtained from mainstream search engines can be used in IR pretraining, for it contains users' implicit judgments of document relevance under a concrete query. However, existing methods mainly use direct query-document click signals to pretrain models. The potential supervision signals from search logs are far from being well explored. In this paper, we propose to comprehensively leverage four query-document relevance relations, including co-interaction and multi-hop relations, to pretrain ranking models in IR. Specifically, we focus on the user's click behavior and construct an Interaction Graph to represent the global relevance relations between queries and documents from all search logs. With the graph, we can consider the co-interaction and multi-hop q-d relationships through their neighbor nodes. Based on the relations extracted from the interaction graph, we propose four strategies to generate contrastive positive and negative q-d pairs and use these data to pretrain ranking models. Experimental results on both industrial and academic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Recent advancements in Generative AI, such as Large Language Models (LLMs), have demonstrated remarkable success across various general tasks. Extensive studies have explored leveraging generative models in finance, but significant challenges persist. This half-day workshop explores potential approaches and research directions to address these challenges by equipping generative models with advanced Information Retrieval (IR) models. Specifically, this workshop seeks to provide a platform for discussing innovative ideas that facilitate the advancement of IR technology to enrich generative models in finance from four key perspectives: (i) financial IR techniques (ii) financial IR benchmarking and evaluation (iii) financial systems and agents/assistants (iv) and trustworthiness, privacy and security when applying financial IR and generative models. This workshop aims to deepen understanding, accelerate progress, and support the advancement of IR technology to enhance generative models to address financial challenges.

In this chapter an overview of the application of fuzzy set theory to soften Information Retrieval Systems is presented. It starts with the description of the main functionalities of an Information Retrieval System, then the main information retrieval models defined in the literature are reviewed and a classification of fuzzy information retrieval models is proposed. Further the fuzzy indexing procedures based on the computation of the significance of the document’s descriptors are illustrated and the introduction of soft requirements into queries, based on both numeric and linguistic weights and soft aggregation operators is discussed. The chapter presents also the fuzzy associative retrieval models based on thesauri, pseudothesauri, and documents clustering and relevance feedback techniques. Finally, in the last section some evaluation issues of IRSs are introduced.

Thesaurus is used with many Information Retrieval (IR) models such as data integration, data warehousing, semantic query processing and classifiers. Considering the existence of various thesauri for a particular domain of knowledge, output quality of an IR model when using different thesauri in the same domain is not predictable. In this paper, we propose a methodology to study the performance of thesaurus in solving schema matching as a case study of IR models. The paper also presents initial results of experiment conducted using different thesauri. Precision, recall, and F-measure were calculated to show that the quality of matching was changed according to the used thesaurus.