Design for a Crane Metallic Structure Based on Imperialist Competitive Algorithm and Inverse Reliability Strategy

To obtain reliable designs, aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are considered recently in the structural analysis and design optimization. The reliability based de-sign optimization (RBDO) method [1] is used when the amount of input data is sufficient enough to create accurate statistical distribution. On the other hand, when the sufficient input data are not available due to limitations in time, human, and facility resources, the optimum design may not be reliable if RBDO method is used. To deal with the situation that input uncertainties have insufficient information, a possibility (or fuzzy set) method can be used for structural analysis and possibility based design optimization (PBDO) [2]. However, in many industry design problems, we may have to deal with design problems that involve with the mixed input statistical random and fuzzy variables simultaneously. For these problems, RBDO may yield unreliable optimum designs because of insufficient data. On the other hand, treating the random variables as fuzzy variables and invoking PBDO to solve the mixed design variable problem may yield too conservative designs with higher optimum costs. This paper proposes a new mixed variable design optimization (MVDO) problem based on the performance measure approach (PMA) [1]. To evaluate the possibilistic constraint in MVDO, a sub-optimization problem for inverse analysis is carried out using a hyper-cylinder domain. To solve this sub-problem efficiently and effectively, a new numerical algorithm, maximum failure search (MFS) method, is proposed in this paper by combining the enhanced hybrid mean value (HMV+) method [3] for the inverse reliability analysis in RBDO and the maximal possibility search (MPS) method [2] for the inverse possibility analysis in PBDO. Some mathematical examples are used to demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed numerical MFS method. Some physical design examples are used to compare the proposed MVDO results with RBDO and PBDO results.

Enhanced sequential approximate programming using second order reliability method for accurate and efficient structural reliability-based design optimization

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the consideration of uncertainty from analysis modules for aircraft conceptual design by implementing uncertainty-based design optimization methods. Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO), Possibility-Based Design Optimization (PBDO) and Robust Design Optimization (RDO) methods were developed to handle uncertainties of design optimization. The RBDO method is found suitable for uncertain parameters when sufficient information is available. On the other hand, the PBDO method is proposed when uncertain parameters have insufficient information. The RDO method can apply to both cases. The RBDO, PBDO and RDO methods were considered with the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) method to generate conservative design results when low fidelity analysis tools are used. Design/methodology/approach – Methods combining MDO with RBDO, PBDO and RDO were developed and have been applied to a numerical analysis and an aircraft conceptual design. This research eva...

Because deterministic optimum designs obtained without taking uncertainty into account could lead to unreliable designs, a reliability-based approach to design optimization is preferable using a Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) method. A typical RBDO process iteratively carries out a design optimization in an original random space (X-space) and a reliability analysis in an independent and standard normal random space (U-space). This process requires numerous nonlinear mappings between X- and U-spaces for various probability distributions. Therefore, the nonlinearity of the RBDO problem will depend on the type of distribution of random parameters, since a transformation between X- and U-spaces introduces additional nonlinearity into the reliability-based performance measures evaluated during the RBDO process. The evaluation of probabilistic constraints in RBDO can be carried out in two ways: using either the Reliability Index Approach (RIA), or the Performance Measure Approach (PMA). Different reliability analysis approaches employed in RIA and PMA result in different behaviors of nonlinearity for RIA and PMA in the RBDO process. In this paper, it is shown that RIA becomes much more difficult to solve for non-normally distributed random parameters because of the highly nonlinear transformations that are involved. However, PMA is rather independent of probability distributions because it only has a small involvement with a nonlinear transformation.

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a technique used for engineering design when uncertainty is being considered. A typical RBDO problem can be formulated as a stochastic optimization model where the performance of a system is optimized and the reliability requirements are treated as constraints. One major challenge of RBDO research has been the prohibitive computational expenses. In this research, a new approximation approach, termed the single-loop deterministic method for RBDO (SLDM_RBDO), is proposed to reduce the computational effort of RBDO without sacrificing much accuracy. Based on the first order reliability method, the SLDM_RBDO method converts the probabilistic constraints to approximate deterministic constraints so that the RBDO problems can be transformed to deterministic optimization problems in one step. Three comparison experiments are conducted to show the performance of the SLDM_RBDO. In addition, a reliable forearm crutch design is studied to demonstrate the applicability of SLDM_RBDO to a real industry case.

Traditional Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) requires a double loop iteration process. The inner optimization loop is to find the reliability and the outer is the regular optimization loop to optimize the RBDO problem with reliability objectives or constraints. It is known that the computation can be prohibitive when the associated function evaluation is expensive. It makes even worse when a large number of reliability constraints are present. As a result, many approximate RBDO methods, which convert the double loop to a single loop, have been developed. In this research, an engineering problem with a large number of constraints (144) is designed to test the RBDO methods, including single and double loop methods. In addition its constraint size, this problem possesses many local minimums. Some original authors of the RBDO methods are also asked to solve the same problem. The results and the efficiencies for different methods are published and discussed.

<div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper presents an enriched performance measure approach (PMA+) for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) to substantially improve computational efficiency when applied to large-scale applications. Three aspects of PMA+ are presented: as a way to launch RBDO at a deterministic optimum design, as an efficient probabilistic feasibility check, and as a fast reliability analysis under the condition of design closeness. It is found that deterministic design optimization helps improve numerical efficiency by reducing some RBDO iterations. Unlike deterministic design optimization, a significant computational burden is imposed on the feasibility check of constraints in the RBDO process due to the costs of a reliability analysis. Such difficulties can be effectively resolved by using a mean value (MV) first-order method with an allowable accuracy for the purpose of feasibility identification, and by carrying out the refined reliability analysis using the hybrid mean value (HMV) first-order method for <i>ε</i>-active and violate constraints in the RBDO process. In addition, the fast reliability analysis method is proposed by reusing some of the information obtained at the previous RBDO iteration to efficiently evaluate probabilistic constraints at the current design iteration under the condition of design closeness. Other RBDO methods have recently been developed to enhance numerical efficiency of RBDO while maintaining numerical accuracy and stability. Thus, the PMA+ is compared to existing RBDO methods from a numerical efficiency and stability point of view. For a numerical understanding of the RBDO process, several numerical examples are provided, including a large-scale multi-crash application.</div>

<p>The primary objective of this study is to develop new computational methods for robust design optimization (RDO) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of high-dimensional, complex engineering systems. Four major research directions, all anchored in polynomial dimensional decomposition (PDD), have been defined to meet the objective. They involve: (1) development of new sensitivity analysis methods for RDO and RBDO; (2) development of novel optimization methods for solving RDO problems; (3) development of novel optimization methods for solving RBDO problems; and (4) development of a novel scheme and formulation to solve stochastic design optimization problems with both distributional and structural design parameters.</p> <p>The major achievements are as follows. Firstly, three new computational methods were developed for calculating design sensitivities of statistical moments and reliability of high-dimensional complex systems subject to random inputs. The first method represents a novel integration of PDD of a multivariate stochastic response function and score functions, leading to analytical expressions of design sensitivities of the first two moments. The second and third methods, relevant to probability distribution or reliability analysis, exploit two distinct combinations built on PDD: the PDD-SPA method, entailing the saddlepoint approximation (SPA) and score functions; and the PDD-MCS method, utilizing the embedded Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of the PDD approximation and score functions. For all three methods developed, both the statistical moments or failure probabilities and their design sensitivities are both determined concurrently from a single stochastic analysis or simulation. Secondly, four new methods were developed for RDO of complex engineering systems. The methods involve PDD of a high-dimensional stochastic response for statistical moment analysis, a novel integration of PDD and score functions for calculating the second-moment sensitivities with respect to the design variables, and standard gradient-based optimization algorithms. The methods, depending on how statistical moment and sensitivity analyses are dovetailed with an optimization algorithm, encompass direct, single-step, sequential, and multi-point single-step design processes. Thirdly, two new methods were developed for RBDO of complex engineering systems. The methods involve an adaptive-sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition (AS-PDD) of a high-dimensional stochastic response for reliability analysis, a novel integration of AS-PDD and score functions for calculating the sensitivities of the failure probability with respect to design variables, and standard gradient-based optimization algorithms, resulting in a multi-point, single-step design process. The two methods, depending on how the failure probability and its design sensitivities are evaluated, exploit two distinct combinations built on AS-PDD: the AS-PDD-SPA method, entailing SPA and score functions; and the AS-PDD-MCS method, utilizing the embedded MCS of the AS-PDD approximation and score functions. In addition, a new method, named as the augmented PDD method, was developed for RDO and RBDO subject to mixed design variables, comprising both distributional and structural design variables. The method comprises a new augmented PDD of a high-dimensional stochastic response for statistical moment and reliability analyses; an integration of the augmented PDD, score functions, and finite-difference approximation for calculating the sensitivities of the first two moments and the failure probability with respect to distributional and structural design variables; and standard gradient-based optimization algorithms, leading to a multi-point, single-step design process.</p> <p>The innovative formulations of statistical moment and reliability analysis, design sensitivity analysis, and optimization algorithms have achieved not only highly accurate but also computationally efficient design solutions. Therefore, these new methods are capable of performing industrial-scale design optimization with numerous design variables.</p>

A novel reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) method using simulation-based techniques for reliability assessments and efficient optimization approach is presented in this paper. In RBDO, model-based reliability analysis needs to be performed to calculate the probability of not satisfying a reliability constraint and the gradient of this probability with respect to each design variable. Among model-based methods, the most widely used in RBDO is the first-order reliability method (FORM). However, FORM could be inaccurate for nonlinear problems and is not applicable for system reliability problems. This paper develops an efficient optimization methodology to perform RBDO using simulation-based techniques. By combining analytical and simulation-based reliability methods, accurate probability of failure and sensitivity information is obtained. The use of simulation also enables both component and system-level reliabilities to be included in RBDO formulation. Instead of using a traditional RBDO formulation in which optimization and reliability computations are nested, a sequential approach is developed to greatly reduce the computational cost. The efficiency of the proposed RBDO approach is enhanced by using a multi-modal adaptive importance sampling technique for simulation-based reliability assessment; and by treating the inactive reliability constraints properly in optimization. A vehicle side impact problem is used to demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed method.

Cloud manufacturing as an emerging service-oriented manufacturing paradigm integrates and manages geographically distributed manufacturing resources such that complex and highly customized manufacturing tasks can be performed cooperatively. The service composition and optimal selection (SCOS) problem, in which manufacturing cloud services are optimally selected for performing subtasks, is one of the key issues for implementing a cloud manufacturing system. In this paper, we propose a new mixed-integer programming model for solving the SCOS problem with sequential composition structure. Unlike the majority of previous research on the problem, in the proposed model, the transportation between distributed resources and its effects on quality of services are considered. Although a wide variety of metaheuristics have been tailored for solving the SCOS problem, no consistent and comprehensive conclusion has been reached so far on the superiority of a specific algorithm. Therefore, for the first time, solution space landscape of the problem was analyzed through several statistical criteria which demonstrated that the landscape is rugged and local optima are clustered in a small region of the search space. Therefore, to find good solutions, a metaheuristic algorithm needs to perform both proper exploitation and exploration of the search space. According to the landscape analysis, the basic imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) was hybridized with a local search (LS) algorithm resulting in the hybrid ICA (HICA). To examine the performance of the proposed HICA, an example of online motorcycle production in the USA as well as four randomly generated large-scale instances, were solved through the LS, ICA, and HICA. Computational results showed that transportation consideration is indispensable for obtaining more realistic solutions in cloud manufacturing. The results also revealed that the HICA outperformed the LS and basic ICA in terms of the value of cost objective function, the stability of solutions and convergence speed. Hence, not only statistically but also analytically, it was proved that algorithms incorporating both exploitation and exploration are able to solve the SCOS problem more efficiently.

An enriched performance measure approach is presented for reliability-based design optimization to substantially improve computational efficiency when applied to large-scale applications. In the enriched performance measure approach, four improvements are made over the original performance measure approach: as a way to launch reliability-based design optimization at a deterministic optimum design, as a new enhanced hybrid-mean value method, as an efficient probabilistic feasibility check, and as a fast reliability analysis under the condition of design closeness. It is found that deterministic design optimization helps improve numerical efficiency by reducing some reliability-based design optimization iterations. In reliability-based design optimization, a computational burden on the feasibility check of constraints can be significantly reduced by using a mean value first-order method and by carrying out the refined reliability analysis using the enhanced hybrid-mean value method for e-active and violated constraints. The enhanced hybrid-mean value method is developed to handle nonlinear and/or nonmonotonic constraints in reliability analysis. The fast reliability analysis method is proposed to efficiently evaluate probabilistic constraints under the condition of design closeness. Moreover, two numerical examples are provided to compare the enriched performance measure approach to existing reliability-based design optimization methods from a numerical efficiency and stability point of view.

Non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of stiffened shells under buckling constraint

A reliability-based design optimization method is proposed in this paper for the deep-water composite catenary risers. Since the load carrying capacity of anisotropic laminated structures is very susceptible to changes in the sequence, orientation, and thickness of plies, it is necessary to introduce a reliability index as a boundary condition during the optimization process. Compared to traditional steel risers, the composites have a broader application prospects due to several advantages, such as high specific strength and stiffness as well as high fatigue and corrosion resistance. The classic lamination theory is used to compute the equivalent mechanical properties of composite risers, and the global model is then established to obtain the response of the key section that serves to be the boundary for the local model. In addition, the Design of Experiment （DOE） method is used to construct an approximate model, and the Monte Carlo method is utilized to analyze the result of the Deterministic Optimization（DO） and the Reliability-Based Design Optimization （RBDO）. This study shows that the optimized results not only satisfy the strength requirements but also possess a lower weight and a better reliability， which are feasible for composite catenary risers.

This article proposes a method for analyzing the gravity balancing reliability of spring-articulated serial robots with uncertainties. Gravity balancing reliability is defined as the probability that the torque reduction ratio (the ratio of the balanced torque to the unbalanced torque) is less than a specified threshold. In this paper, the reliability analysis is performed by exploiting a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with consideration of the uncertainties in the link dimensions, masses, and compliance parameters. A reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) method is also developed to seek reliable spring setting parameters for maximized balancing performance under a prescribed uncertainty level. The RBDO is formulated with consideration of a probabilistic reliability constraint and solved by using a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the gravity balancing performance and reliability of a robot with uncertainties. A sensitivity analysis of the balancing design is also performed. Lastly, the effectiveness of the RBDO method is demonstrated through a case study in which the balancing performance and reliability of a robot with uncertainties are improved with the proposed method.

In this study, an effective method for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is proposed enhancing sequential optimization and reliability assessment (SORA) method by convex approximations. In SORA, reliability estimation and deterministic optimization are performed sequentially. The sensitivity and function value of probabilistic constraint at the most probable point (MPP) are obtained in the reliability analysis loop. In this study, the convex approximations for probabilistic constraint are constructed by utilizing the sensitivity and function value of the probabilistic constraint at the MPP. Hence, the proposed method requires much less function evaluations of probabilistic constraints in the deterministic optimization than the original SORA method. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method were verified through numerical examples.