Design strategies for additive manufacturing using vat photopolymerization systems

The unique tool-less and layer-upon-layer capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) have largely lessened manufacturing constraints and significantly broadened design freedom. AM offers new opportunities for developing customized products by achieving significant improvements in product performances and lower overall costs. The AM-enabled customization opportunities inevitably challenge traditionally design theories and methodologies (DTMs) that lack design knowledge for AM products. Here, to counteract this limitation, this study presents a novel methodology for constructing knowledge supporting DTMs for AM-enabled customization: customized design for AM (CDfAM). The CDfAM supports two main phases of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM): (1) opportunistic DfAM in a conceptual design phase and (2) restrictive DfAM in an embodiment design phase. In terms of the knowledge construction for the opportunistic DfAM, it is essential to construct knowledge that supports to explore a customized design space enabled by AM’s design freedom from the conceptual design phase. To address the challenge, this study provides a novel method for capturing knowledge of customized AM product behaviors. First, this study proposes an affordance-based DfAM framework by integrating the concept of affordance into three link chain models. Second, an affordance structure is proposed to develop a formal method for representing the knowledge of the customized AM product behaviors utilizing finite state automata. In terms of the knowledge construction for the restrictive DfAM, this study presents a formal method for representing and reasoning customizable modular knowledge of design rules for AM. First, a novel structured modular hierarchy and associated formalisms of AM design rule elements are presented. Second, machine learning is employed to automatically learn design rules from AM data, which leverages the proposed design rule formalisms. A knowledge graph is designed and built to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Case studies with AM products such as a transtibial prosthesis leg and AM data such as ex-situ AM measurement data provide illustrations in this study. The case studies show that the proposed methodology explicitly constructs structured and correlated AM design knowledge of customized AM product behaviors, product geometries, and additive manufacturability constraints. It is also shown that qualified design knowledge in the knowledge graph enhances automation of DfAM decision-making and data-driven knowledge constructions. The proposed CDfAM methodology enables incorporating both customized AM product functionalities and additive manufacturability constraints into product designs. This study provides a foundation for AM knowledge construction and data- and knowledge-driven automation of DfAM decision-making. Validated design rules and representations are expected to contribute to developing international standards on AM design rules.

Research in additive manufacturing (AM) has increased the use of AM in many industries, resulting in a commensurate need for a workforce skilled in AM. In order to meet this need, educational institutions have undertaken different initiatives to integrate design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) into the engineering curriculum. However, limited research has explored the impact of these educational interventions in bringing about changes in the technical goodness of students' design outcomes, particularly through the integration of DfAM concepts in an engineering classroom environment. This study explores this gap using an experimental study with 193 participants recruited from a junior-level course on mechanical engineering design. The participants were split into three educational intervention groups: (1) no DfAM, (2) restrictive DfAM, and (3) restrictive and opportunistic (dual) DfAM. The effects of the educational intervention on the participants' use of DfAM were measured through changes in (1) participants' DfAM self-efficacy, (2) technical goodness of their AM design outcomes, and (3) participants' use of DfAM-related concepts when describing and evaluating their AM designs. The results showed that while all three educational interventions result in similar changes in the participants' opportunistic DfAM self-efficacy, participants who receive only restrictive DfAM inputs show the greatest increase in their restrictive DfAM self-efficacy. Further, we see that despite these differences, all three groups show a similar decrease in the technical goodness of their AM designs, after attending the lectures. A content analysis of the participants' design descriptions and evaluations revealed a simplification of their design geometries, which provides a possible explanation for the decrease in their technical goodness, despite the encouragement to utilize the design freedom of AM to improve functionality or optimize the weight of the structure. These results emphasize the need for more in-depth DfAM education to encourage the use of both opportunistic and restrictive DfAM during student design challenges. The results also highlight the possible influence of how the design problem is stated on the use of DfAM in solving it.

The cyclic manufacturing processes of Additive Manufacturing (AM) create three-dimensional objects layer by layer, offer a large freedom in design, and suffer from very different restrictions compared to conventional manufacturing processes. Nowadays, AM is a mature manufacturing technology capable of being applied in industrial series production. However, the AM technology enters the industrial series production only slowly. A main reason is the fact that engineers in industry have little to no experience in Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) and an integrated experience transfer in engineering education is not yet widespread. To implement the AM technology, a course for graduate students was developed and established, mainly in the master studies and in the field of mechanical engineering. The goal of the course is that the students gain experience in the possibilities and the restrictions of DfAM. The course is based on the Experience Transfer Model (ETM) and is divided in two parts, a lecture and a team project. In the lecture, the students gain explicit knowledge for DfAM. In the practical team project, the students develop and produce AM prototypes based on a variety of AM processes and gain implicit knowledge. The concept of the team project is based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The whole team project follows a product development process, including presentations of milestone. The physical outcomes showed that the students are able to design AM optimized parts without falling back into old design patterns. In a survey at the end of the lecture series, the students gave the authors feedback. The large majority of the feedback was positive.

A Design for Additive Manufacturing Framework: Product Function Integration and Structure Simplification

Additive manufacturing (AM) is widely used in various industries and has transformed the way products are designed and manufactured.Training workshops in conjunction with a part assessment framework encourage designers to use design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) considerations during the process of idea generation.In this respect, a training framework will assist researchers, educators, and students to evaluate and improve designs and encourage exploration of changes that need to be made during the design process.Successful implementation of DfAM considerations in engineering design classes are an important step in preparing students for professional careers.This research investigates the effect of DfAM integration in engineering curriculum on student design in the first-year engineering classes.Students are given a pre-intervention survey to gather information on their self-efficacy and prior experience with AM.Students complete a design challenge prior to the DfAM educational intervention that is then offered in the form of a design workshop in conjunction with a brief lecture.Ideas generated are collected and assessed using an assessment framework that encourages the use of DfAM considerations.Parts are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in the following categories: part complexity, assembly complexity, number of separate parts, functionality, thin/smallest feature size, smallest tolerance, unsupported features, support material removal and the largest build plate contact.A score is generated and assigned to each design pre and post intervention.A post intervention survey is given to participants to gather information on changes in DfAM self-efficacy after the intervention as well as to gather feedback on suggested improvements and usefulness of the intervention workshops.The student outcomes before and after intervention are collected and compared for improvement in use of DfAM concepts.Gender differences are also investigated.Results show that DfAM educational intervention improves design scores and student DfAM self-efficacy.These results will enable educators to incorporate DfAM workshops in the engineering curriculum.

The aim of this study was to measure the concentrations of gaseous and particulate contaminants originated from additive manufacturing operations and post-processes in an occupational setting when plastics were used as feedstock materials. Secondary aims were to evaluate the concentration levels based on proposed exposure limits and target values and to propose means to reduce exposure to contaminants released in additive manufacturing processes. Volatile organic compounds were sampled with Tenax TA adsorption tubes and analyzed with a thermo desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry instrument. Carbonyl compounds were sampled with DNPH-Silica cartridges and analyzed with a high-performance liquid chromatography device. Particles were measured with P-Trak instrument and indoor air quality was sampled with IAQ-Calc instrument. Dust mass concentrations were measured simultaneously with a DustTrak DRX instrument and IOM-samplers. Particle concentrations were highest (2070-81 890 #/cm3 mean) during manufacturing with methods where plastics were thermally processed. Total volatile organic compounds concentrations, in contrast, were low (113–317 µg/m3 mean) during manufacturing with such methods, and vat photopolymerization. However, total volatile organic compounds concentrations of material jetting and multi jet fusion methods were higher (1,114–2,496 µg/m3 mean), perhaps because of material and binder spraying, where part of the spray can become aerosolized. Chemical treatment of manufactured objects was found to be a severe volatile organic compounds source as well. Formaldehyde was detected in low concentrations (3–40 µg/m3) in all methods except for material jetting method, in addition to several other carbonyl compounds. Notable dust concentrations (1.4–9.1 mg/m3) were detected only during post-processing of powder bed fusion and multi jet fusion manufactured objects. Indoor air quality parameters were not found to be notably impacted by manufacturing operations. Only low concentrations (below 2 ppm) of CO were detected during several manufacturing processes. All studied additive manufacturing operations emitted potentially harmful contaminants into their environments, which should be considered in occupational additive manufacturing and workplace design. According to the measured contaminant levels it is possible that adverse additive manufacturing related health effects may occur among exposed workers.

The design methodologies and part shape algorithms for additive manufacturing (AM) are rapidly growing fields, proven to be of critical importance for the uptake of additive manufacturing of parts with enhanced performance in all major industrial sectors. The current trend for part design is a computationally driven approach where the parts are algorithmically morphed to meet the functional requirements with optimized performance in terms of material distribution. However, the manufacturability restrictions of AM processes are not considered at the primary design phases but at a later post-morphed stage of the part’s design. This paper proposes an AM design method to ensure: (1) optimized material distribution based on the load case and (2) the part’s manufacturability. The buildability restrictions from the direct energy deposition (DED) AM technology were used as input to the AM shaping algorithm to grant high AM manufacturability. The first step of this work was to define the term of AM manufacturability, its effect on AM production, and to propose a framework to estimate the quantified value of AM manufacturability for the given part design. Moreover, an AM design method is proposed, based on the developed internal stresses of the build volume for the load case. Stress tensors are used for the determination of the build orientation and as input for the part morphing. A top-down mesoscale geometric optimization is used to realize the AM part design. The DED Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) rules are used to delimitate the morphing of the part, representing at the same time the freeform mindset of the AM technology. The morphed shape of the part is optimized in terms of topology and AM manufacturability. The topology optimization and AM manufacturability indicator (TMI) is introduced to screen the percentage of design elements that serve topology optimization and the ones that serve AM manufacturability. In the end, a case study for proof of concept is realized.

The demand for additive manufacturing (AM) continues to grow as more industries look to integrate the technology into their product development. However, there is a deficit of designers skilled to innovate with this technology due to challenges in supporting designers with tools and education for their development in design for AM (DfAM). There is a need to introduce intuitive tools and knowledge to enable future designers to DfAM. Immersive virtual reality (VR) shows promise to serve as an intuitive tool for DfAM to aid designers during design evaluation. The goal of this research is to, therefore, identify the effects of immersion in design evaluation and study how evaluating designs for DfAM between mediums that vary in immersion, affects the results of the DfAM evaluation and the mental effort experienced from evaluating the designs. Our findings suggest that designers can use immersive and non-immersive mediums for DfAM evaluation without experiencing significant differences in the outcomes of the evaluation and the cognitive load experienced from conducting the evaluation. The findings from this work thus have implications for how industries can customize product and designer-talent development using modular design evaluation systems that leverage capabilities in immersive and non-immersive DfAM evaluation.

Additive manufacturing (AM) can produce designs in a manner that greatly differs from the methods used in the older, more familiar technologies of traditional manufacturing (TM). As an example, AM's layer-by-layer approach to manufacturing designs can lead to the production of intricate geometries and make use of multiple materials, made possible without added manufacturing cost and time due to AM's “free complexity.” Despite this contrasting method for manufacturing designs, designers often forgo the new design considerations for AM (AM design heuristics). Instead, they rely on their familiarity with the design considerations for TM (TM design heuristics) regardless of the intended manufacturing process. For designs that are intended to be manufactured using AM, this usage of TM design considerations is wasteful as it leads to unnecessary material usage, increased manufacturing time, and can result in designs that are poorly manufactured. To remedy this problem, there is a need to intervene early in the design process to help address any concerns regarding the use of AM design heuristics. This work aims to address this opportunity through a preliminary exploration of the design heuristics that students naturally leverage when creating designs in the context of TM and AM. In this study, 117 students in an upper-level engineering design course were given an open-ended design challenge and later tasked with self-evaluating their designs for their manufacturability with TM and AM. This evaluation of the students' designs was later repeated by relevant experts, who would identify the common design heuristics that students are most likely to use in their designs. Future studies will build on these findings by cementing early-stage design support tools that emphasize the significant heuristics found herein. For example, this work found that the design heuristic “incorporating complexity” was the most significant indicator of designs most suited for AM and should therefore be highly encouraged/emphasized when guiding designers in the use of AM. In doing so, it will be possible for early-stage design support tools to maximally improve designs that are intended to be manufactured for AM.

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a “game-changing” digital fabrication technology that can fundamentally alter the way products are designed and manufactured. In nuclear engineering, the application of additive manufacturing can enable advanced reactor designs with better performance, lower cost, and quicker deployment. To exploit the maximum potential of additive manufacturing, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) is needed, DfAM can leverage the complexity freedom offered by additive manufacturing technology to break traditional design constraints and achieve enhanced performance. Generative design, one of the key technologies in DfAM, is an iterative exploration method using AI-driven algorithms to generate a series of design solutions that meet specified constraints. In this work, a generative design platform for micro-reactors is developed based on DASSULT SIMULIA Isight. To simulate and analyze the multi-physics performance of the reactor design, various multi-physics simulation codes are integrated on this generative design platform, including RMC for neutron physics analysis, ANSYS Fluent for computational fluid dynamics analysis, and ANSYS Mechanical for structural mechanics analysis. A multi-objective optimization method is used to explore geometric parameters and fuel configurations to achieve better neutronics, thermal-fluidics, and structural mechanics performance. The generative design solution is a 4 MW helium-cooled nuclear reactor which includes 3D-printed silicon carbide (SiC) matrix embedded with tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel. Helium at 3 MPa is chosen as the coolant, and the cross-shaped coolant channels are distributed within the matrix to remove the heat generated by fission. According to the multiphysics analysis, the reactor has a initial keff of 1.0571, power peaking factor FQ of 1.50, and operating lifetime of 1200 EFPD (Effective Full Power Days), with a maximum temperature of 1331 K and a peak thermal stress of 141.3 MPa. The generative design method and platform provide a systematic and efficient approach for the design of additively manufactured micro-reactors, and the generative design solution demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have seen fast growth in the last few decades. AM needs the implementation of new methods in design, fabrication, and delivery to end-users. Hence, AM techniques have given great flexibility to designers as the design of complex components and highly customized products are no longer binding from a manufacturability point of view. In addition to high material variety, this allows multi-material and variable mechanical characteristics of product manufacturing. This review paper addresses the design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) rules, guidelines, and tools to guide the designer to take advantage of the opportunities provided by AM whether in the early design stages (EDS) or in the later phase using computer-aided design (CAD) tools. It discusses issues related to the design for AM and proposes a DfAM framework applied in the design for the additive manufacturing process.

This study establishes a systematic and reproducible workflow for topology optimization (TO) of indexable face milling cutter bodies with integrated internal coolant channels, designed for Additive Manufacturing (AM) of metallic parts. Grounded in Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) principles, the workflow combines displacement-based TO and computational fluid dynamics analysis to generate simulation-driven tool geometries tailored to the constraints of AM. By leveraging iterative design knowledge, the proposed methodology enhances the scalability and repeatability of the design process, reducing development time and supporting rapid adaptation across various tool geometries. AM is explicitly exploited to integrate support-free internal coolant channels directed toward the insert cutting edge, thereby achieving a 20% mass reduction relative to the initial milling tool designs, and improving material usage efficiency at the design stage. The workflow yields numerically optimized geometries that maintain simulated global stiffness under the considered loading conditions and exhibit coolant flow distributions that effectively target the exposed cutting edges. These simulation results demonstrate the feasibility of an AM oriented, workflow-based approach for the numerical design of milling tools with internal cooling, mass reduction and provide a focused basis for subsequent experimental validation and comparison with conventionally manufactured counterparts.

Chapter 1 - Introduction to AM

Opportunities are offered by multiple Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes nowadays. Design rules are evolving to lead to lighter and stiffer parts with really more complex shapes than those obtained by conventional processes. Worldwide, new methodologies/tools of assistance for the design are developed such as Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM). Additive manufacturing can allow the development of new metamaterials and health-matter evaluation based on energy flow evaluation. In this paper, the objective is to generate a new methodology with DfAM based on mesoscale knowledge. It is generated with open lab bench and simple object characterization. A methodology is presented to formalize and quantify information at multilayer dimension. A database is also generated following Design of Experiments (DoE) to obtain metamodels. They are developed for specific features representative of AM geometric class such as overhanging, holes or walls for instance. Mereotopological primitives with their AM definitions are used to define features in term of space and time variables. This theory enables the formalization of knowledge at the mesoscopic scale taken into consideration layer by layer build-up. It is then possible to use it to integrate data and information to the different feature juxtapositions using recognition algorithm. Information for each feature can then be included and explicitly used to help the designer during detailed design phase. A global 4-steps DfAM methodology maximizing the potential of AM is presented and validated through a part from the space industry use case. It includes the definition of skeleton/skin entities, pattern decomposition, information associated based on material evaluation and decision for AM part.

Design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) seeks to develop designs that take advantage of the unique capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) processes to maximize benefits. In this paper, several issues at the frontier of DFAM research are highlighted. First, the need is described to include as-manufactured mechanical and other physical properties, such as topology and shape optimization and generative design, during computational design. AM processes rarely produce parts with homogeneous composition and isotropic properties, so design methods and tools should not assume them. Second, the topic of designing for the AM process chain is important since AM-fabricated parts typically need postprocessing operations, such as support removal, finish machining, heat treatments, etc. DFAM methods need to incorporate the entire process chain, not just the AM process, which is explored with an example from metal powder bed fusion. Third, potentially, the largest benefit of AM can be realized by radically rethinking product architectures. Examples of an electric motorcycle and an assistive exosuit illustrate the ideas and potential benefits. Finally, some thoughts on design for 4D printing are offered, specifically for 3D printed morphing and deployable systems that utilize the shape memory effect.