Design for additive manufacturing: Review and framework proposal

The design methodologies and part shape algorithms for additive manufacturing (AM) are rapidly growing fields, proven to be of critical importance for the uptake of additive manufacturing of parts with enhanced performance in all major industrial sectors. The current trend for part design is a computationally driven approach where the parts are algorithmically morphed to meet the functional requirements with optimized performance in terms of material distribution. However, the manufacturability restrictions of AM processes are not considered at the primary design phases but at a later post-morphed stage of the part’s design. This paper proposes an AM design method to ensure: (1) optimized material distribution based on the load case and (2) the part’s manufacturability. The buildability restrictions from the direct energy deposition (DED) AM technology were used as input to the AM shaping algorithm to grant high AM manufacturability. The first step of this work was to define the term of AM manufacturability, its effect on AM production, and to propose a framework to estimate the quantified value of AM manufacturability for the given part design. Moreover, an AM design method is proposed, based on the developed internal stresses of the build volume for the load case. Stress tensors are used for the determination of the build orientation and as input for the part morphing. A top-down mesoscale geometric optimization is used to realize the AM part design. The DED Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) rules are used to delimitate the morphing of the part, representing at the same time the freeform mindset of the AM technology. The morphed shape of the part is optimized in terms of topology and AM manufacturability. The topology optimization and AM manufacturability indicator (TMI) is introduced to screen the percentage of design elements that serve topology optimization and the ones that serve AM manufacturability. In the end, a case study for proof of concept is realized.

The unique tool-less and layer-upon-layer capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) have largely lessened manufacturing constraints and significantly broadened design freedom. AM offers new opportunities for developing customized products by achieving significant improvements in product performances and lower overall costs. The AM-enabled customization opportunities inevitably challenge traditionally design theories and methodologies (DTMs) that lack design knowledge for AM products. Here, to counteract this limitation, this study presents a novel methodology for constructing knowledge supporting DTMs for AM-enabled customization: customized design for AM (CDfAM). The CDfAM supports two main phases of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM): (1) opportunistic DfAM in a conceptual design phase and (2) restrictive DfAM in an embodiment design phase. In terms of the knowledge construction for the opportunistic DfAM, it is essential to construct knowledge that supports to explore a customized design space enabled by AM’s design freedom from the conceptual design phase. To address the challenge, this study provides a novel method for capturing knowledge of customized AM product behaviors. First, this study proposes an affordance-based DfAM framework by integrating the concept of affordance into three link chain models. Second, an affordance structure is proposed to develop a formal method for representing the knowledge of the customized AM product behaviors utilizing finite state automata. In terms of the knowledge construction for the restrictive DfAM, this study presents a formal method for representing and reasoning customizable modular knowledge of design rules for AM. First, a novel structured modular hierarchy and associated formalisms of AM design rule elements are presented. Second, machine learning is employed to automatically learn design rules from AM data, which leverages the proposed design rule formalisms. A knowledge graph is designed and built to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Case studies with AM products such as a transtibial prosthesis leg and AM data such as ex-situ AM measurement data provide illustrations in this study. The case studies show that the proposed methodology explicitly constructs structured and correlated AM design knowledge of customized AM product behaviors, product geometries, and additive manufacturability constraints. It is also shown that qualified design knowledge in the knowledge graph enhances automation of DfAM decision-making and data-driven knowledge constructions. The proposed CDfAM methodology enables incorporating both customized AM product functionalities and additive manufacturability constraints into product designs. This study provides a foundation for AM knowledge construction and data- and knowledge-driven automation of DfAM decision-making. Validated design rules and representations are expected to contribute to developing international standards on AM design rules.

Research in additive manufacturing (AM) has increased the use of AM in many industries, resulting in a commensurate need for a workforce skilled in AM. In order to meet this need, educational institutions have undertaken different initiatives to integrate design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) into the engineering curriculum. However, limited research has explored the impact of these educational interventions in bringing about changes in the technical goodness of students' design outcomes, particularly through the integration of DfAM concepts in an engineering classroom environment. This study explores this gap using an experimental study with 193 participants recruited from a junior-level course on mechanical engineering design. The participants were split into three educational intervention groups: (1) no DfAM, (2) restrictive DfAM, and (3) restrictive and opportunistic (dual) DfAM. The effects of the educational intervention on the participants' use of DfAM were measured through changes in (1) participants' DfAM self-efficacy, (2) technical goodness of their AM design outcomes, and (3) participants' use of DfAM-related concepts when describing and evaluating their AM designs. The results showed that while all three educational interventions result in similar changes in the participants' opportunistic DfAM self-efficacy, participants who receive only restrictive DfAM inputs show the greatest increase in their restrictive DfAM self-efficacy. Further, we see that despite these differences, all three groups show a similar decrease in the technical goodness of their AM designs, after attending the lectures. A content analysis of the participants' design descriptions and evaluations revealed a simplification of their design geometries, which provides a possible explanation for the decrease in their technical goodness, despite the encouragement to utilize the design freedom of AM to improve functionality or optimize the weight of the structure. These results emphasize the need for more in-depth DfAM education to encourage the use of both opportunistic and restrictive DfAM during student design challenges. The results also highlight the possible influence of how the design problem is stated on the use of DfAM in solving it.

Design for manufacturing to design for Additive Manufacturing: Analysis of implications for design optimality and product sustainability

The cyclic manufacturing processes of Additive Manufacturing (AM) create three-dimensional objects layer by layer, offer a large freedom in design, and suffer from very different restrictions compared to conventional manufacturing processes. Nowadays, AM is a mature manufacturing technology capable of being applied in industrial series production. However, the AM technology enters the industrial series production only slowly. A main reason is the fact that engineers in industry have little to no experience in Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) and an integrated experience transfer in engineering education is not yet widespread. To implement the AM technology, a course for graduate students was developed and established, mainly in the master studies and in the field of mechanical engineering. The goal of the course is that the students gain experience in the possibilities and the restrictions of DfAM. The course is based on the Experience Transfer Model (ETM) and is divided in two parts, a lecture and a team project. In the lecture, the students gain explicit knowledge for DfAM. In the practical team project, the students develop and produce AM prototypes based on a variety of AM processes and gain implicit knowledge. The concept of the team project is based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The whole team project follows a product development process, including presentations of milestone. The physical outcomes showed that the students are able to design AM optimized parts without falling back into old design patterns. In a survey at the end of the lecture series, the students gave the authors feedback. The large majority of the feedback was positive.

Smart manufacturing involves the use of emergent technologies and requires dynamic feedback of customer’s demands. These concerns need a rapid Decision Support System (DSS) considering emergent manufacturing processes such as Additive (AM) and Hybrid (HM) Manufacturing and tracking the product changes. This paper proposes a DSS for process selection based on manufacturing complexity and cost. The complexity parameters, deduced from design for manufacturing (DFM), design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) and design for hybrid manufacturing (DFHM) rules, are automatically extracted from computer aided design (CAD) model to follow the product changes. Cost models are defined for each manufacturing process type. In design phase, the manufacturing cost estimation allows considering the cost as a selection factor. The combined complexity based on manufacturing difficulty and cost represents a new paradigm for process selection. The case studies show the reliability of the proposed DSS and its ability to respect the company resources and strategy.

The unique design freedom offered by additive manufacturing (AM) technologies enables engineers to develop more innovative products with relatively lower costs within a shorter period of processing time in comparison with conventional manufacturing methods. On the other hand, the unique capabilities of AM have created a platform for researchers to combine several engineering methods with the new manufacturing technique to grow industrial applications as well as resolve the existing issues with AM processes. Understanding the research values that AM offers academic environments, this paper performs a systematic survey on AM-related research topics in the fields of mechanical engineering and materials science that have attracted much attention from research teams over the last few years. These topics, namely process modelling in AM, innovative research in AM, generative design by AM, material characterisation in AM processes, and finally, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), are notably investigated through this study.

Additively manufactured materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review on their mechanical characteristics and energy absorption

Fundamentals of Mechanical Design and Analysis for AM Fabricated Parts

Additive manufacturing (AM) has impacted the manufacturing of complex three-dimensional objects in multiple materials for a wide array of applications. However, additive manufacturing, as an upcoming field, lacks automated and specific design rules for different AM processes. Moreover, the selection of specific AM processes for different geometries requires expert knowledge, which is difficult to replicate. An automated and data-driven system is needed that can capture the AM expert knowledge base and apply it to 3D-printed parts to avoid manufacturability issues. This research aims to develop a data-driven system for AM process selection within the design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) framework for Industry 4.0. A Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Weighting technique was optimized using 3D CAD data as an input to identify the optimal AM technique based on several requirements and constraints. A two-stage model was developed wherein the stage 1 model displayed average accuracies of 70% and the stage 2 model showed higher average accuracies of up to 97.33% based on quantitative feature labeling and augmentation of the datasets. The steady-state genetic algorithm (SSGA) was determined to be the most effective algorithm after benchmarking against estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms, respectively. The output of this system leads to the identification of optimal AM processes for manufacturing 3D objects. This paper presents an automated design for an additive manufacturing system that is accurate and can be extended to other 3D-printing processes.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present Design Rules for additive manufacturing and a method for their development. Design/methodology/approach – First, a process-independent method for the development of Design Rules was worked out. Therefore, geometrical standard elements and attributes that characterize the elements’ shapes have been defined. Next, the standard elements have been manufactured with different attribute values with Laser Sintering, Laser Melting and Fused Deposition Modeling, and their geometrical quality was examined. From the results, Design Rules for additive manufacturing were derived and summarized in a catalogue. Findings – Due to the process independent method, Design Rules were developed that apply for the different considered additive manufacturing technologies equally. These Design Rules are completely function-independent and easily transferable to individual part designs. Research limitations/implications – The developed Design Rules can only apply for the considered boundary conditions. To extend the Design Rules’ validity, their applicability should be proven for other boundary conditions. Practical implications – The developed Design Rules practically support the design of technical parts. Additionally they can be used for training and teaching in the field of “design for additive manufacturing”. Originality/value – The developed Design Rules constitute a first step toward general Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing. Thus, they might form a suitable basis for further scientific approaches, and the Design Rules can be used to set up teaching documentations for lessons and seminars.

Design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) seeks to develop designs that take advantage of the unique capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) processes to maximize benefits. In this paper, several issues at the frontier of DFAM research are highlighted. First, the need is described to include as-manufactured mechanical and other physical properties, such as topology and shape optimization and generative design, during computational design. AM processes rarely produce parts with homogeneous composition and isotropic properties, so design methods and tools should not assume them. Second, the topic of designing for the AM process chain is important since AM-fabricated parts typically need postprocessing operations, such as support removal, finish machining, heat treatments, etc. DFAM methods need to incorporate the entire process chain, not just the AM process, which is explored with an example from metal powder bed fusion. Third, potentially, the largest benefit of AM can be realized by radically rethinking product architectures. Examples of an electric motorcycle and an assistive exosuit illustrate the ideas and potential benefits. Finally, some thoughts on design for 4D printing are offered, specifically for 3D printed morphing and deployable systems that utilize the shape memory effect.

Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in the architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is attracting the attention of designers, practitioners, and construction project stakeholders. Digital fabrication (Dfab) and design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) practices are found in current need of further research and development. The DfMA’s conceptual function is to maximize the process efficiency of Dfab and AM building projects. This work reviewed 171 relevant research articles over the past few decades. The concepts and the fundamentals of DfMA in building and construction were explored. In addition, DfMA procedures for Dfab, DfAM, and AM assembly processes were discussed. Lastly, the current machine learning research on DfMA in construction was also highlighted. As Dfab and DFAM are innovated, practical DFMA techniques begin to develop to a great extent. Large research gaps in the DfMA for Dfab and DfAM can be filled in terms of integrating them with product structural performance, management, studied cases, building information modeling (BIM), and machine learning to increase operational efficiency and sustainable practices.

Additive manufacturing (AM) systems present tremendous advantages over the traditional manufacturing systems, particularly for realizing complex shapes and producing custom parts. These advantages, and the rapid growth in the availability of AM systems, have led to a widespread increase in the use of AM. Unfortunately, general design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) tools that predict the engineering performance of AM parts are largely unavailable, and this has forced engineers to rely on engineering judgment and/or data from physical experiments. The data sets reported in the literature that quantify the performance of the existing AM systems provide much needed insight, but the data produced by experiments conducted on specific AM systems are necessarily of limited applicability. Given the large number of AM systems currently in use today, a potentially vast amount of data are needed to fully understand them all, and new AM systems and materials are being developed almost daily. To mitigate this need for an ever-increasing amount of data, this paper proposes the use of an approximation-assisted multi-objective optimization technique to quantify the performance of an AM system for specific design application in a targeted fashion. This general approach uses a limited number of physical experiments to answer a specific DfAM question of interest, and the results can then be used to design functional parts without the need for additional data. The implementation of the proposed approach is demonstrated with a material extrusion case study.

The emerging additive manufacturing (AM) technology works in a layer-wise fashion which makes it possible to manipulate material distribution and composition. The resulting effects are reflected on the potential of innovative shape design, consolidated assembly, optimized topology, and functionally graded material. These new characteristics force designers to rethink about how to make a better engineering design. However, existing design theory and methodology cannot take these potentials provided by AM into account. To fill this void, various design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) approaches are reported. Unfortunately, majority of them focused on part-level redesign without potential of being extended to assembly-level applications. In order to shed a light into this emerging field, an overview of current assembly-level DFAM is summarized in this paper. After that, existing issues including the absent analysis of AM’s impact on conceptual design, the lack of explicit functional analysis method, the shortage of decision-making support for part consolidation, the deficiency of functional reasoning approaches to generate AM-enabled features, and the scarcity of integrating manufacturing and assembly knowledge into design stage are analyzed and discussed. However, it seems that addressing these issues is such a large scope that collaborative efforts are in need from both design and manufacturing communities. Therefore, this paper serves as a call to action for the research community to establish a comprehensive assembly-level/ product-level DFAM method to realize product evolution. As an initial benchmark, authors propose a three-stage design methodology on the basis of the Systematic Design approach. In the presented framework, functional analysis, part consolidation, and structural optimization with process knowledge integration are much highlighted. Moreover, a simple redesign case study is exemplified to clarify existing issues and how the benchmark method works. In the end, this paper is wrapped up with future research.