Economic and social upgrading dynamics in global manufacturing value chains: A comparative analysis

Economic and Social Upgrading Dynamics in Global Manufacturing Value Chains: A Comparative Analysis

Agriculture, food and global value chains: issues, methods and challenges

Global value chains (GVCs) have changed the nature of production and specialisation around the world, including in agriculture and food sectors. This study takes an in-depth look at the landscape of agro-food GVCs and explores the factors that influence GVC participation by making use of a newly developed database on trade in value added for 20 agro-food sectors derived from the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) database. The study also explores the benefits of GVC participation, viewed through the lens of domestic value added creation and employment, with a focus on the policy factors that influence these benefits. The study points to considerable variation in GVC participation across agro-food sectors, driven not only by product characteristics but also by policy factors related to trade and investment, the agricultural enabling environment and policies influencing service markets. The study shows that for agro-food sectors, trade barriers act as a tax on exports, reducing the domestic value added created from participation in agro-food GVCs.

The Co-Evolution of Concentration in Mobile Phone Global Value Chains and Its Impact on Social Upgrading in Developing Countries

Effective integration into global value chains (GVCs) has enabled China’s technological progress and economic growth. Studying how China has built interactions with other countries within these GVCs and how it has transformed its GVCs in the electronics and IT equipment industries is of high scientific and practical significance. Using the TiVA 2023 value-added database published by the OECD, this article aims to examine the transformation of China’s GVCs in the development of IT production and exports from 1995 to 2022 and then to characterize the current situation and prospects. The study calculates indices of China’s upward and downward participation in electronics and IT equipment GVCs, as well as the role of this industry in the creation of final demand in other countries. The results of the study reveal the sustainability of the export potential China has created through its participation in GVCs, primarily in the consumer electronics and telecom equipment segments. China has been able to make significant inroads into GVCs, replacing essential products and technologies from Western countries while simultaneously increasing the dependence of their GVCs and final consumption on its IT industry. Under conditions of technological decoupling, the participation of both China and other countries in GVCs will gradually decline and/or develop toward regionalization. For China, this does not pose a threat of losing its leading position in the global market for most IT products, with the exception of semiconductors

The article is devoted to the generalization and systematization of the main theoretical approaches and practical methods of measuring the participation of countries or industries in global value chains (GVC). The work provides the definition and main content of global value chains. It has been noted that the growing role of global value chains and their importance not only changes the approach to the ways of generating income and ensuring economic growth, but also gives an awareness that the most important driver of economic growth of an industry or country is direct participation in global value chains. Significant arguments have been presented in favor of the participation of countries in global value chains. Summarizing the existing methods of calculating the degree of a country’s participation in global value chains, the authors have singled out four index based methods: Index of Vertical Specialization, Export complexity index, GVC participation index and GVC position index. Index of Vertical Specialization assumes using data on the country’s expenditure-output for the distribution of the value of imported foreign goods contained in export products of a certain industry in this country, on the total export value of the industry. Export complexity index based on export volume and income of a country that participates in global value chains, as well as the export of goods of a specific country and the industry index of goods to measure the national product index. GVC participation index is measured in terms of the value of goods and services added as a result of trade. GVC position index shows the “status” of a certain industry in a country: the higher the value, the higher the “status” of a certain industry in the country’s global value chain, and vice versa. The main formulas for calculating indices, advantages and disadvantages of their use have been presented. Thus, it has been proven that the GVC participation index, which is based on the Index of Vertical Specialization, reflects the dynamics of the integration of countries in the GVC and allows for inter-country and inter-industry comparative analysis, but does not provide an opportunity to assess the benefits received from participation in the GVC. The use of the GVC Status Index allows to solve this task both at the country and at the sectoral level. It has been proposed to use GVC participation index and GVC position index as a basis for analyzing Ukraine’s participation in global value chains. This will allow not only to reveal the degree of Ukraine’s participation in the modern international division of labor but also, based on the conclusions of such an analysis, to develop recommendations for improving the place of Ukraine in the GVC and change the position of Ukraine from a raw material supplier country to a raw material processing country.

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the relationship between economic upgrading (implementing higher value-added activities) and social upgrading (improvements in workers’ rights and employment) of supplier firms in global value chains (GVCs) governed by multinational enterprises (MNEs). This paper answers Buckley and Ghauri’s (2004) and Buckley and Strange (2015) calls to incorporate other theoretical approaches within the international business (IB) literature. Furthermore, the paper also responds to Lee and Gereffi (2015) argument, published in Critical perspectives on international business, of the need to incorporate the social impact of upgrading in the IB literature.Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with representatives from five supplier firms each in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, as well as with industry representatives.FindingsGovernance patterns within GVCs can create the conditions for economic upgrading leading to social upgrading achievements. Institutional factors also affect the conditions for social upgrading. Although moving to higher value-added activities is critical for supplier firms, this does not necessarily lead to social upgrading. This paper’s research findings suggest that the combination of economic and social upgrading is positively associated with suppliers manufacturing high value-added products and operating in relational networks. In contrast, economic upgrading, by itself, was limited to those firms manufacturing low value-added products, typically those in captive networks.Originality valueThis research is among an emerging body of literature seeking to integrate the GVC literature with the IB field. Importantly, it also contributes to the GVC literature by providing insight into an under-theorized aspect – the relationship between social and economic upgrading.

Environmental and social upgrading are emerging in the global value chains (GVCs) literature as areas of investigation related to upgrading. A limited number of studies have been conducted to explore environmental upgrading processes and outcomes, while considerable research has analysed the relationship between economic and social upgrading in GVCs. However, the relationship between environmental and social upgrading still needs to be investigated. This qualitative empirical research explores this under-theorised area by studying apparel firms in South Asia, namely in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, where social upgrading initiatives can be linked to environmental upgrading. Empirical findings suggest that there is a positive relationship between environmental and social upgrading in GVCs. Environmental upgrading not only results in increased wages, bonuses and allowances through skills development, learning and training but also results in improved working conditions. Employees are enthusiastic about being part of an environmental upgrading initiative.

Economic globalization creates new opportunities for countries to develop and achieve high rates of economic growth through participation in global value chains. However, many countries, especially developing ones, face economic difficulties due to weak involvement in global value chains and low prospects for moving from the least profitable to more profitable links of the chains. The relevance of the study lies in the need to assess the nature of Russia's participation in global value chains in high-tech sectors in order to understand the prospects for improving the position of Russian companies in the global production system, ensuring a technological breakthrough and sovereignty. In this study, based on the concept of the "smile curve" of global value chains and the ADB MRIO input-output tables for 2000, 2011 and 2021 for 63 countries and 35 industries, an assessment of the nature of participation of companies in high-tech sectors of the Russian economy in global value chains is given for the first time. The distribution of added value for Russian global value chains takes the form of a "smile curve". At the same time, the main beneficiaries of the added value in such chains are domestic service companies. The theoretical significance of the work is due to the original knowledge about the specifics of the involvement of high-tech sectors of Russia in global production, as well as the features of its spatial organization (by identifying key foreign partners) and the transformation of participation in global value chains over the studied period of time. The practical significance of the study primarily comes from the data obtained on the contribution of foreign partners and Russian sectors of the economy to intra- and inter-industry trade in the studied sectors. This made it possible to decompose the studied sector in terms of added value from the point of view of foreign and national final and intermediate products, as well as from the point of view of foreign and national added values.

Global value chain (GVC) participation has played a significant role in boosting the trade gains of both developed and developing seafood-exporting countries over the past three decades. In addition, the extent of GVC participation has become the most important platform for addressing gains from trade in developing seafood-exporting countries to ensure that their participation enhances economic growth. Recent studies on GVC participation in developing countries have highlighted the importance of domestic institutions. However, the literature is silent on the quality of the domestic institutions–GVC participation nexus. This paper aims to investigate the determinants of GVC participation and the effect of the quality of domestic institutional governance on seafood-exporting developing countries’ GVC participation indices. Using the Hausman–Taylor (HT) estimator and the system generalised method of moments (GMM) dynamic panel data methodology to examine seafood export data from 32 countries from 2009 to 2018, we find that economic potential drives backward GVC participation, while low forward participation might not only lead to lower gains from trade, but also limit countries to the supply of primary seafood products with little value addition. In addition, the quality of domestic institutional governance constrains GVC participation. Overall the results indicate that the quality of domestic institutional governance matters for the GVC participation of seafood-exporting developing countries.

This paper investigates the impact of global value chain (GVC) participation on energy efficiency in developing countries, using firm-level data from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. While integration into GVCs may expose firms to energy-intensive production segments, it also offers access to advanced technologies and spillovers. We develop a theoretical framework linking firms’ GVC embeddedness to energy consumption behavior and test its implications using detailed trade and energy use data. Our empirical results show that greater GVC participation significantly improves firms’ energy efficiency. Mechanism analysis reveals that GVC embeddedness enhances innovation input and productivity, both of which contribute to energy performance improvements. The effects are more pronounced for private firms and firms in capital-intensive industries. Our study contributes to the literature by offering the first firm-level evidence on the environmental implications of GVC integration, revealing importance of participating in GVC in solving the energy problems for the developing countries.

This study investigates the impacts of the global value chain (GVC) participation on conflicts across nations. The first novelty of this study is to observe the impacts of GVC participation on conflicts. In other words, the trade statistics are not conventional, but they track true domestic value-added embedded in exports and true foreign value-added embedded in imports, which provides a more accurate way to measure trade values. Secondly, the comprehensive data set enables us to include 188 countries and to conduct disaggregated analysis via the heterogeneity across sectors. The findings indicate that bilateral GVC participation has a significantly negative impact on the number of conflicts regardless of sector groups. The multilateral GVC participation of manufacturing and service sectors also decreases the number of conflicts across the countries. In other words, greater GVC activities can foster economic interdependence and peace because countries with close economic relations are less likely to wage war on one another due to the associated costs. Moreover, GVC participation may allow countries to access resources that are not available domestically. Therefore, trade can alleviate a potential cause of conflict. Regarding control variables, membership in the GATT, distance, common language, and polity measures are negatively associated with the number of conflicts whereas contiguity, common border, landlocked, and common colony are positively correlated with the number of conflicts. The findings are quite robust to a couple of robustness checks: different dependent variables, different samples, and 5-year (moving) averages. Therefore, we can argue that enlarging and deepening world trade negotiations and policies emphasizing peace might help to decrease tensions.

Engagement in the global division of labor has greatly influenced China’s economy and environment. With the multi-regional input–output (MRIO) framework, we calculate the global value chain (GVC) participation index of China’s 16 manufacturing sectors. We also measure the green upgrade index of manufacturing sectors based on the super-efficiency epsilon-based measure (SEBM) and the Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) index. In addition, the effect of GVC participation on the green upgrade of manufacturing sectors is empirically tested with a fixed effects regression model for panel data. Results show that: (1) sectors that rank high in the forward linkage-based GVC participation index also tend to rank high in the backward linkage-based GVC participation index; (2) the ML index is greater than 1 in most years, indicating that the green upgrade of China’s manufacturing sectors shows an uptrend; (3) for both forward and backward linkage, the rise of the GVC and complex GVC participation indexes significantly promotes the green upgrade of manufacturing sectors. Finally, GVC participation of China’s manufacturing sectors promotes green upgrade mainly through green technology progress. The conclusions have empirical evidence and policy implications for the advancement to medium- and high-end GVC participation and the green transition of China’s manufacturing sectors.

The research voices a two-fold attempt: the effect of global value chain (GVC) on the sustenance of gender-based inequalities and its reverse impact on higher gender-based discrimination in trade in GVC. In the theory of discrimination, it has been pointed out that an increase in market competition may drive out discrimination (Arrow, 1971; Becker, 1957; Goldin, 1990). This chapter tests the conjunction of the literature of discrimination and trade in the backdrop of GVC. The questions that we attempt to address are: first, whether trade in forward GVC or backward GVC mitigates or accentuates gender-based disparities? Second, whether trade in GVC that leads to an increase in market competition can contradict the Becker–Arrow–Goldin hypothesis? And finally, whether an exogenous increase in discrimination promotes or discourages GVC trade? We build a 3 × 3 Jonesian general equilibrium model with heterogeneity in the labor market. Discrimination between male and female labor is captured by the Beckerian wage markup of the male wage over the female wage. For generality of the model, it is assumed that while discrimination persists in two sectors of the economy employing unskilled labor, the other sector employing high-skilled labor is nondiscriminatory. Additionally, across the discriminatory sectors, the magnitude of discrimination is nonuniform. Interestingly, we obtain that in a labor-intensive GVC sector, capitalists prefer discrimination in the GVC sector over trade participation in GVC, whereas in a non-GVC capital-intensive sector, capitalists become indifferent over trade participation in GVC and discrimination in the non-GVC sector.

In the context of China’s integration into global value chains (GVCs) and construction of lower-carbon economy, this study examines the effects of two different types of GVC involvement (i.e. GVC participation and GVC position) and domestic research and development (R&D) on carbon emissions, simultaneously and interactively. Using the panel data of 17 industrial sectors in China from 2005 to 2015, which were identified by merging the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) industries and China’s National Economy Industries, we estimate GVC participation and GVC position. We then test the interaction effects of GVC involvement and R&D on carbon emissions, applying the extended Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model and feasible generalised least squares (FGLS) method. The results reveal that both GVC involvement and R&D have negative effects on carbon emissions. Moreover, the complementary effect occurs between GVC participation and R&D, while the substitution effect occurs between GVC position and R&D.