• Home
  • Search
  • Electro-Hydraulic Control Systems for Subsea Applications
  • Cite Icon7
  • https://doi.org/10.2118/3762-msCopy DOI Icon

Electro-Hydraulic Control Systems for Subsea Applications

  • May 16, 1972
  • G.s Stivers
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract This paper describes a versatile family of control systems for subsea BOP'S, wellheads, and valves. It also presents results of extensive shop and field tests including one serie conducted eight hundred feet below the water surface. After describing in some detail the various subsystems used in making up such systems, the paper will discuss several applications for some of the systems and review operating conditions and their effect on choosing systems. Because the primary power output of the systems is hydraulic, they operate valves and blowout preventers without requiring modification or intermediate equipment. However, considerations of economy and reliability frequently favor electrical signal transmission. Test results reported show the success of composite electro-hydraulic systems including several unique design features. Introduction A versatile family of control systems for subsea BOP'S, wellheads, and valve manifolds has been designed and extensively tested in the shop and in the field. These systems are electro-hydraulic in that the communication subsystems are electric and the primary power trains are hydraulic, so that the systems are easily used with existing equipment such as BOP stacks, wellhead valves, and flowline valves. This family of controls offers several important advantages over the all-hydraulic systems used almost exclusively today in subsea applications. The first is speed of response. Electric communications are almost instanteous, whereas all-hydraulic systems require several seconds to several minutes for the pressure signal to propagate down the hose or pipe. The pressure signal to propagate down the hose or pipe. The greater the separation between the control panel and the operating equipment, the greater the time saving. A second advantage is that information on the status of the subsea equipment and the control system itself is easily obtained at little additional cost. This feature can be an important factor in safety, pollution control, and timely maintenance of the equipment. A third feature, particularly important in BOP Controls, is that armored electro-hydraulic umbilical or electric cable can be used in place of the unarmored hose bundles used today, thus providing a strong control link that is less likely to be damaged and can be used to raise and lower a retrievable control system, eliminating separate running lines and winches. A fourth feature, of considerable importance in deep water operations, is the capability of these systems to incorporate an acoustic communications link to operate the subsea equipment in the event the primary control line is lost. Finally, these systems offer a very flexible package of subsystems that can be selected to provide the most economical control system for whatever combination of performance features the application requires. performance features the application requires. As an illustration of this flexibility, consider the various communications and power subsystems that are available. Any control system can be visualized as consisting of two subsystems, a power train and a communication subsystem, which interface in some type of switching component, such as a solenoid operated hydraulic pilot valve. The communications subsystems available are 1) a one-wire-per-function system, in which the control panel push button is connected directly to a solenoid-operated valve; 2) a multiplex communications system, in which a pair of wires carries a coded message, much as a telegraph does; and 3) an acoustic communications system which can be used independently or as a back-up to either of the other systems. In fact, the acoustic system and the multiplex system can use the same receiving and transmitting electronics to reduce cost if the primary aim is to guard against cable failure. The one-wire-per-function system is more economical for shorter separation distances and smaller numbers of controlled functions, whereas the multiplex system is more economical for longer separation distances and larger numbers of controlled functions.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations285

An integrated, underwater optical /acoustic communications system

  • May 01, 2010
  • OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY
  • N Farr +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Distributing The Knowledge From The Ocean-Application Of Open Standards In Subsea Control Systems

  • May 02, 2005
  • B Gardner +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Leakage Monitoring of Subsea Blowout Preventer Control System

  • Apr 30, 2018
  • Taoufik Wassar +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Protective Deployment of Subsea Equipment

  • May 05, 2003
  • E.B Lallier +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

A Multi-User Detection Scheme Based on Polar Code Construction in Downlink Underwater Acoustic OFDM Communication System

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • IEEE Access
  • Gang Qiao +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations14

A Comparative Analysis and Experimental Study on Wireless Aerial and Underwater Acoustic Communications

  • Aug 29, 2006
  • R Jurdak +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Growling from the gut: co-option of the gastric mill for acoustic communication in ghost crabs.

  • Sep 11, 2019
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • Jennifer R A Taylor +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

An improved demodulation scheme for FH-MFSK underwater acoustic communications

  • May 01, 2012
  • Zheguang Zou +3
  • Conference Article

Remote Connection of Deepwater Pipelines Using Standard Bolted Flanges

  • Apr 30, 2007
  • Ian Frazer +2
  • Conference Article

Hybrid control and data acquisition system for geographically distributed sensors for environmental monitoring

  • Oct 05, 2007
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Fabio Garufi +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Riser gas risk mitigation with advanced flow detection and managed pressure drilling technologies in deepwater operations in Australia

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • The APPEA Journal
  • Julmar Shaun Toralde +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations17

Work-in-Progress: Networked Control of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles with Acoustic and Radio Frequency Hybrid Communication

  • Dec 01, 2017
  • Mehrullah Soomro +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Energy Scavenging Technology and Components in WSN

  • Feb 08, 2014
  • International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security
  • Sutapa Sarkar +2
  • Research Article

C3 群型ロボット衛星に向けた再構成アームシステム

  • Jan 01, 2004
  • The Proceedings of the Space Engineering Conference
  • Nobumasa Yamaguchi +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations39

Reliability analysis of subsea blowout preventer control systems subjected to multiple error shocks

  • Jul 14, 2012
  • Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Baoping Cai +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.