• Home
  • Search
  • Flux-freezing breakdown in high-conductivity magnetohydrodynamic turbulence
  • Cite Icon189
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12128Copy DOI Icon

Flux-freezing breakdown in high-conductivity magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

  • May 22, 2013
  • Nature
  • Gregory Eyink +8 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The idea of 'frozen-in' magnetic field lines for ideal plasmas is useful to explain diverse astrophysical phenomena, for example the shedding of excess angular momentum from protostars by twisting of field lines frozen into the interstellar medium. Frozen-in field lines, however, preclude the rapid changes in magnetic topology observed at high conductivities, as in solar flares. Microphysical plasma processes are a proposed explanation of the observed high rates, but it is an open question whether such processes can rapidly reconnect astrophysical flux structures much greater in extent than several thousand ion gyroradii. An alternative explanation is that turbulent Richardson advection brings field lines implosively together from distances far apart to separations of the order of gyroradii. Here we report an analysis of a simulation of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence at high conductivity that exhibits Richardson dispersion. This effect of advection in rough velocity fields, which appear non-differentiable in space, leads to line motions that are completely indeterministic or 'spontaneously stochastic', as predicted in analytical studies. The turbulent breakdown of standard flux freezing at scales greater than the ion gyroradius can explain fast reconnection of very large-scale flux structures, both observed (solar flares and coronal mass ejections) and predicted (the inner heliosheath, accretion disks, γ-ray bursts and so on). For laminar plasma flows with smooth velocity fields or for low turbulence intensity, stochastic flux freezing reduces to the usual frozen-in condition.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Photospheric signatures of CME onset

  • Sep 10, 2024
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • O P M Aslam +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations96

CME-Flare Association Deduced from Catastrophic Model of CMEs

  • Jan 01, 2004
  • Solar Physics
  • Jun Lin
  • Research Article
  • Citations111

Space weather effects of October?November 2003

  • Aug 14, 2004
  • GPS Solutions
  • Patricia Doherty +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

Analyzing the variation of Lyapunov exponents of solar and geomagnetic activity indices during coronal mass ejections

  • Jul 01, 2009
  • Space Weather
  • M Mirmomeni +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

Multi-wavelength observations of an X-class flare without a coronal mass ejection.

  • Feb 01, 2002
  • Solar Physics
  • L.M Green +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

Investigation of Martian Magnetic Topology Response to 2017 September ICME

  • Aug 14, 2018
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Shaosui Xu +10
  • Conference Article

From Sun to ground: Particle Acceleration and transport in the inner heliosphere

  • Sep 23, 2025
  • Gang Li
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Space weather study through analysis of solar radio bursts detected by a single-station CALLISTO spectrometer

  • Oct 29, 2021
  • Annales Geophysicae
  • Theogene Ndacyayisenga +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations69

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Two Solar Coronal Mass Ejections Using the STEREO Spacecraft

  • Oct 08, 2008
  • Solar Physics
  • Timothy A Howard +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

DIRECT OBSERVATIONS OF MAGNETIC FLUX ROPE FORMATION DURING A SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTION

  • Aug 28, 2014
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • H Q Song +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Solar signatures and eruption mechanism of the August 14, 2010 coronal mass ejection (CME)

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
  • Elke D’Huys +4
  • Research Article

Spectral component imaging of solar X-ray flares

  • Dec 01, 2025
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics
  • Muriel Zoë Stiefel +4
  • Conference Article

Determination of formation of type II burst and type III burst based on beta-gamma (βγ) sunspot

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • AIP conference proceedings
  • S N U Sabri +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Correlation of Coronal Mass Ejection Shock Temperature with Solar Energetic Particle Intensity

  • Mar 21, 2024
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Manuel Enrique Cuesta +15
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Statistical Analysis of Solar Radio Burst Type III and Type IV with Relation to Solar Activities

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Journal of Physics: Conference Series
  • Z.S Hamidi +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.