Hy2: A Hybrid Vulnerability Analysis Method

Due to the diversity of existing software vulnerability analysis methods, a unified index system is required if we are to accurately and comprehensively evaluate the analytic effects in order to further improve the level of analysis. Accordingly, this paper first proposes the principles and process necessary to construct an evaluation index system for software vulnerability analysis. Moreover, by focusing on the problems identified in previous relevant research, an evaluation index system for software vulnerability analysis methods that contains four aspects-accuracy, coverage, value and performance-is proposed; this system is more comprehensive and complete than existing achievements. Finally, using the vulnerability analysis testing framework, the indexes of the three different versions of cppcheck are measured. The results show that the proposed evaluation index system can be used for the comparative evaluation of different vulnerability analysis methods.

The past decade has witnessed an explosive increase in the scale, intensity and sophistication of cyber attacks. While software vendors have significantly increased their efforts on security, they are almost always playing catch up. As a result, security-conscious organizations and individuals have come to expect their system administrators to deploy an array of tools and techniques to stay a step ahead of the hackers. While developer-oriented security tools rely mainly on static analysis, runtime analysis and policy enforcement are the mechanisms of choice in administrator-oriented tools. Runtime techniques offer increased automation and precision over static analysis, thus addressing the needs of administrators who don't have the time or resources needed to acquire extensive knowledge about the internals of a software system. In this talk, I will begin by summarizing some of the significant advances that have been achieved in the past few years in the context of software vulnerability mitigation, including buffer overflow defenses, and more recently, the impressive results that have been achieved using dynamic information-flow analysis for blocking the most popular exploits today, including SQL and command injection and cross-site scripting. I will then proceed to describe dynamic analysis and enforcement techniques aimed at another high-profile security problem faced today, namely, malware defense. Our initial target in this regard has been on dynamic analysis techniques for extracting high-level models of program behavior. These models could be used in a variety of applications such as intrusion detection, vulnerability analysis and security policy verification. More recently, interesting advances have been made in the context of security policy development, where a combination of static and dynamic analysis techniques have been developed to synthesize low-level, enforceable policies that achieve a high-level goal such as protecting system integrity. Finally, I will conclude the talk with a discussion of some research opportunities and challenges in software security.

In recent years, software security plays an important role in verifying system safety and avoiding the casualties and property losses, but it is difficult to assess system security in traditional software engineering and software test. Focusing on the software security assessment system, this paper based on the vulnerability analysis method, which takes the advantage of both qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis to assess the security of software. The major methods of domestic and foreign software security measurement are discussed. Through the comparative analysis of existing vulnerability rating system, especially the CVSS and VRSS, this paper discovers their respective advantages and proposes a more accurate rating system to obtain the final security score of the software system. An example application is provided in the paper, which shows that the assessment system we proposed is practical.

Malware classification plays an important role in tracing the attack sources of computer security. However, existing static analysis methods are fast in classification, but they are inefficient in some malware using packing and obfuscation techniques; the dynamic analysis methods have better universality for packing and obfuscation, but they will cause excessive classification cost. To overcome these shortcomings, in this paper, we propose a classification system Malscore based on the probability scoring and machine learning, which sets the probability threshold to concatenate static analysis (called Phase 1) and dynamic analysis (called Phase 2). The convolutional neural networks with spatial pyramid pooling were used to analyze the grayscale images (static features) in Phase 1, and the variable n-grams and machine learning were used to analyze the native API call sequences (dynamic features) in Phase 2. Malscore combined static analysis with dynamic analysis not only accelerated the static analysis process by taking advantage of the CNN in image recognition but also appeared to be more resilient to obfuscation by the dynamic analysis. Different from other static and dynamic analysis techniques, when malware is detected, due to the fact that malware will most likely be labeled only by static analysis, we could reduce the overheads by dynamically analyzing a few malware that has less obvious features or greater confusion in static analysis. We performed experiments on 174607 malware samples from 63 malware families. The result showed that Malscore achieved 98.82% accuracy for malware classification. Furthermore, Malscore was compared with the method of using static and dynamic analysis. The preprocessing and test time represented a reduction of 59.58% and 61.70%, respectively.

Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks

Static and dynamic program analysis techniques are important research areas in software security. Static analysis helps us locate vulnerabilities in a software by looking at the source code. Dynamic analysis helps us reason about the behavior of the software from information gathered at run-time. In this thesis, we are focusing on data flow analysis and heap analysis which are key static and dynamic program analysis techniques respectively.
\n
\nIn the first part of this thesis, we aim at detecting vulnerabilities in Android applications which have capability leaks. The security of the Android platform relies mainly on sandboxing applications and restricting their capabilities such that no application, by default, can perform any operations that would adversely impact other applications, the operating system, or the user. However, a recent research reported that a genuine but vulnerable application may leak its capabilities. When being leveraged, other applications can gain extra capabilities which they are not granted originally. We present DroidChecker, an Android application analyzing tool which searches for the aforementioned vulnerability in Android applications. DroidChecker uses interprocedural control flow graph searching and static taint checking to detect exploitable data paths in an Android application. We analyzed more than 1100 Android applications using DroidChecker and found 6 previously unknown vulnerable applications including the renowned Adobe Photoshop Express application. We also developed a malicious application that exploits the previously unknown vulnerability found in the Adobe Photoshop Express application. We showed that the malicious application, which is not granted any permissions, can access contacts on the phone with just a few lines of code.
\n
\nIn the second part of this thesis, we explore the use of heap analysis to extract software birthmarks. There are techniques like code obfuscation and watermarking which can make the source code of a program difficult to understand by humans and prove the ownership of the program. However, code obfuscation cannot avoid the source code being copied and a watermark can be defaced. A birthmark is a group of unique characteristics a program possesses that can be used to identify the program. We propose two novel dynamic birthmark systems based on the run-time heap. A dynamic birthmark is one that is extracted when the program is executing. Since it is based on the run-time behavior of the program, semantics-preserving transformations of the code like obfuscation cannot defeat dynamic birthmarks. In this regard, dynamic birthmarks are more robust compared with static birthmarks.
\n
\nTo the best of our knowledge, these are the first birthmark systems using heap analysis as the underlying technique. The basic idea is to take snapshots of the heap while the program is running. From the snapshots, heap graphs are constructed to model the referencing structure between objects. After going through some filtering and referencing processes, they become the birthmarks. The two birthmark systems have been devised to extract birthmarks for Java programs and JavaScript programs respectively. While the underlying ideas of the two birthmark systems are similar, the differences in nature of the two programming languages led to different implementation designs.

A typestate property describes which operations are available on an object or a group of inter-related objects, depending on this object’s or group’s internal state, the typestate. Researchers in the field of static analysis have devised static program analyses to prove the absence of typestate-property violations on all possible executions of a given program under test. Researchers in runtime verification, on the other hand, have developed powerful monitoring approaches that guarantee to capture property violations on actual executions. Although static analysis can greatly benefit runtime monitoring, up until now, most static analyses are incompatible with most monitoring tools. We present Clara, a novel framework that makes these approaches compatible. With Clara, researchers in static analysis can easily implement powerful typestate analyses. Runtime-verification researchers, on the other hand, can use Clara to specialize AspectJ-based runtime monitors to a particular target program. To make aspects compatible to Clara, the monitoring tool annotates them with so-called dependency state machines. Clara uses the static analyses to automatically convert an annotated monitoring aspect into a residual runtime monitor that is triggered by fewer program locations. If the static analysis succeeds on all locations, this proves that the program fulfills the stated typestate properties, making runtime monitoring entirely obsolete. If not, the residual runtime monitor is at least optimized. We instantiated Clara with three static typestate analyses and applied these analyses to monitoring aspects generated from tracematches. In two-thirds of the cases in our experiments, the static analysis succeeds on all locations, proving that the program fulfills the stated properties, and completely obviating the need for runtime monitoring. In the remaining cases, the runtime monitor is often significantly optimized.

Recent research proposed efficient methods for software verification combining static and dynamic analysis, where static analysis reports possible runtime errors (some of which may be false alarms) and test generation confirms or rejects them. However, test generation may time out on real-sized programs before confirming some alarms as real bugs or rejecting some others as unreachable.To overcome this problem, we propose to reduce the source code by program slicing before test generation. This paper presents new optimized and adaptive usages of program slicing, provides underlying theoretical results and the algorithm these usages rely on. The method is implemented in a tool prototype called sante (Static ANalysis and TEsting). Our experiments show that our method with program slicing outperforms previous combinations of static and dynamic analysis. Moreover, simplifying the program makes it easier to analyze detected errors and remaining alarms.

Dynamic analysis tools, such as those that detect data-races, verify memory safety, and identify information flow, have become a vital part of testing and debugging complex software systems. While these tools are powerful, their slow speed often limits how effectively they can be deployed in practice. Hybrid analysis speeds up these tools by using static analysis to decrease the work performed during dynamic analysis. In this paper we argue that current hybrid analysis is needlessly hampered by an incorrect assumption that preserving the soundness of dynamic analysis requires an underlying sound static analysis. We observe that, even with unsound static analysis, it is possible to achieve sound dynamic analysis for the executions which fall within the set of states statically considered. This leads us to a new approach, called optimistic hybrid analysis. We first profile a small set of executions and generate a set of likely invariants that hold true during most, but not necessarily all, executions. Next, we apply a much more precise, but unsound, static analysis that assumes these invariants hold true. Finally, we run the resulting dynamic analysis speculatively while verifying whether the assumed invariants hold true during that particular execution; if not, the program is reexecuted with a traditional hybrid analysis. Optimistic hybrid analysis is as precise and sound as traditional dynamic analysis, but is typically much faster because (1) unsound static analysis can speed up dynamic analysis much more than sound static analysis can and (2) verifications rarely fail. We apply optimistic hybrid analysis to race detection and program slicing and achieve 1.8x over a state-of-the-art race detector (FastTrack) optimized with traditional hybrid analysis and 8.3x over a hybrid backward slicer (Giri).

Memory is one of the critical resources in model checking. This paper discusses a strategy for reducing peak memory in model checking by case-based partitioning of the search space. This strategy combines model checking for verification of different cases and static analysis or expert judgment for guaranteeing the completeness of the cases. Description of the static analysis is based on using PROMELA as the modeling language. The strategy is applicable to a subset of models including models for verification of certain aspects of protocols.

Dynamic program analysis is extremely successful both in code debugging and in malicious code attacks. Fuzzing, concolic, and monkey testing are instances of the more general problem of analysing programs by dynamically executing their code with selected inputs. While static program analysis has a beautiful and well established theoretical foundation in abstract interpretation, dynamic analysis still lacks such a foundation. In this paper, we introduce a formal model for understanding the notion of precision in dynamic program analysis. It is known that in sound-by-construction static program analysis the precision amounts to completeness. In dynamic analysis, which is inherently unsound, precision boils down to a notion of coverage of execution traces with respect to what the observer (attacker or debugger) can effectively observe about the computation. We introduce a topological characterisation of the notion of coverage relatively to a given (fixed) observation for dynamic program analysis and we show how this coverage can be changed by semantic preserving code transformations. Once again, as well as in the case of static program analysis and abstract interpretation, also for dynamic analysis we can morph the precision of the analysis by transforming the code. In this context, we validate our model on well established code obfuscation and watermarking techniques. We confirm the efficiency of existing methods for preventing control-flow-graph extraction and data exploit by dynamic analysis, including a validation of the potency of fully homomorphic data encodings in code obfuscation.

A secure software demands effective techniques for vulnerability detection during its development cycle. The practice of detecting security flaws before the deployment phase eliminates the risks that vulnerabilities may impose for the company. Static analysis and dynamic analysis techniques offer two complimentary approaches for checking vulnerabilities. Static analysis involves the scanning of source code or binary eliminating the need of executing it. This approach is fast and has no run time overhead. However, static analysis are quite imprecise and generate huge false positives and false negatives. On the other hand, dynamic analysis involves the running of the software. The problem of false positives and negatives is less in case of dynamic analysis because they analyze by running the test cases. But this approach requires large number of test cases to ensure a certain confidence level in detecting security bugs. This paper describes a methodology which integrates the two approaches in a complimentary manner. It adopts the strengths of the two and eliminates their weaknesses. We are currently dealing with buffer overflow vulnerability with pointer aliasing. However the idea can be extended to other vulnerabilities also for e.g memory related errors, race conditions( Time of Check to Time to Use vulnerability), dangling pointer vulnerability, integer errors etc.

Cryptomining malware (also referred to as cryptojacking) has changed the cyber threat landscape. Such malware exploits the victim’s CPU or GPU resources with the aim of generating cryptocurrency. In this paper, we study the potential of using deep learning techniques to detect cryptomining malware by utilizing both static and dynamic analysis approaches. To facilitate dynamic analysis, we establish an environment to capture the system call events of 1500 Portable Executable (PE) samples of the cryptomining malware. We also demonstrate how one can perform static analysis of PE files’ opcode sequences. In our study, we evaluate the performance of using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Attention-based LSTM (ATT-LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) on our sequential data (opcodes and system call invocations) for classification by a Softmax function. We achieve an accuracy rate of 95% in the static analysis and an accuracy rate of 99% in the dynamic analysis.

With the rapid increase of practical problem complexity and code scale, the threat of software security is increasingly serious. Consequently, it is crucial to pay attention to the analysis of software source code vulnerability in the development stage and take efficient measures to detect the vulnerability as soon as possible. Machine learning techniques have made remarkable achievements in various fields. However, the application of machine learning in the domain of vulnerability static analysis is still in its infancy and the characteristics and performance of diverse methods are quite different. In this survey, we focus on a source code-oriented static vulnerability analysis method using machine learning techniques. We review the studies on source code vulnerability analysis based on machine learning in the past decade. We systematically summarize the development trends and different technical characteristics in this field from the perspectives of the intermediate representation of source code and vulnerability prediction model and put forward several feasible research directions in the future according to the limitations of the current approaches.

How to apply automated verification technology such as model checking and static program analysis to millions of lines of embedded C/C++ code? How to package this technology in a way that it can be used by software developers and engineers, who might have no background in formal verification? And how to convince business managers to actually pay for such a software? This work addresses a number of those questions. Based on our own experience on developing and distributing the Goanna source code analyzer for detecting software bugs and security vulnerabilities in C/C++ code, we explain the underlying technology of model checking, static analysis and SMT solving, steps involved in creating industrial-proof tools.