Integration of lower bound estimates in pseudo-Boolean optimization

Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) is a keystone in the history of computer science. SAT was the first problem shown to be NP-complete in 1971 by Stephen Cook. Having passed more than 40 years from then, SAT is now a lively research field where theory and practice have a natural intermixing. In this talk, we overview the use of SAT in practical domains, where SAT is thought in a broad sense, i.e. including SAT extensions such as Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT), Pseudo-Boolean Optimization (PBO) and Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF).

Measurement errors make power analysis attacks difficult to mount when only a single power trace is available: the statistical methods that make DPA attacks so successful are not applicable since they require many (typically thousands) of traces. Recently it was suggested by [18] to use algebraic methods for the single-trace scenario, converting the key recovery problem into a Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem, then using a SAT solver. However, this approach is extremely sensitive to noise (allowing an error rate of well under 1% at most), and the question of its practicality remained open. In this work we show how a single-trace side-channel analysis problem can be transformed into a pseudo-Boolean optimization (PBOPT) problem, which takes errors into consideration. The PBOPT instance can then be solved using a suitable optimization problem solver. The PBOPT syntax provides for a more expressive input specification which allows a very natural representation of measurement errors. Most importantly, we show that using our approach we are able to mount successful and efficient single-trace attacks even in the presence of realistic error rates of 10%-20%. We call our new attack methodology Tolerant Algebraic Side-Channel Analysis (TASCA). We show practical attacks on two real ciphers: Keeloq and AES.

The dramatic improvements in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving since the turn of the millennium have made it possible to leverage state-of-the-art conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers for many combinatorial problems in academia and industry, and the use of proof logging has played a crucial role in increasing the confidence that the results these solvers produce are correct. However, the fact that SAT proof logging is performed in conjunctive normal form (CNF) clausal format means that it has not been possible to extend guarantees of correctness to the use of SAT solvers for more expressive combinatorial paradigms, where the first step is an unverified translation of the input to CNF. In this work, we show how cutting-planes-based reasoning can provide proof logging for solvers that translate pseudo-Boolean (a.k.a. 0-1 integer linear) decision problems to CNF and then run CDCL. To support a wide range of encodings, we provide a uniform and easily extensible framework for proof logging of CNF translations. We are hopeful that this is just a first step towards providing a unified proof logging approach that will also extend to maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) solving and pseudo-Boolean optimization in general.

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is a widely used modeling tool in Electronic Design Automation (EDA). It finds application in test pattern generation, delay-fault testing, equivalence checking and circuit delay computation, among many other problems. This paper starts by describing how Boolean Satisfiability algorithms can take circuit structure into account when solving instances derived from combinational circuits. Afterwards, it shows how recursive learning techniques can be incorporated into Boolean Satisfiability algorithms. The proposed algorithmic framework has several natural applications in EDA. Moreover, potential advantages include smaller run times, the utilization of circuit-specific search pruning techniques, avoiding the overspecification problem that characterizes Boolean Satisfiability testers, and reducing the time for iteratively generating instances of SAT from circuits. The experimental results obtained, on a large number of benchmark examples in different problem domains, illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed techniques.

Haplotype inference from genotype data is a key computational problem in bioinformatics, since retrieving directly haplotype information from DNA samples is not feasible using existing technology. One of the methods for solving this problem uses the pure parsimony criterion, an approach known as Haplotype Inference by Pure Parsimony (HIPP). Initial work in this area was based on a number of different Integer Linear Programming (ILP) models and branch and bound algorithms. Recent work has shown that the utilization of a Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) formulation and state of the art SAT solvers represents the most efficient approach for solving the HIPP problem. Motivated by the promising results obtained using SAT techniques, this paper investigates the utilization of modern Pseudo-Boolean Optimization (PBO) algorithms for solving the HIPP problem. The paper starts by applying PBO to existing ILP models. The results are promising, and motivate the development of a new PBO model (RPoly) for the HIPP problem, which has a compact representation and eliminates key symmetries. Experimental results indicate that RPoly outperforms the SAT-based approach on most problem instances, being, in general, significantly more efficient.

This dissertation is to illustrate the current state of the art of DNA computing achievements, especially of new approaches to solve theoretical 3-SAT problems and the hitting-set problem. Beginning with Adleman’s breakthrough which is an molecular algorithm for the solution of a NP-complete, combinatorial problem, the directed Hamiltonian path problem (HPP). Today, many researchers all over the world concentrate on proposing new methods to solve engineering or application problems with a DNA computing approach. Satisfiability problem is given a Boolean formula, and decide if a satisfying truth assignment exists. ( ) ( ) … ( ) ( ) is an example of Boolean formula. k-SAT problem means that each clause has exactly k literals. Not-All-Equal (NAE) 3-SAT problem and One-In-Three (1IN3) 3-SAT problem are both NP-complete problems. In this dissertation, we present molecular solutions to find all true assignments (3-SAT problem) and furthermore find Not-All-Equal (NAE) solutions and One-In-Three (1IN3) solutions in DNA-based Supercomputing. Hitting-set problem assume that there exists a collection C of subsets of a finite set S, and a positive integer K  |S|, and we need to know if there is a subset  S with | |  K such that contains at least one element of each subset in C. In other words, is the subset that intersects every subset in C and is called the hitting-set. In this dissertation, a DNA-based algorithm is proposed to solve the small hitting-set problem. A small hitting-set is a hitting-set with the smallest K value, i.e., the hitting-set with the smallest number of elements. Furthermore, an algorithm is introduced to find the number of ones from 2n combinations and minimum numbers of ones represents the small hitting-set since K is expected to be as small as possible. The complexity of all the presented DNA-based algorithms is also discussed. We describe time complexity and volume complexity of three Algorithms, numbers of test tube used and the longest library strand in solution space of all three Algorithms. Finally, the simulated experiment is applied to verify correctness of the proposed DNA-based algorithm for solving the One-In-Three (1IN3) 3-SAT problem, and simulation of Not-All-Equal (NAE) 3-SAT problem is similar. Also, another simulated experiment is applied to our proposed DNA-based algorithm 6-2, in order to solve the well-known hitting-set problem. This research has been motivated by the benefit and the application of DNA computing and gives new methods to solve two 3-SAT problems and the hitting-set problem which are NP-complete.

This study is concerned with the Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem and its solution in setting a hybrid computational intelligence environment of genetic and fuzzy computing. In this framework, fuzzy sets realize an embedding principle meaning that original two-valued (Boolean) functions under investigation are extended to their continuous counterparts resulting in the form of fuzzy (multivalued) functions. In the sequel, the SAT problem is reformulated for the fuzzy functions and solved using a genetic algorithm (GA). It is shown that a GA, especially its recursive version, is an efficient tool for handling multivariable SAT problems. Thorough experiments revealed that the recursive version of the GA can solve SAT problems with more than 1000 variables.

It was investigated the Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem defined as follows: given a Boolean formula, check whether an assignment of Boolean values to the propositional variables in the formula exists, such that the formula evaluates to true. If such an assignment exists, the formula is said to be satisfiable; otherwise, it is unsatisfiable. With using of analytical expressions of multi-valued logic 2SAT boolean satisfiability was formulated as linear programming optimization problem. The same linear programming formulation was extended to find 3SAT and kSAT boolean satisfiability for k greater than 3. So, using new analytic multi-valued logic expressions and linear programming formulation of boolean satisfiability proposition that kSAT is in P and could be solved in linear time was proved.KeywordsBoolean satisfiabilityConjunctive normal formConvex functionLinear programmingMulti-valued logicNP problemTime complexity.

Quantum annealing device has shown a great potential in solving discrete problems that are theoretically and empirically hard. Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem, determining if there is an assignment of variables that satisfies a given Boolean function, is the first proven NP-complete problem widely used in various domains. Here, we present a novel mapping of the SAT problem to the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem (QUBO), and further develop a tool flow embedding the proposed QUBO to the architecture of the commercialized quantum computer D-Wave. By leveraging electronic design automation techniques including synthesis, placement and routing, this is not only the first work providing the detail flow that embeds the QUBO, but also a technique scalable for real world applications and some hard SAT problems with over 6000 variables in QUBO. Based on our results, we discuss the challenges in solving SAT using the current generation of annealing device, and explore the problem solving capability of future quantum annealing computers.

An SMT-solving procedure can be implemented by using a SAT solver to find a satisfying assignment of the propositional skeleton of the predicate formula and then deciding the feasibility of the assignment using a particular decision procedure. The complexity of the decision procedure depends on the size of the assignment. In case that the runtime of the solving is dominated by the decision procedure it is convenient to find short satisfying assignments in the SAT solving phase. Unfortunately most of the modern state-of-the-art SAT solvers always output a complete assignment of variables for satisfiable formulas even if they can be satisfied by assigning truth values to only a fraction of the variables. In this paper,we first describe an application in the code performance modeling domain, which requires SMT-solving with a costly decision procedure. Then we focus on the problem of finding minimum-size satisfying partial truth assignments. We describe and experimentally evaluate several methods how to solve this problem. These include reduction to partial maximum satisfiability - PMaxSAT, PMinSAT, pseudo-Boolean optimization and iterated SAT solving. We examine the methods experimentally on existing benchmark formulas as well as on a new benchmark set based on the performance modeling scenario.

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is a prominent problem in artificial intelligence with many important applications. Stochastic local search (SLS) is a well-known approach for solving SAT and known to achieve excellent performance on randomly generated, satisfiable instances. However, SLS solvers for SAT are usually ineffective in solving application instances. Here, we propose a highly configurable SLS solver dubbed PbO-CCSAT, which leverages a powerful technique known as configuration checking (CC) in combination with the automatic algorithm design paradigm of programming by optimisation (PbO). Our PbO-CCSAT solver exposes a large number of design choices, which are automatically configured to optimise the performance for specific classes of SAT instances. We present extensive empirical results showing that our PbO-CCSAT solver significantly outperforms state-of-the-art SLS solvers on SAT instances from many applications, and further show that PbO-CCSAT is complementary to state-of-the-art complete solvers.

Advances in methods for solving Boolean satisfiability (SAT) for large problems have motivated recent attempts to recast physical design problems as Boolean SAT problems. One persistent criticism of these approaches is their inability to supply partial solutions, i.e., to satisfy most but not all of the constraints cast in the SAT style. In this paper, we present a formulation for "subset satisfiable" Boolean SAT: we transform a "strict" SAT problem with N constraints into a new, "relaxed" SAT problem which is satisfiable just if not more than k/spl Lt/N of these constraints cannot be satisfied in the original problem. We describe a transformation based on explicit thresholding and counting for the necessary SAT relaxation. Examples from field-programmable gate-array routing show how we can determine efficiently when we can satisfy "almost all" of our geometric constraints.

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is a fundamental problem of immense practical importance. While SAT is NP-complete when clauses can contain 3 literals or more, the problem can be solved in linear time when the given formula contains only binary clauses (2SAT). Many complete search algorithms for SAT solving have taken advantage of 2SAT information that occurs in the statement of the problem in order to simplify the solving process, only one that we are aware of uses 2SAT information that arises in the process of the search, as clauses are simplified. There are a number of possibilities for making use of 2SAT information to improve the SAT solving process: maintaining 2SAT satisfiability during search, detecting unit consequences of the 2SAT clauses, and Krom subsumption using 2SAT clauses. In this paper we investigate the tradeoffs of increasing complex 2SAT handling versus the search space reduction and execution time. We give experimental results illustrating that the SAT solver resulting from the best tradeoff is competitive with state of the art Davis-Putnam methods, on hard problems involving a substantial 2SAT component.

We perform a comprehensive study of mappings between constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and propositional satisfiability (SAT). We analyse four different mappings of SAT problems into CSPs, and two of CSPs into SAT problems. For each mapping, we compare the impact of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP with unit propagation on the SAT problem. We then extend these results to CSP algorithms that maintain (some level of) arc-consistency during search like FC and MAC, and to the Davis-Putnam procedure (which performs unit propagation at each search node). Because of differences in the branching structure of their search, a result showing the dominance of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP over unit propagation on the SAT problem does not necessarily translate to the dominance of MAC over the Davis-Putnam procedure. These results provide insight into the relationship between propositional satisfiability and constraint satisfaction.

The Boolean Satisfiability Problem (SAT) is a well known NP-Complete problem. While its complexity remains a source of many interesting questions for theoretical computer scientists, the problem has found many practical applications in recent years. The emergence of efficient SAT solvers which can handle large structured SAT instances has enabled the use of SAT solvers in diverse domains such as electronic design automation and artificial intelligence. These applications continue to motivate the development of faster and more robust SAT solvers. In this paper, we describe the popular SAT solver zchaff with a focus on recent developments.