Theorizing Shadow Education and Academic Success in East Asia: Understanding the Meaning, Value, and Use of Shadow Education by East Asian Students. By Young ChunKim and Jung HoonJung (eds.), New York: Routledge, 2021. 278 pp. £135 (hardback copy). ISBN: 978‐0‐36‐756460‐5 (ISBN‐100367564602/ISBN‐13978‐0367564605)
In East Asian countries, shadow education has long existed as an alternative form of education alongside public schooling to enhance academic achievement. This system of shadow education includes personalized preparation for high school and university entrance exams via home-based individual tutoring (gawoe), group learning (hakwon), and online learning. Shadow education is a supplementary “learning space”—in the sense proposed by Davies and Aurini (2006)—that permeates the K-12 education of students in East Asian countries. When examining students' academic success and learning culture, the meaning, value, and impact of shadow education should be discussed. Theorizing Shadow Education and Academic Success in East Asia: Understanding the Meaning, Value, and Use of Shadow Education by East Asian Students by Kim and Jung presents the first international study introducing Western scholars to the contribution of shadow education to the world-class academic achievements of East Asian students on international tests such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Furthermore, the theoretical approach and empirical data used in this book provide a comprehensive framework to help readers understand the role of shadow education, offering insights into the academic success of East Asian students through ethnographic and qualitative research methods. This book is divided into three parts. Part 1 establishes a new theoretical ground of shadow education through the lens of transboundary learning culture and East Asian students' nomadic identities, revisiting the dominant discourse on shadow education and uncovering its defining characteristics. It explores how shadow education is applied to facilitate the academic success of East Asian students through an analysis of empirical data. This part induces a shift in the perception of the power and influence of shadow education, which has previously been portrayed negatively in the works of both Eastern and Western educational scholars. Part 2 documents case studies of shadow education in five East Asian countries—South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore—written by scholars specializing in each country, exploring how shadow education is embedded within learning cultures that enhance students' academic achievement. This book forms the first academic effort in which leading scholars from each country introduce the learning culture associated with shadow education in relation to the academic achievement and self-development of elementary, middle, and high school students in the East Asian context. Part 3 highlights three negative impacts of shadow education on students' educational growth and future success: (1) shadow education widens the learning gap between slow and fast learners, (2) its hidden curriculum negatively influences students, and (3) it reproduces inequality based on meritocracy and social class. The authors extend general issues of educational inequality and learning gaps in public education to practices of shadow education, calling on educational scholars in various fields—such as curriculum studies, sociology of education, educational anthropology, and educational policy—to discuss solutions and policy implementation necessary to address the three issues. The authors reinvent Western definitions of East Asian learning culture and methods using postmodern concepts such as “de-truth,” “students as nomads,” and “learning culture beyond borders.” This book is, therefore, an ethnographic anthology on the academic success of East Asian students facilitated by shadow education. By examining postcolonial cases, the book effectively explains the diversity and important aspects of East Asian students' learning methods and cultures for academic success using ethnographic and qualitative research (Kim et al. 2020). A limitation of this book is its somewhat narrow perspective that focuses only on East Asia. Therefore, it would be beneficial to include a broader comparative perspective that encompasses other regions, such as Southeast Asia or South Asia, where private education is also widespread. This could help strengthen the argument that private education is a global phenomenon with diverse regional manifestations. This book, which positions shadow education as a cultural and social practice, provides a new framework for understanding how education operates outside formal education systems. The focus on East Asian students' experiences and perceptions offers valuable insights into how educational practices are shaped by cultural and social expectations. This book can serve as a valuable resource for understanding shadow education as an alternative learning space facilitating the academic success of East Asian students, a topic that has not been seriously discussed or theorized in Western educational scholarship. Thus, this anthology could help Western scholars determine the factors underlying the superior academic achievements of East Asian students in tests such as PISA and TIMSS. Broadly speaking, the postcolonial research presented in this book can effectively shift the anthropological research focus from Western-centered student learning and academic development to more diverse, non-Western, and multicultural contexts. This study was supported by the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University.
Read more