Machine Learning and Computer Vision System for Phenotype Data Acquisition and Analysis in Plants.

Recent advances in machine learning techniques have significantly influenced the development of early diabetes detection systems. In this paper, different machine learning (ML) algorithms are employed for diabetes detection based on hand movement. The spatial and temporal information for horizontal and vertical hand movement deviations for both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects are obtained using a data acquisition system. A dataset is constructed based on the obtained hand movement information along with other related attributes such as age, gender, weight and vision health. Binary classification of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects is achieved using several machine learning algorithms. These algorithms include Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP). The considered ML algorithms are evaluated and ranked according to a set of key performance metrics that include accuracy, precision, recall and F-1 score. Algorithm ranking results demonstrate that LR, CART, KNN and MLP algorithms have achieved higher ranking positions as compared to other algorithms. The best ranked ML algorithms are then validated and thoroughly investigated to prove their ability to discriminate between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Validation results show that the best-ranked ML algorithms have achieved high classification accuracy, precision, recall and F-1 scores. Therefore, the considered machine learning algorithms can serve as efficient tools for diabetes detection based on the constructed dataset.

ObjectiveEnhanced technology in computer and internet has driven scale and quality of data to be improved in various areas including healthcare sectors. Machine Learning (ML) has played a pivotal role in efficiently analyzing those big data, but a general misunderstanding of ML algorithms still exists in applying them (e.g., ML techniques can settle a problem of small sample size, or deep learning is the ML algorithm). This paper reviewed the research of diagnosing mental illness using ML algorithm and suggests how ML techniques can be employed and worked in practice.MethodsResearches about mental illness diagnostic using ML techniques were carefully reviewed. Five traditional ML algorithms-Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN)-frequently used for mental health area researches were systematically organized and summarized.ResultsBased on literature review, it turned out that Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN) were frequently employed in mental health area, but many researchers did not clarify the reason for using their ML algorithm though every ML algorithm has its own advantages. In addition, there were several studies to apply ML algorithms without fully understanding the data characteristics.ConclusionResearchers using ML algorithms should be aware of the properties of their ML algorithms and the limitation of the results they obtained under restricted data conditions. This paper provides useful information of the properties and limitation of each ML algorithm in the practice of mental health.

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is an important protection instrument for detecting complex network attacks. Various machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) algorithms have been proposed for implementing anomaly-based IDS (AIDS). Our review of the AIDS literature identifies some issues in related work, including the randomness of the selected algorithms, parameters, and testing criteria, the application of old datasets, or shallow analyses and validation of the results. This paper comprehensively reviews previous studies on AIDS by using a set of criteria with different datasets and types of attacks to set benchmarking outcomes that can reveal the suitable AIDS algorithms, parameters, and testing criteria. Specifically, this paper applies 10 popular supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms for identifying effective and efficient ML-AIDS of networks and computers. These supervised ML algorithms include the artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms, whereas the unsupervised ML algorithms include the expectation-maximization (EM), k-means, and self-organizing maps (SOM) algorithms. Several models of these algorithms are introduced, and the turning and training parameters of each algorithm are examined to achieve an optimal classifier evaluation. Unlike previous studies, this study evaluates the performance of AIDS by measuring the true positive and negative rates, accuracy, precision, recall, and F-Score of 31 ML-AIDS models. The training and testing time for ML-AIDS models are also considered in measuring their performance efficiency given that time complexity is an important factor in AIDSs. The ML-AIDS models are tested by using a recent and highly unbalanced multiclass CICIDS2017 dataset that involves real-world network attacks. In general, the k-NN-AIDS, DT-AIDS, and NB-AIDS models obtain the best results and show a greater capability in detecting web attacks compared with other models that demonstrate irregular and inferior results.

Text mining is a special case of data mining which explore unstructured or semi-structured text documents, to establish valuable patterns and rules that indicate trends and significant features about specific topics. Text mining has been in pattern recognition, predictive studies, sentiment analysis and statistical theories in many areas of research, medicine, financial analysis, social life analysis, and business intelligence. Text mining uses concept of natural language processing and machine learning. Machine learning algorithms have been used and reported to give great results, but their performance of machine learning algorithms is affected by factors such as dataset domain, number of classes, length of the corpus, and feature selection techniques used. Redundant attribute affects the performance of the classification algorithm, but this can be reduced by using different feature selection techniques and dimensionality reduction techniques. Feature selection is a data preprocessing step that chooses a subset of input variable while eliminating features with little or no predictive information. Feature selection techniques are Information gain, Term Frequency, Term Frequency-Inverse document frequency, Mutual Information, and Chi-Square, which can use a filters, wrappers, or embedded approaches. To get the most value from machine learning, pairing the best algorithms with the right tools and processes is necessary. Little research has been done on the effect of feature selection techniques on classification accuracy for pairing of these algorithms with the best feature selection techniques for optimal results. In this research, a text classification experiment was conducted using incident management dataset, where incidents were classified into their resolver groups. Support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB) and Decision tree (DT) machine learning algorithms were examined. Filtering approach was used on the feature selection techniques, with different ranking indices applied for optimal feature set and classification accuracy results analyzed. The classification accuracy results obtained using TF were, 88% for SVM, 70% for NB, 79% for Decision tree, and KNN had 55%, while Boolean registered 90%, 83%, 82% and 75%, for SVM, NB, DT, and KNN respectively. TF-IDF, had 91%, 83%, 76%, and 56% for SVM, NB, DT, and KNN respectively. The results showed that algorithm performance is affected by feature selection technique applied. SVM performed best, followed by DT, KNN and finally NB. In conclusion, presence of noisy data leads to poor learning performance and increases the computational time. The classifiers performed differently depending on the feature selection technique applied. For optimal results, the classifier that performed best together with the feature selection technique with the best feature subset should be applied for all types of data for accurate classification performance. Keywords: Text Classification, Supervised Machine Learning, Feature Selection DOI : 10.7176/JIEA/9-3-06 Publication date :May 31 st 2019

This study presents a comparative analysis of the classification performance of facial and emotion recognition systems using Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. The primary objective of this work is to evaluate the applicability of emotion recognition in fields such as psychotherapy and crime analysis, using the FER-2013 dataset.The study was conducted with ML algorithms such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Trees, and Gradient Boosting, as well as the DL algorithm, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Supported by the application of feature selection, preprocessing, and feature extraction techniques, the model’s performance was measured using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, F1-score, and AUC-ROC.The experimental results showed that the highest classification accuracy (46.61%) was achieved with the CNN model. While the ML models generally offered lower accuracy, they provided advantages in terms of computational efficiency in specific scenarios.This study aims to contribute to the literature by providing a comparative analysis of ML and DL algorithms and by highlighting the effect of data preprocessing on performance. The findings set targets for future work, such as real-time system integration and hybrid model development.

In brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), it is crucial to process brain signals to improve the accuracy of the classification of motor movements. Machine learning (ML) algorithms such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), decision tree (D.T.), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), naive Bayes (N.B.), and support vector machine (SVM) have made significant progress in classification issues. This paper aims to present a signal processing analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals among different feature extraction techniques to train selected classification algorithms to classify signals related to motor movements. The motor movements considered are related to the left hand, right hand, both fists, feet, and relaxation, making this a multiclass problem. In this study, nine ML algorithms were trained with a dataset created by the feature extraction of EEG signals.The EEG signals of 30 Physionet subjects were used to create a dataset related to movement. We used electrodes C3, C1, CZ, C2, and C4 according to the standard 10-10 placement. Then, we extracted the epochs of the EEG signals and applied tone, amplitude levels, and statistical techniques to obtain the set of features. LabVIEW™2015 version custom applications were used for reading the EEG signals; for channel selection, noise filtering, band selection, and feature extraction operations; and for creating the dataset. MATLAB 2021a was used for training, testing, and evaluating the performance metrics of the ML algorithms. In this study, the model of Medium-ANN achieved the best performance, with an AUC average of 0.9998, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of 0.9552, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.9819, and a loss of 0.0147. These findings suggest the applicability of our approach to different scenarios, such as implementing robotic prostheses, where the use of superficial features is an acceptable option when resources are limited, as in embedded systems or edge computing devices.

The disease popularly known as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which causes cognitive impairment, is extensively distributed throughout the world. The lack of a cure or strategy to stop the growth of the disease notwithstanding, it is one of the most extensively studied illnesses in medicine and healthcare. However, patients with AD have a variety of treatment options to select from, including pharmaceuticals or non-drug alternatives, to help them maintain their quality of life. Over time, patients will need to be treated differently based on how far into the disease process they are. In this regard, early detection and classification of the illness stages can have a substantial impact on the treatment of symptoms. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease is critical for the analysis of patient medications and the selection of appropriate specialists. The goal of this project is to provide a comprehensive comparison of the techniques used in the detection and classification of Alzheimer’s disease. In medical research, machine learning algorithms can be used to uncover facts, particularly in disease prediction. Support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, Bayes classifiers, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), gradient boosting, and other machine learning algorithms are used to diagnose a variety of diseases and conditions. The application of machine learning algorithms can result in the quick and highly accurate prediction and classification of this disease. This project helps in analyses of different machine learning techniques and algorithms that are used to predict and classify and provides an extensive accuracy comparison of the machine learning techniques used for the prediction and classification of Alzheimer’s disease.

Advancement in technology has helped people to live a long and better life. But the increased life expectancy has also elevated the risk of age related disorders, especially the neurodegenerative disorders. Alzheimer’s is one such neurodegenerative disorder, which is also the leading contributor towards dementia in elderly people. Despite of extensive research in this field, scientists have failed to find a cure for the disease till date. This makes early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s very crucial so as to delay its progression and improve the condition of the patient. Various techniques are being employed for diagnosing Alzheimer’s which include neuropsychological tests, medical imaging, blood based biomarkers, etc. Apart from this, various machine learning algorithms have been employed so far to diagnose Alzheimer’s in its early stages. In the current research, authors compared the performance of various machine learning techniques i.e., Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Random Forests (RF) and Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) on Alzheimer’s dataset. This paper experimentally demonstrated that normalization exhibits a predominant role in enhancing the efficiency of some machine learning algorithms. Therefore it becomes imperative to choose the algorithms as per the available data. In this paper, the efficiency of the given machine learning methods was compared in terms of accuracy and f1-score. Naïve Bayes gave a better overall performance for both accuracy and f1-score and it also remained unaffected with the normalization of data along with LDA, DT and RF. Whereas KNN, SVM and MLP showed a drastic (17% to 86%) improvement in the performance when they are given normalized data as compared to un-normalized data from Alzheimer’s dataset.

Machine learning (ML) is the most common technique for predicting the future or for classifying information, to help people make the required decisions. ML techniques are based on algorithms – sets of mathematical procedures that explain the relationship between variables. ML algorithms are trained in situations where they learn from past data and can even evaluate historical data. After extensive training, the algorithm can recognize patterns sufficiently to make predictions. ML provides methods, techniques, and tools that can help in solving diagnostic and prognostic problems in a variety of medical domains. It is being used for the analysis of the importance of clinical parameters and their combinations for prognosis, e.g., for prediction of disease progression, for the extraction of medical information to predict research outcomes, for therapy planning and support, and for overall patient management. ML is also being used for data analysis, such as detection of patterns in the data by dealing appropriately with imperfect data, interpretation of continuous data generated in the Intensive Care Unit, and for intelligent alarms, resulting in effective and efficient monitoring. Successful implementation of ML methods can help the integration of computer-based systems into the healthcare environment, providing opportunities to facilitate and enhance the work of medical experts, and ultimately to improve the efficiency and quality of medical care. Most ML methods can be categorized into one of two types of learning techniques, namely supervised or unsupervised algorithms. A supervised learning algorithm takes a known set of input data (the training set) and known responses to the data (the output) and trains a model to generate reasonable predictions for the response to new input data. In medicine, supervised learning involves training a model to relate a person’s characteristics (e.g., height, weight, smoking status) to a certain outcome (onset of diabetes within five years, for example). Once the algorithm is successfully trained, it will be capable of making outcome predictions when supplied with new data. Predictions which are made by models trained using supervised learning can be either discrete (e.g., positive or negative, benign or malignant) or continuous (e.g., a score from 0 to 100). A supervised model which produces discrete categories (sometimes referred to as classes) is referred to as a classification algorithm. Examples of classification algorithms include those which predict whether a tumor is benign or malignant, or to establish whether comments written by a patient convey a positive or negative sentiment. In practice, classification algorithms return the probability of a class (between 0 for impossible and 1 for certain). Common classification algorithms are Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, and Naïve Bayes. A supervised model which returns a prediction of a continuous value is known as a regression algorithm, which might be used by ML to predict an individual’s life expectancy or the tolerable dose of chemotherapy. Supervised ML algorithms are typically developed using a dataset, which contains several variables and a relevant outcome. In contrast with supervised learning, unsupervised learning does not involve a predefined outcome. In unsupervised learning, patterns are sought by algorithms without any input from the user. Unsupervised techniques are thus exploratory and used to find undefined patterns or clusters which occur within datasets. In this chapter, the use of different types of supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms for various applications in health care are discussed.

Biogas plant operators often face huge challenges in the monitoring, controlling and optimisation of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process, as it is very sensitive to surrounding changes, which often leads to process failure and adversely affects biogas production. Conventional implemented methods and mechanistic models are impractical and find it difficult to model the nonlinear and intricate interactions of the AD process. Thus, the development of machine learning (ML) algorithms has attracted considerable interest in the areas of process optimization, real-time monitoring, perturbation detection and parameter prediction. This paper provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of different machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic (FL), adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), support vector machine (SVM), genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) in terms of working mechanism, structure, advantages and disadvantages, as well as their prediction performances in modelling the biogas production. A few recent case studies of their applications and limitations are also critically reviewed and compared, providing useful information and recommendation in the selection and application of different ML algorithms. This review shows that the prediction efficiency of different ML algorithms is greatly impacted by variations in the reactor configurations, operating conditions, influent characteristics, selection of input parameters and network architectures. It is recommended to incorporate mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) concentration of the anaerobic digester (ranging from 16,500 to 46,700mg/L) as one of the input parameters to improve the prediction efficiency of ML modelling. This review also shows that the combination of different ML algorithms (i.e. hybrid GA-ANN model) could yield better accuracy with higher R2 (0.9986) than conventional algorithms and could improve the optimization model of AD. Besides, future works could be focused on the incorporation of an integrated digital twin system coupled with ML techniques into the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system of any biogas plant to detect any operational abnormalities and prevent digester upsets.

This article introduces an advanced vital sign monitoring system that seamlessly integrates sensor technology, wireless communication, and machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance patient care. The system accurately records and interprets vital physiological metrics such as oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and body temperature. The integration forms the foundation of our comprehensive approach to patient health status classification through the ML algorithm. We employed three distinct ML algorithms—K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) models to analyze health states, each precisely trained and validated using data collected from sensors on vital sign. This meticulous training aims to enable the models to accurately identify various patient health states, with the KNN model achieving an average accuracy of 92%, while the SVM and SGD models attained even higher accuracies of 94% and 97%, respectively. These outcomes were rigorously validated against established health scoring systems, showcasing the models’ exceptional performance in multiclass classification scenarios. This is further evidenced by their area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores: KNN (0.9021), SVM (0.9841), and SGD (0.9933). The integration of these technologies into our health monitoring system represents a significant advancement in the continuous and comprehensive assessment of patient health, demonstrating the potential of modern technologies to revolutionize healthcare monitoring and management.

Orthopedic patients have been increasing in hospital because of road traffic accidents, advanced age, a lack of exercise, inadequate nutrition, and other factors. The suggested article uses Machine Learning (ML) techniques to examine the patient reports. The ability to mimic the human actions is called ML. It is a subclass of AI that solves a number of healthcare-related issues. Here ML algorithms are used for health-related data. It solves a number of healthcare-related issues. ML is the process of a machine imitating intelligent human activities. It belongs to the Artificial Intelligence (AI) subclass. ML algorithms are used for medical data such as Logistic Regression, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network to predict orthopedic illnesses such as Normal, Hernia and Spondylolisthesis orthopedic. ML techniques have increased the speed and accuracy for diagnosis. The most serious and urgent cases require rapid care. It improves patient care by lowering human error and stress on medical staff. Our primary objective is to improve machine performance and decrease incorrect categorization.

In the era of artificial intelligence, machine learning methods are successfully used in various fields. Machine learning has attracted extensive attention from investors in the financial market, especially in stock price prediction. However, one argument for the machine learning methods used in stock price prediction is that they are black-box models which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, we focus on the future stock price prediction with the historical stock price by machine learning and deep learning methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), Bayesian classifier (BC), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM), the embedded CNN, and the embedded BiLSTM. Firstly, we manually design several financial time series where the future price correlates with the historical stock prices in pre-designed modes, namely the curve-shape-feature (CSF) and the non-curve-shape-feature (NCSF) modes. In the CSF mode, the future prices can be extracted from the curve shapes of the historical stock prices. Conversely, in the NCSF mode, they can’t. Secondly, we apply various algorithms to those pre-designed and real financial time series. We find that the existing machine learning and deep learning algorithms fail in stock price prediction because in the real financial time series, less information of future prices is contained in the CSF mode, and perhaps more information is contained in the NCSF. Various machine learning and deep learning algorithms are good at handling the CSF in historical data, which are successfully applied in image recognition and natural language processing. However, they are inappropriate for stock price prediction on account of the NCSF. Therefore, accurate stock price prediction is the key to successful investment, and new machine learning algorithms handling the NCSF series are needed.

The aim of this paper is to review machine learning (ML) algorithms and techniques for hate speech detection in social media (SM). Hate speech problem is normally model as a text classification task. In this study, we examined the basic baseline components of hate speech classification using ML algorithms. There are five basic baseline components – data collection and exploration, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, classifier selection and training, and model evaluation, were reviewed. There have been improvements in ML algorithms that were employed for hate speech detection over time. New datasets and different performance metrics have been proposed in the literature. To keep the researchers informed regarding these trends in the automatic detection of hate speech, it calls for a comprehensive and an updated state-of-the-art. The contributions of this study are three-fold. First to equip the readers with the necessary information on the critical steps involved in hate speech detection using ML algorithms. Secondly, the weaknesses and strengths of each method is critically evaluated to guide researchers in the algorithm choice dilemma. Lastly, some research gaps and open challenges were identified. The different variants of ML techniques were reviewed which include classical ML, ensemble approach and deep learning methods. Researchers and professionals alike will benefit immensely from this study.

Worldwide, cancer is the most frequent cause of passing away for women. Any development in predicting and diagnosing cancer is crucial for a healthy life. As such, vital cancer accuracy in predicting patients' survival parameters and treatment aspects is necessary. Machine learning methods significantly impact breast cancer diagnosis and early diagnosis. This study aims to increase prediction accuracy using a novel statistical feature selection technique. This article examines the classification test accuracy, standard data precision, and the process performance of multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as Random; using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset, the following models were used: Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree (C4.5), Forest Naïve Bayes (NB), Linear Regression (LR), k-nearest-neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The data set is partitioned to use the machine learning algorithm: 20% is used during the test phase, while 80% is used throughout training. Hyper-parameters that are manually assigned are utilized to modify the classifier. When applied to a subset of data, it showed that combining SVM and model in machine learning reached the maximum accuracy of up to 90%, which was noticeably superior to the other ML model.