• Home
  • Search
  • Maintaining vs. milking good reputation when customer feedback is inaccurate.
  • Cite Icon4
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207172Copy DOI Icon

Maintaining vs. milking good reputation when customer feedback is inaccurate.

  • Nov 12, 2018
  • PloS one
  • Behnud Mir Djawadi +3 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In Internet transactions, customers and service providers often interact once and anonymously. To prevent deceptive behavior a reputation system is particularly important to reduce information asymmetries about the quality of the offered product or service. In this study we examine the effectiveness of a reputation system to reduce information asymmetries when customers may make mistakes in judging the provided service quality. In our model, a service provider makes strategic quality choices and short-lived customers are asked to evaluate the observed quality by providing ratings to a reputation system. The customer is not able to always evaluate the service quality correctly and possibly submits an erroneous rating according to a predefined probability. Considering reputation profiles of the last three sales, within the theoretical model we derive that the service provider’s dichotomous quality decisions are independent of the reputation profile and depend only on the probabilities of receiving positive and negative ratings when providing low or high quality. Thus, a service provider optimally either maintains a good reputation or completely refrains from any reputation building process. However, when mapping our theoretical model to an experimental design we find that a significant share of subjects in the role of the service provider deviates from optimal behavior and chooses actions which are conditional on the current reputation profile. With respect to these individual quality choices we see that subjects use milking strategies which means that they exploit a good reputation. In particular, if the sales price is high, low quality is delivered until the price drops below a certain threshold, and then high quality is chosen until the price increases again.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Abstract
  • Citations5

Both Quantity and Quality of Antenatal Care Matter for Child Birthweight: An Analysis of Nationally Representative Data From Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan

  • Jun 01, 2021
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Sumanta Neupane +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Context-Aware Distributed Reputation Management System

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Jinhwan Lee +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Demand Postponement with Strategic Service Customers

  • Sep 09, 2021
  • Omega
  • Haiyan Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Demand Postponement with Strategic Service Customers

  • Sep 24, 2020
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Haiyan Wang +2
  • Conference Article

Bandwidth aggregation in allied WiFi routers

  • Dec 01, 2014
  • Daniel J Robertson +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

OP52 Sociodemographic determinants of healthy and sustainable diets in the UK

  • Aug 01, 2022
  • Maria Galazoula +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Alliances Between Competitors and Consumer Information

  • May 18, 2005
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Paolo G Garella +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Reputation Service and Reputation Based Access Control

  • Nov 01, 2010
  • Linying Su +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations129

Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.

  • Nov 28, 2013
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Susanne Hempel +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations36

Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities

  • Oct 03, 1999
  • J M Alvarez +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations287

Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities

  • Sep 01, 2001
  • SPE Journal
  • J M Alvarez +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations29

Reputation premiums in electronic peer-to-peer markets

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Anindya Ghose +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

ISP’s Pricing Strategy: Advance vs Simultaneous

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • Rohit Tripathi
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Models of improved multilink reverse charging network by utilizing the bit error rate QoS attribute

  • Apr 01, 2021
  • Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
  • Fitri Maya Puspita +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOW QUALITY PRODUCT AND CONSUMER CHOICE

  • Jul 30, 2018
  • Global Fashion Management Conference
  • Qianhui Shen +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.