• Home
  • Search
  • Motion vector field phase-to-amplitude resampling for 4D motion-compensated cone-beam CT
  • Cite Icon12
  • https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaa16dCopy DOI Icon

Motion vector field phase-to-amplitude resampling for 4D motion-compensated cone-beam CT

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

We propose a phase-to-amplitude resampling (PTAR) method to reduce motion blurring in motion-compensated (MoCo) 4D cone-beam CT (CBCT) image reconstruction, without increasing the computational complexity of the motion vector field (MVF) estimation approach. PTAR is able to improve the image quality in reconstructed 4D volumes, including both regular and irregular respiration patterns. The PTAR approach starts with a robust phase-gating procedure for the initial MVF estimation and then switches to a phase-adapted amplitude gating method. The switch implies an MVF-resampling, which makes them amplitude-specific. PTAR ensures that the MVFs, which have been estimated on phase-gated reconstructions, are still valid for all amplitude-gated reconstructions. To validate the method, we use an artificially deformed clinical CT scan with a realistic breathing pattern and several patient data sets acquired with a TrueBeamTM integrated imaging system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Motion blurring, which still occurs around the area of the diaphragm or at small vessels above the diaphragm in artifact-specific cyclic motion compensation (acMoCo) images based on phase-gating, is significantly reduced by PTAR. Also, small lung structures appear sharper in the images. This is demonstrated both for simulated and real patient data. A quantification of the sharpness of the diaphragm confirms these findings. PTAR improves the image quality of 4D MoCo reconstructions compared to conventional phase-gated MoCo images, in particular for irregular breathing patterns. Thus, PTAR increases the robustness of MoCo reconstructions for CBCT. Because PTAR does not require any additional steps for the MVF estimation, it is computationally efficient. Our method is not restricted to CBCT but could rather be applied to other image modalities.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Reduction of motion artifacts in cardiac CT based on partial angle reconstructions from short scan data

  • Mar 25, 2016
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Juliane Hahn +5
  • Dissertation

Comparison of 3D and 4D CBCT for the Localization of Moving Targets

  • May 28, 2015
  • Runyon Woods
  • Research Article

‘See’ through the surface: surface-derived three-dimensional AI-driven real-time imaging solution for intra-treatment image guidance

  • Jan 23, 2026
  • Machine Learning: Health
  • Tingliang Zhuang +6
  • Research Article

Field of view and voxel size considerations in cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review

  • Dec 31, 2024
  • Odonto : Dental Journal
  • Syurri Innaddinna Syahraini +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Image-based deformable motion compensation in cone-beam CT: translation to clinical studies in interventional body radiology

  • Mar 16, 2020
  • Sarah Capostagno +5
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

3D Volume Reconstruction from Single Lateral X-Ray Image via Cross-Modal Discrete Embedding Transition

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Yikun Jiang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations204

Four‐dimensional cone‐beam computed tomography using an on‐board imager

  • Sep 26, 2006
  • Medical Physics
  • Tianfang Li +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Usefulness of intra-procedural cone-beam computed tomography in modified balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices.

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • World Journal of Radiology
  • Edward Wolfgang Lee +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption

  • Sep 27, 2016
  • Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
  • Omer Demirtas +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

On-Board Patient Positioning for Head-and-Neck IMRT: Comparing Digital Tomosynthesis to Kilovoltage Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

  • Sep 14, 2007
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Q Jackie Wu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

A hybrid approach for head and neck cancer using online image guidance and offline adaptive radiotherapy planning

  • Feb 18, 2019
  • Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
  • Roopam Srivastava +3
  • Abstract

P-022 Rotation of skull pin artifacts during image-guided neurosurgery

  • Jul 01, 2017
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • J Dinitto
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

SU-FF-J-68: Dosimetric Comparison of Patient-Specific Margins Vs. Uniform Margins for Prostate IMRT Treatments

  • Jun 01, 2007
  • Medical Physics
  • S Yoo +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations68

Motion-compensated iterative cone-beam CT image reconstruction with adapted blobs as basis functions

  • Nov 07, 2008
  • Physics in Medicine & Biology
  • A A Isola +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study

  • Jul 10, 2015
  • International Journal of Implant Dentistry
  • Johann Malina-Altzinger +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.