Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels.

Multiple protein sequence alignment using double-dynamic programming

Multiple protein sequence alignment using double-dynamic programming.

This paper presents a parallel hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) for solving the sum-of-pairs multiple protein sequence alignment. A new chromosome representation and its corresponding genetic operators are proposed. A multi-population GENITOR-type GA is combined with local search heuristics. It is then extended to run in parallel on a multiprocessor system for speeding up. Experimental results of benchmarks from the BAliBASE show that the proposed method is superior to MSA, OMA, and SAGA methods with regard to quality of solution and running time. It can be used for finding multiple sequence alignment as well as testing cost functions.

With the development of new sequencing techniques, whole genomes of many species have become available. This huge amount of data gives rise to new opportunities and challenges. These new sequences provide valuable information on relationships among species, e.g. genome recombination and conservation. One of the principal ways to investigate such information is multiple sequence alignment (MSA). Currently, there is large amount of MSA data on the internet, such as the UCSC genome database, but how to effectively use this information to solve classical and new problems is still an area lacking of exploration. In this thesis, we explored how to use this information in four problems, i.e. sequence orthology search problem, multiple alignment improvement problem, short read mapping problem, and genome rearrangement inference problem. For the first problem, we developed a EM algorithm to iteratively align a query with a multiple alignment database with the information from a phylogeny relating the query species and the species in the multiple alignment. We also infer the query's location in the phylogeny. We showed that by doing alignment and phylogeny inference together, we can improve the accuracies for both problems. For the second problem, we developed an optimization algorithm to iteratively refine the multiple alignment quality. Experiment results showed our algorithm is very stable in term of resulting alignments. The results showed that our method is more accurate than existing methods, i.e. Mafft, Clustal-O, and Mavid, on test data from three sets of species from the UCSC genome database. For the third problem, we developed a model, PhyMap, to align a read to a multiple alignment allowing mismatches and indels. PhyMap computes local alignments of a query sequence against a fixed multiple-genome alignment of closely related species. PhyMap uses a known phylogenetic tree on the species in the multiple alignment to improve the quality of its computed alignments while also estimating the placement of the query on this tree. Both theoretical computation and experiment results show that our model can differentiate between orthologous and paralogous alignments better than other popular short read mapping tools (BWA, BOWTIE and BLAST). For the fourth problem, we gave a simple genome recombination model which can express insertions, deletions, inversions, translocations and inverted translocations on aligned genome segments. We also developed an MCMC algorithm to infer the order of the query segments. We proved that using any Euclidian metrics to measure distance between two sequence orders in the tree optimization goal function will lead to a degenerated solution where the inferred order will be the order of one of the leaf nodes. We also gave a graph-based formulation of the problem which can represent the probability distribution of the order of the query sequences.

In this paper, an approach is described that combines multiple structure alignments and multiple sequence alignments to generate sequence profiles for protein families. First, multiple sequence alignments are generated from sequences that are closely related to each sequence of known three-dimensional structure. These alignments then are merged through a multiple structure alignment of family members of known structure. The merged alignment is used to generate a Hidden Markov Model for the family in question. The Hidden Markov Model can be used to search for new family members or to improve alignments for distantly related family members that already have been identified. Application of a profile generated for SH2 domains indicates that the Janus family of nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinases contains SH2 domains. This conclusion is strongly supported by the results of secondary structure-prediction programs, threading calculations, and the analysis of comparative models generated for these domains. One of the Janus kinases, human TYK2, has an SH2 domain that contains a histidine instead of the conserved arginine at the key phosphotyrosine-binding position, betaB5. Calculations of the pK(a) values of the betaB5 arginines in a number of SH2 domains and of the betaB5 histidine in a homology model of TYK2 suggest that this histidine is likely to be neutral around pH 7, thus indicating that it may have lost the ability to bind phosphotyrosine. If this indeed is the case, TYK2 may contain a domain with an SH2 fold that has a modified binding specificity.

This article presents an immune inspired algorithm to tackle the Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) problem. MSA is one of the most important tasks in biological sequence analysis. Although this paper focuses on protein alignments, most of the discussion and methodology may also be applied to DNA alignments. The problem of finding the multiple alignment was investigated in the study by Bonizzoni and Vedova and Wang and Jiang, and proved to be a NP-hard (non-deterministic polynomial-time hard) problem. The presented algorithm, called Immunological Multiple Sequence Alignment Algorithm (IMSA), incorporates two new strategies to create the initial population and specific ad hoc mutation operators. It is based on the ‘weighted sum of pairs’ as objective function, to evaluate a given candidate alignment. IMSA was tested using both classical benchmarks of BAliBASE (versions 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0), and experimental results indicate that it is comparable with state-of-the-art multiple alignment algorithms, in terms of quality of alignments, weighted Sums-of-Pairs (SP) and Column Score (CS) values. The main novelty of IMSA is its ability to generate more than a single suboptimal alignment, for every MSA instance; this behaviour is due to the stochastic nature of the algorithm and of the populations evolved during the convergence process. This feature will help the decision maker to assess and select a biologically relevant multiple sequence alignment. Finally, the designed algorithm can be used as a local search procedure to properly explore promising alignments of the search space.

Background: Due to the growing amount of biological data, it is often necessary to select the most optimal estimation method for DNA sequence alignment across livestock species. One of the most important benches of genomics is to modelling homology between considered DNA sequences. A multiple sequence alignment is a potent tool for molecular and evolutionary biology, and there are several programs and algorithms applicable for this purpose. The purpose of this paper was to study the most commonly used DNA alignment algorithms to select the optimal tool dedicated for short sequences.Methods: Four steps of bioinformatics pipelines were considered to benchmark the algorithms for multiple DNA sequence alignment across livestock species: 1) selection of reference genome sequences of ARS1.2 for cattle, EquCab3.0 for horse and vicPac2 for alpaca with a low E-value using TBLASTn 2) removing gaps for these sequences 3) alignment of obtained sequences using examined algorithms 4) matching the quality of aligned sequences with sequences of reference genomes by more software. The time of computation was archived for the whole analysis. The seven programs were utilized, each based on different alignment algorithms, namely: ClustalO, ClustalW, Kalign, MAFFT, MUSCLE, Probcons and T-Coffee.Results: The result obtained in this study showed that the fastest is progressive algorithms such as Kalign or MUSCLE-FAST. Moreover, the iterative algorithms like MAFFT and MUSCLE revealed a higher quality of the alignment. The T-Coffee and Probcons programs were computational cost-effective; simultaneously, they were generating a medium-quality calculation in a relatively long time. The best quality of alignment was shown by iterative variants of the MAFFT program; however, the speed of the calculations was relatively low. The fastest algorithm was Kalign, making alignment much faster than the competitors, but achieving average results in the quality of the alignment. The average speed ratio concerning the quality of the analyzed algorithms was obtained by the progressive version of MAFFT, NS1.Conclusions: We conclude that the results of this study can be used to re-alignment of variant primers in new livestock genome releases.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) methods infer the homologous regions within DNA and protein sequences. Among the other algorithms for MSA, the center star method (CSM) is useful when processing a large number of sequences. In this method, the partially conserved regions among the non-center sequences tend to hide in the alignment. Therefore, existence of subsets of similar sequences in the input set leads to a significant accuracy loss. As a solution to the above problem, this research introduces an algorithm for MSA based on a solution proposed by D. Gusfield in 1991. In this research, the sequences are first grouped into subsets, aligned separately using CSM and finally these alignments are merged by applying progressive alignment procedure. The detailed solution for this problem is presented in the following section.

We present MUSCLE, a new program for creating multiple alignments of protein sequences. MUSCLE achieves the highest scores so far reported on four alignment benchmarks: Balibase, PREFAB, SABmark and SMART, achieving accuracy from 1% to 2.5% higher than T-Coffee and execution times that are generally lower than CLUSTALW for typical input data. With options designed for high-throughput applications, MUSCLE gives average accuracy statistically indistinguishable from T-Coffee and is the fastest published method for large numbers of sequences, able to align 5,000 sequences of length 300 in 7 minutes on a desktop computer. MUSCLE is freely available at http://www.drive5.com/muscle.

The object of this work was to improve multiple sequence alignments using public-domain software and methods as far as possible. A method is described where the secondary structure of proteins is predicted and this information, coupled with a simplified description of the amino acids, is used to produce multiple sequence alignments. This method improved the accuracy of the resulting alignments by between 5 and 14% when compared with full sequence profile alignments (as scored against structural alignments). These improved alignments were used to predict the secondary structure of the sequences they contain. The resultant predictions were more accurate than those produced from less optimal alignments. An improvement of 6% for a three-state (helix, sheet and coil) prediction was observed when using the best alignment from the method presented here and the alignment obtained using sequence only. The method makes use of public domain software and all the associated files required to repeat the work are available from the primary author.

An automatic sequence searching method (ProtEST) is described which constructs multiple protein sequence alignments from protein sequences and translated expressed sequence tags (ESTs). ProtEST is more effective than a simple TBLASTN search of the query against the EST database, as the sequences are automatically clustered, assembled, made non-redundant, checked for sequence errors, translated into protein and then aligned and displayed. A ProtEST search found a non-redundant, translated, error- and length-corrected EST sequence for > 58% of sequences when single sequences from 1407 Pfam-A seed alignments were used as the probe. The average family size of the resulting alignments of translated EST sequences contained > 10 sequences. In a cross-validated test of protein secondary structure prediction, alignments from the new procedure led to an improvement of 3.4% average Q3 prediction accuracy over single sequences. The ProtEST method is available as an Internet World Wide Web service http://barton.ebi.ac.uk/servers/protest.html+ ++ The Wise2 package for protein and genomic comparisons and the ProtESTWise script can be found at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Wise2 geoff@ebi.ac.uk

Multi-objective two-level swarm intelligence approach for multiple RNA sequence-structure alignment

BackgroundStructural alignment of RNAs is becoming important, since the discovery of functional non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Recent studies, mainly based on various approximations of the Sankoff algorithm, have resulted in considerable improvement in the accuracy of pairwise structural alignment. In contrast, for the cases with more than two sequences, the practical merit of structural alignment remains unclear as compared to traditional sequence-based methods, although the importance of multiple structural alignment is widely recognized.ResultsWe took a different approach from a straightforward extension of the Sankoff algorithm to the multiple alignments from the viewpoints of accuracy and time complexity. As a new option of the MAFFT alignment program, we developed a multiple RNA alignment framework, X-INS-i, which builds a multiple alignment with an iterative method incorporating structural information through two components: (1) pairwise structural alignments by an external pairwise alignment method such as SCARNA or LaRA and (2) a new objective function, Four-way Consistency, derived from the base-pairing probability of every sub-aligned group at every multiple alignment stage.ConclusionThe BRAliBASE benchmark showed that X-INS-i outperforms other methods currently available in the sum-of-pairs score (SPS) criterion. As a basis for predicting common secondary structure, the accuracy of the present method is comparable to or rather higher than those of the current leading methods such as RNA Sampler. The X-INS-i framework can be used for building a multiple RNA alignment from any combination of algorithms for pairwise RNA alignment and base-pairing probability. The source code is available at the webpage found in the Availability and requirements section.

Efforts to use computers in predicting the secondary structure of proteins based only on primary structure information started over a quarter century ago [1-3]. Although the results were encouraging initially, the accuracy of the pioneering methods generally did not attain the level required for using predictions of secondary structures reliably in modelling the three-dimensional topology of proteins. During the last decade, however, the introduction of new computational techniques as well as the use of multiple sequence information has lead to a dramatic increase in the success rate of prediction methods, such that successful 3D modelling based on predicted secondary structure has become feasible [e.g., Ref 4]. This review is aimed at presenting an overview of the scale of the secondary structure prediction problem and associated pitfalls, as well as the history of the development of computational prediction methods. As recent successful strategies for secondary structure prediction all rely on multiple sequence information, some methods for accurate protein multiple sequence alignments will also be described. While the main focus is on prediction methods for globular proteins, also the prediction of trans-membrane segments within membrane proteins will be briefly summarised. Finally, an integrated iterative approach tying secondary structure prediction and multiple alignment will be introduced [5].

This chapter describes the Multiple Carbohydrate Alignment with Weights (MCAW) tool, which is available as a part of the RINGS (Resource for INformatics of Glycomes at Soka) website. It implements a combination of KCaM (Aoki, Yamaguchi, Ueda, et al., Nucl Acids Res 32:W267-W272, 2004), a pairwise glycan alignment algorithm, and ClustalW (Thompson, Higgins, Gibson, Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-80, 1994), a weighted multiple protein sequence alignment algorithm. This tool computes the multiple glycan alignment by first computing a guide tree to determine the order by which to progressively add glycans to the multiple alignment. The dynamic programming algorithm results in a glycan profile of the alignment glycans, containing "monosaccharide positions" indicating the ratio of monosaccharides and their glycosidic bonds that are aligned at the corresponding position. This tool has been used to analyze databases of glycan array experimental data, incorporating weights to reflect the biological significance of certain glycans over others. As a result, it has been shown that the alignments obtained are biologically relevant, matching the results as found in the literature.