• Home
  • Search
  • Network Management Challenges and Trends in Multi-Layer and Multi-Vendor Settings for Carrier-Grade Networks
  • Cite Icon47
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2014.2327754Copy DOI Icon

Network Management Challenges and Trends in Multi-Layer and Multi-Vendor Settings for Carrier-Grade Networks

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The exponential growth of Internet traffic gives no respite to the telecommunications industry and is visibly shortening the life-cycle of the technologies used for core networking. To cope with the traffic demand, the industry has primarily focused on the evolution of the data and control planes, and has rapidly made progress in both subjects. However, the innovations in the market have not reached the management plane at the same speed. This stems from a number of factors, most of which point to the segmentation of competencies in managing multi-layer infrastructures. Current carrier-grade networks are organized as multi-layer infrastructures, typically composed of two layers: IP routers deployed in tandem with optical transport nodes. In turn, each of the two layers is typically composed of devices from different vendors, each of which usually supplies its own (proprietary) network management system (NMS). In practice, the lack of broadly accepted mechanisms for enabling interoperability among the different NMSs has led to the isolation of these proprietary systems. As a result, the operation and maintenance tasks on the network are becoming increasingly complex, which is leading to duplication of functions, higher OPEX, and significant delays in the coordination of multi-layer provisioning processes. In this paper, we examine in detail the interoperability challenges of managing multi-layer and multi-vendor carrier-grade networks, and review the current trends and recent standards in the area, with strong focus on industrial advances. We cover the Multi-Technology Operations System Interface (MTOSI) as well as OpenFlow, and analyze their potential impact and reach. We also discuss some of the reasons why relevant carrier-grade management proposals have not been able to fulfill the requirements of Internet service providers (ISPs), and identify a set of features that might help pave the way to market for new management products.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Research on concentrated-model of Transmission Network Management System based on Cloud

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Huiping Meng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

A generic architecture for management and control of end-to-end quality of service over multiple domains

  • Sep 15, 2001
  • Computer Communications
  • Filip Vandermeulen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

An open network management architecture: OSI/NM Forum architecture and concepts

  • Jul 01, 1990
  • IEEE Network
  • J Embry +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

GIS based network management study and its application

  • Aug 01, 2010
  • Xixian Niu +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Application of Bayesian Networks for Autonomic Network Management

  • Oct 20, 2013
  • Journal of Network and Systems Management
  • Abul Bashar +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Research on new integrated network management system based on SDN

  • Mar 04, 2022
  • Hailong Wang +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Network Neutrality and Internet Market Fragmentation

  • Apr 13, 2012
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Jasper P Sluijs
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Development of NETCONF-Based Network Management Systems in Web Services Framework

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • IEICE Transactions on Communications
  • Tomoyuki Iijima +3
  • Conference Article

Characteristics of IPS Control Plane Data And Security Consideration

  • Apr 20, 2021
  • Madhu Niraula
  • Book Chapter

Issues in Managing Multimedia Networks

  • Nov 25, 2020
  • Luc T Nguyen
  • Conference Article

IPv6 based building automation solution integration into an ipv4 network service provider infrastructure

  • Jun 22, 2012
  • Nikolay Milovanov +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations14

Studies on Network Management System framework of Campus Network

  • Mar 01, 2010
  • Xiaosong Wang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

A Heterogeneous Service-Oriented Deep Packet Inspection and Analysis Framework for Traffic-Aware Network Management and Security Systems

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • IEEE Access
  • Muhammad Asrar Ashraf +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

A scalable manager-agency-based network management design to provide adaptive configuration management for tactical battlefield networks

  • Oct 28, 2001
  • L Kant +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1260

Improving network management with software defined networking

  • Feb 01, 2013
  • IEEE Communications Magazine
  • Hyojoon Kim +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.