• Home
  • Search
  • On the Security Loss in Cryptographic Reductions
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon7
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01001-9_4Copy DOI Icon

On the Security Loss in Cryptographic Reductions

  • Jan 1, 2009
  • Chi-Jen Lu
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Almost all the important cryptographic protocols we have today base their security on unproven assumptions, which all imply NP \(\ne\) P, and thus having unconditional proofs of their security seems far beyond our reach. One research effort then is to identify more basic primitives and prove the security of these protocols by reductions to the security of these primitives. However, in doing so, one often observes some security loss in the form that the security of the protocols is measured against weaker adversaries, e.g., adversaries with a smaller running time. Is such a security loss avoidable? We study two of the most basic cryptographic reductions: hardness amplification of one-way functions and constructing pseudorandom generators from one-way functions. We show that when they are done in a certain black-box way, such a security loss is in fact unavoidable.KeywordsOblivious TransferHard FunctionMarkov InequalityCircuit SizeOracle QueryThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

A tight lower bound for entropy flattening

  • Jun 22, 2018
  • Yi-Hsiu Chen +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

On the Power of the Randomized Iterate

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • SIAM Journal on Computing
  • Iftach Haitner +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Efficiency Improvements in Constructing Pseudorandom Generators from One-Way Functions

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • SIAM Journal on Computing
  • Iftach Haitner +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations11

On the Complexity of Hardness Amplification

  • Jun 11, 2005
  • Chi-Jen Lu +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations732

One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures

  • Jan 01, 1990
  • J Rompel
  • Conference Article
  • Citations754

Pseudo-random generation from one-way functions

  • Jan 01, 1989
  • R Impagliazzo +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations20

Efficient Pseudorandom Generators from Exponentially Hard One-Way Functions

  • Jan 01, 2006
  • Iftach Haitner +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Pseudorandom Generators for Read-Once Monotone Branching Programs

  • Jan 01, 2021
  • DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)
  • Dean Doron +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations67

Fooling Functions of Halfspaces under Product Distributions

  • Jun 01, 2010
  • Parikshit Gopalan +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations11

Input Locality and Hardness Amplification

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Andrej Bogdanov +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations12

The Computational SLR: A Logic for Reasoning about Computational Indistinguishability

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Yu Zhang
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

The Application of Claw Free Functions in Cryptography: - Unconditional Protection in Cryptographic Protocols

  • May 01, 1988
  • DAIMI Report Series
  • Ivan Bjerre Damgård
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations50

Computational Security of Quantum Encryption

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Gorjan Alagic +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations282

One way functions and pseudorandom generators

  • Dec 01, 1987
  • Combinatorica
  • Leonid A Levin
  • Conference Article
  • Citations61

Efficient cryptographic schemes provably as secure as subset sum

  • Jan 01, 1989
  • R Impagliazzo +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.