Embedded Temperature Sensing in Li-Ion Battery Pouch Cell to Investigate Dependence of Cell Orientation and Sensor Location
Battery temperature is one of the most important states to monitor to ensure good operation and safety, it has a significant impact on cell performance and life. Sensors embedded internally provide more accurate measurements of battery temperature and can therefore support more advanced battery characterisation. [1] Previously temperature sensors have been embedded within the centre of cells without considering how sensor location and cell orientation could impact the accuracy of the measurement. [1] In this work we investigate: (i) the in plane temperature change both inside and on the external surface of the cell, (ii) the difference in temperature change between internal and corresponding external sensor (cross plane temperature change) and how they vary in different cell orientations.We integrate bespoke non-invasive 10kOhm thermistor arrays (0201 size) internally (see figure 1f), on top of the electrode stack of A7 Li-ion pouch cells (1Ah NMC622/graphite), manufactured within the university. In addition, an external thermistor array is mounted on the pouch bag, the seven sensors on both arrays are aligned for direct comparison. An external thermocouple is also used as a reference. The experiment is undertaken in a thermal chamber (representative of a typical chamber used in literature), left to stabilise to 25oC for two hours before proceeding with the experiment. The thermal chamber comprises a volume of 0.27m3 with heat circulation fans located towards the top of the chamber, in principle, ensuring homogeneous temperature during testing. The temperature change is monitored throughout the test profile shown in figure 1a & b, a current magnitude of 2C is applied for a duration of 10 seconds at state of charge levels of 100 %, 80 %, 50 % and 20%.Four different cell configurations (A-D) are considered, see figure 1c. Configuration A represents the use case when the internal thermistor array is placed towards the side facing upwards and the external array is mounted on the surface facing downwards. The thermocouple in this configuration is on the topside, in all configurations it is placed centrally. Configuration B represents when the external thermistor array is moved to the top surface of the cell, here the pouch bag material only separates the two arrays. In configuration C the cell is wrapped in an insulating layer and is then reorientated in configuration D.Results from (i) show the same trend throughout all configurations, sensors closest to the electrical tabs experienced the smallest temperature change, similar to results found in [2], whereas the sensors centrally towards the opposite side of the tabs read ~0.45 oC higher, during the 1C discharge of the test program (all temperature change values are extracted from this step). When investigating (ii) we observe the greatest temperature change difference towards the centre of the cell for all cell configurations, where the internal sensors read ~ 0.4oC higher. The temperature change values therefore vary more in plane (i) than cross plane (ii), a similar trend is observed in [3]. The average internal temperature change observed between different cell configurations varied more compared to its equivalent external temperature change, the greatest difference being between configuration C and D and is therefore shown in figure 1d & e. We have shown that at this scale, the cell orientation has a significant impact on the readings than whether the sensor is integrated internally or externally on the cell. If this experiment was repeated on a larger battery the significance of cell orientation on temperature change would further increase. Researchers must be aware of the importance of consistent positioning of the cell and the sensor in the thermal chamber during testing and insulating the cell from the circulation fans.Instrumenting the cell had minimal effects on its life and performance as no capacity and internal resistance differences are present between equivalent cells with no internal sensor. Further work includes integrating the array between the electrode layers to understand how significantly the internal temperature will vary and quantify the reliability between the outer embedded sensors.[1] L. H. J. Raijmakers, D. L. Danilov, R. A. Eichel, and P. H. L. Notten, “A review on various temperature-indication methods for Li-ion batteries,” Apr. 15, 2019, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.078.[2] S. Novais et al., “Internal and external temperature monitoring of a li-ion battery with fiber bragg grating sensors,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 9, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.3390/s16091394.[3] T. Waldmann et al., “Influence of Cell Design on Temperatures and Temperature Gradients in Lithium-Ion Cells: An In Operando Study,” J Electrochem Soc, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. A921–A927, 2015, doi: 10.1149/2.0561506jes. Figure 1
Read more