• Home
  • Search
  • Optimizing polynomial solvers for minimal geometry problems
  • Cite Icon18
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126341Copy DOI Icon

Optimizing polynomial solvers for minimal geometry problems

  • Nov 1, 2011
  • Oleg Naroditsky +1 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In recent years polynomial solvers based on algebraic geometry techniques, and specifically the action matrix method, have become popular for solving minimal problems in computer vision. In this paper we develop a new method for reducing the computational time and improving numerical stability of algorithms using this method. To achieve this, we propose and prove a set of algebraic conditions which allow us to reduce the size of the elimination template (polynomial coefficient matrix), which leads to faster LU or QR decomposition. Our technique is generic and has potential to improve performance of many solvers that use the action matrix method. We demonstrate the approach on specific examples, including an image stitching algorithm where computation time is halved and single precision arithmetic can be used.

Similar Papers
  • Single Report
  • Citations1

Novel View Synthesis in Time and Space

  • Feb 01, 2020
  • Simon Niklaus
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Gender classification based on fuzzy clustering and principal component analysis

  • Apr 01, 2016
  • IET Computer Vision
  • Hamid Hassanpour +3
  • Research Article

3D STRUCTURE FROM MOTION WITH FOURIER DESCRIPTOR TRANSFORMATION

  • Aug 01, 2013
  • International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
  • Gamal F Elhady
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Unsupervised Learning of Graph and Hypergraph Matching

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Marius Leordeanu
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Toward designing intelligent PDEs for computer vision: An optimal control approach

  • Oct 11, 2012
  • Image and Vision Computing
  • Risheng Liu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Acquiring qualified samples for RANSAC using geometrical constraints

  • Dec 12, 2017
  • Pattern Recognition Letters
  • Van-Hung Le +4
  • Research Article

Compilation of Different Approaches for Determining Illuminant Direction

  • Dec 31, 2019
  • The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology
  • Tan Bowen +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations93

Where do emotions come from? Predicting the Emotion Stimuli Map

  • Sep 01, 2016
  • Kuan-Chuan Peng +3
  • Research Article

Computational 3D photography: extracting shape, motion and appearance from images

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Marc Pollefeys
  • Book Chapter

Computer Vision, Some Definitions, and Some History

  • Oct 01, 2017
  • Wesley E Snyder +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

A fast sparse QR factorization for solving linear least squares problems in graphics

  • Jul 31, 2021
  • Abeynaya Gnanasekaran +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

A unified co-processor architecture for matrix decomposition

  • Jul 11, 2010
  • Journal of Computer Science and Technology
  • Yong Dou +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Recalling Direct 2D-3D Matches for Large-Scale Visual Localization

  • Sep 27, 2021
  • Zhuo Song +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Convolutional neural network of deep learning in computer vision and image classification problems

  • Jun 01, 2021
  • IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
  • K E Tokarev +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

How to Track a Flying Saucer

  • Jun 01, 1996
  • Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
  • Alfred M Bruckstein +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.