- Research Article
- 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00033.x
EDITORIAL
- Jan 26, 2006
- Journal of Small Animal Practice
- Dylan Clements
THE wide variety of clinical research presented in this issue of Journal of Small Animal Practice aptly demonstrates how progress in the diagnosis and treatment of clinical disease requires a multifacetted approach from both researchers and clinicians. There are five reports in this issue of Journal of Small Animal Practice detailing developmental and traumatic conditions of the canine and feline elbow, and each is worthy of note, containing information of clinical significance to all veterinarians with an interest in orthopaedics. Canine elbow dysplasia is a generic term describing a number of well-defined conditions of the cubital joint, such as fragmentation of the medial coronoid process (FCP), osteochondrosis dissecans of the medial part of the humeral condyle (OCD), and ununited anconeal process (UAP). There are strong breed associations with each of these diseases (LaFond and others 2002), suggesting a significant underlying genetic aetiology (or aetiologies). In this issue, Janutta and others (p. 75) publish important information on the heritability of elbow dysplasia. Estimates of heritability of different radiographic traits of elbow dysplasia were calculated in a pedigree of German shepherd dogs, using three radiographic scoring systems. Although the heritability estimates from their pedigree were relatively low, they do support previous work indicating that elbow dysplasia has a genetic origin. Indeed, the lack of consistent heritability estimates for such a disease reflects a number of different issues with canine genetic studies, such as population size, breed restriction, and difficulty in accurately phenotyping cases. This is especially true of studies considering elbow dysplasia through the use of radiographic phenotyping, where factors such as the radiographic view, the radiographic assessment criteria, and the age at radiography are rarely standardised between studies. However, perhaps a more fundamental observation of this article is that UAP and OCD appear to be inherited independently of other radiographic criteria of elbow dysplasia. This finding supports the view that bracketing a number of different conditions under the “umbrella” term canine elbow dysplasia may be convenient but is scientifically unsatisfactory because these conditions are likely to have partial or completely differing underlying genetic origins. So, if we are to make real progress in the understanding, diagnosis, treatment and eradication of elbow dysplasia from canine populations, has the time come to consider each of the individual component conditions separately? I believe so. Approaching elbow dysplasia from an anatomical standpoint, Gemmill and others (p. 66) evaluate the reliability of reconstructed computed tomography (rCT) for the assessment of elbow incongruity. Measurements of joint space width using rCT were found to correlate with anatomical (frozen section) measurements of the same parameters. This article verifies the methodology used by the same author in a previous publication in this journal (Gemmill and others 2005), detailing the presence of incongruency in some but not in all cases of FCP. The relevance of this work to the veterinarian treating FCP, but without facilities for computed tomography, is that it supports the theory suggesting that incongruency may be involved in the pathogenesis of canine FCP in some but not in all patients. Thus, careful preoperative evaluation and case selection are required for treatments that aim to address incongruency, such as osteotomies of the ulna. Meyer-Lindenberg and others (p. 61) provide a new slant on UAP by addressing the common perception that UAP and FCP rarely, if ever, occur in the same joint. By evaluating the medial part of the coronoid process with arthroscopy or arthrotomy in 155 clinical cases of UAP, they found that 16 per cent of joints contained an FCP. This article raises two important issues for clinicians treating cases of UAP. First, radiography was extremely poor at predicting the presence or absence of an FCP in canine elbows with UAP; thus, all cases of UAP should be evaluated for FCP either directly at surgery or through the use of more advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography. Secondly, incongruency (short ulna) was identified in nearly half the cases of UAP, both on preoperative radiographs and at surgery, including nearly a third of the FCP cases. This raises the inevitable question of how does the FCP occur in these joints, if the ulna is too short, and thus (theoretically) taking load off the medial coronoid process and presumably reducing its possibility for fracture? Clearly, there is much still to be learnt about both these conditions. Finally, two reports are published documenting unusual traumatic conditions of the feline elbow. Macias and others (p. 89) describe the presentation and treatment of five cats with Y-T humeral fractures. In contrast to dogs, this injury invariably appears to be caused by high-energy trauma and results in extremely comminuted fractures. The results obtained through the use of bilateral plate and transcondylar lag screw fixation of these fractures were considerably better than most veterinarians may have expected. Clinicians should note that these catastrophic fractures need not be given a poor prognosis, provided they are managed at the hands of a skilled surgeon. Finally, Liehmann and Lorinson (p. 94) publish the successful treatment of an extremely unusual condition, traumatic triceps tendon avulsion, in a cat. The publication deserves note, not only for its rarity and successful management but also for the author's ability to maintain a Spica splint on a feline patient for three weeks, which is truly a feat in itself! Dylan Clements graduated from the University of Liverpool in 1997 and then worked at the PDSA in Liverpool for three years before completing a surgical residency at the University of Glasgow Veterinary School. After his residency, he worked for a year as a registrar in Small Animal Orthopaedics at the University of Glasgow Veterinary School, during which he gained his RCVS diploma in small animal surgery (orthopaedics) and ECVS diploma in surgery. He is currently a BBSRC scholar at the University of Liverpool and The University of Manchester, where he is investigating the molecular genetics of canine osteoarthritis.
Read more