Recent Advances and Perspectives in Single-Ion COF-Based Solid Electrolytes

Currently, electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries are flammable and leaky, causing safety problems when used under high temperatures or extreme conditions. Solid electrolytes can fundamentally avoid the occurrence of such issues, at the same time, it can significantly increase the energy density of solid state lithium batteries. Solid electrolytes are classified into inorganic solid electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes. Although inorganic solid electrolytes have the high mechanical strength and room temperature ionic conductivity, it has poor flexibility and complicated preparation process. In contrast, solid polymer electrolyte has good elasticity and good interface contact, which can overcome many disadvantages of the inorganic solid electrolyte. Among them, polyethylene oxide (PEO) is first proposed as a polymer electrolyte. Due to its excellent mechanical properties, electrochemical stability and thermal stability, it has been a hot topic for polymer solid electrolytes for decades. However, its low room temperature ionic conductivity limits practical application. Given the problems existing in PEO-based polymer electrolytes, several methods for improving ionic conductivity have been proposed. The primary methods include plasticization, the organic-inorganic composite, and polymer blending. Comparing these methods, it can be seen that adding plasticizers to the polymer can effectively increase the conductivity of the electrolyte, but at the same time it will cause a decrease in the mechanical properties, and the safety issues limit its application in lithium-ion batteries. Inorganic fillers can balance the problems of ionic conductivity and mechanical properties, but the construction of a good filler-polymer dispersion system is complicated in preparing such composite electrolytes, design a new type of multi-dimensional the ion transport network also face tremendous challenges. Undoubtedly, in the future research, inorganic fillers will be the dominant means in the modification of composite electrolytes. Compared with the former two modification methods, polymer blending is easy to operate and friendly to industry, but low ionic conductivity at room temperature still exist. To give full play to the advantages of polymer blending, using it as an auxiliary means to improve the performance of composite electrolytes will be the primary development direction of such modification methods. PEO is the most widely studied polymer electrolyte. Even though a large number of modification methods have emerged in its development history, the ionic conductivity at room temperature is still limited to a relatively low level. To meet the needs of the application in lithium-ion batteries, a high operating temperature (50−70℃) is still needed, the biggest problem remains exist. To solve the problems in polymer solid electrolytes, the research directions in the future may mainly focus on: Expanding the modification method of PEO to other polymer electrolyte host materials, broadening the scope of research, and finding the available polymer electrolytes at room temperature. Concerned about the preparation of ultra-thin polymer electrolytes, reducing the ion transmission path to increase the transmission efficiency of lithium ions between positive and negative electrodes. Effectively combines inorganic solid electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes to give full play to their advantages. In addition, exploring the effect of inorganic filler morphology on the conductivity of the composite electrolyte will also deserve attention. Many one-dimensional, two-dimensional materials can build ion transport networks so that lithium ions can travel rapidly along the path. With the deepening of research, it is expected that PEO-based polymer electrolytes may replace liquid electrolytes and become an essential cornerstone for building the next generation of safe and reliable lithium-ion batteries.

Global demand for lithium-ion secondary batteries have been increasing due to new market growth from electric vehicles and power storage systems. Lithium-ion batteries possess high power density, energy density and long cycle life without memory effect and little self-discharge, and have been primary energy storage system for commercial electronics. However, recent accidents regarding battery safety, such as Samsung Note 7 issue, has raised doubt among public about lithium-ion batteries as option for energy storage. Separator is one of the primary component for lithium-ion battery safety. Commercial separators like PE or PP not only possess outstanding mechanical and electrochemical performance, but also have thermal shutdown function that provide safety measure by pore—blocking with melted polyolefin materials. Nevertheless, polyolefin materials suffered serious shrinkage at elevated temperature, which cause internal short-circuited of batteries ; also, polyolefin materials have relatively low electrolyte uptake, and could be major obstacle for future lithium-ion battery application. Hence it’s necessary to design new type of separator that guarantee battery safety and demonstrate better electrochemical performance In this study, we proposed a brand-new method to design composite separator with high thermal stability, electrolyte uptake ability and thermal shutdown function. Polyimide(PI) nanofiber film was used as substrate and produced by electrospinning technique, and ultra-thin Low-Density-Polyethylene(LDPE) layer was laid upon PI by simple spin-coating method. Spin-coating method provided unique advantages such as ultra thin coating layer (less than 1 micron), uniform coating structure and simple process, and was yet been applied for construction of composite film as lithium-ion battery separator. Coating parameter was tuned to obtain the optimized composite separator. Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) was used to investigate morphologies of separators ; Contact angle measurement was conducted to verify electrolyte affinity of different separators ; A.C. impedance method was used to measure conductivities and verify thermal shutdown of separators, and electrolyte uptake of different separators were measured by electrolyte soaking method in an argon-filled glovebox. The composite film had sub-micron average pore size, and possessed excellent physical properties, for instance, high porosity(73%), electrolyte uptake(1300%), ion conductivity(4.3*10-4 S/cm), air permeability(gurley value=0), and thermal stability(no shrink up to 150。C). Thermal shutdown function of composite film was also confirmed by impedance measurement at elevated temperature. It was noticed that physical properties between pristine PI and composite film were similar owning to ultra-thin coating layer, which mitigate performance loss from LDPE coating. Afterward, full cell battery tests were conducted with CR2032 type coin cell (Cathode : LFP, anode : MCMB, electrolyte : 1 M LiPF6 in EC/EMC/DMC=1:1:1+1%VC, 1C=2.4mAh/g). The first cycle charge-discharge curves, rate capability and cyclic performance were conducted. The composite film showed flatter first cycle charge-discharge plateau, better capacity retention at higher C-rate (Composite film :102 mAh/g at 1C, 79% retention, Celgard 2500 : 73 mAh/g, 51% retention , w.r.t. 0.1C), and higher discharge capacity at 0.5C 50th cyclic test. The higher porosity and electrolyte uptake of composite film facilitated ion conduction and were the main cause for enhanced battery performance. With enhanced thermal stability and electrochemical performance, we expected this type of composite separator to be promising for future lithium-ion battery application. Figure 1

In the past decades, due to an always more electrification and the research of a greener environment, Li-ion Batteries (LIB) have taken an important place in worldwide research. Solid-state batteries (SSBs) have the potential to revolutionize the energy storage industry, offering superior safety and energy density in comparison to traditional LIBs[1, 2]. Our research aims to enhance the performance and safety of solid-state batteries at ambient temperature by incorporating electrodes with high specific capacity with a lithium lanthanum zirconate (LLZO) solid electrolyte.The integration of SiNW electrodes into the solid-state battery architecture offers several advantages. SiNWs are known for their large surface area and superior electrical conductivity and offer a strong platform for efficient lithium-ion transport and cell energy density optimization, theoretically almost 10 times the capacity of graphite[3, 4]. Furthermore, LLZO solid electrolytes are a stable and non-flammable alternative to conventional liquid electrolytes[2, 5], significantly improving battery safety.The main objectives of this study are to investigate the combined effects of silicon nanowires (SiNWs) electrodes and LLZO solid electrolyte and to determine the optimal amount of liquid electrolytes to improve cell safety.In this work, an LLZO thin solid electrolyte tape has been manufactured by casting technique. Precise volumes of liquid electrolyte have been added to the LLZO tape to improve surface contact and ion conductivity. Furthermore, the study will provide a view of the relationship between the quantity of liquid electrolytes introduced and their impact on cell stability and safety.Preliminary results show the preparation of a mechanically stable LLZO tape with high ionic conductivity (>10-4 S cm-1) through an easy and up-scalable procedure. Improvements have been reported in the electrochemical performance of SiNW-LLZO solid-state batteries compared to the relative Li-ion liquid cell.In conclusion, here we developed a new thin solid electrolyte tape with high ionic conductivity, used in solid-state LIBs with silicon nanowires as anode material. Moreover, we standardized a procedure to optimize the use of organic liquid electrolytes as an additive, without omitting the volume or using any excess that could lead to safety issues. This optimization process can contribute to the development of solid-state batteries that are not only high-performance but also safe and reliable for various applications, including electric vehicles and portable electronics. References Wu, F., J. Maier, and Y. Yu, Guidelines and trends for next-generation rechargeable lithium and lithium-ion batteries. Chem Soc Rev, 2020. 49(5): p. 1569-1614.Wang, C., et al., Garnet-Type Solid-State Electrolytes: Materials, Interfaces, and Batteries. Chem Rev, 2020. 120(10): p. 4257-4300.Chan, C.K., et al., High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nat Nanotechnol, 2008. 3(1): p. 31-5.Kennedy, T., M. Brandon, and K.M. Ryan, Advances in the Application of Silicon and Germanium Nanowires for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv Mater, 2016. 28(27): p. 5696-704.Xu, L., et al., Garnet Solid Electrolyte for Advanced All ‐Solid ‐State Li Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020. 11(2).

<p indent="0mm">In order to deal with the increasingly severe global energy crisis as well as serious environmental pollution, it is urgent to develop new energy resources. Although lithium-ion batteries have only been successfully introduced into the market since 1990s, there is still an exponentially growing demand for lithium-ion batteries all over the world. As a considerable novel energy source, lithium-ion batteries have significant potential, which is widely used in electric vehicles, energy-storage systems, metallurgy, ceramic production, glass manufacturing and aviation fuel industries. Among them, the solid-state lithium-ion batteries (SSLIBs) represent a promising evolution in battery technology, offering superior safety, energy density, and longevity compared to conventional liquid electrolyte batteries. Traditional lithium-ion batteries, which use liquid electrolytes, suffer from safety issues such as leakage, flammability and thermal runaway. SSLIBs replace these liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes, mitigating these risks and enabling higher energy densities due to the ability to accommodate lithium metal anodes. The SSLIB consists of a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a solid electrolyte. Compared with liquid electrolytes, solid electrolytes avoid the direct contact between positive electrodes and negative electrodes, fundamentally eliminating the risk of lithium dendrites piercing the separator, so as to enhance the safety of lithium batteries greatly. Furthermore, the SSLIBs are expected to be a hot spot in future lithium battery research due to the advantages of high energy density, wide operating voltage range and long cycle life. Advancements in SSLIBs technology are crucial for the next generation of electric vehicles, portable electronics, and large-scale energy storage systems, pushing the boundaries of battery performance, safety and sustainability. Solid electrolytes are regarded as the key component of SSLIBs, serving dual functions as both separators and electrolytes. The currently developed solid electrolytes can be divided into two categories: Polymer solid electrolytes and inorganic solid electrolytes, in which the oxide solid electrolytes, as the earliest developed inorganic solid electrolytes, play an indispensable role in the development of solid-state battery industry. The typical oxide solid electrolytes, including sodium super ionic conductor (NASICON), garnet (LLZO), inorganic perovskite (LLTO), and LiPON films, are reviewed in this paper. NASICON, for example, is known for its high ionic conductivity and structural stability. Garnet-type electrolytes, such as LLZO, possess high ionic conductivity and chemical stability with lithium. Inorganic perovskite (LLTO) provides a good balance between ionic conductivity and mechanical strength. LiPON films, widely used in thin-film batteries, have excellent electrochemical stability and compatibility with lithium metal. In addition, the crystal structures and ion-transport mechanism, the solutions to improve conductivity and measures to improve the compatibility between electrodes and electrolytes are introduced, along with a comparation of oxide solid electrolytes. Finally, several suggestions for future development directions are proposed. These include enhancing the ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes, improving the interface compatibility between the electrolytes and electrodes, and developing cost-effective and scalable manufacturing processes. Additionally, further research is needed to understand the degradation mechanisms and long-term stability of solid-state batteries. These recommendations aim to provide a more comprehensive reference for ongoing and future research on oxide solid electrolytes, supporting the broader goal of advancing solid-state lithium battery technology.

<p indent="0mm">Since the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries in the 1990s, lithium-ion batteries have been successfully applied in portable electronics, electric vehicles, and grid energy storage. Although current organic liquid electrolytes have high ionic conductivities, they are inherently flammable, volatile, and prone to leakage. Moreover, severe side reactions and dendrite growth on the surface of the lithium anode during the charge-discharge process can cause safety hazards, which greatly impede their applications in lithium metal batteries. Solid electrolytes, including inorganic solid electrolytes and polymer electrolytes, are regarded as effective alternatives to organic liquid electrolytes for the construction of lithium metal batteries with high energy density and safety. Among them, solid polymer electrolytes offer excellent flexibility, processability, and interfacial compatibility over inorganic solid electrolytes, and they are extraordinarily promising for lithium metal batteries with high energy density and safety. Ideal solid polymer electrolytes should have following features: (1) High ionic conductivity (&gt; <sc>10 ^–4 S cm ^–1) </sc> at room temperature; (2) high lithium ion transference number (~1) to reduce the concentration polarization and improve the rate performance of batteries; (3) intimate contact at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces; (4) wide electrochemical window <sc>(&gt;4.5 V</sc> vs. Li/Li ⁺) to match high-voltage cathodes and improve the energy density of batteries; (5) good mechanical stability to resist processing, buffer electrode volume change and inhibit dendrite growth; (6) good thermal stability to withstand environmental changes. Generally, the ionic conductivity of pure solid polymer electrolytes at room temperature is low <sc>(~10 ^–6 S cm ^–1). </sc> Researchers have tried to improve the ionic conductivities by adjusting the lithium salt concentration, such as developing “polymer-in-salt” solid electrolytes. However, increasing the concentration of lithium salt leads to the deterioration of the mechanical strength. Strategies such as developing novel lithium salts, modifying polymer matrix, and incorporating inorganic fillers into solid polymer electrolytes are proposed to promote ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes. In particular, composite polymer electrolytes, fabricated by dispersing a certain amount of inorganic fillers into solid polymer electrolytes, have improved ionic conductivities without sacrificing their mechanical performances. Poor interfacial property between electrodes and electrolytes is also a critical issue for solid polymer electrolytes. On one hand, poor and uneven solid/solid contacts at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces lead to high resistance and sluggish ionic transport kinetics. Furthermore, the volume change of the positive and negative electrodes in the charge/discharge process deteriorates the interfacial contacts, blocks the ion and electron transport through the interfaces, and greatly reduces the electrochemical reaction kinetics. On the other hand, the electrochemical windows of solid polymer electrolytes are usually narrow <sc>(＜4.5 V).</sc> During cycling, redox reactions are prone to occur at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces, causing battery failure. Solid polymer electrolytes have also poor thermal and mechanical stabilities. Therefore, design and synthesis of polymer-based solid electrolytes with excellent comprehensive performances and construction of fast and stable ion transport channels at the electrolyte/electrode interfaces are of great significance for the successful development of solid-state lithium metal batteries. This paper presents a brief review of the research progress in solid polymer electrolytes from two aspects: Improving the ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes and enhancing the interfacial performance at electrolyte/electrode interfaces. First, targeted optimization strategies on ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes, including constructing continuously aligned ionic transport paths and shortening the ionic transport distance, are summarized. Second, interface optimization strategies, including constructing wetting interfaces and synthesizing asymmetric electrolytes, are presented to reduce the interface resistance and improve the interfacial contact. Finally, perspectives on the development of solid polymer electrolytes and high-performance solid-state lithium metal batteries are discussed, and key research directions and advanced test methods are proposed. This review may provide a comprehensive understanding and further guidance for not only the material design of solid polymer electrolytes, but also the structural design of lithium metal batteries with favorable electrochemical and interfacial performances.

Battery safety is increasingly at the forefront of consumer concerns, especially regarding electric vehicles. Current lithium ion battery technology utilizes liquid electrolytes, which have very high ionic conductivities but are extremely flammable. To improve safety, researchers are investigating replacing liquid electrolytes in lithium ion batteries with solid electrolytes. A promising approach is the use of solid polymer composite electrolytes where lithium conductive ceramic powders are dispersed into polymer electrolyte matrix. These materials are intended to improve lithium conductivities and mechanical properties relative to pure polymer electrolyte, lower manufacturing and battery cell construction costs relative to using pure ceramic electrolytes, and eliminate volatile and flammable electrolyte solvents. Currently, the archetypal polymer matrix used in composite electrolytes is polyethylene oxide (PEO). When mixed with lithium salts, such as lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and ceramics, such as Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO), PEO based composites have conductivities (~10-7 S/cm at room temperature) that are still insufficient for today’s applications. In addition, PEO tends to crystallize and has poor oxidative stability (decomposition ca. 4V). We are exploring poly(polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate) (PEGMA) and polyethylene carbonate (PEC) as alternatives to PEO to address issues with crystallization and oxidative stability, respectively. Composite electrolytes are fabricated by blending bulk polymer with LiTFSI and LLZO powders. We have formed rubbery PEGMA-based composites with comparable conductivities (~10-7 S/cm at room temperature, 70 vol% polymer, 10:1 ethylene oxide:lithium). Lithium symmetric cycling was observed to be stable over 250 hours at 1C. We have also recently formed stand-alone PEC based composites with high conductivities (~10-6 S/cm at room temperature, 60 vol% polymer, 10:1 ethylene carbonate:lithium). Investigations into the origin of this high conductivity and measurements of electrochemical stability are currently underway.

Research on solid-state batteries began in the 1950s to address issues that stem from the liquid electrolyte, such as electrolyte leakage. Today, with implementation of batteries in larger systems like electric vehicles or the grid, the performance demands are greatly increased, which compounds the safety issues associated with electrolyte decomposition. In solid state batteries, a solid electrolyte is utilized, which eliminates the use of flammable, organic solvents in the cell. Solid state electrolytes transport ions with better selectivity than liquid electrolytes, which reduces unwanted side reactions. Liquid electrolyte decomposition can also accelerate passivation of the solid/electrolyte interface1. Solid-state batteries may be the key to the development of safe lithium batteries. Lithium batteries are exciting next generation energy storage as lithium anodes have the most negative potential of any known material, which enables lithium anodes to have a high energy density and high discharge voltage. However, lithium batteries suffer from many issues that have prevented their widespread commercialization as rechargeable cells. When lithium metal batteries are cycled, the anode is used non-uniformly which leads to the development of finger-like dendrites. Dendrite formation leads to cell short circuits, higher rates of adverse reactions, and large volume changes. These problems are major safety issues but also account for the low Coulombic efficiency and poor cycling performance2. The utilization of all-solid-state cells for lithium batteries can reduce the growth of dendrites3, which greatly improves safety2. However, solid-state batteries suffer from high resistances at ambient temperatures. Wu et al.4 studied an all-solid-state battery composed of a lithium foil anode and a cathode made of lithium ferric phosphate (LFP) particles in a block copolymer matrix. In the cathode, the electronic conduction is facilitated by a conducting polymer, poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT). The conductivity of this semiconductor polymer depends on the electrode potential because the conducting polymer is oxidized and reduced when transporting the electrons. The electronic conductivity of the cathode polymer matrix without the LFP active particles was measured as a function of the voltage, and this experimental fit was used with a macro-homogeneous continuum model developed by Newman and associates5,6. The model output was relatively independent of the rate and failed to capture the trend of the experimental data. The authors then reduced the electronic conductivity until the best agreement between the experimental data and the model was achieved4. This talk explores the possibility of obtaining better fits for the model predictions by performing detailed estimation of different parameters that affect the performance of the system by combining different/robust simulation and estimation methods. Acknowledgments The authors are thankful for the financial support from the Battery 500 Consortium and the Clean Energy Institute (CEI) at the University of Washington. References Takada, K., AIP Conf. Proc., 1765, (2016).Cheng, X. B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C. Z. & Zhang, Q., Chem. Rev., 117, 10403–10473 (2017).Kim, J. G. et al., J. Power Sources, 282, 299–322 (2015).Wu, S.-L., Javier, A. E., Devaux, D., Balsara, N. P. & Srinivasan, V. J., Electrochem. Soc., 161, A1836–A1843 (2014).Newman, J. S. & Tobias, C. W., J. Electrochem. Soc., 109, 1183 (1962).Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F. & Newman, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1526 (1993).

Progress in safe nano-structured electrolytes for sodium ion batteries: A comprehensive review

Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have been successfully utilized as power sources for various electronic devices (e.g. mobile phone, remote controller, lab-top, etc.). Recently, the application of LIBs is extending to emerging markets such as electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESSs) for grid-supporting. Unfortunately, conventional LIBs still suffer from safety issues associated with the use of flammable organic electrolytes. To overcome such limitation of LIBs, many attentions have been devoted to the development of all-solid-state batteries (ASBs) that are employing solid electrolytes with excellent structural and electrochemical stabilities. Li1+xAlxGe2–x(PO4)3 (LAGP) is a kind of potential solid electrolytes with a NASICON structure. It offers relatively high bulk ionic conductivity (~10-4 Scm-1) with a wide electrochemical window and great moisture tolerance.[2] Owing to these advantages, LAGP can be a great option as a practical solid electrolyte for realizing ASBs. However, there are some technical issues to be resolved before commercial use of LAGP solid electrolytes as follow; i) a low ionic conductivity arising from the high boundary resistance and ii) a high synthesis temperature (i.e. energy consumable process). In this work, the microstructures of LAGP solid electrolyte are tailored by addition of Bi2O3 and B2O3 with a purpose of improving the ionic conductivity and reducing the fabrication temperature. Based on various structural and electrochemical analyses, we investigate the correlation between microstructure and ionic conductivity of LAGP. In practice, Bi2O3 is able to improve the structural integrity of LAGP with turning down of the sintering temperature, leading to the densification of LAGP [1] and, on the other hand, B2O3 facilitates the grain growth of LAGP during synthesis.[3] As a result of co-addition of Bi2O3 and B2O3, the ionic conductivity of LAGP solid electrolyte increases about one order of magnitude higher than pristine LAGP. This work will provide a practical guideline to develop a highly reliable solid electrolytes for ABSs. (Figure 1 image) SD Lee and KN Jung, ChemSusChem 10, 2175 (2017)Masashi Kotobuki, Keigo Hoshina, Yasuhiro Isshiki, Phosphorus Research Bulletin 24, 061 (2010)Harsharaj S. Jadhav, Ramchandra S. Kalubarme, Seong-Yong Jang, KN Jung, Mo, Dalton Trans. 43, 11723 (2014) Figure 1

Recently, all solid lithium batteries have been studied for a solution of safety problem in EV and ESS applications. The batteries are composed of cathode, solid electrolyte and lithium metal as anode. In here, lithium dendrite and dead lithium were formed on the surface of lithium electrode during charge and discharge cycling, resulting in the rapid degradation of battery capacity. In order to improve the above problems in all solid lithium batteries, interface layer, which is made of graphite-based thin composite film, was introduced between solid electrolyte and lithium metal. The interface layer showed a great improvement of cycling performance of all solid lithium battery. Furthermore, it was possible to reduce the thickness of lithium metal due to the reduction of lithium consumption during the charge and discharge cycling.

Battery safety concerns are becoming more and more prominent with the increasing demands of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with higher energy density. The greatest threat to battery safety derives from the easy release of oxygen from the high-capacity layered oxide cathodes at highly delithiated states and subsequent exothermic reactions with reductive agents in batteries. Herein, it is demonstrated that solid electrolyte Li6.5 La3 Zr1.5 Ta0.5 O12 (LLZTO) can supply lithium ions to re-lithiate the charged LiCoO2 at elevated temperatures. Such a re-lithiation process can lower the state-of-charge of LiCoO2 , and thus, inherently postpones its structural decomposition and the associated release of oxygen during the heating process. The LiCoO2 /graphite full cell with 1wt% addition of LLZTO demonstrates remarkably enhanced safety performances. This work proposes a strategy that through the adoption of solid electrolytes to solve safety issues raised from both flammable liquid electrolytes and high capacity cathodes, to achieve intrinsically safe LIBs or solid-state batteries.

The challenges for rechargeable batteries are cost, safety, energy, density, life, and rate. Traditional rechargeable batteries based on aqueous electrolytes have good rate capabilities but limited energy density because the voltage for a long shelf-life is restricted to 1.5 V. The discovery of fast Na ion conductivity in β-alumina in 1967 introduced the novel concept of a solid oxide electrolyte and molten electrodes: the sodium–sulfur battery operates at 350 °C. Interest in rechargeable batteries with aprotic electrolytes was further stimulated by the first energy crisis in the early 1970s. Since protons are not mobile in aprotic electrolytes, the Li+ ion was the logical choice for the working ion, and on-going work on reversible Li intercalation into layered sulfides suggested the TiS2//Li cell, which was shown in 1976 to have a voltage of V ≃ 2.2 V and good rate capability. However, the organic liquid carbonates used as electrolytes are flammable, and dendrites growing across the electrolyte from the lithium anode on repeated charge/discharge cycles short-circuited the cells with disastrous consequences. Safety concerns caused this effort to be dropped. However, substitution of the layered oxides LiMO2 for the layered sulfides MS2 and reversible intercalation of Li into graphitic carbon without dendrite formation at slow charging rates gave a safe rechargeable lithium ion battery (LIB) of large-enough energy density to enable the wireless revolution. Although carbon-buffered alloys now provide anodes that allow a fast charge and have a higher capacity, nevertheless a passivation layer permeable to Li+ forms on the anode surface, and the Li+ in the passivation layer is taken irreversibly from the cathode on the initial charge. Since the specific capacity of a cell with an insertion-compound cathode is limited by the latter, strategies to increase the specific capacity for a LIB powering an electric vehicle or storing electricity from wind or solar farms include a return to consideration of a solid electrolyte.

Synthesis of the solid electrolyte Li2O–LiF–P2O5 and its application for lithium-ion batteries

Electrolytes are susceptible to reductive decomposition on the surface of negative electrodes leading to the formation and growth of solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer [1]. Stable SEI can be beneficial as a protective layer, given that it can provide insulation to electron transport from the anode to electrolyte, prevent solvent molecules from reaching the anode, and at the same time allow transport of Li+ [2]. Thus, the SEI can contribute critically to the safety and operability of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), but its functionality heavily depends on the conditions under which it gets synthesized [3]. This can have a significant effect on battery performance. For instance, nucleation and growth of lithium dendrites during cycling is known to result in continuous electrolyte degradation, destruction of the SEI, agglomeration of so-called “dead lithium”, and short-circuiting of the battery [4]. This greatly affects next-generation electric vehicles (EVs), for which all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries (ASSLMBs) have garnered significant attention due to their superior energy storage capacity and safety over LIBs [5]. However, the considerable interfacial impedance originating from poor physical contact and/or parasitic reactions at the Li/SSE interface hinders the development of ASSLMBs. Alternative approaches towards achieving a stable protective interface have been pursued: like use of electrolyte additives to manipulate the constituents and compositions of SEI or designing artificial protective layers to improve performance. For instance, admixture of optimum amounts of fluorine-rich additives like fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) to traditional carbonate electrolytes (like EC/DMC) has been seen to generate a robust LiF-rich SEI. However, the intrinsic role of LiF remains a topic of uncertainty. Conventional understanding would posit that dominance of LiF leaves the SEI susceptible to poor lithium-ion transport properties. Previously, theoretical works reported significantly lower ionic conductivities in crystalline LiF when compared to other common inorganic SEI materials like Li2O and Li2CO3. Underwhelming transport properties pose serious rate limitations in its effectiveness as a serious candidate for interfacial protection in ASSLMBs. To potentially overcome such bottleneck, this study systematically investigates different phases of LiF: their structures, stabilities and interfacial properties are described using first principles calculations. Careful analysis of the structural models reveals that unlike the widely studied rock salt ordered counterpart, certain phases of LiF exhibit excellent Li+ transport properties with a high predicted diffusivity at room temperature. Mechanically too, improved interfacial qualities are demonstrated with increased flexibility and fracture resistance, opening up important avenues for structural and compositional stability over cell cycling while maintaining its desirable electron-blocking characteristics. However, it is also important to take a step back and note that the rock salt phase is the most energetically stable among LiF phases, which thereby exhibit a propensity for phase transformation under ambient conditions. To overcome this, a strategy of incorporating hetero dopants as impurities to stabilize the host matrix is discussed. By increasing the dopant concentration up to an optimum amount, relative thermodynamic stability of the interface-friendly phases of LiF is achieved. Our examination of the structure reveals unique lithium-dopant interactions which help sustain such LiF phases in the host matrix. The combination of excellent Li-ion transport properties and electron blocking ability makes such LiF-rich composites an excellent candidate for use as an interfacial protective layer that can effectively suppress electrolyte decomposition and Li dendrite propagation, while simultaneously improving the contact and compatibility of the electrode/electrolyte interface. These unique and exceptional traits make them materials of great promise for protecting critical interfaces in ASSLMBs and LIBs.[1] M. Gauthier, T.J. Carney, A. Grimaud, L. Giordano, N. Pour, H.-H. Chang, D.P. Fenning, S.F. Lux, O. Paschos, C. Bauer, F. Maglia, S. Lupart, P. Lamp, Y. Shao-Horn, Electrode−Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Batteries: Current Understanding and New Insights, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015) 4653−4672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727[2] D. Bedrov, O. Borodin, J.B. Hooper, Li+ Transport and Mechanical Properties of Model Solid Electrolyte Interphases (SEI): Insight from Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. C 121 (2017) 16098–16109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04247[3] D. Aurbach, B. Markovsky, I. Weissman, E. Levi, Y. Ein-Eli, On the Correlation Between Surface Chemistry and Performance of Graphite Negative Electrodes for Li Ion Batteries, Electrochim. Acta 45 (1999) 67−86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00194-2[4] W. Xu, J. Wang, F. Ding, X. Chen, E. Nasybulin, Y. Zhang, J.G. Zhang, Lithium Metal Anodes for Rechargeable Batteries, Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014) 513−537. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE40795K[5] J. G. Kim, B. Son, S. Mukherjee, N. Schuppert, A. Bates, O. Kwon, M. J. Choi, H. Y. Chung, S. Park, A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid state batteries, J. Power Sources 282 (2015) 299−322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.054

Due to their high energy density, long lifespan and light weight, lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries accounted for $11.8 billion dollars in sales in 2012, that makes up 60% of total portable battery sales and 37% of total battery sales. The same factors also make them the best candidate for use in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs). Currently in the US almost all spent lithium ion batteries are land filled, compared to other types of batteries, such as lead acid batteries, in which 97% are recycled. This presents a large amount of environmental waste. Based on current trends in Li-ion battery use, if Li-ion batteries are not recycled, global lithium reserves are expected to be depleted by 2050. Additionally, recycling Li-ion batteries presents an economic opportunity in through the recovery of key valuable metals, such as cobalt, nickel and copper. Currently, most Li-ion battery recyclers focus on recovering cobalt from LiCoO2 cathode material or through the recovery of Co and Ni from the cathode materials via a high temperature pyrometallurgical approach. We propose a new methodology that uses a low temperature hydrometallurgical approach that has the advantage of having high efficiency of recovery. This process works regardless of the Li-ion batteries chemistry, shape and size and recovers Co, Ni, and Mn in the form of their hydroxides, which when sintered with recovered Li2CO3 produces new LiNixMnyCozO2 cathode materials. The regenerated cathode material, LiNixMnyCozO2 , has been tested and exhibits good electrochemical performance. In addition to the cathode material, copper, aluminium, steel, etc are also recycled. Figure 1