• Home
  • Search
  • Reconstructing Daily Discharge in a Megadelta Using Machine Learning Techniques
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon43
  • https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr031048Copy DOI Icon

Reconstructing Daily Discharge in a Megadelta Using Machine Learning Techniques

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract In this study, six machine learning (ML) models, namely, random forest (RF), Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector regression (SVR), decision tree (DT), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) models, were employed to reconstruct the missing daily‐averaged discharge in a mega‐delta from 1980 to 2015 using upstream‐downstream multi‐station data. The performance and accuracy of each ML model were assessed and compared with the stage‐discharge rating curves (RCs) using four statistical indicators, Taylor diagrams, violin plots, scatter plots, time‐series plots, and heatmaps. Model input selection was performed using mutual information and correlation coefficient methods after three data pre‐processing steps: normalization, Fourier series fitting, and first‐order differencing. The results showed that the ML models are superior to their RC counterparts, and MARS and RF are the most reliable algorithms, although MARS achieves marginally better performance than RF. Compared to RC, MARS and RF reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 135% and 141% and the mean absolute error by 194% and 179%, respectively, using year‐round data. However, the performance of MARS and RF developed for the climbing (wet season) and recession (dry season) limbs separately worsened slightly compared to that developed using the year‐round data. Specifically, the RMSE of MARS and RF in the falling limb was 856 and 1,040 m3/s, respectively, while that obtained using the year‐round data was 768 and 789 m3/s, respectively. In this study, the DT model is not recommended, while the GPR and SVR models provide acceptable results.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article

Development and comparison of three different machine learning (ANN, RT, and GPR) models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in sub-humid region

  • Jan 07, 2023
  • ANADOLU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
  • Sevda Taşan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations341

Application of least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in long term prediction of river water pollution

  • Dec 29, 2015
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Ozgur Kisi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Simulating root length density dynamics of sunflower in saline soils based on machine learning

  • Apr 04, 2022
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • Lifeng Wu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models Performance in predicting wind energy

  • Jul 21, 2025
  • EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web
  • Saswati Rakshit +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Prediction of shear behavior of glass FRP bars-reinforced ultra-highperformance concrete I-shaped beams using machine learning

  • Aug 30, 2023
  • International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
  • Asif Ahmed +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations73

Application of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach in prediction of compressive strength of eco-friendly concrete

  • Jun 23, 2022
  • Case Studies in Construction Materials
  • Ali H Naser +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Evaluating machine learning models in predicting GRI drought indicators (case study: Ajabshir area)

  • Aug 22, 2024
  • Applied Water Science
  • Mahtab Faramarzpour +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Comparative analysis of machine learning models for rainfall prediction

  • Aug 30, 2024
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • Pritee Krishna Das +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

Optimisation and interpretation of machine and deep learning models for improved water quality management in Lake Loktak

  • Dec 25, 2023
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Swapan Talukdar +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations18

A new framework for missing data estimation and reconstruction based on the geographical input information, data mining, and multi-criteria decision-making; theory and application in missing groundwater data of Damghan Plain, Iran

  • Apr 06, 2022
  • Groundwater for Sustainable Development
  • Alireza Mohaghegh +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) for OCR prediction

  • Jan 18, 2012
  • Soft Computing
  • Pijush Samui +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations130

Analyzing angle crashes at unsignalized intersections using machine learning techniques

  • Nov 02, 2010
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Mohamed Abdel-Aty +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations4

Prediction of Irrigation Water Supply Using Supervised Machine Learning Models in Koga Irrigation Scheme, Ethiopia

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
  • Menwagaw T Damtie +3
  • Preprint Article
  • Citations1

Using a boundary-corrected wavelet transform coupled with machine learning and hybrid deep learning approaches for multi-step water level forecasting in Lakes Michigan and Ontario

  • Mar 23, 2020
  • Rahim Barzegar +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

Modeling Significant Wave Heights for Multiple Time Horizons Using Metaheuristic Regression Methods

  • Jul 16, 2023
  • Mathematics
  • Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.