Reflections on ?difficult? embeddings

Intuitionistic logic encompasses the principles of reasoning which were used by L. Brouwer in developing his intuitionistic mathematics, beginning in [Bro07]. Intuitionistic logic can be succinctly described as classical logic without the law ϕ ∨ ¬ϕ of excluded middle. Brouwer observed that this law was abstracted from finite situations and its application to statements about infinite collections is not justified. One of the consequences of the rejection of the law of excluded middle is that every intuitionistic proof of an existential sentence can be effectively transformed into an intuitionistic proof of an instance of that sentence. More precisely, if a formula of the form ∃xϕ(x) without free variables is provable in the intuitionistic predicate logic, then there is a term t without free variables such that ϕ(t) is provable. In particular, if ϕ ∨ ψ is provable, then either ϕ or ψ is provable. In that sense intuitionistic logic may provide a logical basis for constructive reasoning. A formal system of intuitionistic logic was proposed in [Hey30]. A relationship between the classical propositional logic PC and intuitionistic propositional logic INT was proved by Glivenko in [Gli29], namely a PC-formula ϕ is PC-provable if and only if ¬ ¬ϕ is INT-provable. Kripke semantics for intuitionistic logic was developed in [Kri65].

In multiparty session types, interconnection networks identify which roles in a session engage in communication (i.e., two roles are connected if they exchange a message). In session-based interpretations of linear logic the analogue notion corresponds to determining which processes are composed, or cut, using compatible channels typed by linear propositions. In this work, we show that well-formed interactions represented in a session-based interpretation of classical linear logic (CLL) form strictly less-expressive interconnection networks than those of a multiparty session calculus. To achieve this result, we introduce a new compositional synthesis property dubbed partial multiparty compatibility (PMC), enabling us to build a global type denoting the interactions obtained by iterated composition of well-typed CLL threads. We then show that CLL composition induces PMC global types without circular interconnections between three (or more) participants. PMC is then used to define a new CLL composition rule that can form circular interconnections but preserves the deadlock-freedom of CLL.

In this paper, we investigate automated proof construction in classical linear logic (CLL) by giving logical foundations for the design of proof search strategies. We propose common theoretical foundations for top-down, bottom-up and mixed proof search procedures with a systematic formalization of strategies construction using the notions of immediate or chaining composition or decomposition, deduced from permutability properties and inference movements in a proof. Thus, we have logical bases for the design of proof strategies in CLL fragments and then we can propose sketches for their design.

General and effective methods are required for providing good automation strategies to prove properties of sequent systems. Structural properties such as admissibility, invertibility, and permutability of rules are crucial in proof theory, and they can be used for proving other key properties such as cut-elimination. However, finding proofs for these properties requires inductive reasoning over the provability relation, which is often quite elaborated, exponentially exhaustive, and error prone. This paper aims at developing automatic techniques for proving structural properties of sequent systems. The proposed techniques are presented in the rewriting logic metalogical framework, and use rewrite- and narrowing-based reasoning. They have been fully mechanized in Maude and achieve a great degree of automation when used on several sequent systems, including intuitionistic and classical logics, linear logic, and normal modal logics.

A theorem for embedding a first‐order linear‐time temporal logic LTL into its intuitionistic counterpart ILTL is proved using Baratella‐Masini's temporal extension of the Gödel‐Gentzen negative translation of classical logic into intuitionistic logic. A substructural counterpart LLTL of ILTL is introduced, and a theorem for embedding ILTL into LLTL is proved using a temporal extension of the Girard translation of intuitionistic logic into intuitionistic linear logic. These embedding theorems are proved syntactically based on Gentzen‐type sequent calculi.

In this paper we describe a solution to the problem of proving cut-elimination for FILL, a variant of exponential-free and multiplicative Linear Logic originally introduced by Hyland and de Paiva. In the work of Hyland and de Paiva, a term assignment system is used to describe the intuitionistic character of FILL and a proof of cut-elimination is barely sketched. In the present paper, as well as correcting a small mistake in their work and extending the system to deal with exponentals, we introduce a different formal system describing the intuitionistic character of FILL and we provide a full proof of the cut-elimination theorem. The formal system is based on a dependency-relation between formulae occurrences within a given proof and seems of independent interest. The procedure for cut-elimination applies to (multiplicative and exponential) Classical Linear Logic, and we can (with care) restrict our attention to the subsystem FILL. The proof, as usual with cut-elimination proofs, is a little involved and we have not seen it published anywhere.

We present three different functional interpretations of intuitionistic linear logic ILL and show how these correspond to well-known functional interpretations of intuitionistic logic IL via embeddings of IL into ILL. The main difference from previous work of the second author is that in intuitionistic linear logic (as opposed to classical linear logic) the interpretations of !A are simpler and simultaneous quantifiers are no longer needed for the characterisation of the interpretations. We then compare our approach in developing these three proof interpretations with the one of de Paiva around the Dialectica category model of linear logic.

With help of a compact Prolog-based theorem prover for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic, we synthesize minimal assumptions under which a given formula formula becomes a theorem. After applying our synthesis algorithm to cover basic abductive reasoning mechanisms, we synthesize conjunctions of literals that mimic rows of truth tables in classical or intermediate logics and we abduce conditional hypotheses that turn the theorems of classical or intermediate logics into theorems in intuitionistic logic. One step further, we generalize our abductive reasoning mechanism to synthesize more expressive sequent premises using a minimal set of canonical formulas, to which arbitrary formulas in the calculus can be reduced while preserving their provability. Organized as a self-contained literate Prolog program, the paper supports interactive exploration of its content and ensures full replicability of our results.

Full classical S5 in natural deduction with weak normalization

This paper introduces Hypersequent GV (HGV), a modular and extensible core calculus for functional programming with session types that enjoys deadlock freedom, confluence, and strong normalisation. HGV exploits hyper-environments, which are collections of type environments, to ensure that structural congruence is type preserving. As a consequence we obtain an operational correspondence between HGV and HCP -- a process calculus based on hypersequents and in a propositions-as-types correspondence with classical linear logic (CLL). Our translations from HGV to HCP and vice-versa both preserve and reflect reduction. HGV scales smoothly to support Girard's Mix rule, a crucial ingredient for channel forwarding and exceptions.

The present article is a brief informal survey o$\textit {computability logic}$ (CoL). This relatively young and still evolving nonclassical logic can be characterized as a formal theory of computability in the same sense as classical logic is a formal theory of truth. In a broader sense, being conceived semantically rather than proof-theoretically, CoL is not just a particular theory but an ambitious and challenging long-term project for redeveloping logic. 
 
 In CoL, logical operators stand for operations on computational problems, formulas represent such problems, and their "truth" is seen as algorithmic solvability. In turn, computational problems – understood in their most general, interactive sense – are defined as games played by a machine against its environment, with "algorithmic solvability" meaning existence of a machine which wins the game against any possible behavior of the environment. With this semantics, CoL provides a systematic answer to the question "What can be computed?", just like classical logic is a systematic tool for telling what is true. Furthermore, as it happens, in positive cases "What can be computed" always allows itself to be replaced by "How can be computed", which makes CoL a problem-solving tool. 
 
 CoL is a conservative extension of classical first order logic but is otherwise much more expressive than the latter, opening a wide range of new application areas. It relates to intuitionistic and linear logics in a similar fashion, which allows us to say that CoL reconciles and unifies the three traditions of logical thought (and beyond) on the basis of its natural and "universal" game semantics. 

Two algebraic structures, the contrapositionally complemented Heyting algebra (ccHa) and the contrapositionally $\vee $ complemented Heyting algebra (c$\vee $cHa), are studied. The salient feature of these algebras is that there are two negations, one intuitionistic and another minimal in nature, along with a condition connecting the two operators. Properties of these algebras are discussed, examples are given and comparisons are made with relevant algebras. Intuitionistic Logic with Minimal Negation (ILM) corresponding to ccHas and its extension ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ for c$\vee $cHas are then investigated. Besides its relations with intuitionistic and minimal logics, ILM is observed to be related to Peirce’s logic and Vakarelov’s logic MIN. With a focus on properties of the two negations, relational semantics for ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ are obtained with respect to four classes of frames, and inter-translations between the classes preserving truth and validity are provided. ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ are shown to have the finite model property with respect to these classes of frames and proved to be decidable. Extracting features of the two negations in the algebras, a further investigation is made, following logical studies of negations that define the operators independently of the binary operator of implication. Using Dunn’s logical framework for the purpose, two logics $K_{im}$ and $K_{im-{\vee }}$ are discussed, where the language does not include implication. The $K_{im}$-algebras are reducts of ccHas and are different from relevant algebraic structures having two negations. The negations in the $K_{im}$-algebras and $K_{im-{\vee }}$-algebras are shown to occupy distinct positions in an enhanced form of Dunn’s kite of negations. Relational semantics for $K_{im}$ and $K_{im-{\vee }}$ is provided by a class of frames that are based on Dunn’s compatibility frames. It is observed that this class coincides with one of the four classes giving the relational semantics for ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$.

The purpose of the research presented in this paper is to extend the author's results on sequent forms of Herbrand theorems for classical and intuitionistic logics onto classical and intuitionistic modal sequent logics. It was found that the technique reported at the SYNASC 2008 symposium and based on the original notions of admissibility and compatibility can satisfactorily be applied for proving Herbrand theorems for the logics under consideration in the sequent form.

We consider a general format for sequent rules for not necessarily normal modal logics based on classical or intuitionistic propositional logic and provide relatively simple local conditions ensuring cut elimination for such rule sets. The rule format encompasses e.g. rules for the boolean connectives and transitive modal logics such as S4 or its constructive version. We also adapt the method of constructing suitable rule sets by saturation to the intuitionistic setting and provide a criterium for translating axioms for intuitionistic modal logics into sequent rules. Examples include constructive modal logics and conditional logic $\mathbb{VA}$ .

Prawitz suggested expanding a natural deduction system for intuitionistic logic to include rules for classical logic constructors, allowing both intuitionistic and classical elements to coexist without losing their inherent characteristics. Looking at the added rules from the point of view of the Gödel-Gentzen translation, led us to propose a general method for the coexistent combination of two logics when a conservative translation exists from one logic (the source) to another (the host). Then we prove that the combined logic is a conservative extension of the original logics, thereby preserving the unique characteristics of each component logic. In this way there is no collapse of one logic into the other in the combination. We also demonstrate that a Gentzen calculus for the combined logic can be induced from a Gentzen calculus for the host logic by considering the translation. This approach applies to semantics as well. We then establish a general sufficient condition for ensuring that the combined logic is both sound and complete. We apply these principles by combining classical and intuitionistic logics capitalizing on the Gödel-Gentzen conservative translation, intuitionistic and S4 modal logics relying on the Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski conservative translation, and classical and Jaśkowski’s paraconsistent logics taking into account the existence of a conservative translation.