Refractive surprise due to intraocular lens mislabeling: case report

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in black‐on‐clear polypseudophakia

BackgroundInvestigating the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in corneal opacities.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Twenty-three eyes of 19 patients with cataracts and corneal opacities obscuring the pupillary center having received phacoemulsification with IOL insertion without any ancillary techniques were enrolled. The primary study outcome measures were uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Backscatters of corneal scar lesions were evaluated by slit lamp-based haze grading, Scheimpflug Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT). Visual outcomes after cataract surgeries and improvement range were used to determine the safety and efficacy of cataract surgery for our patients.ResultsAll patients underwent uneventful capsulorhexis and phacoemulsification. The mean age was 72.22 ± 10.1 years, and the mean follow-up period was 18.57 ± 15.42 months. The mean BCVA significantly improved from 1.45 ± 0.65 preoperatively to 0.94 ± 0.55 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.001), and the number of eyes with a BCVA of 20/100 or better increased from 4 to 14. Complications included corneal edema in two eyes and reactivation of the previous corneal pathology in five eyes. Four eyes did not achieve an improvement in visual acuity after surgery, which may have been due to co-existing ocular co-morbidities. Both Pentacam corneal densitometry and ASOCT demonstrated no significant correlations with final visual outcome. However, a statistically significant relationship between the severity of corneal opacity and improvement range in BCVA (r = − 0.782, P = 0.001) was found by our OCT grading method.ConclusionsPhacoemulsification and IOL implantation in selected cases of coexisting cataracts and corneal opacities is safe that can provide suboptimal but long-term vision when penetrating keratoplasty is not possible or at high-risk of graft failure. ASOCT is a simple tool to predict visual outcomes after cataract surgery in opacified corneas.

Postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) is an uncommon complication. A 57-year-old diabetic female who had undergone phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in her right eye 16 years back presented with diminution of vision in the same eye for 3 years. Significant IOL opacification was observed clinically and anterior segment optical coherence tomography clearly delineated the intraoptic deposits, sparing the haptics, and edges of the optic. IOL explant and exchange was performed leading to restoration of visual acuity to 6/9. Histochemical evaluation of the IOL confirmed that the hydrophilic acrylic IOL optic had calcium deposits.

Capsular bag distension syndrome (CBDS) is a rare complication following cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We describe the case of a 68-year-old female who developed early-onset CBDS of her left eye after manual small-incision cataract surgery with implantation of posterior chamber IOL in the sulcus (Excel PMMA IOL (polymethyl methacrylate), Manufactured by Excel Optics (P) Limited, Chennai). The patient had an uneventful cataract surgery performed by a resident in training. Her immediate postoperative uncorrected vision was 20/40, but it decreased to finger counting 1 m on postoperative day 7, for which she presented back to hospital. Slit-lamp examination revealed a quiet anterior chamber without any cells–flare with IOL in the sulcus with a relatively smaller capsulorhexis of about 5 mm, and IOL optic was covering the capsulorhexis in a symmetric fashion, thus causing a block. Distension of capsular bag was further confirmed by Anterion anterior segment optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Engineering Technology, Germany), which showed a confined hyperechogenic fluid trapped between the IOL and the posterior capsule. She was diagnosed with CBDS secondary to retention of turbid fluid. Phased treatment was done; neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy was tried in the first attempt, but failed as the posterior capsule was far too behind. This was followed by anterior chamber wash with redialing of the lens in the bag, which thereby improved vision to 20/20 (best corrected visual acuity) at 1-week postoperatively. Even with IOL in the sulcus, the postoperative CBDS may rarely happen at any point of time with a small capsulorrhexis and an intumescent mature cataract. Immense cortex wash should always be kept in mind in such a case, as the liquefied cortex is sometimes stuck at the equator and a little more duration of irrigation is required in such scenarios. Hence, complete clearance of turbid fluid of intumescent mature cataract variety also holds due importance similar to the need of removing viscoelastic substance to prevent CBDS.

This study aimed to compare ocular wavefront aberrations for pupil diameters of 4 mm and 6 mm, and contrast sensitivity, in eyes with AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural intraocular lenses (IOLs). Sixty eyes of 60 patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. After phacoemulsification the eyes received either AcrySof IQ SN60WF or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOLs. One month after surgery, all patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination including corneal topography, wavefront analysis for pupil diameters of 4 mm and 6 mm, and contrast sensitivity measurements with the CSV 1000E instrument under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, sex or other preoperative ocular characteristics (p > 0.05). Patients with AcrySof IQ IOLs had higher contrast sensitivity at 6 c.p.d. under photopic conditions, at 6 c.p.d. and 18 c.p.d. under mesopic conditions, and at 6 c.p.d., 12 c.p.d. and 18 c.p.d. under mesopic conditions with glare (p < 0.05). Corneal spherical aberration was 0.273 ± 0.074 μm in the AcrySof Natural group and 0.294 ± 0.086 μm in the AcrySof IQ group (p = 0489). Ocular spherical aberration was 0.362 ± 0.141 μm and 0.069 ± 0.043 μm (p < 0.001) for 6-mm diameter pupils and 0.143 ± 0.091 μm and 0.017 ± 0.016 μm (p < 0.001) for 4-mm diameter pupils, with AcrySof Natural and AcrySof IQ IOLs, respectively. There were no significant differences in other higher-order aberrations between the groups (p > 0.05). Aspherical AcrySof IQ IOLs significantly reduced spherical aberration for pupil diameters of both 4 mm and 6 mm and also improved contrast sensitivity more than spherical AcrySof Natural IOLs, especially in mesopic conditions.

This study aimed to develop and analyze the accuracy of predictive formulae for postoperative anterior chamber depth, tilt, and decentration of low-added-segment refractive intraocular lenses. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included the right eyes of 96 patients (mean age: 72.43 ± 6.58 years), who underwent a cataract surgery with implantation of a low-added segmented refractive intraocular lens at the Medical University Hospital between July 2019 and January 2021, and were followed up for more than 1 month postoperatively. The participants were divided into an estimation group to create a prediction formula and a validation group to verify the accuracy of the formula. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2, Tomey Corporation, Japan) and swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry (IOL Master 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) were used to measure the anterior ocular components. A predictive formula was devised for postoperative anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens tilt, and intraocular lens decentration (p <0.01) in the estimation group. A significant positive correlation was observed between the estimated values calculated using the prediction formula and the measured values for postoperative anterior chamber depth (r = 0.792), amount of intraocular lens tilt (r = 0.610), direction of intraocular lens tilt (r = 0.668), and amount of intraocular lens decentration (r = 0.431) (p < 0.01) in the validation group. In conclusion, our findings reveal that predicting the position of the low-added segmented refractive intraocular lens enables the prognosis of postoperative refractive values with a greater accuracy in determining the intraocular lens adaptation.

To optimize the implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing method using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Nagoya Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Japan. Interventional case series. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed using the optimal ICL size as a dependent variable and preoperative AS-OCT parameters as explanatory variables for 81 eyes of 41 patients, and the NK-formula version 2 (NK-formula V2) was obtained. Thereafter, 68 eyes of 42 patients were implanted with the ICLs selected as closest to the optimal ICL size calculated by the NK-formula V2. At 3 months postoperatively, the achieved vault was measured by AS-OCT to evaluate the optimization of the sizing method. The anterior chamber width (ACW) and crystalline lens rise were selected as significant parameters for the regression model (R = 0.61, P < .001), as with the previous NK-formula. Of the 68 eyes, 36 patients/62 eyes (91.2%), 5 patients/5 eyes (7.3%), and 1 patient/1 eye (1.5%) were in the moderate, high, and low vault categories, respectively. In the 68 eyes, the vault showed no correlation with the optimal ICL size (R = 0.0185, P = .269), whereas the vault showed a negative correlation with the optimal ICL size in both the 12.6 mm ICL subgroup (R = -0.409, P = .0088) and the 13.2 mm ICL subgroup (R = -0.818, P = .0013). This optimization approach showed excellent ability to select an appropriate ICL to be implanted regardless of the value of other ocular parameters and age, except ACW.

Swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in late-onset capsular block syndrome: High-resolution imaging and morphometric modifications after posterior capsulotomy

To explore the time and method of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in open-globe injury after vitrectomy and to analyze the efficacies and relative factors of the treatment. This is a retrospective case series study. Clinical data of 78 eyes of 78 patients with open-globe injury who underwent secondary IOL implantation after vitrectomy in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from 2007 to 2012 were analyzed. There were 27 eyes of 27 patients with penetrating injury, 36 eyes of 36 patients with intraocular foreign body (IFB), 4 eyes of 4 patients with ocular rupture, and 11 eyes of 11 patients with endophthalmitis. The IFB included magnetic foreign body in 23 eyes of 23 patients, glass foreign body in 6 eyes of 6 patients, and eyelash foreign body in 7 eyes of 7 patients. Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients were tamponadewith silicone oil, and 47 eyes of 47 patients were tamponadewith C3F8 during vitrectomy. The methods of IOL implantation included posterior chamber IOL implantation in 32 eyes of 32 patients and sulcus-fixed IOL implantation in 46 eyes of 46 patients. The examinations before IOL implantation mainly included visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscope, direct and indirect ophthalmoscope, visual electrophysiology, corneal endothelium, B scan, ultrasound biomicroscope and intraocular pressure. Four eyes of 4 patients underwent suturing of peripheral iris, and 5 eyes of 5 patients underwent suturing of iris laceration. The visual acuity ranged from light perception to 0.1 before vitrectomy. The mean follow-up time was 15 ± 3 months with a range from 6 to 36 months. The mean interval between IOL implantation and vitrectomy was 2.5 ± 0.2 months with a range from 1.5 to 6 months. The best corrected visual acuity was from 0.1 to 1.0 after vitrectomy. The uncorrected visual acuity ranged from 0.1 to 0.8, and the best corrected visual acuity was from 0.1 to 1.0 after IOL implantation. The postoperative complications mainly included mild anterior chamber exudates in 4 eyes of 4 patients, temporary intraocular pressure elevation in 7 eyes of 7 patients, and recurrent retinal detachment in 2 eyes of 2 patients. The appropriate interval of secondary IOL implantation in open-globe injury after vitrectomy is important. Posterior chamber IOL implantation is performed in eyes with integrity of posterior capsule, and IOL sutured in the sulcus in eyes without posterior capsule support. It is safe and effective for secondary IOL implantation in open-globe injury after vitrectomy.

PurposeTo evaluate the refractive prediction error of common intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae in patients who underwent intrascleral IOL fixation using two different techniques.MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized, longitudinal, single-site, single-surgeon study. Patients who underwent intrascleral IOL implantation using the Yamane or the Carlevale technique were followed up for a period of six months postoperatively. Refraction was measured using the best-corrected visual acuity at 4 m (EDTRS chart). Lens decentration, tilt and effective lens position (ELP) were assessed using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The prediction error (PE) and the absolute error (AE) were evaluated for the SRK/T, Hollayday1 and Hoffer Q formula. Subsequently, correlations between the PE and axial length, keratometry, white to white and ELP were assessed.ResultsIn total, 53 eyes of 53 patients were included in the study. Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients were in the Yamane group (YG) and 29 eyes of 29 patients were in the Carlevale group (CG). In the YG, the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q formulae resulted in a hyperopic PE (0.02 ± 0.56 D, and 0.13 ± 0.64 D, respectively) while in the SRK/T formula the PE was slightly myopic (− 0.16 ± 0.56 D). In the CG, SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulae led to a myopic PE (− 0.1 ± 0.80 D and − 0.04 ± 0.74 D, respectively), Hoffer Q to a hyperopic PE (0.04 ± 0.75 D). There was no difference between the PE of the same formulae across both groups (P > 0.05). In both groups the AE differed significantly from zero in each evaluated formula. The AE error was within ± 0.50 D in 45%–71% and was within ± 1.00 D in 72%–92% of eyes depending on the formula and surgical method used. No significant differences were found between formulae within and across groups (P > 0.05). Intraocular lens tilt was lower in the CG (6.45 ± 2.03°) compared to the YG (7.67 ± 3.70°) (P < 0.001). Lens decentration was higher in the YG (0.57 ± 0.37 mm) than in the CG (0.38 ± 0.21 mm), though the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.9996).ConclusionsRefractive predictability was similar in both groups. IOL tilt was better in the CG, however this did not influence the refractive predictability. Though not significant, Holladay 1 formula seemed to be more probable than the SRK/T and Hoffer Q formulae. However, significant outliers were observed in all three different formulae and therefore remain a challenging task in secondary fixated IOLs.

To report the causes of pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL) explantation in Spain over a 20 year period. Multicenter observational prospective study of a consecutive series of cases corresponding to pseudophakic intraocular lenses explantations performed in 22 Spanish clinical centres from 2002 to 2021, within a national clinical research network. The clinical data of all IOL explantation patients was evaluated, and the different causes for IOL explantation were systematically analyzed. From a total of 1013 pseudophakic explantations, 919 cases were included in this investigation. The mean age of the patients at the time of explantation was 66.3 years, and 142 (15.45%) were women. Over the 20 years of the study, the five main reasons for explanting lenses in the last 20 years in Spain according to the Iberia RETICS database were: dislocation / decentration / misalignment (43.08%), bullous keratopathy (16.79%), neuroadaptation failure (13.85%), IOL opacification (9.71%), refractive surprise (6.87%). Other causes, less frequent, were uveitis / endophthalmitis / infection with 39 cases (4.25%); IOL substitution for reasons other than multifocal IOL neuroadaptation failure 3 cases (0.33%); and other causes, 47 cases (5.13%). Hydrophobic lenses were the most frequently explanted with a ratio of 47.1%. Over the 20 years of the study, the five main reasons for explanting lenses in the last 20 years in Spain according to the Iberia RETICS database were: dislocation / decentration / misalignment, bullous keratopathy, neuroadaptation failure, IOL opacification, and refractive surprise.

To evaluate the effects of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation on the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and subsequently to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) against biometric changes. Masayuki Ouchi Eye Clinic, Kyoto, Japan. Prospective consecutive case series. 100 patients (100 eyes) who underwent pIOL implantation were enrolled. In each eye, biometry was performed using partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and AS-OCT. Pre-pIOL and post-pIOL implantation IOL power calculation using SRK/T (S), Haigis (H), and Barret Universal II (B) formulas was compared. 100 patients (100 eyes) were included. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was significantly shorter at post-pIOL implantation for both PCI (P < .001) and AS-OCT (P = .05). When using PCI, the crystalline lens surface was misidentified in 75% of eyes, and in these eyes, the ACD difference between pre-pIOL and post-pIOL implantation exceeded that with both PCI and AS-OCT. The estimated IOL power was significantly lower at post-pIOL implantation according to the H and B formulas (both P < .001) but remained unchanged by the S formula. However, no difference was observed when AS-OCT-derived ACD and lens thickness (LT) values were introduced in the H (P = .16) and B (P = .55) formulas. Misidentification of the lens surface occurs in many pIOL-implanted eyes with PCI measurements and could influence the power calculation with H and B formulas while leaving the S formula unaffected. AS-OCT-derived ACD and LT value substitution is recommended for H and B formulas.

To evaluate the application of anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in posterior capsule opacification (PCO) severity assessment and analyse the relationship between PCO severity and intraocular lens (IOL) characters. PCO patients were prospectively recruited. Cross-sectional images of the anterior segment at horizontal and vertical meridians were acquired with AS-OCT. The area of the IOL-PC (posterior capsular) space and PCO severity (area, thickness, and density at 3 mm and 5 mm IOL optic regions) were measured. The relationship between PCO severity and visual acuity, comparisons of PCO severity and IOL-PC space using varied IOL designs were analysed. One hundred PCO eyes were enrolled. IOL-PC space, PCO thickness and area were positively correlated with axial length. In addition, PCO area and thickness were positively correlated with visual acuity when it was ≤0.52 logMAR. The cut-off level of visual acuity should be 0.52 logMAR. With varied IOL designs, 3-piece C haptic IOL showed a smaller PCO area and thickness than the 1-piece 3 haptic IOL and 1-piece 4 haptic IOL. PCO area and thickness values for an IOL with a diameter ≤11.0 mm was greater than for an IOL with a diameter of 12.5 mm, and the differences were statistically significant. PCO area and thickness increased when IOL haptic angulation increased (from 0 to 12 degrees). In PCO eyes, cut-off level of visual acuity is 0.52 logMAR. With more severe PCO, visual acuity maybe not enough to describe the visual function impairment. PCO severity and IOL-PC space are significantly correlated with axial length and IOL design and material.

To quantitatively assess intraocular lens (IOL) calcification using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and correlate findings with straylight measurements in patients with homogenous IOL calcification. Department of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Prospective, observational clinical study. Healthy patients with homogenous IOL calcification underwent AS-OCT imaging with the ANTERION, with IOL opacity being automatically quantified using a custom image-analysis script. Straylight was assessed using the C-Quant straylight meter. Correlation between IOL opacity and straylight was analyzed using Spearman ρ coefficient. 35 eyes of 35 patients (mean age 72.9 ± 7.8 years) were included. Mean IOL opacity was 69.15 ± 13.55 pixel intensity units (PIUs), and mean straylight was 2.24 ± 0.38 log(s). A statistically significant correlation was found between IOL opacity and straylight with ρ = 0.494, P = .003. After the linear regression model was established: straylight = 0.0569 × OCT opacity [log(s)] - 1.69 with R2 = 0.244. Of the 35 eyes, 17 underwent IOL exchange surgery, with a mean IOL opacity of 75.69 ± 7.58 PIU and a mean straylight of 2.33 ± 0.30 log(s). AS-OCT can quantitatively assess IOL calcification in vivo, with results correlating significantly with straylight measurements. This technique may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating IOL opacification and assist in surgical decision-making, particularly in borderline cases.

PurposeTo estimate the power of an implanted intraocular lens (IOL) by measuring IOL thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and to assess the repeatability of measurements.MethodsNinety-seven eyes were studied one month after uneventful phacoemulsification within the bag Acrysof SA60AT IOL implantation (range +11 to +35). All eyes had postoperative refraction of 0.5 D of target refraction. AS-OCT was used to measure the central thickness of the IOL. Correlation between labelled IOL power and central IOL thickness as well as the measure of repeatability, for example, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), were evaluated. IOL thicknesses were also calculated using a formula and compared with AS-OCT derived measurements.Results IOL thickness correlated significantly with labelled IOL power (R2 = 0.985, P 0.001). The regression equation (IOL Power = [0.04 IOL thickness in micron] – 7.56) indicates 25 microns of central IOL thickness change per 1D power change. Over the studied range, IOL power could be estimated with a precision of 0.85 0.02 D (95% confidence interval: 0.83–0.94D). ICC for repeated measurements was 0.999. There was a significant correlation between calculated and measured (AS-OCT) IOL thickness (R2 = 0.984, P 0.001).ConclusionCentral IOL thickness measurements with the AS-OCT are highly repeatable and closely correlated with the labelled IOL power, which can predict the IOL power with 0.85 D from the actual power. This method can be helpful in cases of postoperative IOL surprise.