Review article

Volumes 31–36 Subject and Volume 36 Author Indices Daniel E. Hursh, Senior Editor The cumulative subject index lists articles (chronologically) by what, to my best judgment, represents the various general categories (listed alphabetically) of participants, behaviors, and procedures studied. I have also noted (parenthetically) any appropriate specific descriptors. In addition, specialized articles (such as reviews) are listed separately as well as within the categories just described. Thus, all articles are listed more than once to allow for cross-referencing. Each listing for the articles takes the form: Volume number (Issue number) Number of the first page of the article (Specific descriptors, if any), e.g., 36(2)121(10 year olds) might appear under the general category of School-Aged Children in the Participants section of the cumulative subject index. Because these listings represent my judgments, any misrepresentations are my responsibility. The author index contains an alphabetical listing of each author in Volume 36 with first authors listed along with their co-authors (if any), the title of the article, and the pages where the article appears. Co-authors are also integrated alphabetically with the first authors with a reference to the first author and the page numbers of the article. Daniel E. Hursh Senior Editor Subject Index ETC Volumes 31–36 Participants ADOLESCENTS: 31(2)223(at risk – Program Description); 31(4)501(incarcerated or committed youth); 32(1)175(global policies on the mental health of children and adolescents – Book Review). CHILDREN: 31(3)395(five to eight year olds with obsessive compulsive disorder – Discussion Article); 32(1)63(six and seven year olds); 32(1)175(global policies on the mental health of children and adolescents – Book Review); 32(3)359(four and five year olds); 33(1)65(with oppositional defiant disorder); 33(2)289(with CHARGE Syndrome – Discussion Article); 35(2)313(brief functional analysis with typically developing – Review Article). [End Page 201] CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: 31(1)27(elementary); 31(3)297(preschoolers); 31(3)381(sex education – Review Article); 31(3)433(functional behavior assessment for – Book Review); 32(1)37(elementary school); 32(1)77(nine year old); 32(1)89(seven year old); 32(1)151(adolescent with Asperger’s disorder); 32(2)343(ABA/VB treatments for autism – Book Review); 33(2)223(young child); 33(2)326(generalization learning in natural environments – Book Review); 33(3)339(adolescents and young adults); 33(3)351(nine, 11, and 12 year old); 33(3)371(seven to 11 year old); 33(3)395(four, five, and eight year old); 33(3)421(five year old); 33(3)443(preschoolers); 33(3)457(four and five year old); 33(3)475(five, six, and seven year old); 33(4)649(solutions for children with – Book Review); 34(2)259(a community-based intensive behavioral intervention program – Program Description); 34(2)287(success strategies for teaching kids with autism – Book Review); 34(2)290(a guide to improving outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorders – Book Review); 34(3)413(effective programs for treating – Book Review); 35(1)91(nine year old boy); 35(1)101(three year old boy); 35(3)389(seven year old); 35(3)407(adolescent); 36(1)49(students); 36(1)61(young); 36(2)33(leisure activity schedules); 36(2)139(developing eye contact and communicative responses); 36(4)169(postsecondary students – Program Description). CHILDREN WITH BEHAVIOR DISORDERS: 31(3)307(K-12); 31(4)549(elementary); 31(4)565(identification and treatment of anxiety in – Review Article); 31(4)593(girls); 32(3)403(video modeling with – Review Article); 32(4)513(preschoolers at risk for behavior disorders – Discussion Article); 32(4)573(first graders); 32(4)631(kindergarten through 12th grade); 32(4)655(preadolescents and adolescents); 33(1)1(Adolescents); 33(4)539(school aged); 33(4)579(at risk kindergarteners and first grader); 33(4)627(elementary); 334(1)15(middle school); 34(1)141(elementary – Review Article); 34(3)299(elementary school student); 34(3)323(in urban elementary, middle, and high school); 34(4)423(research directions for the field of emotional or behavior disorders – Discussion Article); 34(4)469...

We are investigating automatic generation of a review (or survey) article in a specific subject domain. In a research paper, there are passages where the author describes the essence of a cited paper and the differences between the current paper and the cited paper (we call them citing areas). These passages can be considered as a kind of summary of the cited paper from the current author's viewpoint. We can know the state of the art in a specific subject domain from the collection of citing areas. FUrther, if these citing areas are properly classified and organized, they can act 8.', a kind of a review article. In our previous research, we proposed the automatic extraction of citing areas. Then, with the information in the citing areas, we automatically identified the types of citation relationships that indicate the reasons for citation (we call them citation types). Citation types offer a useful clue for organizing citing areas. In addition, to support writing a review article, it is necessary to take account of the contents of the papers together with the citation links and citation types. In this paper, we propose several methods for classifying papers automatically. We found that our proposed methods BCCT-C, the bibliographic coupling considering only type C citations, which pointed out the problems or gaps in related works, are more effective than others. We also implemented a prototype system to support writing a review article, which is based on our proposed method.

Reviews and industry: A love‐hate relationship

As a result of several questions and difficulties of some authors in understanding the difference between complete article and scientific note, as well as what is a review article, the objective of this editorial note is to clarify to editors, authors and readers of the Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias a the types of articles that are published in this journal. It is also included that this journal will standardize the types of articles, from 2018, as Research Article (full article), Research Note (scientific note) and Review Article (literature review). In addition, this journal publishes communications of the publishers as Nota Editorial. The three types of articles published by the journal, Research Article, Research Note and Review Article, are scientific articles derived from research conducted by the authors. Research articles and research notes are usually derived from original experimental research and, therefore, based on results obtained experimentally by the authors. Review articles are derived from non-experimental research, that is, not based on results obtained experimentally, but rather based on the knowledge (results and conclusions) generated so far on a given subject. Research article and research note are therefore similar according to their empirical basis. However, there are differences between these two types of articles that go beyond the extension of the text. Research notes are short, short texts with small results, but that generate unprecedented conclusion (s) as a result of a new fact discovered by the authors. In this way, its publication is justified due to the importance of the discovery, that is, of the scientific knowledge generated, even though there is not a large volume of results. Research articles are, in turn, longer texts, with greater volume of results, which also generate unprecedented conclusions as a result of new scientific discoveries. Therefore, it should be clear that research articles and research notes are equally important in the construction of scientific knowledge. Thus, an article with a small volume of results, in which the authors increase the information of the introduction and the discussion, in order to increase the number of pages, will not, in essence, be a complete article (Research Paper). Nor will a full article whose text is lean be characterized as a scientific note (Research Note), because its essence is not the same. So while overall articles are generally longer than scientific notes, it is not the number of pages that defines what is one and what is another. Review article, in turn, is not limited to the presentation (or meeting) of the scientific knowledge generated so far in a single article. Structurally, review articles are similar to full papers or scientific notes, presenting the justification, the objective, the methodology, the results (referring to the knowledge generated so far), the discussion (which is the author's critical view on the generated knowledge) and the conclusion (which is the unpublished scientific knowledge generated by the author, based on the scientific knowledge we had so far). Therefore, a review article should generate new scientific knowledge, not just gather information (knowledge) already present in the literature. Another type of scientific paper explored most recently is the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is a synthesis of previous research on a (often polemical) subject, which emphasizes the production of quantitative conclusions, aiming at extracting additional information from pre-existing data through the union of the results of several works and the application of a or more statistical techniques (UFSM 2017). Meta-analysis is not derived from an original research, but from the analysis of previously published research, and therefore is included as Review Article. It is hoped, in conclusion, that the doubts regarding the articles published by the Revista de Ciencias Agroveterinarias have been remedied and that this brief note will help the writing of future works to be submitted and published in this journal.

Citation information helps researchers observe the evolution of the knowledge. In scientific publications, a review paper discusses a professional field and thus tends to have more citations than general papers do. This study investigated whether specific characteristics of review papers induce different results in citation-based analysis. From the Scopus database, we collected scientific publications in a specific research field, e-tourism, to examine the role of review papers in citation-based analysis. The dataset includes 1421 publications covering the period from the 1988---2015. Empirical statistics show that review papers' specific citation patterns influence citation analysis. First, in the main path analysis, the result expresses review papers' integrative role in linking papers from diverse perspectives toward a clear mainstream topic. Second, in a well-defined research context, review papers introduce bias in citation-based clustering analysis because the specific high citation pattern in review papers obfuscates the grouping process. When using citation information in analysis, scholars must consider the purpose of the study and treat review papers distinctly to avoid bias when using certain analysis methods and datasets.

The classes, purposes and characteristics associated with the review article in the field of applied linguistics were analyzed. The data were collected from a randomly selected corpus of thirty two review articles from a discipline-related key journal in applied linguistics. The findings revealed that different sub-genres can be identified within the applied linguistic review article genre. Three main types of review articles were therefore identified based on the analysis of linguistic devices often used by the authors, their communicative purposes, and the specialist informants’ feedback: (1) the bibliographic review article which gives readers a comprehensive and descriptive record of annual works and it encompasses the literature-oriented approach, (2) the critical evaluative review article which encompasses subject-oriented approach, that is to say it identifies an idea or raises a research problem, then gives its solution by analyzing and evaluating the selective works done before in the related field, and finally it suggests a new direction, and (3) the mixed-mode review article which has the twin roles and encompasses both literature-oriented and subject-oriented approaches. A possible colony of review genre was suggested and this study further examined some of the characteristics and purposes associated with the review articles. The classification continuum, purposes, characteristics, and linguistic devices of the review articles proposed thus provide useful guidance for graduate EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students and novice writers how to monitor and make use of the review articles during their research writing.

Since its inception, the Information Systems discipline has been striving to develop impactful papers that contribute to cumulative knowledge development. Yet, there is a surprising lack of insights on how scientific impact can be accomplished and to which extent this impact represents a substantial engagement with, and extension of the knowledge contributions of the original papers. Especially for review articles and design science research, there are both competing conceptions of what makes these papers impactful and a lack of empirical evidence that would inform this debate. Furthermore, there is a latent skepticism as to whether this sometimes staggering impact of review articles actually represents knowledge development. In a similar way, it is unclear how and to which extent design science research has stimulated meaningful, cumulative knowledge development in information systems. The goal of this thesis is therefore to (1) explain and to (2) distinguish the scientific impact of review articles and design science research. Specifically, the first goal considers overall scientific impact as the dependent variable whose association with antecedent factors is analyzed by regression methodologies. The second goal zooms in on the concept of scientific impact and considers it as a relation between citing and cited papers that is explored through methodologies of manual content analysis and machine learning classification. With Paper 1, I develop the foundation of knowledge development through review articles by crystallizing their contributions and aligning them with their underlying knowledge conversion processes in an overarching framework. This framework is based on the abstraction and codification of knowledge and thereby integrates two essential dimensions of knowledge development. Overall, the foundation developed in the first paper informs the underlying conception of knowledge development of both review articles and citing papers. Addressing the first goal, Papers 2 and 3 develop and test scientometric impact models explaining the scientific impact of review articles and design science research, respectively. Beyond common control variables related to the journal and author level, they offer distinct insights for each type of paper. For review articles, I identify strong effects related to methodological transparency and the development of a research agenda, which vary depending on the type of review. For design science research, I show that theorization and novelty drive scientific impact. Concerning the second goal, Papers 4 and 5 distinguish different types of scientific impact of review articles and design science research, respectively. To analyze the different types of impact that review articles have on their overwhelming number of citing papers, I develop machine learning classifiers. Specifically, I distinguish ideational impact, which corresponds to a substantial engagement with and development of the knowledge contributions of the review article, from perfunctory impact, which corresponds to more trivial connections to the review article. In a similar, though not automated way, I analyze the types of impact of information systems design theories, a particular type of design science research. These analyses primarily focus on whether follow-up research tests and extends these theories. Based on our content analysis, I identify an alarming paucity of follow-up research in this area and develop specific guidelines for the design science community to address this challenge. The thesis concludes with an overview of the research contributions, implications for research practice, future research opportunities, and final remarks.

Background: Trends of research publication has to be evaluated timely to acknowledge the growth and advancement of the research publications. Review of literature is not only beneficial to curricular and institutional developer but also useful for scientific researcher to recognize the critical issuance to be built.Aims and Objectives: To analyse and evaluate the trends of publications in five highly indexed forensic journals 2019 to 2023 concerning review articles.Materials and Methods: The retrospective study design was totally based on five highly indexed forensic journals. Data were collected by searching from website of respective journal from January 2019 to December 2023. Selected articles of respective journal were studied for acquiring information of the evaluation. The screening of published review article was done by segregating the topic of articles on the basis of 25 major field of forensic and each topic was assigned as code. All the published article and trend in review of literature of forensic in the last five years in top five highly indexed journal were statistically analysed.Results: Out of 4292 total number of articles considered for this study, 3475 were original articles, 563 case reports and 254 review articles. Review articles constitute 6% of total published articles. From the twenty-five topics drown out for major field of forensic, topic “Forensic biology and DNA” had maximum number of review articles with 15% contribution, “Forensic pathology” had 13 % review article. Topic “Crime scene investigation”, “Digital evidence” and “Torture” had lowest review articles with 0.4 % contribution for each.Conclusion: Review articles give brief review of the recent progress and direction of a particular topics.

Terminology vs Physiology and Mechanics

Photocatalytic degradation technology has received much attention from researchers in the last few decades, due to its easy and cost-effective nature. A lot of review articles have been published on dyes via photocatalytic degradation, but most of the review articles lack a detailed and in-depth photocatalytic degradation mechanism of dyes. Numerous review articles are available on photocatalysis. Here, in this review article, we are mainly focused on the complete and in-depth photocatalytic degradation mechanism of four commonly used dyes such as Malachite Green, Methylene Blue, Congo Red and Rhodamine B, which will be highly useful for the new researchers that work on dyes’ photocatalytic degradation. Initially, various aspects of dyes have been included in this review article, comprehensively. The main focus was on the covalent organic framework-based photocatalysts for dyes’ photocatalytic degradation, due to their porous nature and various unique properties. Various synthesis routes and the photocatalytic performance of covalent organic frameworks and composite of covalent organic frameworks have been highlighted in this review article. In the last section of this review article, the main stimulus was the four mentioned dyes’ properties, uses, and toxicity, and the photocatalytic degradation mechanism through various paths into environmentally friendly and less-harmful compounds in the presence of photocatalysts. Factors effecting the photocatalytic degradation, economic cost, challenges and future aspects of photocatalytic technology were also included in this review article. This review article will be highly useful for those researchers that work on the photocatalytic degradation of various dyes and search for the complete degradation of complex dye molecules.

Author Guidelines Are Here!

Correction| October 19, 2022 Erratum to Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review Manabu Hashimoto Manabu Hashimoto * 1School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan *Corresponding author: hashimoto@g.dendai.ac.jp https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-3531 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Manabu Hashimoto https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-3531 * 1School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan *Corresponding author: hashimoto@g.dendai.ac.jp Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 19 Oct 2022 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (1): 555. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220311 Article history First Online: 19 Oct 2022 Connected Content Errata: Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Manabu Hashimoto; Erratum to Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review. Seismological Research Letters 2022;; 94 (1): 555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220311 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The unit of displacement in Figure 3 is incorrect. This figure shows cumulative uplift at the Cape Muroto and estimate recurrence interval of earthquake along the Nankai trough based on Shimazaki and Nakata (1980). The unit should be replaced by meters. In the original article Hashimoto (2021), coseismic uplift is correctly presented, and this correction does not affect the conclusion. The author regrets this error, and the complete figure can be found in the current version. The author acknowledges that there are no conflicts of interest recorded. View Original Article You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Dear Editor, I read the review article ‘Principles of Physics in Surgery: The Laws of Flow Dynamics Physics for Surgeons—Part I’ by Srivastava et al. [1] in July–August 2009 issue, pages 182–187 with great interest. The authors have very well summarized the various laws of physics applicable to haemodynamics. I am a regular reader of the Indian Journal of Surgery, but the publication of this ‘Review Article’ raises certain issues, which I believe should be considered by the editorial board. The title of the article gives an impression as if the laws of physics cited are applicable only to surgery. On the contrary, the authors could have used the word ‘Medical Science’ rather than surgery, because these laws are applicable to haemodynamics with which all clinical specialties have to deal with and not only surgeons. The article is nothing but a summary of well-established facts and chapters published in various text books of physics and physiology. A look at the reference list clearly brings this to light: Of the 17 references, 11 are textbooks and 6 of these are from only two textbooks [2, 3]. I wish to bring forth the fact, that the laws and their applications summarized are taught to undergraduate (MBBS) medical students during their first year of graduation, and hence it is difficult to believe that surgeons are unaware of these basic principles and a review article is required. A review article should not be just a mere presentation of facts that are well documented. It’s hard to believe that a journal like Indian Journal of Surgery has published nothing more than textbook knowledge as a review article. This letter should be viewed as a healthy comment for the growth and betterment of Indian medical journals in general.

Review article: Gender Segregation at Work Sylvia Walby Review article: Women's Attitudes towards Work Shirley Dex Macmillan Review article: Equality and Sex Discrimination Law, K. O’Donovan and E. Szyszczak Review article: Managerial Job Change: men and women in transition Nigel Nicholson and Michael West Review article: Service Sector Workers in a Manufacturing City Ian Procter, Gower Review article: Temporary Employment: Practice and Policy in Britain

A review on EMG-based motor intention prediction of continuous human upper limb motion for human-robot collaboration