Simple Parsimonious Types and Logarithmic Space

Logical definitions can thus also be expressed in the logical form of necessary and sufficient conditions in the logic of sentences. We can interpret this language by interpretations using the logical terms in the formal languages of the propositional or the sentential calculus.

This article aims to generate all theorems of a given size in the implicational fragment of propositional intuitionistic linear logic. It was presented at the 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP).

This paper is the fourth of a series exposing a systematic combinatorial approach to Girard's Geometry of Interaction (GoI) program. The GoI program aims at obtaining particular realisability models for linear logic that accounts for the dynamics of cut-elimination. This fourth paper tackles the complex issue of defining exponential connectives in this framework. For that purpose, we use the notion of \emph{graphings}, a generalisation of graphs which was defined in earlier work. We explain how to define a GoI for Elementary Linear Logic (ELL) with second-order quantification, a sub-system of linear logic that captures the class of elementary time computable functions.

We introduce graph reduction technology that implements functional languages with control, such as Scheme with call/cc, where continuations can be manipulated explicitly as values, and can be optimally reduced in the sense of LEvy. The technology is founded on proofnets for multiplicative-exponential linear logic, extending the techniques originally proposed by Lamping, where we adapt the continuation-passing style transformation to yield a new understanding of sharable values. Confluence is maintained by returning multiple answers to a (shared) continuation. Proofnets provide a concurrent version of linear logic proofs, eliminating structurally irrelevant sequentialization, and ignoring asymmetric distinctions between inputs and outputs--dually, expressions and continuations. While Lamping's graphs and their variants encode an embedding of intuitionistic logic into linear logic, our construction implicitly contains an embedding of classical logic into linear logic. We propose a family of translations, produced uniformly by beginning with a continuation-passing style semantics for the languages, employing standard codings into proofnets using call-by-value, call-by-name--or hybrids of the two--to locate proofnet boxes, and converting the proofnets to direct style. The resulting graphs can be reduced simply (cut elimination for linear logic), have a consistent semantics that is preserved by reduction (geometry of interaction, via the so-called context semantics), and allow shared, incremental evaluation of continuations (optimal reduction).

Dear SCPE Reader, We present a selection of papers which are extensions of papers presented at the 7-th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing, 1–5 July 2008, in Krakow, Poland. The motivation for publishing the selection in the SCPE Journal was, on the one hand, to present the flavour of the research reported at the conference and on the other hand to present some of the most relevant topics currently focused on the research on parallel and distributed computing in general. The selection contains only 6 papers out of about 60 presented at the conference, and thus, is far from covering all relevant topics represented at the ISPDC 2008. This is because not all of the invited authors were patient enough to accept a fairly long paper publishing process. Nevertheless, we hope that the presented papers will bring you closer to the research covered by the ISPDC conferences and will encourage you to participate in future ISPDC editions. The first paper ``The Impact of Workload Variability on Load Balancing Algorithms'' is by Marta Beltran and Antonio Guzman from King Juan Carlos University in Spain. It concerns an important topic of load balancing in cluster systems, namely adaptativity of the load balancing algorithms to changes of the workload in the system. Adequate accounting for additional load in the hosting system is of great relevance for correct optimization effects. The paper presents a thorough formal analysis of the workload variability metrics and their influence on the quality of load balancing algorithms. Four basic activities appearing in load balancing algorithms are identified, and based on them some algorithmic solutions are proposed to correctly deal with workload variability in system load balancing. The problem of dynamic load balancing algorithms robustness has been discussed. Two different robustness metrics sensitive to the applied type of opimization: local task-oriented or a global one enable selecting task remote execution or migration as load balancing operations. The proposed approach is illustrated with experiments. The second paper ``Model-Driven Engineering and Formal Validation of High-Performance Embedded Systems'' is by Abdoulaye Gamatie, Eric Rutten, Huafeng Yu, Pierre Boulet, Jean-Luc Dekeyser, from University of Lille and INRIA in France. The paper is concerned with a very advanced methodology of designing correct parallel embedded systems for intensive data-parallel computing. In their previous research, the authors of the paper designed the GASPARD embedded system design framework. It is based on the hardware/software co-design approach through model-driven engineering. The framework is based on an UML-like model specification language in which hardware and software elements are modelled using a component approach with special mechanisms for repetitive structures. This paper tries to combine the modelling framework of GASPARD with the mechanisms of synchronous languages to achieve design verifiability provided for such languages. The paper shows how GASPARD models can be translated into synchronous models based on data flow equations in order to formally check their correctness. The proposed approach is illustrated with an example of a video processing system. The third paper ``Relations Between Several Parallel Computational Models'' is by Stephan Bruda and Yuanqiao Zhang from Bishop’s University in Canada. The paper is concerned with theoretical aspects of shared memory systems described by the parallel random access machine PRAM model and aims in studying performance properties of different types of PRAM systems. The attention is focussed on analysing the computational power of two more sophisticated PRAM models (Combining CRCW and Broadcast Selective Reduction), which include data reduction in case of concurrent writes. The paper shows that these two models have equivalent computational power, which is a new result comparing the existing literature. The performance of both models applied to reconfigurable multiple bus machines was studied as a possible architectural solution for current VLSI processor implementations. It was shown that in such systems under reasonable assumptions concurrent-write does not enhance performance comparing the exclusive-write model. Another result important for the VLSI technology is that the Combining CRCW PRAM model (in which data of concurrent writes are arthmetically or logically combined before write) and the exclusive-write on directed reconfigurable busses perform in equivalent way under strong real-time requirements. The fourth paper ``Experiences with Mesh-Like Computations Using Prediction Binary Trees'' is by Gennaro Cordasco, Biagio Cosenza, Rosario de Chiara, Ugo Erra and Vittorio Scarano from the University ``degli Studi'' of Salerno and the University ``degli Studi della Biasilicata'' of Potenza in Italy. The paper concerns optimization methods for mesh-like computations in clusters of processors. The computations are perfomed assuming a phase-like program execution control using a tiling approach which reduces inter-processor communication. A temporal coherence is also assumed, which means that task sizes provide similar execution times in consecutive phases. Temporary coherent computations are structured in a Prediction Binary Tree, in which leaves represent computing tiles to be mapped to processors. A phase-by-phase semi-static load balancing is introduced to the scheduling algorithm. The scheduling algorithm is equipped with a predictor, which estimates the computation time of next phase tiles based on previous execution times and modifies the tiles to achieve balanced execution in phases. For this, two heuristics are used to leverage on data locality in processors. The proposed approach is illustrated by the example of interactive rendering with Parallel Ray Tracing algorithm. The fifth paper ``The Influence of the IBM pSeries Servers Virtualization Mechanism on Dynamic Resource Allocation in AIX 5L'' is by Maciej Mlynski from ASpartner Limited in Poland. The paper concerns a very up-to-date problem of system virtualization and presents the results of research carried on IBM pSeries servers. IBM is strongly developing the virtualization technique especially on IBM pSeries servers enabling an improved and flexible sharing of system resources between applications. The paper investigates novel facilities for dynamic resource management such as micro-partitioning and partition load manager. They enable dynamic creation of workload logical partitions of system resources and their dynamic mangement. It includes run-time resource re-alocation between logical partitions including setting of sharing specifications as well as run-time adding/removing/setting parameters of resources in the system. It remains an open question how to properly tune parameters of the operating system using the provided virtualization facilities to obtain the best efficiency for a given application program. The paper presents the results of experiments which study the effects of tuning the disk subsystem parameters under the IBM AIX 5L operating system with the use of the provided virtualization facilities on the resulting application execution performance. The results show that even small deterioration in the resource pool status requires an immediate adaptation of the operating system parameters to maintain the required performance. The sixth paper ``HeteroPBLAS: A Set of Parallel Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms Optimized for Heterogeneous Computational Clusters'' is by Ravi Reddy, Alexey Lastovetsky and Pedro Alonso from University College Dublin in Ireland and Polytechnic University of Valencia in Spain. The paper concerns the methodology for parallelization of linear algebra computations for execution in heterogeneous cluster environments. The design of the HeteroPBLAS library (Parallel Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms) for heterogeneous computational clusters is presented. The main contribution of the paper is the automation of the parallelization and optimization of the PBLAS, which is done by means of a special user interface and the underlying set of functions. An important element is here a performance model that is based on program code instrumentation, which determines parameters of the application and the executive heterogeneous platform relevant for execution performance of parallel code. The parameter values specified for or returned by execution of the performance model functions are next used for generation and optimal mapping of the parallel code of the library subroutines. The proposed approach is illustrated by experimental results of execution of optimized HeteroPBLAS programs on homogeneous and heterogeneous computing clusters. Marek Tudruj

We proved recently that the extensional collapse of the relational model of linear logic coincides with its Scott model, whose objects are preorders and morphisms are downwards closed relations. This result is obtained by the construction of a new model whose objects can be understood as preorders equipped with a realizability predicate. We present this model, which features a new duality, and explain how to use it for reducing normalization results in idempotent intersection types (usually proved by reducibility) to purely combinatorial methods. We illustrate this approach in the case of the call-by-value lambda-calculus, for which we introduce a new resource calculus, but it can be applied in the same way to many different calculi.

Workflows are a technology to structure work in functional, non-overlapping steps. They define
\nnot only the order of execution of the steps, and describe whether steps are executed in
\nparallel, they also specify who or what tool has to fulfill which step. Workflows offer the possibility
\nto automate work, to increase the understandability of processes, and they ease the
\ncontrol of process execution. The tools to manage workflows, so called workflow management
\nsystems (WfMSs), are traditionally rigid as they separate workflow definition done at build time
\nfrom workflow execution done at run time. This makes them ill-suited for managing flexible and
\nunstructured workflows. In this thesis, we focus on the support of flexible processes in eHealth,
\nwhich are affected by more foreseen than unforeseen events. To bridge the gap between rigid
\nWfMSs and flexible workflows, we developed a concept for dynamic and context-aware workflow
\nmanagement called Flexwoman. Although our focus lies on flexible eHealth processes,
\nFlexwoman is a generic approach that can be applied to several different application domains.
\nFlexwoman supports the usage of context information to adapt processes automatically at run
\ntime to foreseen events. Processes can also be manually adapted to handle unforeseen events.
\nTo achieve this flexibility, context information from different sensors is unified and thus can be
\nanalyzed in the same way. The analysis and adaptation of workflows is executed with a rule engine.
\nA rule engine can store, reason about and apply knowledge automatically and efficiently.
\nRules and application logic are separated, thus, rules can be changed during run time without
\naffecting application logic or process description. Workflows are internally described by Hierarchical
\nColored Petri nets (HCPNs) and executed by a HCPN execution engine. HCPNs allow for
\na deterministic execution of workflows and can represent workflows on different levels of detail.
\nIn summary, in Flexwoman, significant context changes (events) trigger automated adaptations
\nthat replace parts of the workflow by sub workflows, which can in turn be adapted. The adaptations
\nand the rules for context-aware adaptation are saved in the organizational memory for
\nlater reuse. Flexwoman’s event based behavior facilitates proactive adaptations instead of only
\nallowing for adaptations while entering or leaving a task. Replacements are not bound to special
\nplaces defined at build time but each part of the workflow, which has not been executed yet, can
\nbe replaced at run time. We implemented and evaluated the concept. The evaluations show
\ni) that all required functionality is available, ii) that the system scales with a growing number of
\nrules, and iii) that the system correctly handles failure situations.

Proofs as Polynomials

In the present paper, automated reasoning based on lattice-valued propositional logic, will be focused where the clauses only contains 0- IESFs as its generalized literals. A method of automated reasoning is given, and the soundness and the completeness of this method is proved. It is hoped that this research will make forward theoretical research of automated reasoning based on lattice-valued logic.

Proof assistants and the programming languages that implement them need to deal with a range of linguistic expressions that involve bindings. Since most mature proof assistants do not have built-in methods to treat this aspect of syntax, many of them have been extended with various packages and libraries that allow them to encode bindings using, for example, de Bruijn numerals and nominal logic features. I put forward the argument that bindings are such an intimate aspect of the structure of expressions that they should be accounted for directly in the underlying programming language support for proof assistants and not added later using packages and libraries. One possible approach to designing programming languages and proof assistants that directly supports such an approach to bindings in syntax is presented. The roots of such an approach can be found in the mobility of binders between term-level bindings, formula-level bindings (quantifiers), and proof-level bindings (eigenvariables). In particular, by combining Church's approach to terms and formulas (found in his Simple Theory of Types) and Gentzen's approach to sequent calculus proofs, we can learn how bindings can declaratively interact with the full range of logical connectives and quantifiers. I will also illustrate how that framework provides an intimate and semantically clean treatment of computation and reasoning with syntax containing bindings. Some implemented systems, which support this intimate and built-in treatment of bindings, will be briefly described.

This thesis proposes a novel way of performing type checking, whose results are incremental, depending on the provided local information. This new way of type checking is called co-contextual, where all context information of expressions, methods, classes, etc., is removed. Instead, we introduce corresponding structures using requirements. Standard type systems are translated to the co-contextual ones systematically using dualism as technique. Type systems play an important role to prevent execution errors from occurring during runtime. They are used to check programs statically for potential errors. Programs are type checked against a given set of rules. Depending on these rules programs are well-typed or not. The set of these rules is called typing rules. Each type rule associates types to the constructs of a program given a certain context. There can be different forms of contexts, depending on the features of the typed programming language. Functional languages use a typing context of variables and their types; object-oriented (OO) languages use additional class tables. Class tables are used for example to ensure that method and class declarations are well-typed. Type checking is performed top-down. While traversing the syntax tree of a program, typing contexts are extended with information on the expressions and their types. In case of OO, class tables are extended with clauses from class declarations, including the class members, i.e., fields, methods, or constructors. Contexts are passed through the nodes of the syntax tree in order to coordinate type checking between them. Therefore, while traversing the syntax tree top-down, the type checker creates dependencies between otherwise independent subexpressions. This way, it inhibits incrementalization and parallelization of type checking. That is, a change to a node of the syntax tree would require to redo the type check of the whole syntax tree. In this thesis a novel formulation of type systems is proposed, in order to remove dependencies between subexpressions. We propose a co-contextual formulation of typing rules that depends only on the local program constructs, e.g., expressions, methods, classes. The co-contextual typing rules have as conclusion a type and sets of requirements. That is, contexts and class tables are replaced by the dual concept of context and class table requirements. In addition, operations on contexts and class tables are replaced by new dual operations on requirements. The co-contextual type checker traverses a syntax tree bottom-up and merges context requirements of independently checked subexpressions. We describe a method for systematically constructing a co-contextual formulation of type rules from a regular context-based formulation and we show how co-contextual type rules give rise to incremental type checking. We derive co-contextual type checkers for functional and OO languages. As a representative of functional languages we consider PCF and extensions of it: records, parametric polymorphism, structural subtyping and let-polymorphism. Also, we investigate featherweight java (FJ) as the basis of OO languages and extensions of it: method overloading and generics. We build a1 co-contextual type checker for FJ enabling key features of OO languages: subtype polymorphism, nominal typing and implementation inheritance. The dualism between the co-contextual and contextual type systems preserves the correctness of the contextual calculus. That is, we prove the correctness of the co-contextual calculus via the equivalence between contextual type rules and their co-contextual formulations. We implemented an incremental type checker for PCF along with a performance evaluation showing that co-contextual type checking has performance comparable to standard context-based type checking, and incrementalization can improve performance significantly. Regarding FJ, we implemented a co-contextual type checker with incrementalization and compared its performance against javac on a number of realistic programs. Our performance evaluation shows significant speedups for the co-contextual type checker with incrementalization in comparison to javac.

In this article, we develop a new and somewhat unexpected connection between higher-order model-checking and linear logic. Our starting point is the observation that once embedded in the relational semantics of linear logic, the Church encoding of any higher-order recursion scheme (HORS) comes together with a dual Church encoding of an alternating tree automata (ATA) of the same signature. Moreover, the interaction between the relational interpretations of the HORS and of the ATA identifies the set of accepting states of the tree automaton against the infinite tree generated by the recursion scheme. We show how to extend this result to alternating parity automata (APT) by introducing a parametric version of the exponential modality of linear logic, capturing the formal properties of colors (or priorities) in higher-order model-checking. We show in particular how to reunderstand in this way the type-theoretic approach to higher-order model-checking developed by Kobayashi and Ong. We briefly explain in the end of the paper how this analysis driven by linear logic results in a new and purely semantic proof of decidability of the formulas of the monadic second-order logic for higher-order recursion schemes.

We present an axiomatic framework for Girard's Geometry of Interaction based on the notion of linear combinatory algebra. We give a general construction on traced monoidal categories, with certain additional structure, that is sufficient to capture the exponentials of Linear Logic, which produces such algebras (and hence also ordinary combinatory algebras). We illustrate the construction on six standard examples, representing both the ‘particle-style’ as well as the ‘wave-style’ Geometry of Interaction.

This paper, starting at the viewpoint of unified cognition, language and action, attempts to reduce the Mo Tzu Hsiao Chu into the system of Mo Pien and elucidates the Ming Pien thought that is relevant to the methodology and philosophical logic in Hsiao Chu. This paper is divided into three parts: I.Preface: to derive the viewpoint from the general studies on Mo Ching and Hsiao Chu. 2.Content:from the viewpoint of action philosophy to discuss the Mo Pien thought in Hsiao Chu. Firstly to point out the philosophical background of discussing Hsiao Chu; secondly to interpret unified cognition, language and action in Hsiao Chu: (l) Lie Tzu: point out the need and purpose of setting up a propositIOn to the topic.(2) Primary principle of setting up a proposition.(3) The elements of proposition and the process of setting proposition. (4) The basic type and practice of Hsing Tzu, the distinguish and explanation about Huo, Chia, Hsiao,Pi, Mou, Yuan and Tui. (5) five set examples of Hsing Tzu: the analysis on differentiation. 3.Conclusion: to review and criticize the Mo Pien in Hsiao Chu as well as to elucidate the contribution of Hsiao Chu to Chinese Ming Pien thought.

RCC8 is a set of eight jointly exhaustive and pairwise disjoint binary relations representing mereotopological relationships between ordered pairs of individuals. Although the RCC8 relations were originally presented as defined relations of Region Connection Calculus (RCC), virtually all implementations use the RCC8 Composition Table (CT) rather than the axioms of RCC. This raises the question of which mereotopology actually underlies the RCC8 composition table. In this paper, we characterize the algebraic and mereotopological properties of the RCC8 CT based on the metalogical relationship between the first-order theory that captures the RCC8 CT and Ground Mereotopology (MT) of Casati and Varzi. In particular, we show that the RCC8 theory and MT are relatively interpretable in each other. We further show that a nonconservative extension of the RCC8 theory that captures the intended interpretation of the RCC8 relations is logically synonymous with MT, and that a conservative extension of MT is logically synonymous with the RCC8 theory. We also present a characterization of models of MT up to isomorphism, and explain how such a characterization provides insights for understanding models of the RCC8 theory.