• Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.4043/7529-msCopy DOI Icon

Single-Trip Subsea Completions

  • May 2, 1994
  • K.j Johnson +4 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Reliability of completion equipment and rig time are becoming more and more critical for subsea completions because of continually increasing water depths in which operators are being required to complete wells. In addition, completion designs must reflect the more stringent economic requirements of today's oil and gas industry. This paper will describe the use of a single-trip completion system that has been successfully and economically installed in the offshore Marimba and Bonito fields of South America. This new completion system has the capability to land the tubing hanger and install it in the wellhead before setting the packer and compensating for subsequent tubing movement.1 The new system also can employ pre-job calculations-based on initial well conditions and anticipated conditions during production-that help determine appropriate completion configurations and bottomhole equipment compatibility. Many failures in offshore wells, whether platform or subsea, can be attributed to inappropriate application of downhole completion tools or methods.2 Use of pre-job calculations during the equipment design stage can facilitate proper selection of design criteria and can help ensure operational safety and cost efficiency. The development of this new completion system will be discussed in detail. Three case histories that document successful test completions will be reviewed along with the economic gains and advantages that the reduction in rig time generated. Introduction Subsea completions were introduced to offshore operations in Brazil in 1977. Early "wet" installations were run in the Enchova field in water depths of approximately 400 feet [120 m] with production back to a floating production system. To date, 448 completions have been installed offshore and account for almost 60 percent of the country's production. Of these, 198 subsea completions have been installed in increased water depths. In 1985, discoveries were made in the giant deep-water Albacora, Marimba and Marlim fields at water depths ranging from 650 feet [200 m] to 6,500 feet [2,000 m].3 There are indications that a new field exists south of Marlim at even greater water depths (Figure 1). History Subsea completions that were run in increased water depths during the late '70's and early '80's identified several problems. The traditional completion design called for a standard hydraulically-set retrievable packer, and movement compensation was accomplished through use of a tubing seal divider (TSD). A traditional subsea completion design is shown in Figure 2. Since gas lift is the only artificial lift method available for subsea wells in this area, the design criteria for most of these completions reflect future gas lift operations.4 In these completions, the bottomhole assembly (packer and TSD pinned in the fully-closed position) would be run into the wellbore to the desired setting depth. Once the packer was anchored, the TSD was shear released. Completion times for these conventional subsea well completions averaged approximately four days from the time the tubing and bottomhole assembly were started into the wellbore until the tubing hanger was set and tested.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Mensa Project: Completion Riser and Workover Control System

  • May 04, 1998
  • B.J Alford +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Deepwater Subsea Completion: State Of The Art And Future Trends

  • May 03, 1993
  • O.J.S Ribeiro +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Advances In Artificial Lift And Boosting Systems For Subsea Completion

  • May 05, 1997
  • R.M.T Camargo +2
  • Conference Article

Gullfaks A Subsea Wells System Development, Completion, and Production Startup

  • Apr 27, 1987
  • O Inderberg +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Fast Track Sand Control and Sand Management Review and Implementation in a Subsea Development

  • May 30, 2007
  • Frederic Jean-Bernard Guinot +4
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

A Subsea Reeled Tubing Service Unit

  • Sep 05, 1989
  • C C Cobb +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Egyptian Deepwater Development, a Case Study

  • May 05, 2003
  • Metwaly Toubar +3
  • Conference Article

Mechanical Umbilical-Less Installation of Tubing Hangers

  • Sep 05, 2023
  • F N Hansen +1
  • Research Article

Sex ratio variation in populations of three submerged dioecious macrophytes of Vallisneria

  • Nov 18, 2025
  • Journal of Systematics and Evolution
  • Yu Liang +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

A quantile count model of water depth constraints on Cape Sable seaside sparrows

  • Nov 01, 2007
  • Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Brian S Cade +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Effect of depth and salinity of basin water on performance of solar still

  • Nov 01, 2017
  • Apurba Layek
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Low-Cost Wireline And Logging Operations On A Satellite Well Using A Subsea Wireline Lubricator Deployed From A Dynamically Positioned Monohull Vessel

  • May 02, 1988
  • D.G Clarke +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Workover and Recompletion of Subsea Completions In the Gulf of Mexico

  • Apr 01, 1975
  • Journal of Petroleum Technology
  • Frank M Brown +1
  • Conference Article

A New Approach to Completing a Previously Drilled Subsea Well

  • Apr 27, 1987
  • J.E Hed +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations5

Gas-Lift Troubleshooting Engineering: An Improved Approach

  • Sep 23, 1990
  • J L Ortiz
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.