Solid electrolyte interface formation between lithium and PEO-based electrolyte

<p indent="0mm">Since the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries in the 1990s, lithium-ion batteries have been successfully applied in portable electronics, electric vehicles, and grid energy storage. Although current organic liquid electrolytes have high ionic conductivities, they are inherently flammable, volatile, and prone to leakage. Moreover, severe side reactions and dendrite growth on the surface of the lithium anode during the charge-discharge process can cause safety hazards, which greatly impede their applications in lithium metal batteries. Solid electrolytes, including inorganic solid electrolytes and polymer electrolytes, are regarded as effective alternatives to organic liquid electrolytes for the construction of lithium metal batteries with high energy density and safety. Among them, solid polymer electrolytes offer excellent flexibility, processability, and interfacial compatibility over inorganic solid electrolytes, and they are extraordinarily promising for lithium metal batteries with high energy density and safety. Ideal solid polymer electrolytes should have following features: (1) High ionic conductivity (&gt; <sc>10 ^–4 S cm ^–1) </sc> at room temperature; (2) high lithium ion transference number (~1) to reduce the concentration polarization and improve the rate performance of batteries; (3) intimate contact at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces; (4) wide electrochemical window <sc>(&gt;4.5 V</sc> vs. Li/Li ⁺) to match high-voltage cathodes and improve the energy density of batteries; (5) good mechanical stability to resist processing, buffer electrode volume change and inhibit dendrite growth; (6) good thermal stability to withstand environmental changes. Generally, the ionic conductivity of pure solid polymer electrolytes at room temperature is low <sc>(~10 ^–6 S cm ^–1). </sc> Researchers have tried to improve the ionic conductivities by adjusting the lithium salt concentration, such as developing “polymer-in-salt” solid electrolytes. However, increasing the concentration of lithium salt leads to the deterioration of the mechanical strength. Strategies such as developing novel lithium salts, modifying polymer matrix, and incorporating inorganic fillers into solid polymer electrolytes are proposed to promote ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes. In particular, composite polymer electrolytes, fabricated by dispersing a certain amount of inorganic fillers into solid polymer electrolytes, have improved ionic conductivities without sacrificing their mechanical performances. Poor interfacial property between electrodes and electrolytes is also a critical issue for solid polymer electrolytes. On one hand, poor and uneven solid/solid contacts at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces lead to high resistance and sluggish ionic transport kinetics. Furthermore, the volume change of the positive and negative electrodes in the charge/discharge process deteriorates the interfacial contacts, blocks the ion and electron transport through the interfaces, and greatly reduces the electrochemical reaction kinetics. On the other hand, the electrochemical windows of solid polymer electrolytes are usually narrow <sc>(＜4.5 V).</sc> During cycling, redox reactions are prone to occur at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces, causing battery failure. Solid polymer electrolytes have also poor thermal and mechanical stabilities. Therefore, design and synthesis of polymer-based solid electrolytes with excellent comprehensive performances and construction of fast and stable ion transport channels at the electrolyte/electrode interfaces are of great significance for the successful development of solid-state lithium metal batteries. This paper presents a brief review of the research progress in solid polymer electrolytes from two aspects: Improving the ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes and enhancing the interfacial performance at electrolyte/electrode interfaces. First, targeted optimization strategies on ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes, including constructing continuously aligned ionic transport paths and shortening the ionic transport distance, are summarized. Second, interface optimization strategies, including constructing wetting interfaces and synthesizing asymmetric electrolytes, are presented to reduce the interface resistance and improve the interfacial contact. Finally, perspectives on the development of solid polymer electrolytes and high-performance solid-state lithium metal batteries are discussed, and key research directions and advanced test methods are proposed. This review may provide a comprehensive understanding and further guidance for not only the material design of solid polymer electrolytes, but also the structural design of lithium metal batteries with favorable electrochemical and interfacial performances.

Lithium metal and anode-free batteries has the potential to increase the energy density and specific energy of the batteries drastically. However, when regular electrolyte materials are tried for these concepts they are plagued with problems due to degradation of the electrolyte at the interface and processes like dendrite formation which leads to poor capacity retention.[1] A strategy to mitigate these problems is to use Solid Polymer Electrolytes (SPEs), as these have better stability towards lithium metal. In order to find appropriate chemistries to use in SPE-based cells it is important to investigate and understand their anode interface, as this is where the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) is created from the degradation products during cycling.This work investigates three polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based SPEs, using lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4), lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB), and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) as the lithium conducting salts. The interfaces of these SPEs (PEO:LiBF4, PEO:LiBOB, and PEO:LiDFOB) was studied using Photo-Electron Spectroscopy (PES) with in situ lithium deposition, where lithium atoms are evaporated on top of the SPE film. The analysis of the core-level spectra before and after lithium deposition is compared to Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the interface, where lithium atoms are gradually added during the simulation. These experimental and theoretical methods are meant to mimic the electrochemical plating of lithium at the lithium|SPE interface during charging of a lithium metal or anode-less cell.The interfaces of PEO:LiBOB and PEO:LiBF4 show, among other compounds, polyethylene as a breakdown product at the interface. PEO:LiDFOB shows a much lesser degree of degradation compared to the other two systems. The degradation layer is however still effective at protecting the SPE from further breakdown, as PEO:LiDFOB has a relatively high capacity retention compared to PEO:LiBF4 and PEO:LiBOB. Suggested is that the LiF provides a better electrochemical stability, while the boron and oxalate breakdown products provides a higher mechanical stability at the interface.[1] Huang WZ, Zhao CZ, Wu P, Yuan H, Feng WE, Liu ZY, Lu Y, Sun S, Fu ZH, Hu JK, Yang SJ. Anode‐Free Solid‐State Lithium Batteries: A Review. Advanced Energy Materials. 2022 Jul;12(26):2201044. Figure 1

Currently, electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries are flammable and leaky, causing safety problems when used under high temperatures or extreme conditions. Solid electrolytes can fundamentally avoid the occurrence of such issues, at the same time, it can significantly increase the energy density of solid state lithium batteries. Solid electrolytes are classified into inorganic solid electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes. Although inorganic solid electrolytes have the high mechanical strength and room temperature ionic conductivity, it has poor flexibility and complicated preparation process. In contrast, solid polymer electrolyte has good elasticity and good interface contact, which can overcome many disadvantages of the inorganic solid electrolyte. Among them, polyethylene oxide (PEO) is first proposed as a polymer electrolyte. Due to its excellent mechanical properties, electrochemical stability and thermal stability, it has been a hot topic for polymer solid electrolytes for decades. However, its low room temperature ionic conductivity limits practical application. Given the problems existing in PEO-based polymer electrolytes, several methods for improving ionic conductivity have been proposed. The primary methods include plasticization, the organic-inorganic composite, and polymer blending. Comparing these methods, it can be seen that adding plasticizers to the polymer can effectively increase the conductivity of the electrolyte, but at the same time it will cause a decrease in the mechanical properties, and the safety issues limit its application in lithium-ion batteries. Inorganic fillers can balance the problems of ionic conductivity and mechanical properties, but the construction of a good filler-polymer dispersion system is complicated in preparing such composite electrolytes, design a new type of multi-dimensional the ion transport network also face tremendous challenges. Undoubtedly, in the future research, inorganic fillers will be the dominant means in the modification of composite electrolytes. Compared with the former two modification methods, polymer blending is easy to operate and friendly to industry, but low ionic conductivity at room temperature still exist. To give full play to the advantages of polymer blending, using it as an auxiliary means to improve the performance of composite electrolytes will be the primary development direction of such modification methods. PEO is the most widely studied polymer electrolyte. Even though a large number of modification methods have emerged in its development history, the ionic conductivity at room temperature is still limited to a relatively low level. To meet the needs of the application in lithium-ion batteries, a high operating temperature (50−70℃) is still needed, the biggest problem remains exist. To solve the problems in polymer solid electrolytes, the research directions in the future may mainly focus on: Expanding the modification method of PEO to other polymer electrolyte host materials, broadening the scope of research, and finding the available polymer electrolytes at room temperature. Concerned about the preparation of ultra-thin polymer electrolytes, reducing the ion transmission path to increase the transmission efficiency of lithium ions between positive and negative electrodes. Effectively combines inorganic solid electrolytes and solid polymer electrolytes to give full play to their advantages. In addition, exploring the effect of inorganic filler morphology on the conductivity of the composite electrolyte will also deserve attention. Many one-dimensional, two-dimensional materials can build ion transport networks so that lithium ions can travel rapidly along the path. With the deepening of research, it is expected that PEO-based polymer electrolytes may replace liquid electrolytes and become an essential cornerstone for building the next generation of safe and reliable lithium-ion batteries.

The practical application of lithium (Li) metal battery is impeded by the Li dendrite growth and unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. Herein, an ultra‐stretchable and ionic conducting chemically crosslinked pressure‐sensitive adhesive (cPSA) synthesized via the copolymerization of 2‐ethylhexyl acrylate and acrylic acid with poly(ethyleneglycol)dimethacrylate as crosslinker (short for 70cPSA), is developed as both artificial SEI layer and solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) for stable Li‐metal electrode, enabling all‐solid‐state Li metal batteries with excellent cycling performance. As an artificial SEI layer, the 70cPSA‐modified electrodes exhibit excellent electrochemical performance in Li|70cPSA@Cu half cells and 70cPSA@Li|70cPSA@Li symmetric cells. In full cells with LiFePO4 (LFP) as cathode, the 70cPSA@Li|LFP cell exhibits stable cycling performance over 250 cycles. Utilized as SPE, the all‐solid‐state Li|SPE|LFP cell delivers excellent cycling stability with a capacity retention of 86% over 500 cycles. With high‐voltage LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) as cathode, the Li|SPE|NMC811 cell exhibits a discharge capacity of 124.3 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention of 71% after 200 cycles. The rational design of PSAs and investigation of their dual role for stable and safe Li‐metal batteries may shed a light on adhesive polymers for battery applications.

The focus of much of this work is the rechargeable lithium battery, because of its high energy density, and the use of solid polymer electrolytes (SPE`s) for ease of fabrication and lightness of weight. The classical solid polymer electrolyte is based on the use of salts such as lithium triflate dissolved in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) or poly(propylene oxide). This specific polymer electrolyte has severe limitations. Poly(ethylene oxide) is a microcrystalline polymer at 25 C, and ion migration occurs only in the 20--30% of the material that is amorphous. Useable conductivities (10{sup {minus}5} S/cm) can be achieved only when the material is heated above 80 C. Two approaches to generate higher electrolyte conductivities at ambient temperatures are being developed. In the first, organic solvents are added to the polymer to plasticize it and dissolve the microcrystallites. This increases the conductivity but raises the possibility of fires if the battery casing ruptures during high charge or discharge conditions or when the device is punctured by impact. The alternative is to design new polymers that are good solid electrolyte media but which are completely amorphous and have low glass transition temperatures. Such a polymer is MEEP (poly[bis(methoxyethoxy)phosphazene]), first synthesized in the author`s laboratories. The main objective was to develop crosslinking methods for MEEP which could be used on a mass production scale to produce thin film rechargeable lithium batteries. A further objective was to assemble working energy storage devices to investigate the feasibility that this system could be developed commercially.

Conventional Li-ion batteries containing flammable and volatile liquid electrolytes are challenged to deliver safe and stable performance for practical energy storage applications. Alternatively, solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), which intrinsically eliminate the use of organic solvents, display good mechanical stability and flexibility against physical deformation of battery pack and volume retention of electrode materials. The use of SPEs with high thermal and electrochemical stability would contribute to the design and manufacture of safe and cost-effective Li-ion batteries, especially for large-scale applications under elevated temperatures [1].Host materials for most SPEs have yet been dominated by polyethers with ethylene oxide (EO) and propylene oxide (PO) as repeating units. As an interesting replacement to the low-molecular-weight cyclic and linear carbonates, a new class of polymer hosts based on polycarbonates has been considered as Li+-conducting electrolytes [2]. The incorporation of polar carbonate units in the polymer host could effectively facilitate the separation of ion clusters and allow high salt doping in SPEs.In this work, we have developed and explored poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) as a polymer host alternative for all solid-state Li-ion batteries. High-molecular-weight PTMC was synthesized via bulk ring-opening polymerization. Electrochemical and thermal properties of the PTMC/LiTFSI complexes with varied salt concentration were systematically investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and thermal analysis (DSC/TGA). The as-prepared SPEs are amorphous materials and thermally stable up to 200 °C. The best-performing electrolyte could display useful ionic conductivity at elevated temperatures and was also found electrochemically stable towards 5.0 V vs. Li+/Li. The cycling performance of Li | SPE | LiFePO4 half cells has been tested at elevated temperatures and the cells display long-term cycling stability with retained high capacity up to 153 mAh/g. The gradual increase in capacity might be due to improved interfacial contacts during cycling and storage [3]. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by the STandUP for Energy project and KIC InnoEnergy.

The electrolyte of lithium secondary batteries is an important component. Among lithium secondary batteries, the lithium polymer battery, which has similar performance to the lithium secondary battery, is made of a solid polymer electrolyte. Lithium ions in a solid polymer electrolyte exist in the form of a solution by a polar group in a polymer matrix. Lithium ions in the solid polymer electrolyte migrate via the segmental motion of the polymer. That is, the properties of a polymer matrix in a solid polymer electrolyte can affect the conduction of lithium ions. Therefore, this study focused on the electrochemical properties of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-blockpoly( ethylene oxide) copolymer-based solid polymer electrolyte. For this, poly(ethylene oxide)-blockpoly( propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer-based solid polymer electrolytes, which have spherical micelles, and various sizes of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer micelle, were prepared. Amino acids were added to the poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer-based solid polymer electrolyte as an ion dissociator to assist in the dissociation of a lithium salt and increase the ionic conductivity of the solid polymer electrolyte. The copolymer-based solid polymer electrolytes was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, impedance analysis, cyclic voltammetry, and linear sweep voltammetry.

Li metal batteries based on solid polymer electrolytes offer the benefits of high energy density and safety, as well as extended cycling life, making them an excellent candidate for the next‐generation battery system. However, current solid polymer electrolytes still suffer from low ion conductivity and Li+ transfer number, which seriously restricts its practical application. Herein, a self‐supporting composite solid polymer electrolyte was prepared, where phenolic resin rich in hydroxyl groups (BR) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) are mixed evenly and poured onto a cellulose membrane in one step. In such an electrolyte, PEO and BR combine to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds, lowering the crystallinity of PEO and increasing the Li+ transfer number. Lastly, the obtained solid electrolytes exhibited a high ion conductivity (1.1×10−4 S cm−1) and Li+ transfer number (0.53), as well as improved electrochemical window. Consequently, Li || Li symmetrical cells can run stably for more than 700 h at 0.1 mA cm−2/0.25 mAh cm−2. And full cells with LiFePO4 cathode can also demonstrate high discharge capacity of 152.12 mAh g−1 and rate performance. We believe that such a design based on supramolecular interaction offer a new avenue to advanced solid polymer electrolytes.

Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are promising ionic conductors for developing high‐specific‐energy solid‐state lithium metal batteries. However, developing SPEs with both high ionic conductivity and interfacial compatibility remains a challenge. Here, we propose a design concept of an anion‐modulated polymer electrolyte (termed AMPE) for high‐voltage Li metal batteries. Specifically, we design the AMPE by incorporating high‐voltage‐resistant and high charge density units with an anion receptor unit. The high‐voltage‐resistant and high charge density segments contribute to achieving a decent voltage tolerance of the polymer chains and ensure sufficient carrier ions. The anion receptor, represented by a boron‐containing molecule, promotes the generation of free Li+ by dissociating anion‐cation pairs. More importantly, the strong interaction between the electron‐deficient B and the TFSI− in the matrix promotes the anion reduction to form a stable anion‐derived mosaic‐like solid electrolyte interphase on the Li‐metal anode. As a result, the AMPE exhibits a high ionic conductivity of 3.80×10−4 S cm−1 and effectively suppresses lithium dendrites, enabling an all‐solid‐state Li|AMPE|LiCoO2 cell to achieve a cycle life of 700 cycles at an operating voltage of 4.40 V. This design concept would inspire efforts to develop high‐performance SPEs for high‐specific‐energy solid‐state lithium metal batteries.

Solid‐state lithium metal batteries (SSLMBs) with solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) are highly promising for next‐generation energy storage due to their enhanced safety and energy density. However, the stability of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the lithium metal/SPE interface is a major challenge, as continuous SEI degradation and regeneration during cycling lead to capacity fading. This article investigates the SEI formation on lithium anodes (l‐SEI) and composite lithium anodes (c‐SEI) in solid‐state lithium metal batteries. The composite anodes form a uniform Li2S‐rich inorganic SEI layer and a thinner organic SEI layer, effectively passivating the interface for enhanced cycling stability. Specifically, the full cells with c‐SEI anodes sustain over 400 cycles at 0.5 C under a high areal capacity of 2.0 mAh cm−2. Moreover, the reversible high‐loading solid‐state pouch cells exhibit exceptional safety even after curling and cutting. These findings offer valuable insights into developing composite electrodes with robust SEI for solid‐state polymer‐based lithium metal batteries.

Enabling high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries with high ionic conductive sulfide-based composite solid electrolyte and ex-situ artificial SEI film

Lithium metal anode has recently regained tremendous attention in the frame of the development of higher power and energy density lithium batteries for automotive industry. Lithium metal is indeed an ideal anode for lithium batteries due to its high capacity (3860 mAh/g). However, upon high discharge currents, the growth of dendrites leads to cell short cuts and limited coulombic efficiency.This issue had first restrained its practical application in rechargeable batteries for high power applications until the use of solid polymer electrolytes that could mechanically prevent the dendrites from crossing the electrolyte. Among the different families of polymer electrolytes, polyethylene oxide-based (PEO-based) electrolytes have been established as the reference thanks to a reasonable conductivity above 60oC and its ability to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) with lithium. Nevertheless, due to the low transference number of POE/LiTFSI electrolytes (t+≈0.15), dendrites or uneven lithium plating are still susceptible to form. Nowadays, many efforts are dedicated to solve these problems by focusing either on the improvement of the electrolyte or on the modification of the lithium-electrolyte interface. Gold layers have been proposed as an alternative to prevent dendrite formation; these gold coatings are used mainly together with ceramic electrolytes in order to improve the interface between Li metal anode and electrolyte. However, their use with polymer electrolytes where dendrite formation is favorable due to low transference number and mechanical strength have not being widely studied. In this presentation, three different coatings will be considered; aluminum (Al), gold (Au) and lithium fluoride (LiF). The choice of Al and Au is based on their ability to form Li-rich alloys while LiF is known to act as an artificial ion conducting SEI. The morphology and physico-chemical properties of the coatings are first characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) before evaluation of the interface between POE-based electrolyte and coated Lithium. Eventually stability during long-term cycling in Lithium Metal Polymer batteries is performed and compared to that of cells made using bare Lithium.

Lithium metal has generated significant interest as an anode material because of its high theoretical capacity (3860 mAh/g). However, issues such as dendrite growth and lithium loss during cycling make this material incompatible with current liquid electrolytes. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPE) have been proposed as a potential replacement as they are non-flammable, able to resist dendrite growth, have decent ionic conductivity and good interfacial contact with lithium metal.One aspect that is often overlooked is the fact that passivation layers, initially reported by Naudin et Al (1), often form on the lithium metal surface and are hence intrinsic to the chemical composition of the lithium surface (2, 3). According to Otto et Al (4), residual quantities of atmospheric gases are often present in lithium metal storage environments, thus electrode surface modification is inevitable. This passivation layer is expected to impact the reactivity of the lithium metal anode (LMA) towards SPE. Moreover, such phenomenon was originally described by Peled et Al as the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) (5). Lithium metal reactivity towards PEO, suspected by Galluzo et Al (6), was recently reported by Liu et Al (7), under optimized conditions (ultra-thin neat materials), but the impact of this phenomenon in a realistic LMA environment has not been extensively investigated.In this study, the impact of gas exposure on a LMA was investigated by exposing freshly cut lithium rods to O2, CO2 and N2. The resultant passivation layers were characterized via XPS. The effect of passivation layer formation on LMA reactivity towards SPE was measured by exposing samples with pre-characterized passivation layers to common SPE materials. The resultant interface was characterized using Raman spectroscopy. SPE-passivation layer reactivity was correlated to ageing properties by EIS and kinetic charge transfer characteristics in galvanostatic linear polarization at the LMA-SPE interface, in a symmetric Li – SPE – Li stack.This study revealed that the chemical composition of the lithium metal passivation layer affects its reactivity towards SPE as well as the electrochemical performance of a Li-SPE-Li symmetric cell. A thorough characterization of the lithium metal passivation layer is essential for the understanding of some of the fundamental factors affecting all solid-state lithium metal battery performance and is therefore consubstantial with the development of modified LMA. C. Naudin et al., Characterization of the lithium surface by infrared and Raman spectroscopies. Journal of Power Sources 124, 518-525 (2003).S.-K. Otto et al., In-Depth Characterization of Lithium-Metal Surfaces with XPS and ToF-SIMS: Toward Better Understanding of the Passivation Layer. Chemistry of Materials 33, 859-867 (2021).P. R. G. Zhuang, F. Kong, F. McLarnon The reaction of clean Li surfaces with small molecules in ultrahigh vacuum: II. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 159-164 (1998).S.-K. Otto et al., Storage of Lithium Metal: The Role of the Native Passivation Layer for the Anode Interface Resistance in Solid State Batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials 4, 12798-12807 (2021).E. Peled, Film forming reaction at the lithium/electrolyte interface. Journal of Power Sources 9, 253-266 (1983).M. D. Galluzzo et al., Dissolution of Lithium Metal in Poly(ethylene oxide). ACS Energy Letters 4, 903-907 (2019).P. Liu et al., Increasing Ionic Conductivity of Poly(ethylene oxide) by Reaction with Metallic Li. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research 3, 2100142 (2022).

The deployment of safe and high‐energy density lithium metal polymer batteries (LMPBs) still requires further advances in the quest for new solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs). In this regard, salt anions have a decisive role in the overall SPE performance. While lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) was chosen earlier to have a highly flexible sulfonimide center and an extensively delocalized negative charge, it still suffers from several drawbacks ascribed to its poor interfacial compatibility with the lithium metal (LiM) anode and the fact that it is a PFAS. In this work, a novel lithium salt is cunningly designed, aiming to combine the advantages of previously reported lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) and lithium bis(difluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiDFSI) to overcome the limitations of the state‐of‐the‐art SPE based on LiTFSI/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). The SPE containing the developed (difluoromethanesulfonyl)(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiDFFSI) salt presented reduced interfacial resistance and improved compatibility with the lithium metal (LiM) anode compared with LiTFSI/PEO, enabled by the formation of a stable, uniform, and ionically conductive solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). In addition, LiDFFSI‐based SPEs demonstrated a prolonged cycling stability, achieving over 125 cycles at C/10 with minimal capacity fading in LiM||LiFePO4 cell configuration. These findings evidence how a rational design of the lithium salt chemistry allows tuning the formed SEI, directly impacting the overall SPE performance. Thus, LiDFFSI is presented as a promising alternative lithium salt to improve electrochemical performance and interfacial stability in next‐generation LiM batteries.

Lithium metal batteries, directly utilizing lithium metal as an anode, are promising as new-generation energy storage devices, and the characteristics of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer are critical to battery operation. However, the roles of electrolyte compositions on the structure and thickness of the passivating SEI film at the atomistic level have been previously overlooked, resulting in poor understanding of SEI characteristics. In this study, the formation of the native SEI layer on lithium metal electrode and various electrolyte composition is scrutinised using ReaxFF molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The study successfully identifies different layers of the SEI film using charge distribution as a tool. The decrease in lithium density and the increase in the charge states of oxidised lithium atoms contribute to the identification of an inner layer and a transition layer within the previously known interface layer, as well as the sparse layer. Additionally, different reaction schemes are observed through the analysis of ratio between consumed lithium atoms and electrolyte molecules. Furthermore, results show the lithium salt concentration effects in suppressing the growth of the SEI between the lithium anode and the liquid electrolyte, and inhibiting the formation of key SEI components. This work provides new insights into the nature of SEI surface chemistry and potentially facilitates the design of artificial SEI layers and optimal electrolyte solutions.