• Home
  • Search
  • Statistical Feature Engineering for Robot Failure Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers.
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051649Copy DOI Icon

Statistical Feature Engineering for Robot Failure Detection: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Industrial robots are widely used in critical tasks such as assembly, welding, and material handling as core components of modern manufacturing systems. For the reliable operation of these systems, early and accurate detection of execution failures is crucial. In this study, a comprehensive comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods is conducted for the classification of robot execution failures using data acquired from force-torque sensors. Three different feature engineering approaches are proposed. The first is a Baseline approach that includes 90 raw time-series features. The second is the Domain-6 approach, which consists of 6 basic statistical features per sensor (36 in total). The third is the Domain-12 approach, which comprises 12 comprehensive statistical features per sensor (72 in total). The domain features include the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, range, slope, median, skewness, kurtosis, RMS, energy, and IQR. In total, ten classification algorithms are evaluated, including eight machine learning methods and two deep learning models: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM-LGBM), as well as a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN-1D) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). For traditional machine learning algorithms, 5 × 5 nested cross-validation is used, whereas for deep learning models, 5-fold cross-validation with a 20% validation split is employed. To ensure statistical reliability, all experiments are repeated over 30 independent runs. The experimental results demonstrate that feature engineering has a decisive impact on classification performance. In addition, regardless of the feature set, the highest accuracy (93.85% ± 0.90) is achieved by the Naive Bayes classifier using the Baseline features. The Domain-12 feature set provides consistent improvements across many algorithms, with substantial performance gains. The results are reported using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics and are supported by confusion matrices. Finally, permutation feature importance analysis indicates that the skewness features of the Fx and Fy sensors are the most critical variables for failure detection. Overall, these findings show that time-domain statistical features offer an effective approach for robot failure classification.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers.

  • Mar 08, 2025
  • International journal of molecular sciences
  • Kesheng Wang +6
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations72

State of the Art Survey of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Smart Cities and Urban Sustainability

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • Saeed Nosratabadi +4
  • Research Article

DETECTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES IN ECG IMAGES USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING METHODS

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization
  • Subrhamanyam Kolusu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Use of subword tokenization for domain generation algorithm classification

  • Sep 07, 2023
  • Cybersecurity
  • Sea Ran Cleon Liew +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations67

Short-term solar radiation forecasting using hybrid deep residual learning and gated LSTM recurrent network with differential covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy

  • May 10, 2023
  • Energy
  • Mehdi Neshat +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Failure in Stock Price Prediction: A Comparison bettwen the Curve-Shape-Feature and Non-Curve-Shape-Feature Modes of Existing Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Dec 03, 2021
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL
  • Ping Zhang +5
  • Research Article

Долгосрочное прогнозирование заморозков с применением методов машинного обучения в системе точного земледелия

  • Dec 15, 2025
  • INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL
  • Aleksandr Molin +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Crop Yield Prediction of Indian Districts Using Deep Learning

  • Nov 26, 2021
  • Parjanya Prashant +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Estimation and uncertainty analysis of groundwater quality parameters in a coastal aquifer under seawater intrusion: a comparative study of deep learning and classic machine learning methods.

  • Aug 08, 2022
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Mehmet Taşan +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Survey on Applications of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for Cyber Security

  • Sep 22, 2020
  • International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)
  • Mohammed I Alghamdi
  • Research Article

CLASSIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURE USING A ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK

  • Sep 01, 2025
  • Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences
  • Ali Öter
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Conventional and deep learning approaches for glacial lake mapping using remote sensing data: a comprehensive review

  • May 01, 2025
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Rakesh Sahu +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Hard X-Ray Emission Detection Using Deep Learning Analysis of the Radiated UHF Electromagnetic Signal From a Plasma Focus Discharge

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • IEEE Access
  • Gonzalo Avaria +6
  • Research Article

UMBRELLA REVIEW OF AI-BASED RADIOLOGY TECHNIQUES: COMPARING TRADITIONAL AND DEEP LEARNING METHODS

  • Apr 18, 2025
  • Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
  • Waseem Sajjad +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Deep learning for modulation and coding rate classification of OFDM

  • Apr 22, 2020
  • Peng Wang +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.